Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Bugs
ParticipantAnd they said it would never happen in Carlsbad. Tsk, tsk.
ParticipantAnd they said it would never happen in Carlsbad. Tsk, tsk.
ParticipantAnd they said it would never happen in Carlsbad. Tsk, tsk.
ParticipantAnd they said it would never happen in Carlsbad. Tsk, tsk.
ParticipantThere’s “too big to fail”, and then the next step after that is “too big to bail out”. Personally, I think we passed the former 4 years ago and we’re now into the latter. All the talk is just that – talk. Unless we’re looking for a U.S. dollar trading at parity with the Mexican peso this problem is too big to simply devalue away.
Don’t forget, price correction via inflation makes everything else more expensive too. Loss of value is loss of value no matter how you look at it.
ParticipantThere’s “too big to fail”, and then the next step after that is “too big to bail out”. Personally, I think we passed the former 4 years ago and we’re now into the latter. All the talk is just that – talk. Unless we’re looking for a U.S. dollar trading at parity with the Mexican peso this problem is too big to simply devalue away.
Don’t forget, price correction via inflation makes everything else more expensive too. Loss of value is loss of value no matter how you look at it.
ParticipantThere’s “too big to fail”, and then the next step after that is “too big to bail out”. Personally, I think we passed the former 4 years ago and we’re now into the latter. All the talk is just that – talk. Unless we’re looking for a U.S. dollar trading at parity with the Mexican peso this problem is too big to simply devalue away.
Don’t forget, price correction via inflation makes everything else more expensive too. Loss of value is loss of value no matter how you look at it.
ParticipantThere’s “too big to fail”, and then the next step after that is “too big to bail out”. Personally, I think we passed the former 4 years ago and we’re now into the latter. All the talk is just that – talk. Unless we’re looking for a U.S. dollar trading at parity with the Mexican peso this problem is too big to simply devalue away.
Don’t forget, price correction via inflation makes everything else more expensive too. Loss of value is loss of value no matter how you look at it.
ParticipantThere’s “too big to fail”, and then the next step after that is “too big to bail out”. Personally, I think we passed the former 4 years ago and we’re now into the latter. All the talk is just that – talk. Unless we’re looking for a U.S. dollar trading at parity with the Mexican peso this problem is too big to simply devalue away.
Don’t forget, price correction via inflation makes everything else more expensive too. Loss of value is loss of value no matter how you look at it.
ParticipantDuring the last bust the average rate of loss was about 5% per year, and believe me, that did plenty of damage. I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again: In RE parlance, an 8%-10% decrease in values over a single year would be a LOT of movement.
I strongly doubt we’ll exceed that rate, but then again I never thought the last run up would go as far as it did, either.
ParticipantDuring the last bust the average rate of loss was about 5% per year, and believe me, that did plenty of damage. I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again: In RE parlance, an 8%-10% decrease in values over a single year would be a LOT of movement.
I strongly doubt we’ll exceed that rate, but then again I never thought the last run up would go as far as it did, either.
ParticipantDuring the last bust the average rate of loss was about 5% per year, and believe me, that did plenty of damage. I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again: In RE parlance, an 8%-10% decrease in values over a single year would be a LOT of movement.
I strongly doubt we’ll exceed that rate, but then again I never thought the last run up would go as far as it did, either.
ParticipantDuring the last bust the average rate of loss was about 5% per year, and believe me, that did plenty of damage. I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again: In RE parlance, an 8%-10% decrease in values over a single year would be a LOT of movement.
I strongly doubt we’ll exceed that rate, but then again I never thought the last run up would go as far as it did, either.
ParticipantDuring the last bust the average rate of loss was about 5% per year, and believe me, that did plenty of damage. I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again: In RE parlance, an 8%-10% decrease in values over a single year would be a LOT of movement.
I strongly doubt we’ll exceed that rate, but then again I never thought the last run up would go as far as it did, either.
-
AuthorPosts
