Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 5, 2008 at 10:27 PM in reply to: San Elijo property; what do you think this is REALLY worth? #199388May 5, 2008 at 10:27 PM in reply to: San Elijo property; what do you think this is REALLY worth? #199429
Bugs
ParticipantThis is not a valid question. It doesn’t matter what the best prices in this neighborhood are right now because they’re still way too high.
It’ll be at least another 2 years before prices in this neighborhood start to settle in. This home sold new in 2002 for $470,000. It’ll get there again and it probably won’t stop there. I think it might drop below $400k.
May 5, 2008 at 10:27 PM in reply to: San Elijo property; what do you think this is REALLY worth? #199452ParticipantThis is not a valid question. It doesn’t matter what the best prices in this neighborhood are right now because they’re still way too high.
It’ll be at least another 2 years before prices in this neighborhood start to settle in. This home sold new in 2002 for $470,000. It’ll get there again and it probably won’t stop there. I think it might drop below $400k.
May 5, 2008 at 10:27 PM in reply to: San Elijo property; what do you think this is REALLY worth? #199478ParticipantThis is not a valid question. It doesn’t matter what the best prices in this neighborhood are right now because they’re still way too high.
It’ll be at least another 2 years before prices in this neighborhood start to settle in. This home sold new in 2002 for $470,000. It’ll get there again and it probably won’t stop there. I think it might drop below $400k.
May 5, 2008 at 10:27 PM in reply to: San Elijo property; what do you think this is REALLY worth? #199516ParticipantThis is not a valid question. It doesn’t matter what the best prices in this neighborhood are right now because they’re still way too high.
It’ll be at least another 2 years before prices in this neighborhood start to settle in. This home sold new in 2002 for $470,000. It’ll get there again and it probably won’t stop there. I think it might drop below $400k.
ParticipantOh, so now NAR is talking about data distribution between datasets.
C-S uses a 3-tier approach involving matched pairs. I’ve seen nothing from NAR that even comes near that in terms of efficacy. NAR generally relies on the blunt-spoon median comparing years against each other as if they all had the same composition. Yun has a lot of nerve criticizing Shiller.
ParticipantOh, so now NAR is talking about data distribution between datasets.
C-S uses a 3-tier approach involving matched pairs. I’ve seen nothing from NAR that even comes near that in terms of efficacy. NAR generally relies on the blunt-spoon median comparing years against each other as if they all had the same composition. Yun has a lot of nerve criticizing Shiller.
ParticipantOh, so now NAR is talking about data distribution between datasets.
C-S uses a 3-tier approach involving matched pairs. I’ve seen nothing from NAR that even comes near that in terms of efficacy. NAR generally relies on the blunt-spoon median comparing years against each other as if they all had the same composition. Yun has a lot of nerve criticizing Shiller.
ParticipantOh, so now NAR is talking about data distribution between datasets.
C-S uses a 3-tier approach involving matched pairs. I’ve seen nothing from NAR that even comes near that in terms of efficacy. NAR generally relies on the blunt-spoon median comparing years against each other as if they all had the same composition. Yun has a lot of nerve criticizing Shiller.
ParticipantOh, so now NAR is talking about data distribution between datasets.
C-S uses a 3-tier approach involving matched pairs. I’ve seen nothing from NAR that even comes near that in terms of efficacy. NAR generally relies on the blunt-spoon median comparing years against each other as if they all had the same composition. Yun has a lot of nerve criticizing Shiller.
ParticipantInherited wealth is certainly the easiest way to get ahead, but it can’t be considered an indication of anything other than luck.
ParticipantInherited wealth is certainly the easiest way to get ahead, but it can’t be considered an indication of anything other than luck.
ParticipantInherited wealth is certainly the easiest way to get ahead, but it can’t be considered an indication of anything other than luck.
ParticipantInherited wealth is certainly the easiest way to get ahead, but it can’t be considered an indication of anything other than luck.
ParticipantInherited wealth is certainly the easiest way to get ahead, but it can’t be considered an indication of anything other than luck.
-
AuthorPosts
