Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Is it ALT-A turn
- This topic has 105 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
DWCAP.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
March 10, 2008 at 8:01 AM #12049
-
March 10, 2008 at 8:04 AM #166655
farbet
Participant-
March 10, 2008 at 10:26 AM #166721
Mean Reversion
ParticipantI believe the next area of the credit sector to implode will likely be Alt-A…
If you follow the credit markets, it is already pretty well known that the meltdown has affected Alt-A and beyond, not just subprime.
Witness Thornburg Mortgage (TMA) which supposedly had no direct exposure to subprime mortgages.
-
March 10, 2008 at 12:21 PM #166776
peterb
ParticipantWith about $550B in mortgages set to adjust this year, all sectors will have trouble meeting this requirement. Whether the loan is Prime, Alt-A or subprime. Having a high FICO score does not mean you didnt lie about your “stated income”. Most of these loans are 1 to 3 years old, so the odds are good that most are upside down at or at best 0$ equity. Combine this with a recession and the new “Debt Relief Act of 2008” and I think the lenders are going to be owning a lot more realestate this year compared to 2007!
-
March 10, 2008 at 12:21 PM #167096
peterb
ParticipantWith about $550B in mortgages set to adjust this year, all sectors will have trouble meeting this requirement. Whether the loan is Prime, Alt-A or subprime. Having a high FICO score does not mean you didnt lie about your “stated income”. Most of these loans are 1 to 3 years old, so the odds are good that most are upside down at or at best 0$ equity. Combine this with a recession and the new “Debt Relief Act of 2008” and I think the lenders are going to be owning a lot more realestate this year compared to 2007!
-
March 10, 2008 at 12:21 PM #167100
peterb
ParticipantWith about $550B in mortgages set to adjust this year, all sectors will have trouble meeting this requirement. Whether the loan is Prime, Alt-A or subprime. Having a high FICO score does not mean you didnt lie about your “stated income”. Most of these loans are 1 to 3 years old, so the odds are good that most are upside down at or at best 0$ equity. Combine this with a recession and the new “Debt Relief Act of 2008” and I think the lenders are going to be owning a lot more realestate this year compared to 2007!
-
March 10, 2008 at 12:21 PM #167132
peterb
ParticipantWith about $550B in mortgages set to adjust this year, all sectors will have trouble meeting this requirement. Whether the loan is Prime, Alt-A or subprime. Having a high FICO score does not mean you didnt lie about your “stated income”. Most of these loans are 1 to 3 years old, so the odds are good that most are upside down at or at best 0$ equity. Combine this with a recession and the new “Debt Relief Act of 2008” and I think the lenders are going to be owning a lot more realestate this year compared to 2007!
-
March 10, 2008 at 12:21 PM #167194
peterb
ParticipantWith about $550B in mortgages set to adjust this year, all sectors will have trouble meeting this requirement. Whether the loan is Prime, Alt-A or subprime. Having a high FICO score does not mean you didnt lie about your “stated income”. Most of these loans are 1 to 3 years old, so the odds are good that most are upside down at or at best 0$ equity. Combine this with a recession and the new “Debt Relief Act of 2008” and I think the lenders are going to be owning a lot more realestate this year compared to 2007!
-
-
March 10, 2008 at 10:26 AM #167041
Mean Reversion
ParticipantI believe the next area of the credit sector to implode will likely be Alt-A…
If you follow the credit markets, it is already pretty well known that the meltdown has affected Alt-A and beyond, not just subprime.
Witness Thornburg Mortgage (TMA) which supposedly had no direct exposure to subprime mortgages.
-
March 10, 2008 at 10:26 AM #167045
Mean Reversion
ParticipantI believe the next area of the credit sector to implode will likely be Alt-A…
If you follow the credit markets, it is already pretty well known that the meltdown has affected Alt-A and beyond, not just subprime.
Witness Thornburg Mortgage (TMA) which supposedly had no direct exposure to subprime mortgages.
-
March 10, 2008 at 10:26 AM #167077
Mean Reversion
ParticipantI believe the next area of the credit sector to implode will likely be Alt-A…
If you follow the credit markets, it is already pretty well known that the meltdown has affected Alt-A and beyond, not just subprime.
Witness Thornburg Mortgage (TMA) which supposedly had no direct exposure to subprime mortgages.
-
March 10, 2008 at 10:26 AM #167139
Mean Reversion
ParticipantI believe the next area of the credit sector to implode will likely be Alt-A…
If you follow the credit markets, it is already pretty well known that the meltdown has affected Alt-A and beyond, not just subprime.
Witness Thornburg Mortgage (TMA) which supposedly had no direct exposure to subprime mortgages.
-
-
March 10, 2008 at 8:04 AM #166976
farbet
Participant -
March 10, 2008 at 8:04 AM #166979
farbet
Participant -
March 10, 2008 at 8:04 AM #167012
farbet
Participant -
March 10, 2008 at 8:04 AM #167074
farbet
Participant -
March 10, 2008 at 12:40 PM #166785
BKinLA
ParticipantLooks like it's already begun…
http://www.housingwire.com/2008/03/10/moodys-downgrades-hundreds-of-bear-stearns-alt-a-mbs/
-
March 10, 2008 at 12:48 PM #166795
Mean Reversion
ParticipantI am shopping in the $1.5M to $2M range of CA, and I have already seen 2 beautiful new homes built in 2005 being foreclosed upon that have been stripped of their high end appliances. One was also stripped of its kitchen cabinets.
One would’ve thought that this only happens in the shittiest of places and homes, but this was a gated community for crying out loud!
-
March 10, 2008 at 12:48 PM #167115
Mean Reversion
ParticipantI am shopping in the $1.5M to $2M range of CA, and I have already seen 2 beautiful new homes built in 2005 being foreclosed upon that have been stripped of their high end appliances. One was also stripped of its kitchen cabinets.
One would’ve thought that this only happens in the shittiest of places and homes, but this was a gated community for crying out loud!
-
March 10, 2008 at 12:48 PM #167121
Mean Reversion
ParticipantI am shopping in the $1.5M to $2M range of CA, and I have already seen 2 beautiful new homes built in 2005 being foreclosed upon that have been stripped of their high end appliances. One was also stripped of its kitchen cabinets.
One would’ve thought that this only happens in the shittiest of places and homes, but this was a gated community for crying out loud!
-
March 10, 2008 at 12:48 PM #167152
Mean Reversion
ParticipantI am shopping in the $1.5M to $2M range of CA, and I have already seen 2 beautiful new homes built in 2005 being foreclosed upon that have been stripped of their high end appliances. One was also stripped of its kitchen cabinets.
One would’ve thought that this only happens in the shittiest of places and homes, but this was a gated community for crying out loud!
-
March 10, 2008 at 12:48 PM #167214
Mean Reversion
ParticipantI am shopping in the $1.5M to $2M range of CA, and I have already seen 2 beautiful new homes built in 2005 being foreclosed upon that have been stripped of their high end appliances. One was also stripped of its kitchen cabinets.
One would’ve thought that this only happens in the shittiest of places and homes, but this was a gated community for crying out loud!
-
March 10, 2008 at 12:51 PM #166800
patientlywaiting
ParticipantSubprime, Alt-A? The are the red herrings.
Even, the prime loans will be affected. It’s the ARMs and exotics, no matter the “grade.”
-
March 10, 2008 at 1:07 PM #166820
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantLIBOR Index Watch …
Rate resets for loans originated in the 2003 – 2006 time frame for Alt-A or prime loans were typically based on the 6-month or 1-year LIBOR index, with margins of typically 2.25%.
Current 1-year LIBOR index : 2.71%
This means that loans re-setting in the near future are likely to re-set at rates in the low 5% range. Some folks who took out 5-year ARMs in 2003 will have their loans reset lower than their original rate.
They may still be in tenuous condition as short-term rates could spike in the next couple of years. But one must consider what prevailing rates are re-setting, not just the fact that x billion dollars in loans will re-set and assume that all the buyers are screwed.
-
March 10, 2008 at 2:18 PM #166880
farbet
ParticipantIs Ninja loans same as ALT A loans
-
March 10, 2008 at 2:18 PM #167201
farbet
ParticipantIs Ninja loans same as ALT A loans
-
March 10, 2008 at 2:18 PM #167204
farbet
ParticipantIs Ninja loans same as ALT A loans
-
March 10, 2008 at 2:18 PM #167237
farbet
ParticipantIs Ninja loans same as ALT A loans
-
March 10, 2008 at 2:18 PM #167300
farbet
ParticipantIs Ninja loans same as ALT A loans
-
March 10, 2008 at 2:18 PM #166885
farbet
ParticipantIs Ninja loans same as ALT A loans
-
March 10, 2008 at 2:18 PM #167206
farbet
ParticipantIs Ninja loans same as ALT A loans
-
March 10, 2008 at 2:18 PM #167211
farbet
ParticipantIs Ninja loans same as ALT A loans
-
March 10, 2008 at 2:18 PM #167242
farbet
ParticipantIs Ninja loans same as ALT A loans
-
March 10, 2008 at 2:18 PM #167306
farbet
ParticipantIs Ninja loans same as ALT A loans
-
March 10, 2008 at 1:07 PM #167141
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantLIBOR Index Watch …
Rate resets for loans originated in the 2003 – 2006 time frame for Alt-A or prime loans were typically based on the 6-month or 1-year LIBOR index, with margins of typically 2.25%.
Current 1-year LIBOR index : 2.71%
This means that loans re-setting in the near future are likely to re-set at rates in the low 5% range. Some folks who took out 5-year ARMs in 2003 will have their loans reset lower than their original rate.
They may still be in tenuous condition as short-term rates could spike in the next couple of years. But one must consider what prevailing rates are re-setting, not just the fact that x billion dollars in loans will re-set and assume that all the buyers are screwed.
-
March 10, 2008 at 1:07 PM #167145
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantLIBOR Index Watch …
Rate resets for loans originated in the 2003 – 2006 time frame for Alt-A or prime loans were typically based on the 6-month or 1-year LIBOR index, with margins of typically 2.25%.
Current 1-year LIBOR index : 2.71%
This means that loans re-setting in the near future are likely to re-set at rates in the low 5% range. Some folks who took out 5-year ARMs in 2003 will have their loans reset lower than their original rate.
They may still be in tenuous condition as short-term rates could spike in the next couple of years. But one must consider what prevailing rates are re-setting, not just the fact that x billion dollars in loans will re-set and assume that all the buyers are screwed.
-
March 10, 2008 at 1:07 PM #167177
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantLIBOR Index Watch …
Rate resets for loans originated in the 2003 – 2006 time frame for Alt-A or prime loans were typically based on the 6-month or 1-year LIBOR index, with margins of typically 2.25%.
Current 1-year LIBOR index : 2.71%
This means that loans re-setting in the near future are likely to re-set at rates in the low 5% range. Some folks who took out 5-year ARMs in 2003 will have their loans reset lower than their original rate.
They may still be in tenuous condition as short-term rates could spike in the next couple of years. But one must consider what prevailing rates are re-setting, not just the fact that x billion dollars in loans will re-set and assume that all the buyers are screwed.
-
March 10, 2008 at 1:07 PM #167239
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantLIBOR Index Watch …
Rate resets for loans originated in the 2003 – 2006 time frame for Alt-A or prime loans were typically based on the 6-month or 1-year LIBOR index, with margins of typically 2.25%.
Current 1-year LIBOR index : 2.71%
This means that loans re-setting in the near future are likely to re-set at rates in the low 5% range. Some folks who took out 5-year ARMs in 2003 will have their loans reset lower than their original rate.
They may still be in tenuous condition as short-term rates could spike in the next couple of years. But one must consider what prevailing rates are re-setting, not just the fact that x billion dollars in loans will re-set and assume that all the buyers are screwed.
-
-
March 10, 2008 at 12:51 PM #167120
patientlywaiting
ParticipantSubprime, Alt-A? The are the red herrings.
Even, the prime loans will be affected. It’s the ARMs and exotics, no matter the “grade.”
-
March 10, 2008 at 12:51 PM #167126
patientlywaiting
ParticipantSubprime, Alt-A? The are the red herrings.
Even, the prime loans will be affected. It’s the ARMs and exotics, no matter the “grade.”
-
March 10, 2008 at 12:51 PM #167157
patientlywaiting
ParticipantSubprime, Alt-A? The are the red herrings.
Even, the prime loans will be affected. It’s the ARMs and exotics, no matter the “grade.”
-
March 10, 2008 at 12:51 PM #167219
patientlywaiting
ParticipantSubprime, Alt-A? The are the red herrings.
Even, the prime loans will be affected. It’s the ARMs and exotics, no matter the “grade.”
-
-
March 10, 2008 at 12:40 PM #167105
BKinLA
ParticipantLooks like it's already begun…
http://www.housingwire.com/2008/03/10/moodys-downgrades-hundreds-of-bear-stearns-alt-a-mbs/
-
March 10, 2008 at 12:40 PM #167111
BKinLA
ParticipantLooks like it's already begun…
http://www.housingwire.com/2008/03/10/moodys-downgrades-hundreds-of-bear-stearns-alt-a-mbs/
-
March 10, 2008 at 12:40 PM #167142
BKinLA
ParticipantLooks like it's already begun…
http://www.housingwire.com/2008/03/10/moodys-downgrades-hundreds-of-bear-stearns-alt-a-mbs/
-
March 10, 2008 at 12:40 PM #167205
BKinLA
ParticipantLooks like it's already begun…
http://www.housingwire.com/2008/03/10/moodys-downgrades-hundreds-of-bear-stearns-alt-a-mbs/
-
March 10, 2008 at 2:46 PM #166915
DWCAP
ParticipantFSD, I was one of those who looked at the numers, and said we are screwed too. I am starting to adjust my thinking to what you are saying alittle, but I dont know if things arnt deeper than the interest rate suggests.
This whole mess was triggered by the FED raising rates. With inflation rising, they can only hold off on worrying about inflation for so long. It takes a year to get cuts into the economy, they started in Sept. so we are half way there. In 6-8 months they will have to start fighting inflation instead of fanning it, and the resets on these morgages will rise.
Also, just because these things are reseting, even to a lower interst rate, doesnt mean the monthly payments are not jumping. How many of these had horrendiously low teaser rates for the first year or two at maybe 1%-3%. How many had intro periods where they were interest only (or not even that) and then now are reseting to include principal into the mix. That could be a jump of 20%+ even if the interest rate didnt move an inch.
It isnt as bad as the numbers make it seem, but it isnt as good as the interest rates make it seem either.-
March 10, 2008 at 3:23 PM #166950
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantDWCAP –
I agree with you. Those with teaser (neg-am) payments will still be screwed. Those with Interest-only options will also see a substantial jump (say 20% or more) and those in this second group that did not plan ahead (by saving) or who haven’t experienced at least 4% annual raises will also get pinched.The wild card of course is rates. Inflation expectations could result in higher rates down the road … say a year from now. If short-term rates returned to their recent peak (up a couple percent from current rates) the payment shocks would be difficult for anyone to absorb.
It isnt as bad as the numbers make it seem, but it isnt as good as the interest rates make it seem either.
Well said. -
March 10, 2008 at 3:23 PM #167271
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantDWCAP –
I agree with you. Those with teaser (neg-am) payments will still be screwed. Those with Interest-only options will also see a substantial jump (say 20% or more) and those in this second group that did not plan ahead (by saving) or who haven’t experienced at least 4% annual raises will also get pinched.The wild card of course is rates. Inflation expectations could result in higher rates down the road … say a year from now. If short-term rates returned to their recent peak (up a couple percent from current rates) the payment shocks would be difficult for anyone to absorb.
It isnt as bad as the numbers make it seem, but it isnt as good as the interest rates make it seem either.
Well said. -
March 10, 2008 at 3:23 PM #167276
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantDWCAP –
I agree with you. Those with teaser (neg-am) payments will still be screwed. Those with Interest-only options will also see a substantial jump (say 20% or more) and those in this second group that did not plan ahead (by saving) or who haven’t experienced at least 4% annual raises will also get pinched.The wild card of course is rates. Inflation expectations could result in higher rates down the road … say a year from now. If short-term rates returned to their recent peak (up a couple percent from current rates) the payment shocks would be difficult for anyone to absorb.
It isnt as bad as the numbers make it seem, but it isnt as good as the interest rates make it seem either.
Well said. -
March 10, 2008 at 3:23 PM #167308
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantDWCAP –
I agree with you. Those with teaser (neg-am) payments will still be screwed. Those with Interest-only options will also see a substantial jump (say 20% or more) and those in this second group that did not plan ahead (by saving) or who haven’t experienced at least 4% annual raises will also get pinched.The wild card of course is rates. Inflation expectations could result in higher rates down the road … say a year from now. If short-term rates returned to their recent peak (up a couple percent from current rates) the payment shocks would be difficult for anyone to absorb.
It isnt as bad as the numbers make it seem, but it isnt as good as the interest rates make it seem either.
Well said. -
March 10, 2008 at 3:23 PM #167371
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantDWCAP –
I agree with you. Those with teaser (neg-am) payments will still be screwed. Those with Interest-only options will also see a substantial jump (say 20% or more) and those in this second group that did not plan ahead (by saving) or who haven’t experienced at least 4% annual raises will also get pinched.The wild card of course is rates. Inflation expectations could result in higher rates down the road … say a year from now. If short-term rates returned to their recent peak (up a couple percent from current rates) the payment shocks would be difficult for anyone to absorb.
It isnt as bad as the numbers make it seem, but it isnt as good as the interest rates make it seem either.
Well said. -
March 10, 2008 at 3:24 PM #166955
cr
ParticipantYes ALT-A were the No Income, No Job, or Asset loans that helped coin the phrase “if you can fog a mirror, you can get a loan.”
I think they basically assume the people applying for them have good credit. The alt refers to them being “alternative”.
In other words they’re gay.
Seriously though, the default rate on these could be worse than sub-prime. Realtors/brokers would say these are for people with fluctuating incomes like actors or entrepreneurs, but not in recent years. Unless you replace actor with teacher, and entrepreneur with house wife.
-
March 10, 2008 at 3:29 PM #166964
farbet
ParticipantI guess we will start seeing “walk Aways” soon
-
March 10, 2008 at 3:29 PM #167284
farbet
ParticipantI guess we will start seeing “walk Aways” soon
-
March 10, 2008 at 3:29 PM #167290
farbet
ParticipantI guess we will start seeing “walk Aways” soon
-
March 10, 2008 at 3:29 PM #167323
farbet
ParticipantI guess we will start seeing “walk Aways” soon
-
March 10, 2008 at 3:29 PM #167386
farbet
ParticipantI guess we will start seeing “walk Aways” soon
-
-
March 10, 2008 at 3:24 PM #167274
cr
ParticipantYes ALT-A were the No Income, No Job, or Asset loans that helped coin the phrase “if you can fog a mirror, you can get a loan.”
I think they basically assume the people applying for them have good credit. The alt refers to them being “alternative”.
In other words they’re gay.
Seriously though, the default rate on these could be worse than sub-prime. Realtors/brokers would say these are for people with fluctuating incomes like actors or entrepreneurs, but not in recent years. Unless you replace actor with teacher, and entrepreneur with house wife.
-
March 10, 2008 at 3:24 PM #167280
cr
ParticipantYes ALT-A were the No Income, No Job, or Asset loans that helped coin the phrase “if you can fog a mirror, you can get a loan.”
I think they basically assume the people applying for them have good credit. The alt refers to them being “alternative”.
In other words they’re gay.
Seriously though, the default rate on these could be worse than sub-prime. Realtors/brokers would say these are for people with fluctuating incomes like actors or entrepreneurs, but not in recent years. Unless you replace actor with teacher, and entrepreneur with house wife.
-
March 10, 2008 at 3:24 PM #167314
cr
ParticipantYes ALT-A were the No Income, No Job, or Asset loans that helped coin the phrase “if you can fog a mirror, you can get a loan.”
I think they basically assume the people applying for them have good credit. The alt refers to them being “alternative”.
In other words they’re gay.
Seriously though, the default rate on these could be worse than sub-prime. Realtors/brokers would say these are for people with fluctuating incomes like actors or entrepreneurs, but not in recent years. Unless you replace actor with teacher, and entrepreneur with house wife.
-
March 10, 2008 at 3:24 PM #167376
cr
ParticipantYes ALT-A were the No Income, No Job, or Asset loans that helped coin the phrase “if you can fog a mirror, you can get a loan.”
I think they basically assume the people applying for them have good credit. The alt refers to them being “alternative”.
In other words they’re gay.
Seriously though, the default rate on these could be worse than sub-prime. Realtors/brokers would say these are for people with fluctuating incomes like actors or entrepreneurs, but not in recent years. Unless you replace actor with teacher, and entrepreneur with house wife.
-
-
March 10, 2008 at 2:46 PM #167236
DWCAP
ParticipantFSD, I was one of those who looked at the numers, and said we are screwed too. I am starting to adjust my thinking to what you are saying alittle, but I dont know if things arnt deeper than the interest rate suggests.
This whole mess was triggered by the FED raising rates. With inflation rising, they can only hold off on worrying about inflation for so long. It takes a year to get cuts into the economy, they started in Sept. so we are half way there. In 6-8 months they will have to start fighting inflation instead of fanning it, and the resets on these morgages will rise.
Also, just because these things are reseting, even to a lower interst rate, doesnt mean the monthly payments are not jumping. How many of these had horrendiously low teaser rates for the first year or two at maybe 1%-3%. How many had intro periods where they were interest only (or not even that) and then now are reseting to include principal into the mix. That could be a jump of 20%+ even if the interest rate didnt move an inch.
It isnt as bad as the numbers make it seem, but it isnt as good as the interest rates make it seem either. -
March 10, 2008 at 2:46 PM #167240
DWCAP
ParticipantFSD, I was one of those who looked at the numers, and said we are screwed too. I am starting to adjust my thinking to what you are saying alittle, but I dont know if things arnt deeper than the interest rate suggests.
This whole mess was triggered by the FED raising rates. With inflation rising, they can only hold off on worrying about inflation for so long. It takes a year to get cuts into the economy, they started in Sept. so we are half way there. In 6-8 months they will have to start fighting inflation instead of fanning it, and the resets on these morgages will rise.
Also, just because these things are reseting, even to a lower interst rate, doesnt mean the monthly payments are not jumping. How many of these had horrendiously low teaser rates for the first year or two at maybe 1%-3%. How many had intro periods where they were interest only (or not even that) and then now are reseting to include principal into the mix. That could be a jump of 20%+ even if the interest rate didnt move an inch.
It isnt as bad as the numbers make it seem, but it isnt as good as the interest rates make it seem either. -
March 10, 2008 at 2:46 PM #167273
DWCAP
ParticipantFSD, I was one of those who looked at the numers, and said we are screwed too. I am starting to adjust my thinking to what you are saying alittle, but I dont know if things arnt deeper than the interest rate suggests.
This whole mess was triggered by the FED raising rates. With inflation rising, they can only hold off on worrying about inflation for so long. It takes a year to get cuts into the economy, they started in Sept. so we are half way there. In 6-8 months they will have to start fighting inflation instead of fanning it, and the resets on these morgages will rise.
Also, just because these things are reseting, even to a lower interst rate, doesnt mean the monthly payments are not jumping. How many of these had horrendiously low teaser rates for the first year or two at maybe 1%-3%. How many had intro periods where they were interest only (or not even that) and then now are reseting to include principal into the mix. That could be a jump of 20%+ even if the interest rate didnt move an inch.
It isnt as bad as the numbers make it seem, but it isnt as good as the interest rates make it seem either. -
March 10, 2008 at 2:46 PM #167336
DWCAP
ParticipantFSD, I was one of those who looked at the numers, and said we are screwed too. I am starting to adjust my thinking to what you are saying alittle, but I dont know if things arnt deeper than the interest rate suggests.
This whole mess was triggered by the FED raising rates. With inflation rising, they can only hold off on worrying about inflation for so long. It takes a year to get cuts into the economy, they started in Sept. so we are half way there. In 6-8 months they will have to start fighting inflation instead of fanning it, and the resets on these morgages will rise.
Also, just because these things are reseting, even to a lower interst rate, doesnt mean the monthly payments are not jumping. How many of these had horrendiously low teaser rates for the first year or two at maybe 1%-3%. How many had intro periods where they were interest only (or not even that) and then now are reseting to include principal into the mix. That could be a jump of 20%+ even if the interest rate didnt move an inch.
It isnt as bad as the numbers make it seem, but it isnt as good as the interest rates make it seem either. -
March 10, 2008 at 4:51 PM #167009
DWCAP
ParticipantI have a dumb question, but how acurate is the reset chart we always refer to? March 08 seems to be the biggest month for resets, so in theory shorts, defaults and prefoclosures in June/July should be jumping. But how many of these March resets are already paid off? If a morgage was orginated in March of 2005 for a reset in March of 2008, but was paid out when the house was sold in Feb 2007 (assuming it was paid in full) is the reset still counted?
I guess what I am wondering is what the refinancing binges of early 08 will do to the resets. Is the reset still counted in all those charts and graphs we use to justify our position, even though the morgage is paid and no reset will ever be seen?-
March 10, 2008 at 6:04 PM #167029
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantDWCAP – To some extent the reset charts are obsolete soon after they are created. The profile of loans out there will presumably constantly shift due to property sales, refinance activity, early re-sets (due to negative amortization), etc. However, with property values generally declining I doubt that huge segments of these loans have been completely worked out.
-
March 10, 2008 at 6:04 PM #167349
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantDWCAP – To some extent the reset charts are obsolete soon after they are created. The profile of loans out there will presumably constantly shift due to property sales, refinance activity, early re-sets (due to negative amortization), etc. However, with property values generally declining I doubt that huge segments of these loans have been completely worked out.
-
March 10, 2008 at 6:04 PM #167354
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantDWCAP – To some extent the reset charts are obsolete soon after they are created. The profile of loans out there will presumably constantly shift due to property sales, refinance activity, early re-sets (due to negative amortization), etc. However, with property values generally declining I doubt that huge segments of these loans have been completely worked out.
-
March 10, 2008 at 6:04 PM #167387
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantDWCAP – To some extent the reset charts are obsolete soon after they are created. The profile of loans out there will presumably constantly shift due to property sales, refinance activity, early re-sets (due to negative amortization), etc. However, with property values generally declining I doubt that huge segments of these loans have been completely worked out.
-
March 10, 2008 at 6:04 PM #167451
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantDWCAP – To some extent the reset charts are obsolete soon after they are created. The profile of loans out there will presumably constantly shift due to property sales, refinance activity, early re-sets (due to negative amortization), etc. However, with property values generally declining I doubt that huge segments of these loans have been completely worked out.
-
March 10, 2008 at 6:04 PM #167035
Bugs
ParticipantThe reset charts are indirect indicators that we’ve been using to project the direct results. So far, it’s been working out. The number of NODs has been increasing behind the resets, the number of foreclosures have been increasing behind the NODs, and the prices have been dropping as a result of the foreclosures.
What’s interesting is that those reset charts are reporting the trends on a national basis. One really has to wonder what the true trends are like locally. I would think the situation here is even worse than average.
Anyways, my point is that the charts don’t have to be that accurate ’cause we’re just using them to project broad trends.
-
March 10, 2008 at 6:52 PM #167054
cr
ParticipantDo the reset charts in HELOC’s too? Or just new mortgages?
That will make quite a difference too.
-
March 11, 2008 at 6:51 PM #167767
DaCounselor
ParticipantRegarding loan resets, I think there is little doubt that we find ourselves in an entirely different scenario than we were in as recently as last summer. USD LIBOR indices have fallen off a cliff and can now be found in a familiar place relative to the FFR. What percentage of impending resets are on loans with extremely (1-3%) teaser rates (and I’m talking straight 3/1 or 5/1 IO ARMS, not neg-ams) is worth discussing but my sources indicate that the majority of such ARMS did not carry the ultra-low teaser rates but instead the prevailing ARM intro rates in the mid to high 5’s. What I am hearing is that the ultra-low rates were found primarily in neg-ams, which is an entirely different animal. That’s what I’m hearing, for whatever that’s worth.
In any event and back to my original point, there is no doubt that many, many borrowers have dodged the proverbial exploding ARM thanks to LIBOR’s plunge. If they were in an 80/20 deal they were probably getting pinched on their second mtg. over the years due to the ongoing rise in the Prime rate but now that has been falling and their first mtg. is going to reset close to or below their intro rate. Instead of a short sale or foreclosure, they stay in the house. At least for now.
I just do not see a “V” in the LIBOR or FFR – I think we are looking at low rates for at least several years. I think LIBOR and the FFR are going lower and staying lower for awhile. There will likely be a day of reckoning for all those in these ARMS, particularly those with fatter margins and the IO variety, but it ain’t this year, that is for certain. And who knows what sort of additional mechanisms will be in place down the road to save the upside-down ARM holder whose rate is increasing or whose IO period is up? Make no mistake about it, the LIBOR cliff-dive is having a very large impact on housing in this area.
-
March 11, 2008 at 11:29 PM #167899
SD Realtor
ParticipantCounselor and DWCAP good posts. I agree bigtime. I think that the towel has been thrown in such that we went from the stock market bubble to the real estate bubble and now the real estate bubble will deflate into inflation for real goods and services. I really do think the decision has been made to load the helicopters up with money and spray it everywhere. You guys are more in the know then I, but I do think France, Italy, Spain and German governments are in a world of hurt. Seems like a repeat of 1913 to me… Flood the system with money…
SD Realtor
-
March 11, 2008 at 11:29 PM #168227
SD Realtor
ParticipantCounselor and DWCAP good posts. I agree bigtime. I think that the towel has been thrown in such that we went from the stock market bubble to the real estate bubble and now the real estate bubble will deflate into inflation for real goods and services. I really do think the decision has been made to load the helicopters up with money and spray it everywhere. You guys are more in the know then I, but I do think France, Italy, Spain and German governments are in a world of hurt. Seems like a repeat of 1913 to me… Flood the system with money…
SD Realtor
-
March 11, 2008 at 11:29 PM #168231
SD Realtor
ParticipantCounselor and DWCAP good posts. I agree bigtime. I think that the towel has been thrown in such that we went from the stock market bubble to the real estate bubble and now the real estate bubble will deflate into inflation for real goods and services. I really do think the decision has been made to load the helicopters up with money and spray it everywhere. You guys are more in the know then I, but I do think France, Italy, Spain and German governments are in a world of hurt. Seems like a repeat of 1913 to me… Flood the system with money…
SD Realtor
-
March 11, 2008 at 11:29 PM #168259
SD Realtor
ParticipantCounselor and DWCAP good posts. I agree bigtime. I think that the towel has been thrown in such that we went from the stock market bubble to the real estate bubble and now the real estate bubble will deflate into inflation for real goods and services. I really do think the decision has been made to load the helicopters up with money and spray it everywhere. You guys are more in the know then I, but I do think France, Italy, Spain and German governments are in a world of hurt. Seems like a repeat of 1913 to me… Flood the system with money…
SD Realtor
-
March 11, 2008 at 11:29 PM #168328
SD Realtor
ParticipantCounselor and DWCAP good posts. I agree bigtime. I think that the towel has been thrown in such that we went from the stock market bubble to the real estate bubble and now the real estate bubble will deflate into inflation for real goods and services. I really do think the decision has been made to load the helicopters up with money and spray it everywhere. You guys are more in the know then I, but I do think France, Italy, Spain and German governments are in a world of hurt. Seems like a repeat of 1913 to me… Flood the system with money…
SD Realtor
-
March 11, 2008 at 6:51 PM #168092
DaCounselor
ParticipantRegarding loan resets, I think there is little doubt that we find ourselves in an entirely different scenario than we were in as recently as last summer. USD LIBOR indices have fallen off a cliff and can now be found in a familiar place relative to the FFR. What percentage of impending resets are on loans with extremely (1-3%) teaser rates (and I’m talking straight 3/1 or 5/1 IO ARMS, not neg-ams) is worth discussing but my sources indicate that the majority of such ARMS did not carry the ultra-low teaser rates but instead the prevailing ARM intro rates in the mid to high 5’s. What I am hearing is that the ultra-low rates were found primarily in neg-ams, which is an entirely different animal. That’s what I’m hearing, for whatever that’s worth.
In any event and back to my original point, there is no doubt that many, many borrowers have dodged the proverbial exploding ARM thanks to LIBOR’s plunge. If they were in an 80/20 deal they were probably getting pinched on their second mtg. over the years due to the ongoing rise in the Prime rate but now that has been falling and their first mtg. is going to reset close to or below their intro rate. Instead of a short sale or foreclosure, they stay in the house. At least for now.
I just do not see a “V” in the LIBOR or FFR – I think we are looking at low rates for at least several years. I think LIBOR and the FFR are going lower and staying lower for awhile. There will likely be a day of reckoning for all those in these ARMS, particularly those with fatter margins and the IO variety, but it ain’t this year, that is for certain. And who knows what sort of additional mechanisms will be in place down the road to save the upside-down ARM holder whose rate is increasing or whose IO period is up? Make no mistake about it, the LIBOR cliff-dive is having a very large impact on housing in this area.
-
March 11, 2008 at 6:51 PM #168096
DaCounselor
ParticipantRegarding loan resets, I think there is little doubt that we find ourselves in an entirely different scenario than we were in as recently as last summer. USD LIBOR indices have fallen off a cliff and can now be found in a familiar place relative to the FFR. What percentage of impending resets are on loans with extremely (1-3%) teaser rates (and I’m talking straight 3/1 or 5/1 IO ARMS, not neg-ams) is worth discussing but my sources indicate that the majority of such ARMS did not carry the ultra-low teaser rates but instead the prevailing ARM intro rates in the mid to high 5’s. What I am hearing is that the ultra-low rates were found primarily in neg-ams, which is an entirely different animal. That’s what I’m hearing, for whatever that’s worth.
In any event and back to my original point, there is no doubt that many, many borrowers have dodged the proverbial exploding ARM thanks to LIBOR’s plunge. If they were in an 80/20 deal they were probably getting pinched on their second mtg. over the years due to the ongoing rise in the Prime rate but now that has been falling and their first mtg. is going to reset close to or below their intro rate. Instead of a short sale or foreclosure, they stay in the house. At least for now.
I just do not see a “V” in the LIBOR or FFR – I think we are looking at low rates for at least several years. I think LIBOR and the FFR are going lower and staying lower for awhile. There will likely be a day of reckoning for all those in these ARMS, particularly those with fatter margins and the IO variety, but it ain’t this year, that is for certain. And who knows what sort of additional mechanisms will be in place down the road to save the upside-down ARM holder whose rate is increasing or whose IO period is up? Make no mistake about it, the LIBOR cliff-dive is having a very large impact on housing in this area.
-
March 11, 2008 at 6:51 PM #168127
DaCounselor
ParticipantRegarding loan resets, I think there is little doubt that we find ourselves in an entirely different scenario than we were in as recently as last summer. USD LIBOR indices have fallen off a cliff and can now be found in a familiar place relative to the FFR. What percentage of impending resets are on loans with extremely (1-3%) teaser rates (and I’m talking straight 3/1 or 5/1 IO ARMS, not neg-ams) is worth discussing but my sources indicate that the majority of such ARMS did not carry the ultra-low teaser rates but instead the prevailing ARM intro rates in the mid to high 5’s. What I am hearing is that the ultra-low rates were found primarily in neg-ams, which is an entirely different animal. That’s what I’m hearing, for whatever that’s worth.
In any event and back to my original point, there is no doubt that many, many borrowers have dodged the proverbial exploding ARM thanks to LIBOR’s plunge. If they were in an 80/20 deal they were probably getting pinched on their second mtg. over the years due to the ongoing rise in the Prime rate but now that has been falling and their first mtg. is going to reset close to or below their intro rate. Instead of a short sale or foreclosure, they stay in the house. At least for now.
I just do not see a “V” in the LIBOR or FFR – I think we are looking at low rates for at least several years. I think LIBOR and the FFR are going lower and staying lower for awhile. There will likely be a day of reckoning for all those in these ARMS, particularly those with fatter margins and the IO variety, but it ain’t this year, that is for certain. And who knows what sort of additional mechanisms will be in place down the road to save the upside-down ARM holder whose rate is increasing or whose IO period is up? Make no mistake about it, the LIBOR cliff-dive is having a very large impact on housing in this area.
-
March 11, 2008 at 6:51 PM #168193
DaCounselor
ParticipantRegarding loan resets, I think there is little doubt that we find ourselves in an entirely different scenario than we were in as recently as last summer. USD LIBOR indices have fallen off a cliff and can now be found in a familiar place relative to the FFR. What percentage of impending resets are on loans with extremely (1-3%) teaser rates (and I’m talking straight 3/1 or 5/1 IO ARMS, not neg-ams) is worth discussing but my sources indicate that the majority of such ARMS did not carry the ultra-low teaser rates but instead the prevailing ARM intro rates in the mid to high 5’s. What I am hearing is that the ultra-low rates were found primarily in neg-ams, which is an entirely different animal. That’s what I’m hearing, for whatever that’s worth.
In any event and back to my original point, there is no doubt that many, many borrowers have dodged the proverbial exploding ARM thanks to LIBOR’s plunge. If they were in an 80/20 deal they were probably getting pinched on their second mtg. over the years due to the ongoing rise in the Prime rate but now that has been falling and their first mtg. is going to reset close to or below their intro rate. Instead of a short sale or foreclosure, they stay in the house. At least for now.
I just do not see a “V” in the LIBOR or FFR – I think we are looking at low rates for at least several years. I think LIBOR and the FFR are going lower and staying lower for awhile. There will likely be a day of reckoning for all those in these ARMS, particularly those with fatter margins and the IO variety, but it ain’t this year, that is for certain. And who knows what sort of additional mechanisms will be in place down the road to save the upside-down ARM holder whose rate is increasing or whose IO period is up? Make no mistake about it, the LIBOR cliff-dive is having a very large impact on housing in this area.
-
March 10, 2008 at 6:52 PM #167375
cr
ParticipantDo the reset charts in HELOC’s too? Or just new mortgages?
That will make quite a difference too.
-
March 10, 2008 at 6:52 PM #167379
cr
ParticipantDo the reset charts in HELOC’s too? Or just new mortgages?
That will make quite a difference too.
-
March 10, 2008 at 6:52 PM #167413
cr
ParticipantDo the reset charts in HELOC’s too? Or just new mortgages?
That will make quite a difference too.
-
March 10, 2008 at 6:52 PM #167476
cr
ParticipantDo the reset charts in HELOC’s too? Or just new mortgages?
That will make quite a difference too.
-
-
March 10, 2008 at 6:04 PM #167355
Bugs
ParticipantThe reset charts are indirect indicators that we’ve been using to project the direct results. So far, it’s been working out. The number of NODs has been increasing behind the resets, the number of foreclosures have been increasing behind the NODs, and the prices have been dropping as a result of the foreclosures.
What’s interesting is that those reset charts are reporting the trends on a national basis. One really has to wonder what the true trends are like locally. I would think the situation here is even worse than average.
Anyways, my point is that the charts don’t have to be that accurate ’cause we’re just using them to project broad trends.
-
March 10, 2008 at 6:04 PM #167360
Bugs
ParticipantThe reset charts are indirect indicators that we’ve been using to project the direct results. So far, it’s been working out. The number of NODs has been increasing behind the resets, the number of foreclosures have been increasing behind the NODs, and the prices have been dropping as a result of the foreclosures.
What’s interesting is that those reset charts are reporting the trends on a national basis. One really has to wonder what the true trends are like locally. I would think the situation here is even worse than average.
Anyways, my point is that the charts don’t have to be that accurate ’cause we’re just using them to project broad trends.
-
March 10, 2008 at 6:04 PM #167392
Bugs
ParticipantThe reset charts are indirect indicators that we’ve been using to project the direct results. So far, it’s been working out. The number of NODs has been increasing behind the resets, the number of foreclosures have been increasing behind the NODs, and the prices have been dropping as a result of the foreclosures.
What’s interesting is that those reset charts are reporting the trends on a national basis. One really has to wonder what the true trends are like locally. I would think the situation here is even worse than average.
Anyways, my point is that the charts don’t have to be that accurate ’cause we’re just using them to project broad trends.
-
March 10, 2008 at 6:04 PM #167456
Bugs
ParticipantThe reset charts are indirect indicators that we’ve been using to project the direct results. So far, it’s been working out. The number of NODs has been increasing behind the resets, the number of foreclosures have been increasing behind the NODs, and the prices have been dropping as a result of the foreclosures.
What’s interesting is that those reset charts are reporting the trends on a national basis. One really has to wonder what the true trends are like locally. I would think the situation here is even worse than average.
Anyways, my point is that the charts don’t have to be that accurate ’cause we’re just using them to project broad trends.
-
-
March 10, 2008 at 4:51 PM #167330
DWCAP
ParticipantI have a dumb question, but how acurate is the reset chart we always refer to? March 08 seems to be the biggest month for resets, so in theory shorts, defaults and prefoclosures in June/July should be jumping. But how many of these March resets are already paid off? If a morgage was orginated in March of 2005 for a reset in March of 2008, but was paid out when the house was sold in Feb 2007 (assuming it was paid in full) is the reset still counted?
I guess what I am wondering is what the refinancing binges of early 08 will do to the resets. Is the reset still counted in all those charts and graphs we use to justify our position, even though the morgage is paid and no reset will ever be seen? -
March 10, 2008 at 4:51 PM #167334
DWCAP
ParticipantI have a dumb question, but how acurate is the reset chart we always refer to? March 08 seems to be the biggest month for resets, so in theory shorts, defaults and prefoclosures in June/July should be jumping. But how many of these March resets are already paid off? If a morgage was orginated in March of 2005 for a reset in March of 2008, but was paid out when the house was sold in Feb 2007 (assuming it was paid in full) is the reset still counted?
I guess what I am wondering is what the refinancing binges of early 08 will do to the resets. Is the reset still counted in all those charts and graphs we use to justify our position, even though the morgage is paid and no reset will ever be seen? -
March 10, 2008 at 4:51 PM #167367
DWCAP
ParticipantI have a dumb question, but how acurate is the reset chart we always refer to? March 08 seems to be the biggest month for resets, so in theory shorts, defaults and prefoclosures in June/July should be jumping. But how many of these March resets are already paid off? If a morgage was orginated in March of 2005 for a reset in March of 2008, but was paid out when the house was sold in Feb 2007 (assuming it was paid in full) is the reset still counted?
I guess what I am wondering is what the refinancing binges of early 08 will do to the resets. Is the reset still counted in all those charts and graphs we use to justify our position, even though the morgage is paid and no reset will ever be seen? -
March 10, 2008 at 4:51 PM #167431
DWCAP
ParticipantI have a dumb question, but how acurate is the reset chart we always refer to? March 08 seems to be the biggest month for resets, so in theory shorts, defaults and prefoclosures in June/July should be jumping. But how many of these March resets are already paid off? If a morgage was orginated in March of 2005 for a reset in March of 2008, but was paid out when the house was sold in Feb 2007 (assuming it was paid in full) is the reset still counted?
I guess what I am wondering is what the refinancing binges of early 08 will do to the resets. Is the reset still counted in all those charts and graphs we use to justify our position, even though the morgage is paid and no reset will ever be seen? -
March 11, 2008 at 11:11 PM #167879
DWCAP
ParticipantThanks guys, I have been kinda questioning the standard interpertation of the reset charts as of late. These people are being bailed out by the Feds disregard of inflation as they may actually see their payment DECREASE due to lower interest rates and the LIBOR cliff jumping. I have to admit, I dont like it. I am being robbed twice in lower interest AND higher inflation so these jerks can stay in their homes and the bankers that put them there can keep their bonus’s and such. But who really cares what I do and dont like?
I still think this is just more evidence that while we will avoid a total crash right now, the debt must be paid. Eventually rates have to go up and then we will have a day of reconing as these morgages reset and the fact that the owners have no equity means that they will reset. I think the idea is that we can withstand a certain number of resets, but that we cant do with with all our major banks capital impared. So the Fed plays for time, lets the banks heal, then lets these morgages go the way that they will naturally go. Hopefully a few years of lower to no growth are better than a crash and following slow recovery. Smart play I must say even if it doesnt help me to the benifit of others.
-
March 11, 2008 at 11:11 PM #168206
DWCAP
ParticipantThanks guys, I have been kinda questioning the standard interpertation of the reset charts as of late. These people are being bailed out by the Feds disregard of inflation as they may actually see their payment DECREASE due to lower interest rates and the LIBOR cliff jumping. I have to admit, I dont like it. I am being robbed twice in lower interest AND higher inflation so these jerks can stay in their homes and the bankers that put them there can keep their bonus’s and such. But who really cares what I do and dont like?
I still think this is just more evidence that while we will avoid a total crash right now, the debt must be paid. Eventually rates have to go up and then we will have a day of reconing as these morgages reset and the fact that the owners have no equity means that they will reset. I think the idea is that we can withstand a certain number of resets, but that we cant do with with all our major banks capital impared. So the Fed plays for time, lets the banks heal, then lets these morgages go the way that they will naturally go. Hopefully a few years of lower to no growth are better than a crash and following slow recovery. Smart play I must say even if it doesnt help me to the benifit of others.
-
March 11, 2008 at 11:11 PM #168212
DWCAP
ParticipantThanks guys, I have been kinda questioning the standard interpertation of the reset charts as of late. These people are being bailed out by the Feds disregard of inflation as they may actually see their payment DECREASE due to lower interest rates and the LIBOR cliff jumping. I have to admit, I dont like it. I am being robbed twice in lower interest AND higher inflation so these jerks can stay in their homes and the bankers that put them there can keep their bonus’s and such. But who really cares what I do and dont like?
I still think this is just more evidence that while we will avoid a total crash right now, the debt must be paid. Eventually rates have to go up and then we will have a day of reconing as these morgages reset and the fact that the owners have no equity means that they will reset. I think the idea is that we can withstand a certain number of resets, but that we cant do with with all our major banks capital impared. So the Fed plays for time, lets the banks heal, then lets these morgages go the way that they will naturally go. Hopefully a few years of lower to no growth are better than a crash and following slow recovery. Smart play I must say even if it doesnt help me to the benifit of others.
-
March 11, 2008 at 11:11 PM #168239
DWCAP
ParticipantThanks guys, I have been kinda questioning the standard interpertation of the reset charts as of late. These people are being bailed out by the Feds disregard of inflation as they may actually see their payment DECREASE due to lower interest rates and the LIBOR cliff jumping. I have to admit, I dont like it. I am being robbed twice in lower interest AND higher inflation so these jerks can stay in their homes and the bankers that put them there can keep their bonus’s and such. But who really cares what I do and dont like?
I still think this is just more evidence that while we will avoid a total crash right now, the debt must be paid. Eventually rates have to go up and then we will have a day of reconing as these morgages reset and the fact that the owners have no equity means that they will reset. I think the idea is that we can withstand a certain number of resets, but that we cant do with with all our major banks capital impared. So the Fed plays for time, lets the banks heal, then lets these morgages go the way that they will naturally go. Hopefully a few years of lower to no growth are better than a crash and following slow recovery. Smart play I must say even if it doesnt help me to the benifit of others.
-
March 11, 2008 at 11:11 PM #168308
DWCAP
ParticipantThanks guys, I have been kinda questioning the standard interpertation of the reset charts as of late. These people are being bailed out by the Feds disregard of inflation as they may actually see their payment DECREASE due to lower interest rates and the LIBOR cliff jumping. I have to admit, I dont like it. I am being robbed twice in lower interest AND higher inflation so these jerks can stay in their homes and the bankers that put them there can keep their bonus’s and such. But who really cares what I do and dont like?
I still think this is just more evidence that while we will avoid a total crash right now, the debt must be paid. Eventually rates have to go up and then we will have a day of reconing as these morgages reset and the fact that the owners have no equity means that they will reset. I think the idea is that we can withstand a certain number of resets, but that we cant do with with all our major banks capital impared. So the Fed plays for time, lets the banks heal, then lets these morgages go the way that they will naturally go. Hopefully a few years of lower to no growth are better than a crash and following slow recovery. Smart play I must say even if it doesnt help me to the benifit of others.
-
March 12, 2008 at 9:36 AM #168004
DWCAP
ParticipantSO we keep flooding the system with money, but that isnt the whole story. As explored in other posts here, oil is going through the roof, killing everything in its wake. Oil is now kinda like gold in that it is viewed as an inflation hedge, so will actually go up in the beginning of recessions as people flee to safty. Hard to find anything safer than gold (it is why they call treasuries the GOLD standard). Oil is looking the same way now, though I think supply and demand restrictions will eventually make this another bubble poping. Eventually all this cheap money has to stop.
BUt in the mean time we have gas at all time high’s and rising fast. I noticed a thing about how disel is 4.25+ now last night on the news. Talked about a bunch of truckers who are independent and considering quiting cause they work for gas $$ now. Who really thinks that wont eat into the budgets of everyone for everything you didnt grow yourself? How many people want to commute from Temc. to SD when gas is $4/gal? Not many, especially when the IE has been tagged a falling market. This will just make it fall more. Who cares about builder costs when the house is already built? If the population isnt there to support the housing demand prices will fall, regardless of builders costs.
This is where itll really get sticky, population declines. Alot of people have been coming to CA for the oppertunity. If things go south, like they are, then that will reverse. If I remember right more CAians are leaving CA than coming from other states. International immigration is the only thing keeping the population growing. How long will that last if jobs disappear? (BTW, I read that crossings of people into the USA from Mexico are down 20%+.) Also, the teachers are getting pink slips in the mail due to budget cuts and already Idaho (who is hiring teachers) is beginning to nibble at advertising for them. It happened in the early 90’s and itll happen again. We havnt seen it yet because usually the economy falls, people leave, and that drags down housing. Instead this time housing pulled the economy down, so people will have to leave. Different chain, one that only really started in December 2007. To early to see where itll go, but my bet rests with my friends, outa state. -
March 12, 2008 at 9:36 AM #168331
DWCAP
ParticipantSO we keep flooding the system with money, but that isnt the whole story. As explored in other posts here, oil is going through the roof, killing everything in its wake. Oil is now kinda like gold in that it is viewed as an inflation hedge, so will actually go up in the beginning of recessions as people flee to safty. Hard to find anything safer than gold (it is why they call treasuries the GOLD standard). Oil is looking the same way now, though I think supply and demand restrictions will eventually make this another bubble poping. Eventually all this cheap money has to stop.
BUt in the mean time we have gas at all time high’s and rising fast. I noticed a thing about how disel is 4.25+ now last night on the news. Talked about a bunch of truckers who are independent and considering quiting cause they work for gas $$ now. Who really thinks that wont eat into the budgets of everyone for everything you didnt grow yourself? How many people want to commute from Temc. to SD when gas is $4/gal? Not many, especially when the IE has been tagged a falling market. This will just make it fall more. Who cares about builder costs when the house is already built? If the population isnt there to support the housing demand prices will fall, regardless of builders costs.
This is where itll really get sticky, population declines. Alot of people have been coming to CA for the oppertunity. If things go south, like they are, then that will reverse. If I remember right more CAians are leaving CA than coming from other states. International immigration is the only thing keeping the population growing. How long will that last if jobs disappear? (BTW, I read that crossings of people into the USA from Mexico are down 20%+.) Also, the teachers are getting pink slips in the mail due to budget cuts and already Idaho (who is hiring teachers) is beginning to nibble at advertising for them. It happened in the early 90’s and itll happen again. We havnt seen it yet because usually the economy falls, people leave, and that drags down housing. Instead this time housing pulled the economy down, so people will have to leave. Different chain, one that only really started in December 2007. To early to see where itll go, but my bet rests with my friends, outa state. -
March 12, 2008 at 9:36 AM #168337
DWCAP
ParticipantSO we keep flooding the system with money, but that isnt the whole story. As explored in other posts here, oil is going through the roof, killing everything in its wake. Oil is now kinda like gold in that it is viewed as an inflation hedge, so will actually go up in the beginning of recessions as people flee to safty. Hard to find anything safer than gold (it is why they call treasuries the GOLD standard). Oil is looking the same way now, though I think supply and demand restrictions will eventually make this another bubble poping. Eventually all this cheap money has to stop.
BUt in the mean time we have gas at all time high’s and rising fast. I noticed a thing about how disel is 4.25+ now last night on the news. Talked about a bunch of truckers who are independent and considering quiting cause they work for gas $$ now. Who really thinks that wont eat into the budgets of everyone for everything you didnt grow yourself? How many people want to commute from Temc. to SD when gas is $4/gal? Not many, especially when the IE has been tagged a falling market. This will just make it fall more. Who cares about builder costs when the house is already built? If the population isnt there to support the housing demand prices will fall, regardless of builders costs.
This is where itll really get sticky, population declines. Alot of people have been coming to CA for the oppertunity. If things go south, like they are, then that will reverse. If I remember right more CAians are leaving CA than coming from other states. International immigration is the only thing keeping the population growing. How long will that last if jobs disappear? (BTW, I read that crossings of people into the USA from Mexico are down 20%+.) Also, the teachers are getting pink slips in the mail due to budget cuts and already Idaho (who is hiring teachers) is beginning to nibble at advertising for them. It happened in the early 90’s and itll happen again. We havnt seen it yet because usually the economy falls, people leave, and that drags down housing. Instead this time housing pulled the economy down, so people will have to leave. Different chain, one that only really started in December 2007. To early to see where itll go, but my bet rests with my friends, outa state. -
March 12, 2008 at 9:36 AM #168364
DWCAP
ParticipantSO we keep flooding the system with money, but that isnt the whole story. As explored in other posts here, oil is going through the roof, killing everything in its wake. Oil is now kinda like gold in that it is viewed as an inflation hedge, so will actually go up in the beginning of recessions as people flee to safty. Hard to find anything safer than gold (it is why they call treasuries the GOLD standard). Oil is looking the same way now, though I think supply and demand restrictions will eventually make this another bubble poping. Eventually all this cheap money has to stop.
BUt in the mean time we have gas at all time high’s and rising fast. I noticed a thing about how disel is 4.25+ now last night on the news. Talked about a bunch of truckers who are independent and considering quiting cause they work for gas $$ now. Who really thinks that wont eat into the budgets of everyone for everything you didnt grow yourself? How many people want to commute from Temc. to SD when gas is $4/gal? Not many, especially when the IE has been tagged a falling market. This will just make it fall more. Who cares about builder costs when the house is already built? If the population isnt there to support the housing demand prices will fall, regardless of builders costs.
This is where itll really get sticky, population declines. Alot of people have been coming to CA for the oppertunity. If things go south, like they are, then that will reverse. If I remember right more CAians are leaving CA than coming from other states. International immigration is the only thing keeping the population growing. How long will that last if jobs disappear? (BTW, I read that crossings of people into the USA from Mexico are down 20%+.) Also, the teachers are getting pink slips in the mail due to budget cuts and already Idaho (who is hiring teachers) is beginning to nibble at advertising for them. It happened in the early 90’s and itll happen again. We havnt seen it yet because usually the economy falls, people leave, and that drags down housing. Instead this time housing pulled the economy down, so people will have to leave. Different chain, one that only really started in December 2007. To early to see where itll go, but my bet rests with my friends, outa state. -
March 12, 2008 at 9:36 AM #168435
DWCAP
ParticipantSO we keep flooding the system with money, but that isnt the whole story. As explored in other posts here, oil is going through the roof, killing everything in its wake. Oil is now kinda like gold in that it is viewed as an inflation hedge, so will actually go up in the beginning of recessions as people flee to safty. Hard to find anything safer than gold (it is why they call treasuries the GOLD standard). Oil is looking the same way now, though I think supply and demand restrictions will eventually make this another bubble poping. Eventually all this cheap money has to stop.
BUt in the mean time we have gas at all time high’s and rising fast. I noticed a thing about how disel is 4.25+ now last night on the news. Talked about a bunch of truckers who are independent and considering quiting cause they work for gas $$ now. Who really thinks that wont eat into the budgets of everyone for everything you didnt grow yourself? How many people want to commute from Temc. to SD when gas is $4/gal? Not many, especially when the IE has been tagged a falling market. This will just make it fall more. Who cares about builder costs when the house is already built? If the population isnt there to support the housing demand prices will fall, regardless of builders costs.
This is where itll really get sticky, population declines. Alot of people have been coming to CA for the oppertunity. If things go south, like they are, then that will reverse. If I remember right more CAians are leaving CA than coming from other states. International immigration is the only thing keeping the population growing. How long will that last if jobs disappear? (BTW, I read that crossings of people into the USA from Mexico are down 20%+.) Also, the teachers are getting pink slips in the mail due to budget cuts and already Idaho (who is hiring teachers) is beginning to nibble at advertising for them. It happened in the early 90’s and itll happen again. We havnt seen it yet because usually the economy falls, people leave, and that drags down housing. Instead this time housing pulled the economy down, so people will have to leave. Different chain, one that only really started in December 2007. To early to see where itll go, but my bet rests with my friends, outa state.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.