[Bugs]

The amounts of the tax assessments will vary widely based on what their prior sales prices were like. If the most recent sale on one of them was in 2000 and their other in 2005 the assessments for each would be different by 100% or more. And those differences would be divided by land and improvements, the former showing more increase than the latter.

Regardless, the properties will be reassessed again if/when they sell, and those assessments will be based on the sale prices.

Other than that, I’d suggest you stop looking at assessments altogether. You’re not going to learn anything relevant about the property from an assessment.

[Bugs]

The amounts of the tax assessments will vary widely based on what their prior sales prices were like. If the most recent sale on one of them was in 2000 and their other in 2005 the assessments for each would be different by 100% or more. And those differences would be divided by land and improvements, the former showing more increase than the latter.

Regardless, the properties will be reassessed again if/when they sell, and those assessments will be based on the sale prices.

Other than that, I’d suggest you stop looking at assessments altogether. You’re not going to learn anything relevant about the property from an assessment.

[Bugs]

The amounts of the tax assessments will vary widely based on what their prior sales prices were like. If the most recent sale on one of them was in 2000 and their other in 2005 the assessments for each would be different by 100% or more. And those differences would be divided by land and improvements, the former showing more increase than the latter.

Regardless, the properties will be reassessed again if/when they sell, and those assessments will be based on the sale prices.

Other than that, I’d suggest you stop looking at assessments altogether. You’re not going to learn anything relevant about the property from an assessment.

[Bugs]

The amounts of the tax assessments will vary widely based on what their prior sales prices were like. If the most recent sale on one of them was in 2000 and their other in 2005 the assessments for each would be different by 100% or more. And those differences would be divided by land and improvements, the former showing more increase than the latter.

Regardless, the properties will be reassessed again if/when they sell, and those assessments will be based on the sale prices.

Other than that, I’d suggest you stop looking at assessments altogether. You’re not going to learn anything relevant about the property from an assessment.

[Bugs]

The amounts of the tax assessments will vary widely based on what their prior sales prices were like. If the most recent sale on one of them was in 2000 and their other in 2005 the assessments for each would be different by 100% or more. And those differences would be divided by land and improvements, the former showing more increase than the latter.

Regardless, the properties will be reassessed again if/when they sell, and those assessments will be based on the sale prices.

Other than that, I’d suggest you stop looking at assessments altogether. You’re not going to learn anything relevant about the property from an assessment.

[Bugs]

We live in the information age. I don’t think we really know how long the half life of some of this information will end up being.

I’m not convinced that the “everyone’s doing it so in time it won’t be a big deal” rationale that some people are pushing right now is going to pan out in the long run.

[Bugs]

We live in the information age. I don’t think we really know how long the half life of some of this information will end up being.

I’m not convinced that the “everyone’s doing it so in time it won’t be a big deal” rationale that some people are pushing right now is going to pan out in the long run.

[Bugs]

We live in the information age. I don’t think we really know how long the half life of some of this information will end up being.

I’m not convinced that the “everyone’s doing it so in time it won’t be a big deal” rationale that some people are pushing right now is going to pan out in the long run.

[Bugs]

We live in the information age. I don’t think we really know how long the half life of some of this information will end up being.

I’m not convinced that the “everyone’s doing it so in time it won’t be a big deal” rationale that some people are pushing right now is going to pan out in the long run.

[Bugs]

We live in the information age. I don’t think we really know how long the half life of some of this information will end up being.

I’m not convinced that the “everyone’s doing it so in time it won’t be a big deal” rationale that some people are pushing right now is going to pan out in the long run.

[Bugs]

The reset charts are indirect indicators that we’ve been using to project the direct results. So far, it’s been working out. The number of NODs has been increasing behind the resets, the number of foreclosures have been increasing behind the NODs, and the prices have been dropping as a result of the foreclosures.

What’s interesting is that those reset charts are reporting the trends on a national basis. One really has to wonder what the true trends are like locally. I would think the situation here is even worse than average.

Anyways, my point is that the charts don’t have to be that accurate ’cause we’re just using them to project broad trends.

[Bugs]

The reset charts are indirect indicators that we’ve been using to project the direct results. So far, it’s been working out. The number of NODs has been increasing behind the resets, the number of foreclosures have been increasing behind the NODs, and the prices have been dropping as a result of the foreclosures.

What’s interesting is that those reset charts are reporting the trends on a national basis. One really has to wonder what the true trends are like locally. I would think the situation here is even worse than average.

Anyways, my point is that the charts don’t have to be that accurate ’cause we’re just using them to project broad trends.

[Bugs]

The reset charts are indirect indicators that we’ve been using to project the direct results. So far, it’s been working out. The number of NODs has been increasing behind the resets, the number of foreclosures have been increasing behind the NODs, and the prices have been dropping as a result of the foreclosures.

What’s interesting is that those reset charts are reporting the trends on a national basis. One really has to wonder what the true trends are like locally. I would think the situation here is even worse than average.

Anyways, my point is that the charts don’t have to be that accurate ’cause we’re just using them to project broad trends.

[Bugs]

The reset charts are indirect indicators that we’ve been using to project the direct results. So far, it’s been working out. The number of NODs has been increasing behind the resets, the number of foreclosures have been increasing behind the NODs, and the prices have been dropping as a result of the foreclosures.

What’s interesting is that those reset charts are reporting the trends on a national basis. One really has to wonder what the true trends are like locally. I would think the situation here is even worse than average.

Anyways, my point is that the charts don’t have to be that accurate ’cause we’re just using them to project broad trends.

[Bugs]

The reset charts are indirect indicators that we’ve been using to project the direct results. So far, it’s been working out. The number of NODs has been increasing behind the resets, the number of foreclosures have been increasing behind the NODs, and the prices have been dropping as a result of the foreclosures.

What’s interesting is that those reset charts are reporting the trends on a national basis. One really has to wonder what the true trends are like locally. I would think the situation here is even worse than average.

Anyways, my point is that the charts don’t have to be that accurate ’cause we’re just using them to project broad trends.

[Author]

Posts