- This topic has 331 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by
NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
November 30, 2007 at 8:19 PM #11032
-
December 1, 2007 at 12:30 AM #106092
Bugs
ParticipantAnd they said it would never happen in Carlsbad. Tsk, tsk.
-
December 1, 2007 at 10:48 AM #106276
sdrealtor
ParticipantSEH is getting slaughtered as expected by everyone. Those houses on Maritime are not in Aviara. There are also under the biggest powerlines I have ever seen not to mention impacted by frequent landings and takeoffs at Palomar Airport.
-
December 1, 2007 at 12:17 PM #106361
svelte
ParticipantThose particular homes don’t appear to be near the powerlines, but they both do back up to a busy 4 lane road.
As everyone keeps saying, only the homes that are impeccable in all respects are going to sell in this environment. If the home has warts it is going to get kicked in the teeth.
Wouldn’t you do the same thing if you were a buyer with zillions of choices?
-
December 1, 2007 at 1:17 PM #106401
sdrealtor
ParticipantHUH? Have you ever been to these homes? I have and they are most definitely under some of the biggest transmission lines in the area.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:26 PM #106621
svelte
ParticipantHUH? Have you ever been to these homes? I have and they are most definitely under some of the biggest transmission lines in the area.
The nearest of the two is 1603:
http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=66110966
The Zillow pic matches my memory. The power lines are about 400-500 feet to the right (pan to the right in the pic).
Unless they have built new powerlines directly overhead since the Zillow pic was taken, they appear to be near but not under the powerlines. I supposed we could argue about whether 400-500 ft is too close. Apparently it is for you. -
December 1, 2007 at 3:38 PM #106641
waiting for bottom
ParticipantLooks like we caught sdrealtor using both sides of the “it is what it is” argument…..or is it “close enough?”
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:41 PM #106646
waiting for bottom
ParticipantI was speaking only to the 92009 that I have a prayer of affording.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:44 PM #106661
waiting for bottom
ParticipantAlso, I see no difference between SEH (92078), Rancho Carillo (92009) and Calavera Hills (92010) from a livablility standpoint.
I would take SEH every time. It is cheaper, mostly newer, and the schools are better than Calavera, same as Carillo.
But I want to live in 92011. Just waiting for the virus to infect them. The data here shows it is starting.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:56 PM #106691
farbet
Participantsd renter asked you whether you visited the locations on Maritime physically. DID YOU? I DID
1. There are the power lines. Huge ones.
2.There was a short sale a few months ago at the house on Maritime and Black Rail.
3 While in the backyard(Poinsetta Road}. There was this strong odor of Horse PEE and Horse Manure from across
TRITON and Black Rail horse farm there.Huge horse fliesImagine a BBQ and the wind brings the smell.
Pity the fools that bought new houses on Triton Street about 20 feet(horse farm) across from the most awful smell
Triton has a few resales after a year. I wonder why !! -
December 1, 2007 at 4:00 PM #106706
niy38
Participantevery time I drive in Palomar Airport RD I smell it.
……………………………………….
3 While in the backyard(Poinsetta Road}. There was this strong odor of Horse PEE and Horse Manure from across
………………………………………… -
December 1, 2007 at 4:00 PM #106801
niy38
Participantevery time I drive in Palomar Airport RD I smell it.
……………………………………….
3 While in the backyard(Poinsetta Road}. There was this strong odor of Horse PEE and Horse Manure from across
………………………………………… -
December 1, 2007 at 4:00 PM #106834
niy38
Participantevery time I drive in Palomar Airport RD I smell it.
……………………………………….
3 While in the backyard(Poinsetta Road}. There was this strong odor of Horse PEE and Horse Manure from across
………………………………………… -
December 1, 2007 at 4:00 PM #106841
niy38
Participantevery time I drive in Palomar Airport RD I smell it.
……………………………………….
3 While in the backyard(Poinsetta Road}. There was this strong odor of Horse PEE and Horse Manure from across
………………………………………… -
December 1, 2007 at 4:00 PM #106863
niy38
Participantevery time I drive in Palomar Airport RD I smell it.
……………………………………….
3 While in the backyard(Poinsetta Road}. There was this strong odor of Horse PEE and Horse Manure from across
………………………………………… -
December 1, 2007 at 3:56 PM #106786
farbet
Participantsd renter asked you whether you visited the locations on Maritime physically. DID YOU? I DID
1. There are the power lines. Huge ones.
2.There was a short sale a few months ago at the house on Maritime and Black Rail.
3 While in the backyard(Poinsetta Road}. There was this strong odor of Horse PEE and Horse Manure from across
TRITON and Black Rail horse farm there.Huge horse fliesImagine a BBQ and the wind brings the smell.
Pity the fools that bought new houses on Triton Street about 20 feet(horse farm) across from the most awful smell
Triton has a few resales after a year. I wonder why !! -
December 1, 2007 at 3:56 PM #106819
farbet
Participantsd renter asked you whether you visited the locations on Maritime physically. DID YOU? I DID
1. There are the power lines. Huge ones.
2.There was a short sale a few months ago at the house on Maritime and Black Rail.
3 While in the backyard(Poinsetta Road}. There was this strong odor of Horse PEE and Horse Manure from across
TRITON and Black Rail horse farm there.Huge horse fliesImagine a BBQ and the wind brings the smell.
Pity the fools that bought new houses on Triton Street about 20 feet(horse farm) across from the most awful smell
Triton has a few resales after a year. I wonder why !! -
December 1, 2007 at 3:56 PM #106826
farbet
Participantsd renter asked you whether you visited the locations on Maritime physically. DID YOU? I DID
1. There are the power lines. Huge ones.
2.There was a short sale a few months ago at the house on Maritime and Black Rail.
3 While in the backyard(Poinsetta Road}. There was this strong odor of Horse PEE and Horse Manure from across
TRITON and Black Rail horse farm there.Huge horse fliesImagine a BBQ and the wind brings the smell.
Pity the fools that bought new houses on Triton Street about 20 feet(horse farm) across from the most awful smell
Triton has a few resales after a year. I wonder why !! -
December 1, 2007 at 3:56 PM #106848
farbet
Participantsd renter asked you whether you visited the locations on Maritime physically. DID YOU? I DID
1. There are the power lines. Huge ones.
2.There was a short sale a few months ago at the house on Maritime and Black Rail.
3 While in the backyard(Poinsetta Road}. There was this strong odor of Horse PEE and Horse Manure from across
TRITON and Black Rail horse farm there.Huge horse fliesImagine a BBQ and the wind brings the smell.
Pity the fools that bought new houses on Triton Street about 20 feet(horse farm) across from the most awful smell
Triton has a few resales after a year. I wonder why !! -
December 1, 2007 at 3:56 PM #106701
niy38
ParticipantI would choose Santa Fe Hill ( 92069) over SEH:
Santa Fe Hill is much affordable than SEH, and
it has good primary school. Very easy access to
78 and shopping and recreation center is just across
78. -
December 1, 2007 at 4:02 PM #106710
waiting for bottom
ParticipantYes, I have phisically visited them and yes I would buy them at the right price.
92069 over SEH??? Give me a break. Primary school may be OK at best, but the middle school over there is horrible. Puhleeeeze.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:08 PM #106725
farbet
ParticipantPrices are staring to crumble in 92009, 92011,92024.I do believe it will pick up in a few weeks.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:13 PM #106741
sdrealtor
ParticipantFarbet prices have been declining in 009, 011 and 024 for 2 years at a slow and steady pace. The less desirable portions (Carillo etc.) have been hit harder. I believe the prices will strengthen a bit after the New Year as the relo folks come pouring in in their annual migration.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:18 PM #106745
farbet
ParticipantCorner of South Melrose & Rancho Santa Fe
Carlsbad, CA 9200953 Melrose –
COMING SOON! 53 Melrose is a charming new-home community designed with young and growing families in mind. Whether you’re just starting out or planning to move up to a bigger home with better amenities, your address of choice is finally here. Located in Carlsbad, 53 Melrose keeps you near every place you want to be. Shopping, dining, and a range of adventure parks and family-friendly outdoor recreation is literally at your doorstep. Come home to the good life waiting to be lived at 53 Melrose.
I am waiting for this . -
December 1, 2007 at 4:33 PM #106767
sdrealtor
ParticipantFarbet
The website said prices are expected to start in the 600’s.sdr
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:33 PM #106860
sdrealtor
ParticipantFarbet
The website said prices are expected to start in the 600’s.sdr
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:33 PM #106894
sdrealtor
ParticipantFarbet
The website said prices are expected to start in the 600’s.sdr
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:33 PM #106901
sdrealtor
ParticipantFarbet
The website said prices are expected to start in the 600’s.sdr
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:33 PM #106923
sdrealtor
ParticipantFarbet
The website said prices are expected to start in the 600’s.sdr
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:18 PM #106840
farbet
ParticipantCorner of South Melrose & Rancho Santa Fe
Carlsbad, CA 9200953 Melrose –
COMING SOON! 53 Melrose is a charming new-home community designed with young and growing families in mind. Whether you’re just starting out or planning to move up to a bigger home with better amenities, your address of choice is finally here. Located in Carlsbad, 53 Melrose keeps you near every place you want to be. Shopping, dining, and a range of adventure parks and family-friendly outdoor recreation is literally at your doorstep. Come home to the good life waiting to be lived at 53 Melrose.
I am waiting for this . -
December 1, 2007 at 4:18 PM #106874
farbet
ParticipantCorner of South Melrose & Rancho Santa Fe
Carlsbad, CA 9200953 Melrose –
COMING SOON! 53 Melrose is a charming new-home community designed with young and growing families in mind. Whether you’re just starting out or planning to move up to a bigger home with better amenities, your address of choice is finally here. Located in Carlsbad, 53 Melrose keeps you near every place you want to be. Shopping, dining, and a range of adventure parks and family-friendly outdoor recreation is literally at your doorstep. Come home to the good life waiting to be lived at 53 Melrose.
I am waiting for this . -
December 1, 2007 at 4:18 PM #106883
farbet
ParticipantCorner of South Melrose & Rancho Santa Fe
Carlsbad, CA 9200953 Melrose –
COMING SOON! 53 Melrose is a charming new-home community designed with young and growing families in mind. Whether you’re just starting out or planning to move up to a bigger home with better amenities, your address of choice is finally here. Located in Carlsbad, 53 Melrose keeps you near every place you want to be. Shopping, dining, and a range of adventure parks and family-friendly outdoor recreation is literally at your doorstep. Come home to the good life waiting to be lived at 53 Melrose.
I am waiting for this . -
December 1, 2007 at 4:18 PM #106902
farbet
ParticipantCorner of South Melrose & Rancho Santa Fe
Carlsbad, CA 9200953 Melrose –
COMING SOON! 53 Melrose is a charming new-home community designed with young and growing families in mind. Whether you’re just starting out or planning to move up to a bigger home with better amenities, your address of choice is finally here. Located in Carlsbad, 53 Melrose keeps you near every place you want to be. Shopping, dining, and a range of adventure parks and family-friendly outdoor recreation is literally at your doorstep. Come home to the good life waiting to be lived at 53 Melrose.
I am waiting for this . -
December 1, 2007 at 4:20 PM #106751
waiting for bottom
ParticipantThere you go being a bull again. Prices will rise in 2008???
What relo person is going to buy in this market? Every single one I know (myself included) has decided to rent.
SEH Mello roos are only huge in the Questhaven area. They are ~$2000 near the town center. Calavera, Carillo, and other parts of Carlsbad have ~$800 fees. $100 per month difference in not huge.
High school? My oldest kid is 2. I’ll give them 12 years to get that straightened out.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:31 PM #106761
sdrealtor
ParticipantDidnt say prices will rise, I said they will strengthen as demand returns meaning that prices wont continuing dropping steeply through Spring.
Plenty of Relo people will buy. They always do.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:33 PM #106772
farbet
Participantsdr, How many corporate owned houses for sale on the MLS.
Those that are for sale are taking a beating. -
December 1, 2007 at 4:34 PM #106778
sdrealtor
ParticipantVery few in 92009, 92011 and 92024.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:34 PM #106871
sdrealtor
ParticipantVery few in 92009, 92011 and 92024.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:34 PM #106904
sdrealtor
ParticipantVery few in 92009, 92011 and 92024.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:34 PM #106911
sdrealtor
ParticipantVery few in 92009, 92011 and 92024.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:34 PM #106933
sdrealtor
ParticipantVery few in 92009, 92011 and 92024.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:33 PM #106865
farbet
Participantsdr, How many corporate owned houses for sale on the MLS.
Those that are for sale are taking a beating. -
December 1, 2007 at 4:33 PM #106899
farbet
Participantsdr, How many corporate owned houses for sale on the MLS.
Those that are for sale are taking a beating. -
December 1, 2007 at 4:33 PM #106905
farbet
Participantsdr, How many corporate owned houses for sale on the MLS.
Those that are for sale are taking a beating. -
December 1, 2007 at 4:33 PM #106928
farbet
Participantsdr, How many corporate owned houses for sale on the MLS.
Those that are for sale are taking a beating. -
December 1, 2007 at 4:39 PM #106785
waiting for bottom
Participantsdrealtor – you may or may not be a knowledable guy but you are talking out of both sides of your mouth consistenly here.
Any way you slice it, you are being bullish on the biggest bear market we have ever seen. “I didn’t say they would rise, I said they would stregnthen”. You should run for President as a Senator from MA with all this flip-flopping.
They always buy, right. Just like houses always go up in value.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:43 PM #106797
waiting for bottom
ParticipantRelo people who have not bought since I move here in August:
Corporate finance – 150K+, rents in Carrillo
Operations Director – 130-160K, rents in “Aviara”
Lawyer – don’t know – rents in Alga Hills
Construction manager – 150K+ – rents in Oceanside
Self employed – don’t know but spends like crazy – rents in Calavera HillsThat’s 5 in 3 months. All waiting for the bottom just like yours truly. These are just random people my wife has met through play groups.
-
December 1, 2007 at 5:04 PM #106815
farbet
ParticipantWith the Credit Crunch and Corporate uncertainty for 2008,why would people buy.
All those office buildings are mostly empty in Carlsbad and in San Diego as a whole. -
December 1, 2007 at 5:04 PM #106912
farbet
ParticipantWith the Credit Crunch and Corporate uncertainty for 2008,why would people buy.
All those office buildings are mostly empty in Carlsbad and in San Diego as a whole. -
December 1, 2007 at 5:04 PM #106944
farbet
ParticipantWith the Credit Crunch and Corporate uncertainty for 2008,why would people buy.
All those office buildings are mostly empty in Carlsbad and in San Diego as a whole. -
December 1, 2007 at 5:04 PM #106951
farbet
ParticipantWith the Credit Crunch and Corporate uncertainty for 2008,why would people buy.
All those office buildings are mostly empty in Carlsbad and in San Diego as a whole. -
December 1, 2007 at 5:04 PM #106971
farbet
ParticipantWith the Credit Crunch and Corporate uncertainty for 2008,why would people buy.
All those office buildings are mostly empty in Carlsbad and in San Diego as a whole. -
December 1, 2007 at 4:43 PM #106893
waiting for bottom
ParticipantRelo people who have not bought since I move here in August:
Corporate finance – 150K+, rents in Carrillo
Operations Director – 130-160K, rents in “Aviara”
Lawyer – don’t know – rents in Alga Hills
Construction manager – 150K+ – rents in Oceanside
Self employed – don’t know but spends like crazy – rents in Calavera HillsThat’s 5 in 3 months. All waiting for the bottom just like yours truly. These are just random people my wife has met through play groups.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:43 PM #106924
waiting for bottom
ParticipantRelo people who have not bought since I move here in August:
Corporate finance – 150K+, rents in Carrillo
Operations Director – 130-160K, rents in “Aviara”
Lawyer – don’t know – rents in Alga Hills
Construction manager – 150K+ – rents in Oceanside
Self employed – don’t know but spends like crazy – rents in Calavera HillsThat’s 5 in 3 months. All waiting for the bottom just like yours truly. These are just random people my wife has met through play groups.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:43 PM #106931
waiting for bottom
ParticipantRelo people who have not bought since I move here in August:
Corporate finance – 150K+, rents in Carrillo
Operations Director – 130-160K, rents in “Aviara”
Lawyer – don’t know – rents in Alga Hills
Construction manager – 150K+ – rents in Oceanside
Self employed – don’t know but spends like crazy – rents in Calavera HillsThat’s 5 in 3 months. All waiting for the bottom just like yours truly. These are just random people my wife has met through play groups.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:43 PM #106952
waiting for bottom
ParticipantRelo people who have not bought since I move here in August:
Corporate finance – 150K+, rents in Carrillo
Operations Director – 130-160K, rents in “Aviara”
Lawyer – don’t know – rents in Alga Hills
Construction manager – 150K+ – rents in Oceanside
Self employed – don’t know but spends like crazy – rents in Calavera HillsThat’s 5 in 3 months. All waiting for the bottom just like yours truly. These are just random people my wife has met through play groups.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:39 PM #106881
waiting for bottom
Participantsdrealtor – you may or may not be a knowledable guy but you are talking out of both sides of your mouth consistenly here.
Any way you slice it, you are being bullish on the biggest bear market we have ever seen. “I didn’t say they would rise, I said they would stregnthen”. You should run for President as a Senator from MA with all this flip-flopping.
They always buy, right. Just like houses always go up in value.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:39 PM #106914
waiting for bottom
Participantsdrealtor – you may or may not be a knowledable guy but you are talking out of both sides of your mouth consistenly here.
Any way you slice it, you are being bullish on the biggest bear market we have ever seen. “I didn’t say they would rise, I said they would stregnthen”. You should run for President as a Senator from MA with all this flip-flopping.
They always buy, right. Just like houses always go up in value.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:39 PM #106921
waiting for bottom
Participantsdrealtor – you may or may not be a knowledable guy but you are talking out of both sides of your mouth consistenly here.
Any way you slice it, you are being bullish on the biggest bear market we have ever seen. “I didn’t say they would rise, I said they would stregnthen”. You should run for President as a Senator from MA with all this flip-flopping.
They always buy, right. Just like houses always go up in value.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:39 PM #106943
waiting for bottom
Participantsdrealtor – you may or may not be a knowledable guy but you are talking out of both sides of your mouth consistenly here.
Any way you slice it, you are being bullish on the biggest bear market we have ever seen. “I didn’t say they would rise, I said they would stregnthen”. You should run for President as a Senator from MA with all this flip-flopping.
They always buy, right. Just like houses always go up in value.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:45 PM #106783
niy38
Participantsdr, what kind of relo people will buy? how many ?
I moved to SD 2 years ago from Phoenix and my salary
doubled but still can not afford a condo in Carlsbad! -
December 1, 2007 at 7:28 PM #106896
sdrealtor
ParticipantPlenty of people buy. I have a friend that moved here from the Midwest. His company bought his house to get him here which he couldnt have sold otherwise. Both he and his wife got big time raises to come here as well as a rich relo package. HH Income went from about 200K to 350K. They bought a house with about 35% down and a mortgage about 1.5X their HH income. They love their house and are glad they bought.
The prices will be lower this Spring than last by about 5 to 10% in this area. One by one your friends will buy as they find they can afford what they truly want. Some this Spring and some next and so on. People with 200K HH incomes can easily afford 500K 30 yr fixed rate mortgages and will start finding homes they like in great areas between 600K and 800K. If you dont buy others will. If you expect to get a great house around here under 500K you will be sadly disappointed IMHO.
-
December 1, 2007 at 8:37 PM #106922
niy38
Participantlet’s do some math here:
1.5 * 350k = 525 K525/0.65=807 K
with this price, u can find decent SFH in 92009 or
SEH, or even 92011.BUT, the key is: how many family having income
350K ? don’t tell me those “Plenty of people” are all
CEO, CFO, lawyer, doctor, etc.sdr, now I find u r really a realtor !!
-
December 1, 2007 at 9:28 PM #106985
SD Realtor
ParticipantOne thing that I find intriguing is that whenever I post something, invariably very few people interpret what I am writing in the same manner as I thought they would when I posted it….
I read sdr’s post and I don’t view it as being bullish so I guess you guys would paint me in black and white stripes and label me a bad guy… I view his posts in the same manner as my own, that is, I do not see bullishness or denial of a bull market. Rather the contrary…I also do see the same thing that he has said, that the zip codes here in question are going down and have gone down for awhile now. Have these zips fallen in the same manner or at the same rate as say Eastlake? No… can they? Perhaps. Will it happen in a few weeks time? No it will not.
I also would forecast a spring bump. Not a rally where spring prices exceed last spring prices, but an INCREASE in activity because that is typical of seasonal cycles regardless of the secular trend. To expect otherwise would indeed be illogical. Does it signify a change in direction? Not at all, but my interpretation of sdrs posts didn’t detect that at all. I am not saying a million midwesterners are gonna relocate here or anything like that. I am just saying that overall data ALWAYS SHOWS that there are more sales closed in the months of march, april, may and june then any other months. Back out those timeframes by 30 days (typical escrow length) and that would indicate that if there is anytime of the year that we see increases in homes going into escrow it is in the spring.
It is not a trend reversal nor is it being bullish. It is simply a statement of fact that there are always more closed escrows in the spring then any other time of year.
Why is that interpreted as being a bull? All secular markets have cyclical components last I checked. These increases do not mean a stalling of the depreciation cycle but they may serve to do a small amount of buoying in certain areas. It will fade as we move into summer…
SD Realtor
-
December 1, 2007 at 9:28 PM #107082
SD Realtor
ParticipantOne thing that I find intriguing is that whenever I post something, invariably very few people interpret what I am writing in the same manner as I thought they would when I posted it….
I read sdr’s post and I don’t view it as being bullish so I guess you guys would paint me in black and white stripes and label me a bad guy… I view his posts in the same manner as my own, that is, I do not see bullishness or denial of a bull market. Rather the contrary…I also do see the same thing that he has said, that the zip codes here in question are going down and have gone down for awhile now. Have these zips fallen in the same manner or at the same rate as say Eastlake? No… can they? Perhaps. Will it happen in a few weeks time? No it will not.
I also would forecast a spring bump. Not a rally where spring prices exceed last spring prices, but an INCREASE in activity because that is typical of seasonal cycles regardless of the secular trend. To expect otherwise would indeed be illogical. Does it signify a change in direction? Not at all, but my interpretation of sdrs posts didn’t detect that at all. I am not saying a million midwesterners are gonna relocate here or anything like that. I am just saying that overall data ALWAYS SHOWS that there are more sales closed in the months of march, april, may and june then any other months. Back out those timeframes by 30 days (typical escrow length) and that would indicate that if there is anytime of the year that we see increases in homes going into escrow it is in the spring.
It is not a trend reversal nor is it being bullish. It is simply a statement of fact that there are always more closed escrows in the spring then any other time of year.
Why is that interpreted as being a bull? All secular markets have cyclical components last I checked. These increases do not mean a stalling of the depreciation cycle but they may serve to do a small amount of buoying in certain areas. It will fade as we move into summer…
SD Realtor
-
December 1, 2007 at 9:28 PM #107114
SD Realtor
ParticipantOne thing that I find intriguing is that whenever I post something, invariably very few people interpret what I am writing in the same manner as I thought they would when I posted it….
I read sdr’s post and I don’t view it as being bullish so I guess you guys would paint me in black and white stripes and label me a bad guy… I view his posts in the same manner as my own, that is, I do not see bullishness or denial of a bull market. Rather the contrary…I also do see the same thing that he has said, that the zip codes here in question are going down and have gone down for awhile now. Have these zips fallen in the same manner or at the same rate as say Eastlake? No… can they? Perhaps. Will it happen in a few weeks time? No it will not.
I also would forecast a spring bump. Not a rally where spring prices exceed last spring prices, but an INCREASE in activity because that is typical of seasonal cycles regardless of the secular trend. To expect otherwise would indeed be illogical. Does it signify a change in direction? Not at all, but my interpretation of sdrs posts didn’t detect that at all. I am not saying a million midwesterners are gonna relocate here or anything like that. I am just saying that overall data ALWAYS SHOWS that there are more sales closed in the months of march, april, may and june then any other months. Back out those timeframes by 30 days (typical escrow length) and that would indicate that if there is anytime of the year that we see increases in homes going into escrow it is in the spring.
It is not a trend reversal nor is it being bullish. It is simply a statement of fact that there are always more closed escrows in the spring then any other time of year.
Why is that interpreted as being a bull? All secular markets have cyclical components last I checked. These increases do not mean a stalling of the depreciation cycle but they may serve to do a small amount of buoying in certain areas. It will fade as we move into summer…
SD Realtor
-
December 1, 2007 at 9:28 PM #107121
SD Realtor
ParticipantOne thing that I find intriguing is that whenever I post something, invariably very few people interpret what I am writing in the same manner as I thought they would when I posted it….
I read sdr’s post and I don’t view it as being bullish so I guess you guys would paint me in black and white stripes and label me a bad guy… I view his posts in the same manner as my own, that is, I do not see bullishness or denial of a bull market. Rather the contrary…I also do see the same thing that he has said, that the zip codes here in question are going down and have gone down for awhile now. Have these zips fallen in the same manner or at the same rate as say Eastlake? No… can they? Perhaps. Will it happen in a few weeks time? No it will not.
I also would forecast a spring bump. Not a rally where spring prices exceed last spring prices, but an INCREASE in activity because that is typical of seasonal cycles regardless of the secular trend. To expect otherwise would indeed be illogical. Does it signify a change in direction? Not at all, but my interpretation of sdrs posts didn’t detect that at all. I am not saying a million midwesterners are gonna relocate here or anything like that. I am just saying that overall data ALWAYS SHOWS that there are more sales closed in the months of march, april, may and june then any other months. Back out those timeframes by 30 days (typical escrow length) and that would indicate that if there is anytime of the year that we see increases in homes going into escrow it is in the spring.
It is not a trend reversal nor is it being bullish. It is simply a statement of fact that there are always more closed escrows in the spring then any other time of year.
Why is that interpreted as being a bull? All secular markets have cyclical components last I checked. These increases do not mean a stalling of the depreciation cycle but they may serve to do a small amount of buoying in certain areas. It will fade as we move into summer…
SD Realtor
-
December 1, 2007 at 9:28 PM #107143
SD Realtor
ParticipantOne thing that I find intriguing is that whenever I post something, invariably very few people interpret what I am writing in the same manner as I thought they would when I posted it….
I read sdr’s post and I don’t view it as being bullish so I guess you guys would paint me in black and white stripes and label me a bad guy… I view his posts in the same manner as my own, that is, I do not see bullishness or denial of a bull market. Rather the contrary…I also do see the same thing that he has said, that the zip codes here in question are going down and have gone down for awhile now. Have these zips fallen in the same manner or at the same rate as say Eastlake? No… can they? Perhaps. Will it happen in a few weeks time? No it will not.
I also would forecast a spring bump. Not a rally where spring prices exceed last spring prices, but an INCREASE in activity because that is typical of seasonal cycles regardless of the secular trend. To expect otherwise would indeed be illogical. Does it signify a change in direction? Not at all, but my interpretation of sdrs posts didn’t detect that at all. I am not saying a million midwesterners are gonna relocate here or anything like that. I am just saying that overall data ALWAYS SHOWS that there are more sales closed in the months of march, april, may and june then any other months. Back out those timeframes by 30 days (typical escrow length) and that would indicate that if there is anytime of the year that we see increases in homes going into escrow it is in the spring.
It is not a trend reversal nor is it being bullish. It is simply a statement of fact that there are always more closed escrows in the spring then any other time of year.
Why is that interpreted as being a bull? All secular markets have cyclical components last I checked. These increases do not mean a stalling of the depreciation cycle but they may serve to do a small amount of buoying in certain areas. It will fade as we move into summer…
SD Realtor
-
December 1, 2007 at 9:28 PM #106980
sdrealtor
ParticipantYour math isnt far off but your idea of prices are. You can buy a 3000+ sq ft nearly new home for 650,000 in SEH. heck you can probably get a new one for that. You could also find a very nice newer home in 92009 this year if you knew where to look and how to find it.
My friends dont fit anything close to what you described. They are two very well educated and experienced professionals but neither drs, lawyers or execs. Plenty of people dont make that kind of money but around here alot do and I know many that make alot more. Heck even waitingforthebottom’s wife has met several women whose husbands make 150K plus. She doesnt get to meet the wives who are working and also making as much (sometimes more) as their husbands.
This is a county of 3,000,000 people! Dont be so naive to believe there arent alot of people making good money one way or another. Where do you think those people want to live….Jamul?
(sorry Rus, drinkin again)
-
December 1, 2007 at 10:21 PM #107035
NotCranky
ParticipantSo every time you have a drink you need to bad mouth South Eastern Rancho Santa Fe? I mean Jamul.
-
December 1, 2007 at 11:10 PM #107070
waiting for bottom
ParticipantOf course we all know that sals activity will pick up in the spring, that’s common sense. I just don’t think it will be at a higher price than we have today. I’m quite certain it will be lower. There will a a few home builders with some major slashes in January that will start it all. Maybe even the REO’s will start moving by then.
I don’t expect to pay less than $500K. If I could get 4 bedrooms and 2500 sq ft in a nice neighborhood in 92011 for 600-650, I would buy today. Right now, that is 799 which is unacceptable. It was 899 a few months ago….but 350 5 years ago. I will pay 5% for inflation since purchase, nothing more.
My company bought my old house in the midwest and will pay my closing costs on a new house if I buy before August. But why would I risk losing 100K to save 15K? I would like to think that other relo’s have at least half a brain to figure that out.
This is why I am waiting for the bottom.
-
December 1, 2007 at 11:37 PM #107115
SD Realtor
Participantwaiting for bottom, well explained… you could be right…I guess our rides to the bottom arrive at the same destination by different paths. My ride to the bottom (regarding pricing) is filled with incremental price increases and larger/longer losses and the losses simply outweigh the gains over the next few years….
My concern is that there are still SOOOOO MANY sellers in denial out there who actually believe that they can list in the spring at a higher price then they left off when they bailed the market in October. Who knows what malarky they also may have been fed by some agent who wants to retain the listing as well ya know? To me we are still in the early stages of this massive depreciation event.
I guess all I am saying is don’t ever doubt the (stupidity, stubborness, boneheadedness, greediness) of sellers this early in the cycle. Also all it takes is one home to go for a little bit higher value to spark a false wave of optimism and everyone reacts on it…this can happen in many neighborhoods this spring…
Lots of sellers love to react on a little good news rather then alot of bad news…
Personally I do think we will get a little listing price bump in the spring due to a bit more sales activity, a bit more false hope, a lot more denial, and all of this will vary with type of housing and location. That is just my opinion and yes it could very well be wrong just like my bet taking the colts over the chargers and my reluctance to bet the jags over the chargers was wrong…
We will know the answer in a few months!
SD Realtor
-
December 2, 2007 at 8:07 AM #107228
hugo
ParticipantCan someone post a link to a SD area zipcode map? (including north county)
Thanks
-
December 2, 2007 at 8:07 AM #107322
hugo
ParticipantCan someone post a link to a SD area zipcode map? (including north county)
Thanks
-
December 2, 2007 at 8:07 AM #107356
hugo
ParticipantCan someone post a link to a SD area zipcode map? (including north county)
Thanks
-
December 2, 2007 at 8:07 AM #107359
hugo
ParticipantCan someone post a link to a SD area zipcode map? (including north county)
Thanks
-
December 2, 2007 at 8:07 AM #107382
hugo
ParticipantCan someone post a link to a SD area zipcode map? (including north county)
Thanks
-
December 1, 2007 at 11:37 PM #107209
SD Realtor
Participantwaiting for bottom, well explained… you could be right…I guess our rides to the bottom arrive at the same destination by different paths. My ride to the bottom (regarding pricing) is filled with incremental price increases and larger/longer losses and the losses simply outweigh the gains over the next few years….
My concern is that there are still SOOOOO MANY sellers in denial out there who actually believe that they can list in the spring at a higher price then they left off when they bailed the market in October. Who knows what malarky they also may have been fed by some agent who wants to retain the listing as well ya know? To me we are still in the early stages of this massive depreciation event.
I guess all I am saying is don’t ever doubt the (stupidity, stubborness, boneheadedness, greediness) of sellers this early in the cycle. Also all it takes is one home to go for a little bit higher value to spark a false wave of optimism and everyone reacts on it…this can happen in many neighborhoods this spring…
Lots of sellers love to react on a little good news rather then alot of bad news…
Personally I do think we will get a little listing price bump in the spring due to a bit more sales activity, a bit more false hope, a lot more denial, and all of this will vary with type of housing and location. That is just my opinion and yes it could very well be wrong just like my bet taking the colts over the chargers and my reluctance to bet the jags over the chargers was wrong…
We will know the answer in a few months!
SD Realtor
-
December 1, 2007 at 11:37 PM #107245
SD Realtor
Participantwaiting for bottom, well explained… you could be right…I guess our rides to the bottom arrive at the same destination by different paths. My ride to the bottom (regarding pricing) is filled with incremental price increases and larger/longer losses and the losses simply outweigh the gains over the next few years….
My concern is that there are still SOOOOO MANY sellers in denial out there who actually believe that they can list in the spring at a higher price then they left off when they bailed the market in October. Who knows what malarky they also may have been fed by some agent who wants to retain the listing as well ya know? To me we are still in the early stages of this massive depreciation event.
I guess all I am saying is don’t ever doubt the (stupidity, stubborness, boneheadedness, greediness) of sellers this early in the cycle. Also all it takes is one home to go for a little bit higher value to spark a false wave of optimism and everyone reacts on it…this can happen in many neighborhoods this spring…
Lots of sellers love to react on a little good news rather then alot of bad news…
Personally I do think we will get a little listing price bump in the spring due to a bit more sales activity, a bit more false hope, a lot more denial, and all of this will vary with type of housing and location. That is just my opinion and yes it could very well be wrong just like my bet taking the colts over the chargers and my reluctance to bet the jags over the chargers was wrong…
We will know the answer in a few months!
SD Realtor
-
December 1, 2007 at 11:37 PM #107250
SD Realtor
Participantwaiting for bottom, well explained… you could be right…I guess our rides to the bottom arrive at the same destination by different paths. My ride to the bottom (regarding pricing) is filled with incremental price increases and larger/longer losses and the losses simply outweigh the gains over the next few years….
My concern is that there are still SOOOOO MANY sellers in denial out there who actually believe that they can list in the spring at a higher price then they left off when they bailed the market in October. Who knows what malarky they also may have been fed by some agent who wants to retain the listing as well ya know? To me we are still in the early stages of this massive depreciation event.
I guess all I am saying is don’t ever doubt the (stupidity, stubborness, boneheadedness, greediness) of sellers this early in the cycle. Also all it takes is one home to go for a little bit higher value to spark a false wave of optimism and everyone reacts on it…this can happen in many neighborhoods this spring…
Lots of sellers love to react on a little good news rather then alot of bad news…
Personally I do think we will get a little listing price bump in the spring due to a bit more sales activity, a bit more false hope, a lot more denial, and all of this will vary with type of housing and location. That is just my opinion and yes it could very well be wrong just like my bet taking the colts over the chargers and my reluctance to bet the jags over the chargers was wrong…
We will know the answer in a few months!
SD Realtor
-
December 1, 2007 at 11:37 PM #107272
SD Realtor
Participantwaiting for bottom, well explained… you could be right…I guess our rides to the bottom arrive at the same destination by different paths. My ride to the bottom (regarding pricing) is filled with incremental price increases and larger/longer losses and the losses simply outweigh the gains over the next few years….
My concern is that there are still SOOOOO MANY sellers in denial out there who actually believe that they can list in the spring at a higher price then they left off when they bailed the market in October. Who knows what malarky they also may have been fed by some agent who wants to retain the listing as well ya know? To me we are still in the early stages of this massive depreciation event.
I guess all I am saying is don’t ever doubt the (stupidity, stubborness, boneheadedness, greediness) of sellers this early in the cycle. Also all it takes is one home to go for a little bit higher value to spark a false wave of optimism and everyone reacts on it…this can happen in many neighborhoods this spring…
Lots of sellers love to react on a little good news rather then alot of bad news…
Personally I do think we will get a little listing price bump in the spring due to a bit more sales activity, a bit more false hope, a lot more denial, and all of this will vary with type of housing and location. That is just my opinion and yes it could very well be wrong just like my bet taking the colts over the chargers and my reluctance to bet the jags over the chargers was wrong…
We will know the answer in a few months!
SD Realtor
-
December 2, 2007 at 9:05 AM #107251
sdrealtor
Participantwaiting for the bottom,
i dont know where you get your figures from but they are way off.Five years ago (In 2002), Mar Brisa homes were 450 to 500. Mariner’s Point homes w/o views were 600K. Homes in the real Aviara started at 550K at the very bottom end.
If you factor in 4% annual appreciation over 6 years that’s more than 25%. That could put Mar Brisa (the bottom end homes in that area in your price range) but not much else. The truth is they arent far off from that already as I’ve seen Mar Brisa homes go under 700K already.
Rus,
I just enjoy giving you the business. You seem to enjoy giving it to me also. Fair enough. -
December 2, 2007 at 9:14 AM #107261
NotCranky
ParticipantFine with me. It does worry me sometimes that the more sensitive or stodgy types get offended. I hope they realize I never shoot at someone who isn’t a little ornery themselves. I hope everyone understands that if I dish it out I can take it and that I am assuming that of the others. I was raised wrong.. what can I say.
-
December 2, 2007 at 9:16 AM #107266
sdrealtor
Participantsame here
-
December 2, 2007 at 10:09 AM #107317
NotCranky
ParticipantYou were raised wrong too? Don’t go around talking about it. They will put you in Jamul with the rest of us.
-
December 2, 2007 at 10:45 AM #107331
sdrealtor
ParticipantFrankly I’m surprised they haven’t already…
-
December 2, 2007 at 10:45 AM #107426
sdrealtor
ParticipantFrankly I’m surprised they haven’t already…
-
December 2, 2007 at 10:45 AM #107461
sdrealtor
ParticipantFrankly I’m surprised they haven’t already…
-
December 2, 2007 at 10:45 AM #107474
sdrealtor
ParticipantFrankly I’m surprised they haven’t already…
-
December 2, 2007 at 10:45 AM #107485
sdrealtor
ParticipantFrankly I’m surprised they haven’t already…
-
December 2, 2007 at 10:09 AM #107413
NotCranky
ParticipantYou were raised wrong too? Don’t go around talking about it. They will put you in Jamul with the rest of us.
-
December 2, 2007 at 10:09 AM #107448
NotCranky
ParticipantYou were raised wrong too? Don’t go around talking about it. They will put you in Jamul with the rest of us.
-
December 2, 2007 at 10:09 AM #107449
NotCranky
ParticipantYou were raised wrong too? Don’t go around talking about it. They will put you in Jamul with the rest of us.
-
December 2, 2007 at 10:09 AM #107459
NotCranky
ParticipantYou were raised wrong too? Don’t go around talking about it. They will put you in Jamul with the rest of us.
-
December 2, 2007 at 10:09 AM #107471
NotCranky
ParticipantYou were raised wrong too? Don’t go around talking about it. They will put you in Jamul with the rest of us.
-
December 2, 2007 at 9:16 AM #107360
sdrealtor
Participantsame here
-
December 2, 2007 at 9:16 AM #107397
sdrealtor
Participantsame here
-
December 2, 2007 at 9:16 AM #107399
sdrealtor
Participantsame here
-
December 2, 2007 at 9:16 AM #107420
sdrealtor
Participantsame here
-
December 2, 2007 at 9:14 AM #107355
NotCranky
ParticipantFine with me. It does worry me sometimes that the more sensitive or stodgy types get offended. I hope they realize I never shoot at someone who isn’t a little ornery themselves. I hope everyone understands that if I dish it out I can take it and that I am assuming that of the others. I was raised wrong.. what can I say.
-
December 2, 2007 at 9:14 AM #107391
NotCranky
ParticipantFine with me. It does worry me sometimes that the more sensitive or stodgy types get offended. I hope they realize I never shoot at someone who isn’t a little ornery themselves. I hope everyone understands that if I dish it out I can take it and that I am assuming that of the others. I was raised wrong.. what can I say.
-
December 2, 2007 at 9:14 AM #107394
NotCranky
ParticipantFine with me. It does worry me sometimes that the more sensitive or stodgy types get offended. I hope they realize I never shoot at someone who isn’t a little ornery themselves. I hope everyone understands that if I dish it out I can take it and that I am assuming that of the others. I was raised wrong.. what can I say.
-
December 2, 2007 at 9:14 AM #107415
NotCranky
ParticipantFine with me. It does worry me sometimes that the more sensitive or stodgy types get offended. I hope they realize I never shoot at someone who isn’t a little ornery themselves. I hope everyone understands that if I dish it out I can take it and that I am assuming that of the others. I was raised wrong.. what can I say.
-
December 2, 2007 at 12:50 PM #107412
waiting for bottom
ParticipantYour are right, I am being a little loose with my years. It is more like 6-7 years ago when the houses were in the ranges I quoted.
I don’t think I’d buy in Mar Brisa, it has a cramped feel to it. The $625-$675K houses there are too small anyways.
Here is one counter-ecample though – Mariner’s point with no view:
6746 Solandra – Currently listed at $799K – Bought in 1997 at $304K – Zillow graph has this hitting 500K in 04-05. Knowing that Zillow is off, let’s call it 2002. Not quite the 600K you quoted. (I’ll use your “close enough” argument). 4%/yr since purchase get them south of $500K. This house is still listed $50K above other listings on a sq footage basis. We’ll see it below 650 in the next 18 months.
I’m not looking in the “real” Aviara.
-
December 2, 2007 at 1:34 PM #107433
sdrealtor
ParticipantLet’s not call it anything WFB, lets look at the facts.
That was the new price and doesnt include throwing in landscaping, appliances, window treatments etc. That brings the price to 350K in 1997 not 2002. New houses also typically go into escrow 6 months or more before closing (at least they used to) so it is essentially a 1996/1997 price which was the bottom of last cycle. That certainly is not 2002.
In 2002, the lowest sale was $585,000 on Bluepoint. There was a model match on Tea Tree for 595,000. The ocean view homes were going in the high 600’s.
I wont say that it wont get to 650,000 which is about as low as I could imagine but if it does you wont be the only one trying to buy it.
-
December 2, 2007 at 7:10 PM #107590
waiting for bottom
ParticipantOther facts:
No one bought this house when it was priced at $899K.
No one bought this house when it was priced at $849K.
No one is bitiing now at $799K.
There is a larger house on a culdesac in The Cove for $799K.
Your colleague marketed it as “priced below market” at 899K.
You guys all take data and twist it however you want. I don’t have access to the same data you do so I don’t know what to say about your 2002 sales.
-
December 2, 2007 at 7:34 PM #107610
NotCranky
Participanthugo,
http://www.sandiego-mls.com/sdpi1.asp?county=1&x=1
Here is and broker’s web page that has a pretty good area locator with a zip code map.
Disclaimer: I don’t know these people.
-
December 2, 2007 at 9:05 PM #107620
sandiego
ParticipantSEH is the opposite of a landfill. They blasted the entire hillside to build it.
The closed landfill is directly south of the old Questhaven Road.
-
December 2, 2007 at 9:05 PM #107718
sandiego
ParticipantSEH is the opposite of a landfill. They blasted the entire hillside to build it.
The closed landfill is directly south of the old Questhaven Road.
-
December 2, 2007 at 9:05 PM #107751
sandiego
ParticipantSEH is the opposite of a landfill. They blasted the entire hillside to build it.
The closed landfill is directly south of the old Questhaven Road.
-
December 2, 2007 at 9:05 PM #107764
sandiego
ParticipantSEH is the opposite of a landfill. They blasted the entire hillside to build it.
The closed landfill is directly south of the old Questhaven Road.
-
December 2, 2007 at 9:05 PM #107775
sandiego
ParticipantSEH is the opposite of a landfill. They blasted the entire hillside to build it.
The closed landfill is directly south of the old Questhaven Road.
-
December 3, 2007 at 7:34 AM #107929
hugo
ParticipantThanks for the link Rustico
-
December 3, 2007 at 8:18 AM #107939
NotCranky
ParticipantYou are welcome Hugo.
-
December 3, 2007 at 8:18 AM #108041
NotCranky
ParticipantYou are welcome Hugo.
-
December 3, 2007 at 8:18 AM #108074
NotCranky
ParticipantYou are welcome Hugo.
-
December 3, 2007 at 8:18 AM #108081
NotCranky
ParticipantYou are welcome Hugo.
-
December 3, 2007 at 8:18 AM #108095
NotCranky
ParticipantYou are welcome Hugo.
-
December 3, 2007 at 7:34 AM #108031
hugo
ParticipantThanks for the link Rustico
-
December 3, 2007 at 7:34 AM #108064
hugo
ParticipantThanks for the link Rustico
-
December 3, 2007 at 7:34 AM #108071
hugo
ParticipantThanks for the link Rustico
-
December 3, 2007 at 7:34 AM #108085
hugo
ParticipantThanks for the link Rustico
-
December 2, 2007 at 7:34 PM #107707
NotCranky
Participanthugo,
http://www.sandiego-mls.com/sdpi1.asp?county=1&x=1
Here is and broker’s web page that has a pretty good area locator with a zip code map.
Disclaimer: I don’t know these people.
-
December 2, 2007 at 7:34 PM #107741
NotCranky
Participanthugo,
http://www.sandiego-mls.com/sdpi1.asp?county=1&x=1
Here is and broker’s web page that has a pretty good area locator with a zip code map.
Disclaimer: I don’t know these people.
-
December 2, 2007 at 7:34 PM #107754
NotCranky
Participanthugo,
http://www.sandiego-mls.com/sdpi1.asp?county=1&x=1
Here is and broker’s web page that has a pretty good area locator with a zip code map.
Disclaimer: I don’t know these people.
-
December 2, 2007 at 7:34 PM #107765
NotCranky
Participanthugo,
http://www.sandiego-mls.com/sdpi1.asp?county=1&x=1
Here is and broker’s web page that has a pretty good area locator with a zip code map.
Disclaimer: I don’t know these people.
-
December 3, 2007 at 9:01 AM #107959
sdrealtor
ParticipantWFB,
There you go again comparing apples and oranges. That house was likely never worth 899K so who cares that they overpriced a few months ago. The fact that no one is biting at price today is of little relevance because there are very few buyers out this time of year. To sell today they would have to take less than they could get in a couple months, not because prices will rise, but because as SD R so adeptly explained, it is the secular trend.BTW, the larger house in The Cove is inferior construction, inferior floorplans, likely under stadium lights from Poinsettia Park and is a 2 story. The house on Solandra is a 1 story which makes a huge difference. As for how my colleague marketed it, I could care less.
Here’s some good advice. Instead of flailing wildly, find yourself a good local realtor that has lived in the area at least 10 years and been in the business at least 5 years if not more. Someone like me who doesnt care when you you buy because my livelihood doesnt depend upon it. There area lot of good realtors in this area that can help you out. BTW, I dont accept clients from this board so you’ll have to find one on your own.
-
December 3, 2007 at 2:51 PM #108224
CBad
ParticipantAnd what’s up with the huge wall of fabric decoration technique in not one but TWO places at 1583?!
-
December 3, 2007 at 3:10 PM #108233
ibjames
ParticipantRust and sdr, your banter better not cease, I personally love some ornery now and then
sdr: why would you not take business from this board? I don’t think it would put a dent in your credibility.
-
December 3, 2007 at 3:31 PM #108244
sdrealtor
ParticipantI guess I’d rather be ornery than rich. I walked away from $4M+ in business this year because I really care about my clients best interests, often more than they do.
Just last month I had a little old lady client who I have been pushing as hard as I could to wait a little longer turn around and go to the listing agent to pay full price for a mediocre property in a bad location that I kept telling her not to buy. It cost me about $8 grand. They day she closed it was obvious that she was underwater by $50,000 on a $400,000 condo. Worst of all, the beauty that she really loved dropped down in price by about $75,000 as soon as she closed and she could have had it for about the same price while it was easily worth $50 to 75K more than the one she got.
-
December 3, 2007 at 3:31 PM #108347
sdrealtor
ParticipantI guess I’d rather be ornery than rich. I walked away from $4M+ in business this year because I really care about my clients best interests, often more than they do.
Just last month I had a little old lady client who I have been pushing as hard as I could to wait a little longer turn around and go to the listing agent to pay full price for a mediocre property in a bad location that I kept telling her not to buy. It cost me about $8 grand. They day she closed it was obvious that she was underwater by $50,000 on a $400,000 condo. Worst of all, the beauty that she really loved dropped down in price by about $75,000 as soon as she closed and she could have had it for about the same price while it was easily worth $50 to 75K more than the one she got.
-
December 3, 2007 at 3:31 PM #108380
sdrealtor
ParticipantI guess I’d rather be ornery than rich. I walked away from $4M+ in business this year because I really care about my clients best interests, often more than they do.
Just last month I had a little old lady client who I have been pushing as hard as I could to wait a little longer turn around and go to the listing agent to pay full price for a mediocre property in a bad location that I kept telling her not to buy. It cost me about $8 grand. They day she closed it was obvious that she was underwater by $50,000 on a $400,000 condo. Worst of all, the beauty that she really loved dropped down in price by about $75,000 as soon as she closed and she could have had it for about the same price while it was easily worth $50 to 75K more than the one she got.
-
December 3, 2007 at 3:31 PM #108383
sdrealtor
ParticipantI guess I’d rather be ornery than rich. I walked away from $4M+ in business this year because I really care about my clients best interests, often more than they do.
Just last month I had a little old lady client who I have been pushing as hard as I could to wait a little longer turn around and go to the listing agent to pay full price for a mediocre property in a bad location that I kept telling her not to buy. It cost me about $8 grand. They day she closed it was obvious that she was underwater by $50,000 on a $400,000 condo. Worst of all, the beauty that she really loved dropped down in price by about $75,000 as soon as she closed and she could have had it for about the same price while it was easily worth $50 to 75K more than the one she got.
-
December 3, 2007 at 3:31 PM #108401
sdrealtor
ParticipantI guess I’d rather be ornery than rich. I walked away from $4M+ in business this year because I really care about my clients best interests, often more than they do.
Just last month I had a little old lady client who I have been pushing as hard as I could to wait a little longer turn around and go to the listing agent to pay full price for a mediocre property in a bad location that I kept telling her not to buy. It cost me about $8 grand. They day she closed it was obvious that she was underwater by $50,000 on a $400,000 condo. Worst of all, the beauty that she really loved dropped down in price by about $75,000 as soon as she closed and she could have had it for about the same price while it was easily worth $50 to 75K more than the one she got.
-
December 3, 2007 at 3:46 PM #108254
NotCranky
ParticipantDon’t be a voyeur James come on out with it! This place was making me think of M.A.S.H. Some posters play Major Frank Burns and some play Hawk-eye and Honeycutt. Yes I know I am being generous with the choices of roles. I just don’t want to be Beavis or Butthead, so we’ll go back a little further. Don’t worry James we are too old to change.
What if one of us had a website where we were hyping buyers to get in the market, like the one in the link I found for Hugo? That would be interesting.
-
December 3, 2007 at 3:46 PM #108357
NotCranky
ParticipantDon’t be a voyeur James come on out with it! This place was making me think of M.A.S.H. Some posters play Major Frank Burns and some play Hawk-eye and Honeycutt. Yes I know I am being generous with the choices of roles. I just don’t want to be Beavis or Butthead, so we’ll go back a little further. Don’t worry James we are too old to change.
What if one of us had a website where we were hyping buyers to get in the market, like the one in the link I found for Hugo? That would be interesting.
-
December 3, 2007 at 3:46 PM #108390
NotCranky
ParticipantDon’t be a voyeur James come on out with it! This place was making me think of M.A.S.H. Some posters play Major Frank Burns and some play Hawk-eye and Honeycutt. Yes I know I am being generous with the choices of roles. I just don’t want to be Beavis or Butthead, so we’ll go back a little further. Don’t worry James we are too old to change.
What if one of us had a website where we were hyping buyers to get in the market, like the one in the link I found for Hugo? That would be interesting.
-
December 3, 2007 at 3:46 PM #108394
NotCranky
ParticipantDon’t be a voyeur James come on out with it! This place was making me think of M.A.S.H. Some posters play Major Frank Burns and some play Hawk-eye and Honeycutt. Yes I know I am being generous with the choices of roles. I just don’t want to be Beavis or Butthead, so we’ll go back a little further. Don’t worry James we are too old to change.
What if one of us had a website where we were hyping buyers to get in the market, like the one in the link I found for Hugo? That would be interesting.
-
December 3, 2007 at 3:46 PM #108409
NotCranky
ParticipantDon’t be a voyeur James come on out with it! This place was making me think of M.A.S.H. Some posters play Major Frank Burns and some play Hawk-eye and Honeycutt. Yes I know I am being generous with the choices of roles. I just don’t want to be Beavis or Butthead, so we’ll go back a little further. Don’t worry James we are too old to change.
What if one of us had a website where we were hyping buyers to get in the market, like the one in the link I found for Hugo? That would be interesting.
-
December 3, 2007 at 3:10 PM #108337
ibjames
ParticipantRust and sdr, your banter better not cease, I personally love some ornery now and then
sdr: why would you not take business from this board? I don’t think it would put a dent in your credibility.
-
December 3, 2007 at 3:10 PM #108371
ibjames
ParticipantRust and sdr, your banter better not cease, I personally love some ornery now and then
sdr: why would you not take business from this board? I don’t think it would put a dent in your credibility.
-
December 3, 2007 at 3:10 PM #108373
ibjames
ParticipantRust and sdr, your banter better not cease, I personally love some ornery now and then
sdr: why would you not take business from this board? I don’t think it would put a dent in your credibility.
-
December 3, 2007 at 3:10 PM #108388
ibjames
ParticipantRust and sdr, your banter better not cease, I personally love some ornery now and then
sdr: why would you not take business from this board? I don’t think it would put a dent in your credibility.
-
December 3, 2007 at 2:51 PM #108327
CBad
ParticipantAnd what’s up with the huge wall of fabric decoration technique in not one but TWO places at 1583?!
-
December 3, 2007 at 2:51 PM #108359
CBad
ParticipantAnd what’s up with the huge wall of fabric decoration technique in not one but TWO places at 1583?!
-
December 3, 2007 at 2:51 PM #108363
CBad
ParticipantAnd what’s up with the huge wall of fabric decoration technique in not one but TWO places at 1583?!
-
December 3, 2007 at 2:51 PM #108379
CBad
ParticipantAnd what’s up with the huge wall of fabric decoration technique in not one but TWO places at 1583?!
-
December 3, 2007 at 9:01 AM #108061
sdrealtor
ParticipantWFB,
There you go again comparing apples and oranges. That house was likely never worth 899K so who cares that they overpriced a few months ago. The fact that no one is biting at price today is of little relevance because there are very few buyers out this time of year. To sell today they would have to take less than they could get in a couple months, not because prices will rise, but because as SD R so adeptly explained, it is the secular trend.BTW, the larger house in The Cove is inferior construction, inferior floorplans, likely under stadium lights from Poinsettia Park and is a 2 story. The house on Solandra is a 1 story which makes a huge difference. As for how my colleague marketed it, I could care less.
Here’s some good advice. Instead of flailing wildly, find yourself a good local realtor that has lived in the area at least 10 years and been in the business at least 5 years if not more. Someone like me who doesnt care when you you buy because my livelihood doesnt depend upon it. There area lot of good realtors in this area that can help you out. BTW, I dont accept clients from this board so you’ll have to find one on your own.
-
December 3, 2007 at 9:01 AM #108094
sdrealtor
ParticipantWFB,
There you go again comparing apples and oranges. That house was likely never worth 899K so who cares that they overpriced a few months ago. The fact that no one is biting at price today is of little relevance because there are very few buyers out this time of year. To sell today they would have to take less than they could get in a couple months, not because prices will rise, but because as SD R so adeptly explained, it is the secular trend.BTW, the larger house in The Cove is inferior construction, inferior floorplans, likely under stadium lights from Poinsettia Park and is a 2 story. The house on Solandra is a 1 story which makes a huge difference. As for how my colleague marketed it, I could care less.
Here’s some good advice. Instead of flailing wildly, find yourself a good local realtor that has lived in the area at least 10 years and been in the business at least 5 years if not more. Someone like me who doesnt care when you you buy because my livelihood doesnt depend upon it. There area lot of good realtors in this area that can help you out. BTW, I dont accept clients from this board so you’ll have to find one on your own.
-
December 3, 2007 at 9:01 AM #108101
sdrealtor
ParticipantWFB,
There you go again comparing apples and oranges. That house was likely never worth 899K so who cares that they overpriced a few months ago. The fact that no one is biting at price today is of little relevance because there are very few buyers out this time of year. To sell today they would have to take less than they could get in a couple months, not because prices will rise, but because as SD R so adeptly explained, it is the secular trend.BTW, the larger house in The Cove is inferior construction, inferior floorplans, likely under stadium lights from Poinsettia Park and is a 2 story. The house on Solandra is a 1 story which makes a huge difference. As for how my colleague marketed it, I could care less.
Here’s some good advice. Instead of flailing wildly, find yourself a good local realtor that has lived in the area at least 10 years and been in the business at least 5 years if not more. Someone like me who doesnt care when you you buy because my livelihood doesnt depend upon it. There area lot of good realtors in this area that can help you out. BTW, I dont accept clients from this board so you’ll have to find one on your own.
-
December 3, 2007 at 9:01 AM #108115
sdrealtor
ParticipantWFB,
There you go again comparing apples and oranges. That house was likely never worth 899K so who cares that they overpriced a few months ago. The fact that no one is biting at price today is of little relevance because there are very few buyers out this time of year. To sell today they would have to take less than they could get in a couple months, not because prices will rise, but because as SD R so adeptly explained, it is the secular trend.BTW, the larger house in The Cove is inferior construction, inferior floorplans, likely under stadium lights from Poinsettia Park and is a 2 story. The house on Solandra is a 1 story which makes a huge difference. As for how my colleague marketed it, I could care less.
Here’s some good advice. Instead of flailing wildly, find yourself a good local realtor that has lived in the area at least 10 years and been in the business at least 5 years if not more. Someone like me who doesnt care when you you buy because my livelihood doesnt depend upon it. There area lot of good realtors in this area that can help you out. BTW, I dont accept clients from this board so you’ll have to find one on your own.
-
December 2, 2007 at 7:10 PM #107686
waiting for bottom
ParticipantOther facts:
No one bought this house when it was priced at $899K.
No one bought this house when it was priced at $849K.
No one is bitiing now at $799K.
There is a larger house on a culdesac in The Cove for $799K.
Your colleague marketed it as “priced below market” at 899K.
You guys all take data and twist it however you want. I don’t have access to the same data you do so I don’t know what to say about your 2002 sales.
-
December 2, 2007 at 7:10 PM #107722
waiting for bottom
ParticipantOther facts:
No one bought this house when it was priced at $899K.
No one bought this house when it was priced at $849K.
No one is bitiing now at $799K.
There is a larger house on a culdesac in The Cove for $799K.
Your colleague marketed it as “priced below market” at 899K.
You guys all take data and twist it however you want. I don’t have access to the same data you do so I don’t know what to say about your 2002 sales.
-
December 2, 2007 at 7:10 PM #107734
waiting for bottom
ParticipantOther facts:
No one bought this house when it was priced at $899K.
No one bought this house when it was priced at $849K.
No one is bitiing now at $799K.
There is a larger house on a culdesac in The Cove for $799K.
Your colleague marketed it as “priced below market” at 899K.
You guys all take data and twist it however you want. I don’t have access to the same data you do so I don’t know what to say about your 2002 sales.
-
December 2, 2007 at 7:10 PM #107748
waiting for bottom
ParticipantOther facts:
No one bought this house when it was priced at $899K.
No one bought this house when it was priced at $849K.
No one is bitiing now at $799K.
There is a larger house on a culdesac in The Cove for $799K.
Your colleague marketed it as “priced below market” at 899K.
You guys all take data and twist it however you want. I don’t have access to the same data you do so I don’t know what to say about your 2002 sales.
-
December 2, 2007 at 1:34 PM #107526
sdrealtor
ParticipantLet’s not call it anything WFB, lets look at the facts.
That was the new price and doesnt include throwing in landscaping, appliances, window treatments etc. That brings the price to 350K in 1997 not 2002. New houses also typically go into escrow 6 months or more before closing (at least they used to) so it is essentially a 1996/1997 price which was the bottom of last cycle. That certainly is not 2002.
In 2002, the lowest sale was $585,000 on Bluepoint. There was a model match on Tea Tree for 595,000. The ocean view homes were going in the high 600’s.
I wont say that it wont get to 650,000 which is about as low as I could imagine but if it does you wont be the only one trying to buy it.
-
December 2, 2007 at 1:34 PM #107562
sdrealtor
ParticipantLet’s not call it anything WFB, lets look at the facts.
That was the new price and doesnt include throwing in landscaping, appliances, window treatments etc. That brings the price to 350K in 1997 not 2002. New houses also typically go into escrow 6 months or more before closing (at least they used to) so it is essentially a 1996/1997 price which was the bottom of last cycle. That certainly is not 2002.
In 2002, the lowest sale was $585,000 on Bluepoint. There was a model match on Tea Tree for 595,000. The ocean view homes were going in the high 600’s.
I wont say that it wont get to 650,000 which is about as low as I could imagine but if it does you wont be the only one trying to buy it.
-
December 2, 2007 at 1:34 PM #107574
sdrealtor
ParticipantLet’s not call it anything WFB, lets look at the facts.
That was the new price and doesnt include throwing in landscaping, appliances, window treatments etc. That brings the price to 350K in 1997 not 2002. New houses also typically go into escrow 6 months or more before closing (at least they used to) so it is essentially a 1996/1997 price which was the bottom of last cycle. That certainly is not 2002.
In 2002, the lowest sale was $585,000 on Bluepoint. There was a model match on Tea Tree for 595,000. The ocean view homes were going in the high 600’s.
I wont say that it wont get to 650,000 which is about as low as I could imagine but if it does you wont be the only one trying to buy it.
-
December 2, 2007 at 1:34 PM #107588
sdrealtor
ParticipantLet’s not call it anything WFB, lets look at the facts.
That was the new price and doesnt include throwing in landscaping, appliances, window treatments etc. That brings the price to 350K in 1997 not 2002. New houses also typically go into escrow 6 months or more before closing (at least they used to) so it is essentially a 1996/1997 price which was the bottom of last cycle. That certainly is not 2002.
In 2002, the lowest sale was $585,000 on Bluepoint. There was a model match on Tea Tree for 595,000. The ocean view homes were going in the high 600’s.
I wont say that it wont get to 650,000 which is about as low as I could imagine but if it does you wont be the only one trying to buy it.
-
December 2, 2007 at 12:50 PM #107506
waiting for bottom
ParticipantYour are right, I am being a little loose with my years. It is more like 6-7 years ago when the houses were in the ranges I quoted.
I don’t think I’d buy in Mar Brisa, it has a cramped feel to it. The $625-$675K houses there are too small anyways.
Here is one counter-ecample though – Mariner’s point with no view:
6746 Solandra – Currently listed at $799K – Bought in 1997 at $304K – Zillow graph has this hitting 500K in 04-05. Knowing that Zillow is off, let’s call it 2002. Not quite the 600K you quoted. (I’ll use your “close enough” argument). 4%/yr since purchase get them south of $500K. This house is still listed $50K above other listings on a sq footage basis. We’ll see it below 650 in the next 18 months.
I’m not looking in the “real” Aviara.
-
December 2, 2007 at 12:50 PM #107541
waiting for bottom
ParticipantYour are right, I am being a little loose with my years. It is more like 6-7 years ago when the houses were in the ranges I quoted.
I don’t think I’d buy in Mar Brisa, it has a cramped feel to it. The $625-$675K houses there are too small anyways.
Here is one counter-ecample though – Mariner’s point with no view:
6746 Solandra – Currently listed at $799K – Bought in 1997 at $304K – Zillow graph has this hitting 500K in 04-05. Knowing that Zillow is off, let’s call it 2002. Not quite the 600K you quoted. (I’ll use your “close enough” argument). 4%/yr since purchase get them south of $500K. This house is still listed $50K above other listings on a sq footage basis. We’ll see it below 650 in the next 18 months.
I’m not looking in the “real” Aviara.
-
December 2, 2007 at 12:50 PM #107554
waiting for bottom
ParticipantYour are right, I am being a little loose with my years. It is more like 6-7 years ago when the houses were in the ranges I quoted.
I don’t think I’d buy in Mar Brisa, it has a cramped feel to it. The $625-$675K houses there are too small anyways.
Here is one counter-ecample though – Mariner’s point with no view:
6746 Solandra – Currently listed at $799K – Bought in 1997 at $304K – Zillow graph has this hitting 500K in 04-05. Knowing that Zillow is off, let’s call it 2002. Not quite the 600K you quoted. (I’ll use your “close enough” argument). 4%/yr since purchase get them south of $500K. This house is still listed $50K above other listings on a sq footage basis. We’ll see it below 650 in the next 18 months.
I’m not looking in the “real” Aviara.
-
December 2, 2007 at 12:50 PM #107566
waiting for bottom
ParticipantYour are right, I am being a little loose with my years. It is more like 6-7 years ago when the houses were in the ranges I quoted.
I don’t think I’d buy in Mar Brisa, it has a cramped feel to it. The $625-$675K houses there are too small anyways.
Here is one counter-ecample though – Mariner’s point with no view:
6746 Solandra – Currently listed at $799K – Bought in 1997 at $304K – Zillow graph has this hitting 500K in 04-05. Knowing that Zillow is off, let’s call it 2002. Not quite the 600K you quoted. (I’ll use your “close enough” argument). 4%/yr since purchase get them south of $500K. This house is still listed $50K above other listings on a sq footage basis. We’ll see it below 650 in the next 18 months.
I’m not looking in the “real” Aviara.
-
December 2, 2007 at 9:05 AM #107346
sdrealtor
Participantwaiting for the bottom,
i dont know where you get your figures from but they are way off.Five years ago (In 2002), Mar Brisa homes were 450 to 500. Mariner’s Point homes w/o views were 600K. Homes in the real Aviara started at 550K at the very bottom end.
If you factor in 4% annual appreciation over 6 years that’s more than 25%. That could put Mar Brisa (the bottom end homes in that area in your price range) but not much else. The truth is they arent far off from that already as I’ve seen Mar Brisa homes go under 700K already.
Rus,
I just enjoy giving you the business. You seem to enjoy giving it to me also. Fair enough. -
December 2, 2007 at 9:05 AM #107380
sdrealtor
Participantwaiting for the bottom,
i dont know where you get your figures from but they are way off.Five years ago (In 2002), Mar Brisa homes were 450 to 500. Mariner’s Point homes w/o views were 600K. Homes in the real Aviara started at 550K at the very bottom end.
If you factor in 4% annual appreciation over 6 years that’s more than 25%. That could put Mar Brisa (the bottom end homes in that area in your price range) but not much else. The truth is they arent far off from that already as I’ve seen Mar Brisa homes go under 700K already.
Rus,
I just enjoy giving you the business. You seem to enjoy giving it to me also. Fair enough. -
December 2, 2007 at 9:05 AM #107384
sdrealtor
Participantwaiting for the bottom,
i dont know where you get your figures from but they are way off.Five years ago (In 2002), Mar Brisa homes were 450 to 500. Mariner’s Point homes w/o views were 600K. Homes in the real Aviara started at 550K at the very bottom end.
If you factor in 4% annual appreciation over 6 years that’s more than 25%. That could put Mar Brisa (the bottom end homes in that area in your price range) but not much else. The truth is they arent far off from that already as I’ve seen Mar Brisa homes go under 700K already.
Rus,
I just enjoy giving you the business. You seem to enjoy giving it to me also. Fair enough. -
December 2, 2007 at 9:05 AM #107405
sdrealtor
Participantwaiting for the bottom,
i dont know where you get your figures from but they are way off.Five years ago (In 2002), Mar Brisa homes were 450 to 500. Mariner’s Point homes w/o views were 600K. Homes in the real Aviara started at 550K at the very bottom end.
If you factor in 4% annual appreciation over 6 years that’s more than 25%. That could put Mar Brisa (the bottom end homes in that area in your price range) but not much else. The truth is they arent far off from that already as I’ve seen Mar Brisa homes go under 700K already.
Rus,
I just enjoy giving you the business. You seem to enjoy giving it to me also. Fair enough. -
December 1, 2007 at 11:10 PM #107168
waiting for bottom
ParticipantOf course we all know that sals activity will pick up in the spring, that’s common sense. I just don’t think it will be at a higher price than we have today. I’m quite certain it will be lower. There will a a few home builders with some major slashes in January that will start it all. Maybe even the REO’s will start moving by then.
I don’t expect to pay less than $500K. If I could get 4 bedrooms and 2500 sq ft in a nice neighborhood in 92011 for 600-650, I would buy today. Right now, that is 799 which is unacceptable. It was 899 a few months ago….but 350 5 years ago. I will pay 5% for inflation since purchase, nothing more.
My company bought my old house in the midwest and will pay my closing costs on a new house if I buy before August. But why would I risk losing 100K to save 15K? I would like to think that other relo’s have at least half a brain to figure that out.
This is why I am waiting for the bottom.
-
December 1, 2007 at 11:10 PM #107199
waiting for bottom
ParticipantOf course we all know that sals activity will pick up in the spring, that’s common sense. I just don’t think it will be at a higher price than we have today. I’m quite certain it will be lower. There will a a few home builders with some major slashes in January that will start it all. Maybe even the REO’s will start moving by then.
I don’t expect to pay less than $500K. If I could get 4 bedrooms and 2500 sq ft in a nice neighborhood in 92011 for 600-650, I would buy today. Right now, that is 799 which is unacceptable. It was 899 a few months ago….but 350 5 years ago. I will pay 5% for inflation since purchase, nothing more.
My company bought my old house in the midwest and will pay my closing costs on a new house if I buy before August. But why would I risk losing 100K to save 15K? I would like to think that other relo’s have at least half a brain to figure that out.
This is why I am waiting for the bottom.
-
December 1, 2007 at 11:10 PM #107206
waiting for bottom
ParticipantOf course we all know that sals activity will pick up in the spring, that’s common sense. I just don’t think it will be at a higher price than we have today. I’m quite certain it will be lower. There will a a few home builders with some major slashes in January that will start it all. Maybe even the REO’s will start moving by then.
I don’t expect to pay less than $500K. If I could get 4 bedrooms and 2500 sq ft in a nice neighborhood in 92011 for 600-650, I would buy today. Right now, that is 799 which is unacceptable. It was 899 a few months ago….but 350 5 years ago. I will pay 5% for inflation since purchase, nothing more.
My company bought my old house in the midwest and will pay my closing costs on a new house if I buy before August. But why would I risk losing 100K to save 15K? I would like to think that other relo’s have at least half a brain to figure that out.
This is why I am waiting for the bottom.
-
December 1, 2007 at 11:10 PM #107227
waiting for bottom
ParticipantOf course we all know that sals activity will pick up in the spring, that’s common sense. I just don’t think it will be at a higher price than we have today. I’m quite certain it will be lower. There will a a few home builders with some major slashes in January that will start it all. Maybe even the REO’s will start moving by then.
I don’t expect to pay less than $500K. If I could get 4 bedrooms and 2500 sq ft in a nice neighborhood in 92011 for 600-650, I would buy today. Right now, that is 799 which is unacceptable. It was 899 a few months ago….but 350 5 years ago. I will pay 5% for inflation since purchase, nothing more.
My company bought my old house in the midwest and will pay my closing costs on a new house if I buy before August. But why would I risk losing 100K to save 15K? I would like to think that other relo’s have at least half a brain to figure that out.
This is why I am waiting for the bottom.
-
December 1, 2007 at 10:21 PM #107132
NotCranky
ParticipantSo every time you have a drink you need to bad mouth South Eastern Rancho Santa Fe? I mean Jamul.
-
December 1, 2007 at 10:21 PM #107164
NotCranky
ParticipantSo every time you have a drink you need to bad mouth South Eastern Rancho Santa Fe? I mean Jamul.
-
December 1, 2007 at 10:21 PM #107172
NotCranky
ParticipantSo every time you have a drink you need to bad mouth South Eastern Rancho Santa Fe? I mean Jamul.
-
December 1, 2007 at 10:21 PM #107193
NotCranky
ParticipantSo every time you have a drink you need to bad mouth South Eastern Rancho Santa Fe? I mean Jamul.
-
December 1, 2007 at 9:28 PM #107076
sdrealtor
ParticipantYour math isnt far off but your idea of prices are. You can buy a 3000+ sq ft nearly new home for 650,000 in SEH. heck you can probably get a new one for that. You could also find a very nice newer home in 92009 this year if you knew where to look and how to find it.
My friends dont fit anything close to what you described. They are two very well educated and experienced professionals but neither drs, lawyers or execs. Plenty of people dont make that kind of money but around here alot do and I know many that make alot more. Heck even waitingforthebottom’s wife has met several women whose husbands make 150K plus. She doesnt get to meet the wives who are working and also making as much (sometimes more) as their husbands.
This is a county of 3,000,000 people! Dont be so naive to believe there arent alot of people making good money one way or another. Where do you think those people want to live….Jamul?
(sorry Rus, drinkin again)
-
December 1, 2007 at 9:28 PM #107109
sdrealtor
ParticipantYour math isnt far off but your idea of prices are. You can buy a 3000+ sq ft nearly new home for 650,000 in SEH. heck you can probably get a new one for that. You could also find a very nice newer home in 92009 this year if you knew where to look and how to find it.
My friends dont fit anything close to what you described. They are two very well educated and experienced professionals but neither drs, lawyers or execs. Plenty of people dont make that kind of money but around here alot do and I know many that make alot more. Heck even waitingforthebottom’s wife has met several women whose husbands make 150K plus. She doesnt get to meet the wives who are working and also making as much (sometimes more) as their husbands.
This is a county of 3,000,000 people! Dont be so naive to believe there arent alot of people making good money one way or another. Where do you think those people want to live….Jamul?
(sorry Rus, drinkin again)
-
December 1, 2007 at 9:28 PM #107116
sdrealtor
ParticipantYour math isnt far off but your idea of prices are. You can buy a 3000+ sq ft nearly new home for 650,000 in SEH. heck you can probably get a new one for that. You could also find a very nice newer home in 92009 this year if you knew where to look and how to find it.
My friends dont fit anything close to what you described. They are two very well educated and experienced professionals but neither drs, lawyers or execs. Plenty of people dont make that kind of money but around here alot do and I know many that make alot more. Heck even waitingforthebottom’s wife has met several women whose husbands make 150K plus. She doesnt get to meet the wives who are working and also making as much (sometimes more) as their husbands.
This is a county of 3,000,000 people! Dont be so naive to believe there arent alot of people making good money one way or another. Where do you think those people want to live….Jamul?
(sorry Rus, drinkin again)
-
December 1, 2007 at 9:28 PM #107138
sdrealtor
ParticipantYour math isnt far off but your idea of prices are. You can buy a 3000+ sq ft nearly new home for 650,000 in SEH. heck you can probably get a new one for that. You could also find a very nice newer home in 92009 this year if you knew where to look and how to find it.
My friends dont fit anything close to what you described. They are two very well educated and experienced professionals but neither drs, lawyers or execs. Plenty of people dont make that kind of money but around here alot do and I know many that make alot more. Heck even waitingforthebottom’s wife has met several women whose husbands make 150K plus. She doesnt get to meet the wives who are working and also making as much (sometimes more) as their husbands.
This is a county of 3,000,000 people! Dont be so naive to believe there arent alot of people making good money one way or another. Where do you think those people want to live….Jamul?
(sorry Rus, drinkin again)
-
December 1, 2007 at 8:37 PM #107016
niy38
Participantlet’s do some math here:
1.5 * 350k = 525 K525/0.65=807 K
with this price, u can find decent SFH in 92009 or
SEH, or even 92011.BUT, the key is: how many family having income
350K ? don’t tell me those “Plenty of people” are all
CEO, CFO, lawyer, doctor, etc.sdr, now I find u r really a realtor !!
-
December 1, 2007 at 8:37 PM #107049
niy38
Participantlet’s do some math here:
1.5 * 350k = 525 K525/0.65=807 K
with this price, u can find decent SFH in 92009 or
SEH, or even 92011.BUT, the key is: how many family having income
350K ? don’t tell me those “Plenty of people” are all
CEO, CFO, lawyer, doctor, etc.sdr, now I find u r really a realtor !!
-
December 1, 2007 at 8:37 PM #107057
niy38
Participantlet’s do some math here:
1.5 * 350k = 525 K525/0.65=807 K
with this price, u can find decent SFH in 92009 or
SEH, or even 92011.BUT, the key is: how many family having income
350K ? don’t tell me those “Plenty of people” are all
CEO, CFO, lawyer, doctor, etc.sdr, now I find u r really a realtor !!
-
December 1, 2007 at 8:37 PM #107078
niy38
Participantlet’s do some math here:
1.5 * 350k = 525 K525/0.65=807 K
with this price, u can find decent SFH in 92009 or
SEH, or even 92011.BUT, the key is: how many family having income
350K ? don’t tell me those “Plenty of people” are all
CEO, CFO, lawyer, doctor, etc.sdr, now I find u r really a realtor !!
-
December 1, 2007 at 7:28 PM #106993
sdrealtor
ParticipantPlenty of people buy. I have a friend that moved here from the Midwest. His company bought his house to get him here which he couldnt have sold otherwise. Both he and his wife got big time raises to come here as well as a rich relo package. HH Income went from about 200K to 350K. They bought a house with about 35% down and a mortgage about 1.5X their HH income. They love their house and are glad they bought.
The prices will be lower this Spring than last by about 5 to 10% in this area. One by one your friends will buy as they find they can afford what they truly want. Some this Spring and some next and so on. People with 200K HH incomes can easily afford 500K 30 yr fixed rate mortgages and will start finding homes they like in great areas between 600K and 800K. If you dont buy others will. If you expect to get a great house around here under 500K you will be sadly disappointed IMHO.
-
December 1, 2007 at 7:28 PM #107024
sdrealtor
ParticipantPlenty of people buy. I have a friend that moved here from the Midwest. His company bought his house to get him here which he couldnt have sold otherwise. Both he and his wife got big time raises to come here as well as a rich relo package. HH Income went from about 200K to 350K. They bought a house with about 35% down and a mortgage about 1.5X their HH income. They love their house and are glad they bought.
The prices will be lower this Spring than last by about 5 to 10% in this area. One by one your friends will buy as they find they can afford what they truly want. Some this Spring and some next and so on. People with 200K HH incomes can easily afford 500K 30 yr fixed rate mortgages and will start finding homes they like in great areas between 600K and 800K. If you dont buy others will. If you expect to get a great house around here under 500K you will be sadly disappointed IMHO.
-
December 1, 2007 at 7:28 PM #107032
sdrealtor
ParticipantPlenty of people buy. I have a friend that moved here from the Midwest. His company bought his house to get him here which he couldnt have sold otherwise. Both he and his wife got big time raises to come here as well as a rich relo package. HH Income went from about 200K to 350K. They bought a house with about 35% down and a mortgage about 1.5X their HH income. They love their house and are glad they bought.
The prices will be lower this Spring than last by about 5 to 10% in this area. One by one your friends will buy as they find they can afford what they truly want. Some this Spring and some next and so on. People with 200K HH incomes can easily afford 500K 30 yr fixed rate mortgages and will start finding homes they like in great areas between 600K and 800K. If you dont buy others will. If you expect to get a great house around here under 500K you will be sadly disappointed IMHO.
-
December 1, 2007 at 7:28 PM #107053
sdrealtor
ParticipantPlenty of people buy. I have a friend that moved here from the Midwest. His company bought his house to get him here which he couldnt have sold otherwise. Both he and his wife got big time raises to come here as well as a rich relo package. HH Income went from about 200K to 350K. They bought a house with about 35% down and a mortgage about 1.5X their HH income. They love their house and are glad they bought.
The prices will be lower this Spring than last by about 5 to 10% in this area. One by one your friends will buy as they find they can afford what they truly want. Some this Spring and some next and so on. People with 200K HH incomes can easily afford 500K 30 yr fixed rate mortgages and will start finding homes they like in great areas between 600K and 800K. If you dont buy others will. If you expect to get a great house around here under 500K you will be sadly disappointed IMHO.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:45 PM #106875
niy38
Participantsdr, what kind of relo people will buy? how many ?
I moved to SD 2 years ago from Phoenix and my salary
doubled but still can not afford a condo in Carlsbad! -
December 1, 2007 at 4:45 PM #106909
niy38
Participantsdr, what kind of relo people will buy? how many ?
I moved to SD 2 years ago from Phoenix and my salary
doubled but still can not afford a condo in Carlsbad! -
December 1, 2007 at 4:45 PM #106918
niy38
Participantsdr, what kind of relo people will buy? how many ?
I moved to SD 2 years ago from Phoenix and my salary
doubled but still can not afford a condo in Carlsbad! -
December 1, 2007 at 4:45 PM #106937
niy38
Participantsdr, what kind of relo people will buy? how many ?
I moved to SD 2 years ago from Phoenix and my salary
doubled but still can not afford a condo in Carlsbad! -
December 1, 2007 at 4:31 PM #106855
sdrealtor
ParticipantDidnt say prices will rise, I said they will strengthen as demand returns meaning that prices wont continuing dropping steeply through Spring.
Plenty of Relo people will buy. They always do.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:31 PM #106889
sdrealtor
ParticipantDidnt say prices will rise, I said they will strengthen as demand returns meaning that prices wont continuing dropping steeply through Spring.
Plenty of Relo people will buy. They always do.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:31 PM #106895
sdrealtor
ParticipantDidnt say prices will rise, I said they will strengthen as demand returns meaning that prices wont continuing dropping steeply through Spring.
Plenty of Relo people will buy. They always do.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:31 PM #106917
sdrealtor
ParticipantDidnt say prices will rise, I said they will strengthen as demand returns meaning that prices wont continuing dropping steeply through Spring.
Plenty of Relo people will buy. They always do.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:20 PM #106845
waiting for bottom
ParticipantThere you go being a bull again. Prices will rise in 2008???
What relo person is going to buy in this market? Every single one I know (myself included) has decided to rent.
SEH Mello roos are only huge in the Questhaven area. They are ~$2000 near the town center. Calavera, Carillo, and other parts of Carlsbad have ~$800 fees. $100 per month difference in not huge.
High school? My oldest kid is 2. I’ll give them 12 years to get that straightened out.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:20 PM #106879
waiting for bottom
ParticipantThere you go being a bull again. Prices will rise in 2008???
What relo person is going to buy in this market? Every single one I know (myself included) has decided to rent.
SEH Mello roos are only huge in the Questhaven area. They are ~$2000 near the town center. Calavera, Carillo, and other parts of Carlsbad have ~$800 fees. $100 per month difference in not huge.
High school? My oldest kid is 2. I’ll give them 12 years to get that straightened out.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:20 PM #106888
waiting for bottom
ParticipantThere you go being a bull again. Prices will rise in 2008???
What relo person is going to buy in this market? Every single one I know (myself included) has decided to rent.
SEH Mello roos are only huge in the Questhaven area. They are ~$2000 near the town center. Calavera, Carillo, and other parts of Carlsbad have ~$800 fees. $100 per month difference in not huge.
High school? My oldest kid is 2. I’ll give them 12 years to get that straightened out.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:20 PM #106908
waiting for bottom
ParticipantThere you go being a bull again. Prices will rise in 2008???
What relo person is going to buy in this market? Every single one I know (myself included) has decided to rent.
SEH Mello roos are only huge in the Questhaven area. They are ~$2000 near the town center. Calavera, Carillo, and other parts of Carlsbad have ~$800 fees. $100 per month difference in not huge.
High school? My oldest kid is 2. I’ll give them 12 years to get that straightened out.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:13 PM #106835
sdrealtor
ParticipantFarbet prices have been declining in 009, 011 and 024 for 2 years at a slow and steady pace. The less desirable portions (Carillo etc.) have been hit harder. I believe the prices will strengthen a bit after the New Year as the relo folks come pouring in in their annual migration.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:13 PM #106869
sdrealtor
ParticipantFarbet prices have been declining in 009, 011 and 024 for 2 years at a slow and steady pace. The less desirable portions (Carillo etc.) have been hit harder. I believe the prices will strengthen a bit after the New Year as the relo folks come pouring in in their annual migration.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:13 PM #106878
sdrealtor
ParticipantFarbet prices have been declining in 009, 011 and 024 for 2 years at a slow and steady pace. The less desirable portions (Carillo etc.) have been hit harder. I believe the prices will strengthen a bit after the New Year as the relo folks come pouring in in their annual migration.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:13 PM #106897
sdrealtor
ParticipantFarbet prices have been declining in 009, 011 and 024 for 2 years at a slow and steady pace. The less desirable portions (Carillo etc.) have been hit harder. I believe the prices will strengthen a bit after the New Year as the relo folks come pouring in in their annual migration.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:08 PM #106823
farbet
ParticipantPrices are staring to crumble in 92009, 92011,92024.I do believe it will pick up in a few weeks.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:08 PM #106854
farbet
ParticipantPrices are staring to crumble in 92009, 92011,92024.I do believe it will pick up in a few weeks.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:08 PM #106861
farbet
ParticipantPrices are staring to crumble in 92009, 92011,92024.I do believe it will pick up in a few weeks.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:08 PM #106882
farbet
ParticipantPrices are staring to crumble in 92009, 92011,92024.I do believe it will pick up in a few weeks.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:02 PM #106806
waiting for bottom
ParticipantYes, I have phisically visited them and yes I would buy them at the right price.
92069 over SEH??? Give me a break. Primary school may be OK at best, but the middle school over there is horrible. Puhleeeeze.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:02 PM #106839
waiting for bottom
ParticipantYes, I have phisically visited them and yes I would buy them at the right price.
92069 over SEH??? Give me a break. Primary school may be OK at best, but the middle school over there is horrible. Puhleeeeze.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:02 PM #106847
waiting for bottom
ParticipantYes, I have phisically visited them and yes I would buy them at the right price.
92069 over SEH??? Give me a break. Primary school may be OK at best, but the middle school over there is horrible. Puhleeeeze.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:02 PM #106868
waiting for bottom
ParticipantYes, I have phisically visited them and yes I would buy them at the right price.
92069 over SEH??? Give me a break. Primary school may be OK at best, but the middle school over there is horrible. Puhleeeeze.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:56 PM #106795
niy38
ParticipantI would choose Santa Fe Hill ( 92069) over SEH:
Santa Fe Hill is much affordable than SEH, and
it has good primary school. Very easy access to
78 and shopping and recreation center is just across
78. -
December 1, 2007 at 3:56 PM #106829
niy38
ParticipantI would choose Santa Fe Hill ( 92069) over SEH:
Santa Fe Hill is much affordable than SEH, and
it has good primary school. Very easy access to
78 and shopping and recreation center is just across
78. -
December 1, 2007 at 3:56 PM #106836
niy38
ParticipantI would choose Santa Fe Hill ( 92069) over SEH:
Santa Fe Hill is much affordable than SEH, and
it has good primary school. Very easy access to
78 and shopping and recreation center is just across
78. -
December 1, 2007 at 3:56 PM #106858
niy38
ParticipantI would choose Santa Fe Hill ( 92069) over SEH:
Santa Fe Hill is much affordable than SEH, and
it has good primary school. Very easy access to
78 and shopping and recreation center is just across
78. -
December 1, 2007 at 4:15 PM #106732
sdrealtor
ParticipantSEH has HUGE Mello Roos fees, a very questionable high school situation, major accessibility issues, a very sterile feel and oh yeah….it was built on a landfill. other than that its great. you can have SEH every time. I wouldnt live there if it was free.
I’d take an older home on a nice size lot in Encinitas or Rancho ponderosa over any of those areas every time.
-
December 3, 2007 at 2:47 PM #108214
CBad
ParticipantWFB, question, why would you know the salaries of these husbands in your kid’s playgroup?? Or are you just guessing? We certainly never discussed that topic when I was involved in one!
And spending like crazy is not a good indicator of salary (nor is the lack thereof).
-
December 3, 2007 at 2:47 PM #108317
CBad
ParticipantWFB, question, why would you know the salaries of these husbands in your kid’s playgroup?? Or are you just guessing? We certainly never discussed that topic when I was involved in one!
And spending like crazy is not a good indicator of salary (nor is the lack thereof).
-
December 3, 2007 at 2:47 PM #108351
CBad
ParticipantWFB, question, why would you know the salaries of these husbands in your kid’s playgroup?? Or are you just guessing? We certainly never discussed that topic when I was involved in one!
And spending like crazy is not a good indicator of salary (nor is the lack thereof).
-
December 3, 2007 at 2:47 PM #108354
CBad
ParticipantWFB, question, why would you know the salaries of these husbands in your kid’s playgroup?? Or are you just guessing? We certainly never discussed that topic when I was involved in one!
And spending like crazy is not a good indicator of salary (nor is the lack thereof).
-
December 3, 2007 at 2:47 PM #108369
CBad
ParticipantWFB, question, why would you know the salaries of these husbands in your kid’s playgroup?? Or are you just guessing? We certainly never discussed that topic when I was involved in one!
And spending like crazy is not a good indicator of salary (nor is the lack thereof).
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:15 PM #106828
sdrealtor
ParticipantSEH has HUGE Mello Roos fees, a very questionable high school situation, major accessibility issues, a very sterile feel and oh yeah….it was built on a landfill. other than that its great. you can have SEH every time. I wouldnt live there if it was free.
I’d take an older home on a nice size lot in Encinitas or Rancho ponderosa over any of those areas every time.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:15 PM #106859
sdrealtor
ParticipantSEH has HUGE Mello Roos fees, a very questionable high school situation, major accessibility issues, a very sterile feel and oh yeah….it was built on a landfill. other than that its great. you can have SEH every time. I wouldnt live there if it was free.
I’d take an older home on a nice size lot in Encinitas or Rancho ponderosa over any of those areas every time.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:15 PM #106867
sdrealtor
ParticipantSEH has HUGE Mello Roos fees, a very questionable high school situation, major accessibility issues, a very sterile feel and oh yeah….it was built on a landfill. other than that its great. you can have SEH every time. I wouldnt live there if it was free.
I’d take an older home on a nice size lot in Encinitas or Rancho ponderosa over any of those areas every time.
-
December 1, 2007 at 4:15 PM #106887
sdrealtor
ParticipantSEH has HUGE Mello Roos fees, a very questionable high school situation, major accessibility issues, a very sterile feel and oh yeah….it was built on a landfill. other than that its great. you can have SEH every time. I wouldnt live there if it was free.
I’d take an older home on a nice size lot in Encinitas or Rancho ponderosa over any of those areas every time.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:44 PM #106758
waiting for bottom
ParticipantAlso, I see no difference between SEH (92078), Rancho Carillo (92009) and Calavera Hills (92010) from a livablility standpoint.
I would take SEH every time. It is cheaper, mostly newer, and the schools are better than Calavera, same as Carillo.
But I want to live in 92011. Just waiting for the virus to infect them. The data here shows it is starting.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:44 PM #106789
waiting for bottom
ParticipantAlso, I see no difference between SEH (92078), Rancho Carillo (92009) and Calavera Hills (92010) from a livablility standpoint.
I would take SEH every time. It is cheaper, mostly newer, and the schools are better than Calavera, same as Carillo.
But I want to live in 92011. Just waiting for the virus to infect them. The data here shows it is starting.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:44 PM #106798
waiting for bottom
ParticipantAlso, I see no difference between SEH (92078), Rancho Carillo (92009) and Calavera Hills (92010) from a livablility standpoint.
I would take SEH every time. It is cheaper, mostly newer, and the schools are better than Calavera, same as Carillo.
But I want to live in 92011. Just waiting for the virus to infect them. The data here shows it is starting.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:44 PM #106816
waiting for bottom
ParticipantAlso, I see no difference between SEH (92078), Rancho Carillo (92009) and Calavera Hills (92010) from a livablility standpoint.
I would take SEH every time. It is cheaper, mostly newer, and the schools are better than Calavera, same as Carillo.
But I want to live in 92011. Just waiting for the virus to infect them. The data here shows it is starting.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:41 PM #106742
waiting for bottom
ParticipantI was speaking only to the 92009 that I have a prayer of affording.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:41 PM #106774
waiting for bottom
ParticipantI was speaking only to the 92009 that I have a prayer of affording.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:41 PM #106781
waiting for bottom
ParticipantI was speaking only to the 92009 that I have a prayer of affording.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:41 PM #106803
waiting for bottom
ParticipantI was speaking only to the 92009 that I have a prayer of affording.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:38 PM #106737
waiting for bottom
ParticipantLooks like we caught sdrealtor using both sides of the “it is what it is” argument…..or is it “close enough?”
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:38 PM #106769
waiting for bottom
ParticipantLooks like we caught sdrealtor using both sides of the “it is what it is” argument…..or is it “close enough?”
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:38 PM #106776
waiting for bottom
ParticipantLooks like we caught sdrealtor using both sides of the “it is what it is” argument…..or is it “close enough?”
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:38 PM #106796
waiting for bottom
ParticipantLooks like we caught sdrealtor using both sides of the “it is what it is” argument…..or is it “close enough?”
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:26 PM #106717
svelte
ParticipantHUH? Have you ever been to these homes? I have and they are most definitely under some of the biggest transmission lines in the area.
The nearest of the two is 1603:
http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=66110966
The Zillow pic matches my memory. The power lines are about 400-500 feet to the right (pan to the right in the pic).
Unless they have built new powerlines directly overhead since the Zillow pic was taken, they appear to be near but not under the powerlines. I supposed we could argue about whether 400-500 ft is too close. Apparently it is for you. -
December 1, 2007 at 3:26 PM #106749
svelte
ParticipantHUH? Have you ever been to these homes? I have and they are most definitely under some of the biggest transmission lines in the area.
The nearest of the two is 1603:
http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=66110966
The Zillow pic matches my memory. The power lines are about 400-500 feet to the right (pan to the right in the pic).
Unless they have built new powerlines directly overhead since the Zillow pic was taken, they appear to be near but not under the powerlines. I supposed we could argue about whether 400-500 ft is too close. Apparently it is for you. -
December 1, 2007 at 3:26 PM #106756
svelte
ParticipantHUH? Have you ever been to these homes? I have and they are most definitely under some of the biggest transmission lines in the area.
The nearest of the two is 1603:
http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=66110966
The Zillow pic matches my memory. The power lines are about 400-500 feet to the right (pan to the right in the pic).
Unless they have built new powerlines directly overhead since the Zillow pic was taken, they appear to be near but not under the powerlines. I supposed we could argue about whether 400-500 ft is too close. Apparently it is for you. -
December 1, 2007 at 3:26 PM #106777
svelte
ParticipantHUH? Have you ever been to these homes? I have and they are most definitely under some of the biggest transmission lines in the area.
The nearest of the two is 1603:
http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=66110966
The Zillow pic matches my memory. The power lines are about 400-500 feet to the right (pan to the right in the pic).
Unless they have built new powerlines directly overhead since the Zillow pic was taken, they appear to be near but not under the powerlines. I supposed we could argue about whether 400-500 ft is too close. Apparently it is for you. -
December 1, 2007 at 1:17 PM #106498
sdrealtor
ParticipantHUH? Have you ever been to these homes? I have and they are most definitely under some of the biggest transmission lines in the area.
-
December 1, 2007 at 1:17 PM #106529
sdrealtor
ParticipantHUH? Have you ever been to these homes? I have and they are most definitely under some of the biggest transmission lines in the area.
-
December 1, 2007 at 1:17 PM #106535
sdrealtor
ParticipantHUH? Have you ever been to these homes? I have and they are most definitely under some of the biggest transmission lines in the area.
-
December 1, 2007 at 1:17 PM #106557
sdrealtor
ParticipantHUH? Have you ever been to these homes? I have and they are most definitely under some of the biggest transmission lines in the area.
-
December 1, 2007 at 12:17 PM #106458
svelte
ParticipantThose particular homes don’t appear to be near the powerlines, but they both do back up to a busy 4 lane road.
As everyone keeps saying, only the homes that are impeccable in all respects are going to sell in this environment. If the home has warts it is going to get kicked in the teeth.
Wouldn’t you do the same thing if you were a buyer with zillions of choices?
-
December 1, 2007 at 12:17 PM #106489
svelte
ParticipantThose particular homes don’t appear to be near the powerlines, but they both do back up to a busy 4 lane road.
As everyone keeps saying, only the homes that are impeccable in all respects are going to sell in this environment. If the home has warts it is going to get kicked in the teeth.
Wouldn’t you do the same thing if you were a buyer with zillions of choices?
-
December 1, 2007 at 12:17 PM #106496
svelte
ParticipantThose particular homes don’t appear to be near the powerlines, but they both do back up to a busy 4 lane road.
As everyone keeps saying, only the homes that are impeccable in all respects are going to sell in this environment. If the home has warts it is going to get kicked in the teeth.
Wouldn’t you do the same thing if you were a buyer with zillions of choices?
-
December 1, 2007 at 12:17 PM #106517
svelte
ParticipantThose particular homes don’t appear to be near the powerlines, but they both do back up to a busy 4 lane road.
As everyone keeps saying, only the homes that are impeccable in all respects are going to sell in this environment. If the home has warts it is going to get kicked in the teeth.
Wouldn’t you do the same thing if you were a buyer with zillions of choices?
-
-
December 1, 2007 at 10:48 AM #106373
sdrealtor
ParticipantSEH is getting slaughtered as expected by everyone. Those houses on Maritime are not in Aviara. There are also under the biggest powerlines I have ever seen not to mention impacted by frequent landings and takeoffs at Palomar Airport.
-
December 1, 2007 at 10:48 AM #106404
sdrealtor
ParticipantSEH is getting slaughtered as expected by everyone. Those houses on Maritime are not in Aviara. There are also under the biggest powerlines I have ever seen not to mention impacted by frequent landings and takeoffs at Palomar Airport.
-
December 1, 2007 at 10:48 AM #106412
sdrealtor
ParticipantSEH is getting slaughtered as expected by everyone. Those houses on Maritime are not in Aviara. There are also under the biggest powerlines I have ever seen not to mention impacted by frequent landings and takeoffs at Palomar Airport.
-
December 1, 2007 at 10:48 AM #106430
sdrealtor
ParticipantSEH is getting slaughtered as expected by everyone. Those houses on Maritime are not in Aviara. There are also under the biggest powerlines I have ever seen not to mention impacted by frequent landings and takeoffs at Palomar Airport.
-
-
December 1, 2007 at 12:30 AM #106186
Bugs
ParticipantAnd they said it would never happen in Carlsbad. Tsk, tsk.
-
December 1, 2007 at 12:30 AM #106220
Bugs
ParticipantAnd they said it would never happen in Carlsbad. Tsk, tsk.
-
December 1, 2007 at 12:30 AM #106228
Bugs
ParticipantAnd they said it would never happen in Carlsbad. Tsk, tsk.
-
December 1, 2007 at 12:30 AM #106244
Bugs
ParticipantAnd they said it would never happen in Carlsbad. Tsk, tsk.
-
December 1, 2007 at 12:32 AM #106097
niy38
Participant92011 drop little, compared to 92081,92069.
92009 and 92078 SEH drop not much too-
December 1, 2007 at 9:42 AM #106222
waiting for bottom
Participant92009 and 92078 SEH drop not much too?
Below is a link to an SEH analysis, see data also. If houses selling 25% below 2005 levels isn’t much to you, then I guess your statement was correct.
http://piggington.com/san_elijo_hills_analysis
Selling for less than purchase price:
1531 Clifftop – $590K – $223 sq/ft – Sold $782K 3/05 (-25%)
1098 Brightwood – $599K – $233 sq/ft – Sold $762K 11/04 (-21%)
704 Hollowbrook – $635K – $226 sq/ft – Sold $754K 1/06 (-16%)
726 Leeward – $648K – $216 sq/ft – Sold $760K 3/06 (-15%)
979 Baylor – $727K – $217 sq/ft – Sold $771K 6/04 (-6%) PENDING SALE – Congrats, good luck with that one.
878 Antilla – $740K – $224 sq/ft – Sold $819K 4/05 (-10%)
855 Antilla – $699K – $194 sq/ft – Sold $872K 7/05 (-20%)
871 Antilla – $750K – $220 sq/ft – Sold $865K 3/05 (-13%)
1419 Eclipse – $750K – $229 sq/ft – Sold $885K 10/06 (-15%)On track to sell by 2020:
1005 Brightwood – $699K – $243 sq/ft – Sold $856K 3/05 (-18%)
1089 Brightwood – $699K – $246 sq/ft – Sold $800K 11/04 (-13%)
1474 Anchor – $725K – $258 sq/ft – No sale available (Gorgeous house with ocean view but get real)
1085 Brightwood – $699K – $264 sq/ft – Sold $745K 11/04 (-6%)
1079 Grain Mill – $699K – $270 sq/ft – Sold $654K 6/05 (+7%)
948 Citrine – $750K – $283 sq/ft – Sold $717K 4/06 (+5%)-
December 1, 2007 at 1:27 PM #106416
niy38
ParticipantTo waiting for bottom:
compared to 92081 and 92069, of course this is not much.
there are A LOT dropping that number, not just 1 or 2
example.772 CAMINO MAGNIFICO, 92069,List Price: $459,000 – $459,000
last purchase: 05/27/2005: $606,0001064 CAMINO DEL SOL, 92069, List Price: $479,000 – $495,000
05/12/2006: $625,000………………….
where is your example of 92009 ?
but I agree your example of 92011 is in Aviara:
http://www.aviarahomes.com/page.cfm?page=NewsNeighborhood -
December 1, 2007 at 1:50 PM #106426
sdrealtor
ParticipantDid you read the link you posted? Morning Ridge is NOT, I repeat is NOT in Aviara. It is in the same zip code but does not fall within the official Aviara boundaries.
-
December 1, 2007 at 2:42 PM #106490
niy38
Participantwhere is official definition of Aviara?
-
December 1, 2007 at 2:57 PM #106516
sdrealtor
ParticipantAt the top of the page you provided a link to.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:04 PM #106531
niy38
Participantbut that one include Morning Ridge.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:04 PM #106627
niy38
Participantbut that one include Morning Ridge.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:04 PM #106659
niy38
Participantbut that one include Morning Ridge.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:04 PM #106666
niy38
Participantbut that one include Morning Ridge.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:04 PM #106688
niy38
Participantbut that one include Morning Ridge.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:06 PM #106540
waiting for bottom
Participantsd realtor, you are really splitting hairs with your definition of Aviara. These houses are just accross Poinsettia from Aviara and right next to Aviara Park.
I lived in corporate housing near them and I would live there permanenly without a doubt.
The power lines are an issue all through Aviara, even on the golf course.
Any way you slice it, this is a great area that is showing weakness, period.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:13 PM #106556
sdrealtor
ParticipantIt is what it is. Kinda like the folks in SEH who say its almost Carlsbad.
The real Aviara has a certain feel to it that you don’t find in Morning Ridge. The real Aviara is located south of Aviara parkway and is influenced by a beautiful lagoon not a busy airport.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:16 PM #106566
waiting for bottom
ParticipantI lived there, the feel is the same. The SEH sames as Carlsbad argument is covering at least a mile, here we are talking about only a block!!
Moot point anyways.
Aviara or not, great houses in 92011 near two great schools, next to a park, and 3 miles from the coast are dropping below 2005 levels.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:19 PM #106585
sdrealtor
ParticipantI have good friends that lived in an almost Aviara home and hated it. The moved to a home that isnt as nice but its in the real Aviara down by the lagoon and they love it.
To each his own but there is defintely a difference.
BTW, you lived in a corporate appartment (Mirabella) that is not the same as either.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:23 PM #106611
waiting for bottom
ParticipantQuit being a bull sd realator.
Everytime I show Carlsbad weakness you split hairs.
92010 is crumbling.
92008 is too.
92011 is beginning.
92009 I don’t care, houses are too old and most are in the SM school district anyways. -
December 1, 2007 at 3:35 PM #106636
sdrealtor
ParticipantHuh? I’ve been claiming Carlsbad was back at 2004 prices and even lower in some cases for more than a year. Carlsbad is starting to show weakness it has been declining for at least 2 years. However, relative to other areas it has held up very well.
BTW you are completely wrong about 92009. At least half of it is in the Encinitas/San Dieguito school district and the homes are some of the nicest newer homes in the county. Take a drive through The Ranch behind LCC, check out Arroyo Vista, Santa Fe Trails, La Costa Valley, Summerwalk and several others nearby. You will find some of the nicest neighborhoods anywhere in SD County.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:35 PM #106731
sdrealtor
ParticipantHuh? I’ve been claiming Carlsbad was back at 2004 prices and even lower in some cases for more than a year. Carlsbad is starting to show weakness it has been declining for at least 2 years. However, relative to other areas it has held up very well.
BTW you are completely wrong about 92009. At least half of it is in the Encinitas/San Dieguito school district and the homes are some of the nicest newer homes in the county. Take a drive through The Ranch behind LCC, check out Arroyo Vista, Santa Fe Trails, La Costa Valley, Summerwalk and several others nearby. You will find some of the nicest neighborhoods anywhere in SD County.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:35 PM #106764
sdrealtor
ParticipantHuh? I’ve been claiming Carlsbad was back at 2004 prices and even lower in some cases for more than a year. Carlsbad is starting to show weakness it has been declining for at least 2 years. However, relative to other areas it has held up very well.
BTW you are completely wrong about 92009. At least half of it is in the Encinitas/San Dieguito school district and the homes are some of the nicest newer homes in the county. Take a drive through The Ranch behind LCC, check out Arroyo Vista, Santa Fe Trails, La Costa Valley, Summerwalk and several others nearby. You will find some of the nicest neighborhoods anywhere in SD County.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:35 PM #106771
sdrealtor
ParticipantHuh? I’ve been claiming Carlsbad was back at 2004 prices and even lower in some cases for more than a year. Carlsbad is starting to show weakness it has been declining for at least 2 years. However, relative to other areas it has held up very well.
BTW you are completely wrong about 92009. At least half of it is in the Encinitas/San Dieguito school district and the homes are some of the nicest newer homes in the county. Take a drive through The Ranch behind LCC, check out Arroyo Vista, Santa Fe Trails, La Costa Valley, Summerwalk and several others nearby. You will find some of the nicest neighborhoods anywhere in SD County.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:35 PM #106792
sdrealtor
ParticipantHuh? I’ve been claiming Carlsbad was back at 2004 prices and even lower in some cases for more than a year. Carlsbad is starting to show weakness it has been declining for at least 2 years. However, relative to other areas it has held up very well.
BTW you are completely wrong about 92009. At least half of it is in the Encinitas/San Dieguito school district and the homes are some of the nicest newer homes in the county. Take a drive through The Ranch behind LCC, check out Arroyo Vista, Santa Fe Trails, La Costa Valley, Summerwalk and several others nearby. You will find some of the nicest neighborhoods anywhere in SD County.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:23 PM #106707
waiting for bottom
ParticipantQuit being a bull sd realator.
Everytime I show Carlsbad weakness you split hairs.
92010 is crumbling.
92008 is too.
92011 is beginning.
92009 I don’t care, houses are too old and most are in the SM school district anyways. -
December 1, 2007 at 3:23 PM #106739
waiting for bottom
ParticipantQuit being a bull sd realator.
Everytime I show Carlsbad weakness you split hairs.
92010 is crumbling.
92008 is too.
92011 is beginning.
92009 I don’t care, houses are too old and most are in the SM school district anyways. -
December 1, 2007 at 3:23 PM #106746
waiting for bottom
ParticipantQuit being a bull sd realator.
Everytime I show Carlsbad weakness you split hairs.
92010 is crumbling.
92008 is too.
92011 is beginning.
92009 I don’t care, houses are too old and most are in the SM school district anyways. -
December 1, 2007 at 3:23 PM #106765
waiting for bottom
ParticipantQuit being a bull sd realator.
Everytime I show Carlsbad weakness you split hairs.
92010 is crumbling.
92008 is too.
92011 is beginning.
92009 I don’t care, houses are too old and most are in the SM school district anyways. -
December 1, 2007 at 3:19 PM #106682
sdrealtor
ParticipantI have good friends that lived in an almost Aviara home and hated it. The moved to a home that isnt as nice but its in the real Aviara down by the lagoon and they love it.
To each his own but there is defintely a difference.
BTW, you lived in a corporate appartment (Mirabella) that is not the same as either.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:19 PM #106714
sdrealtor
ParticipantI have good friends that lived in an almost Aviara home and hated it. The moved to a home that isnt as nice but its in the real Aviara down by the lagoon and they love it.
To each his own but there is defintely a difference.
BTW, you lived in a corporate appartment (Mirabella) that is not the same as either.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:19 PM #106721
sdrealtor
ParticipantI have good friends that lived in an almost Aviara home and hated it. The moved to a home that isnt as nice but its in the real Aviara down by the lagoon and they love it.
To each his own but there is defintely a difference.
BTW, you lived in a corporate appartment (Mirabella) that is not the same as either.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:19 PM #106743
sdrealtor
ParticipantI have good friends that lived in an almost Aviara home and hated it. The moved to a home that isnt as nice but its in the real Aviara down by the lagoon and they love it.
To each his own but there is defintely a difference.
BTW, you lived in a corporate appartment (Mirabella) that is not the same as either.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:16 PM #106662
waiting for bottom
ParticipantI lived there, the feel is the same. The SEH sames as Carlsbad argument is covering at least a mile, here we are talking about only a block!!
Moot point anyways.
Aviara or not, great houses in 92011 near two great schools, next to a park, and 3 miles from the coast are dropping below 2005 levels.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:16 PM #106694
waiting for bottom
ParticipantI lived there, the feel is the same. The SEH sames as Carlsbad argument is covering at least a mile, here we are talking about only a block!!
Moot point anyways.
Aviara or not, great houses in 92011 near two great schools, next to a park, and 3 miles from the coast are dropping below 2005 levels.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:16 PM #106700
waiting for bottom
ParticipantI lived there, the feel is the same. The SEH sames as Carlsbad argument is covering at least a mile, here we are talking about only a block!!
Moot point anyways.
Aviara or not, great houses in 92011 near two great schools, next to a park, and 3 miles from the coast are dropping below 2005 levels.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:16 PM #106723
waiting for bottom
ParticipantI lived there, the feel is the same. The SEH sames as Carlsbad argument is covering at least a mile, here we are talking about only a block!!
Moot point anyways.
Aviara or not, great houses in 92011 near two great schools, next to a park, and 3 miles from the coast are dropping below 2005 levels.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:13 PM #106652
sdrealtor
ParticipantIt is what it is. Kinda like the folks in SEH who say its almost Carlsbad.
The real Aviara has a certain feel to it that you don’t find in Morning Ridge. The real Aviara is located south of Aviara parkway and is influenced by a beautiful lagoon not a busy airport.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:13 PM #106684
sdrealtor
ParticipantIt is what it is. Kinda like the folks in SEH who say its almost Carlsbad.
The real Aviara has a certain feel to it that you don’t find in Morning Ridge. The real Aviara is located south of Aviara parkway and is influenced by a beautiful lagoon not a busy airport.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:13 PM #106692
sdrealtor
ParticipantIt is what it is. Kinda like the folks in SEH who say its almost Carlsbad.
The real Aviara has a certain feel to it that you don’t find in Morning Ridge. The real Aviara is located south of Aviara parkway and is influenced by a beautiful lagoon not a busy airport.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:13 PM #106713
sdrealtor
ParticipantIt is what it is. Kinda like the folks in SEH who say its almost Carlsbad.
The real Aviara has a certain feel to it that you don’t find in Morning Ridge. The real Aviara is located south of Aviara parkway and is influenced by a beautiful lagoon not a busy airport.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:06 PM #106637
waiting for bottom
Participantsd realtor, you are really splitting hairs with your definition of Aviara. These houses are just accross Poinsettia from Aviara and right next to Aviara Park.
I lived in corporate housing near them and I would live there permanenly without a doubt.
The power lines are an issue all through Aviara, even on the golf course.
Any way you slice it, this is a great area that is showing weakness, period.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:06 PM #106669
waiting for bottom
Participantsd realtor, you are really splitting hairs with your definition of Aviara. These houses are just accross Poinsettia from Aviara and right next to Aviara Park.
I lived in corporate housing near them and I would live there permanenly without a doubt.
The power lines are an issue all through Aviara, even on the golf course.
Any way you slice it, this is a great area that is showing weakness, period.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:06 PM #106676
waiting for bottom
Participantsd realtor, you are really splitting hairs with your definition of Aviara. These houses are just accross Poinsettia from Aviara and right next to Aviara Park.
I lived in corporate housing near them and I would live there permanenly without a doubt.
The power lines are an issue all through Aviara, even on the golf course.
Any way you slice it, this is a great area that is showing weakness, period.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:06 PM #106698
waiting for bottom
Participantsd realtor, you are really splitting hairs with your definition of Aviara. These houses are just accross Poinsettia from Aviara and right next to Aviara Park.
I lived in corporate housing near them and I would live there permanenly without a doubt.
The power lines are an issue all through Aviara, even on the golf course.
Any way you slice it, this is a great area that is showing weakness, period.
-
December 1, 2007 at 2:57 PM #106612
sdrealtor
ParticipantAt the top of the page you provided a link to.
-
December 1, 2007 at 2:57 PM #106644
sdrealtor
ParticipantAt the top of the page you provided a link to.
-
December 1, 2007 at 2:57 PM #106650
sdrealtor
ParticipantAt the top of the page you provided a link to.
-
December 1, 2007 at 2:57 PM #106673
sdrealtor
ParticipantAt the top of the page you provided a link to.
-
December 1, 2007 at 2:42 PM #106588
niy38
Participantwhere is official definition of Aviara?
-
December 1, 2007 at 2:42 PM #106619
niy38
Participantwhere is official definition of Aviara?
-
December 1, 2007 at 2:42 PM #106625
niy38
Participantwhere is official definition of Aviara?
-
December 1, 2007 at 2:42 PM #106648
niy38
Participantwhere is official definition of Aviara?
-
December 1, 2007 at 1:50 PM #106523
sdrealtor
ParticipantDid you read the link you posted? Morning Ridge is NOT, I repeat is NOT in Aviara. It is in the same zip code but does not fall within the official Aviara boundaries.
-
December 1, 2007 at 1:50 PM #106554
sdrealtor
ParticipantDid you read the link you posted? Morning Ridge is NOT, I repeat is NOT in Aviara. It is in the same zip code but does not fall within the official Aviara boundaries.
-
December 1, 2007 at 1:50 PM #106561
sdrealtor
ParticipantDid you read the link you posted? Morning Ridge is NOT, I repeat is NOT in Aviara. It is in the same zip code but does not fall within the official Aviara boundaries.
-
December 1, 2007 at 1:50 PM #106582
sdrealtor
ParticipantDid you read the link you posted? Morning Ridge is NOT, I repeat is NOT in Aviara. It is in the same zip code but does not fall within the official Aviara boundaries.
-
December 1, 2007 at 1:27 PM #106513
niy38
ParticipantTo waiting for bottom:
compared to 92081 and 92069, of course this is not much.
there are A LOT dropping that number, not just 1 or 2
example.772 CAMINO MAGNIFICO, 92069,List Price: $459,000 – $459,000
last purchase: 05/27/2005: $606,0001064 CAMINO DEL SOL, 92069, List Price: $479,000 – $495,000
05/12/2006: $625,000………………….
where is your example of 92009 ?
but I agree your example of 92011 is in Aviara:
http://www.aviarahomes.com/page.cfm?page=NewsNeighborhood -
December 1, 2007 at 1:27 PM #106544
niy38
ParticipantTo waiting for bottom:
compared to 92081 and 92069, of course this is not much.
there are A LOT dropping that number, not just 1 or 2
example.772 CAMINO MAGNIFICO, 92069,List Price: $459,000 – $459,000
last purchase: 05/27/2005: $606,0001064 CAMINO DEL SOL, 92069, List Price: $479,000 – $495,000
05/12/2006: $625,000………………….
where is your example of 92009 ?
but I agree your example of 92011 is in Aviara:
http://www.aviarahomes.com/page.cfm?page=NewsNeighborhood -
December 1, 2007 at 1:27 PM #106550
niy38
ParticipantTo waiting for bottom:
compared to 92081 and 92069, of course this is not much.
there are A LOT dropping that number, not just 1 or 2
example.772 CAMINO MAGNIFICO, 92069,List Price: $459,000 – $459,000
last purchase: 05/27/2005: $606,0001064 CAMINO DEL SOL, 92069, List Price: $479,000 – $495,000
05/12/2006: $625,000………………….
where is your example of 92009 ?
but I agree your example of 92011 is in Aviara:
http://www.aviarahomes.com/page.cfm?page=NewsNeighborhood -
December 1, 2007 at 1:27 PM #106572
niy38
ParticipantTo waiting for bottom:
compared to 92081 and 92069, of course this is not much.
there are A LOT dropping that number, not just 1 or 2
example.772 CAMINO MAGNIFICO, 92069,List Price: $459,000 – $459,000
last purchase: 05/27/2005: $606,0001064 CAMINO DEL SOL, 92069, List Price: $479,000 – $495,000
05/12/2006: $625,000………………….
where is your example of 92009 ?
but I agree your example of 92011 is in Aviara:
http://www.aviarahomes.com/page.cfm?page=NewsNeighborhood
-
-
December 1, 2007 at 9:42 AM #106317
waiting for bottom
Participant92009 and 92078 SEH drop not much too?
Below is a link to an SEH analysis, see data also. If houses selling 25% below 2005 levels isn’t much to you, then I guess your statement was correct.
http://piggington.com/san_elijo_hills_analysis
Selling for less than purchase price:
1531 Clifftop – $590K – $223 sq/ft – Sold $782K 3/05 (-25%)
1098 Brightwood – $599K – $233 sq/ft – Sold $762K 11/04 (-21%)
704 Hollowbrook – $635K – $226 sq/ft – Sold $754K 1/06 (-16%)
726 Leeward – $648K – $216 sq/ft – Sold $760K 3/06 (-15%)
979 Baylor – $727K – $217 sq/ft – Sold $771K 6/04 (-6%) PENDING SALE – Congrats, good luck with that one.
878 Antilla – $740K – $224 sq/ft – Sold $819K 4/05 (-10%)
855 Antilla – $699K – $194 sq/ft – Sold $872K 7/05 (-20%)
871 Antilla – $750K – $220 sq/ft – Sold $865K 3/05 (-13%)
1419 Eclipse – $750K – $229 sq/ft – Sold $885K 10/06 (-15%)On track to sell by 2020:
1005 Brightwood – $699K – $243 sq/ft – Sold $856K 3/05 (-18%)
1089 Brightwood – $699K – $246 sq/ft – Sold $800K 11/04 (-13%)
1474 Anchor – $725K – $258 sq/ft – No sale available (Gorgeous house with ocean view but get real)
1085 Brightwood – $699K – $264 sq/ft – Sold $745K 11/04 (-6%)
1079 Grain Mill – $699K – $270 sq/ft – Sold $654K 6/05 (+7%)
948 Citrine – $750K – $283 sq/ft – Sold $717K 4/06 (+5%) -
December 1, 2007 at 9:42 AM #106349
waiting for bottom
Participant92009 and 92078 SEH drop not much too?
Below is a link to an SEH analysis, see data also. If houses selling 25% below 2005 levels isn’t much to you, then I guess your statement was correct.
http://piggington.com/san_elijo_hills_analysis
Selling for less than purchase price:
1531 Clifftop – $590K – $223 sq/ft – Sold $782K 3/05 (-25%)
1098 Brightwood – $599K – $233 sq/ft – Sold $762K 11/04 (-21%)
704 Hollowbrook – $635K – $226 sq/ft – Sold $754K 1/06 (-16%)
726 Leeward – $648K – $216 sq/ft – Sold $760K 3/06 (-15%)
979 Baylor – $727K – $217 sq/ft – Sold $771K 6/04 (-6%) PENDING SALE – Congrats, good luck with that one.
878 Antilla – $740K – $224 sq/ft – Sold $819K 4/05 (-10%)
855 Antilla – $699K – $194 sq/ft – Sold $872K 7/05 (-20%)
871 Antilla – $750K – $220 sq/ft – Sold $865K 3/05 (-13%)
1419 Eclipse – $750K – $229 sq/ft – Sold $885K 10/06 (-15%)On track to sell by 2020:
1005 Brightwood – $699K – $243 sq/ft – Sold $856K 3/05 (-18%)
1089 Brightwood – $699K – $246 sq/ft – Sold $800K 11/04 (-13%)
1474 Anchor – $725K – $258 sq/ft – No sale available (Gorgeous house with ocean view but get real)
1085 Brightwood – $699K – $264 sq/ft – Sold $745K 11/04 (-6%)
1079 Grain Mill – $699K – $270 sq/ft – Sold $654K 6/05 (+7%)
948 Citrine – $750K – $283 sq/ft – Sold $717K 4/06 (+5%) -
December 1, 2007 at 9:42 AM #106357
waiting for bottom
Participant92009 and 92078 SEH drop not much too?
Below is a link to an SEH analysis, see data also. If houses selling 25% below 2005 levels isn’t much to you, then I guess your statement was correct.
http://piggington.com/san_elijo_hills_analysis
Selling for less than purchase price:
1531 Clifftop – $590K – $223 sq/ft – Sold $782K 3/05 (-25%)
1098 Brightwood – $599K – $233 sq/ft – Sold $762K 11/04 (-21%)
704 Hollowbrook – $635K – $226 sq/ft – Sold $754K 1/06 (-16%)
726 Leeward – $648K – $216 sq/ft – Sold $760K 3/06 (-15%)
979 Baylor – $727K – $217 sq/ft – Sold $771K 6/04 (-6%) PENDING SALE – Congrats, good luck with that one.
878 Antilla – $740K – $224 sq/ft – Sold $819K 4/05 (-10%)
855 Antilla – $699K – $194 sq/ft – Sold $872K 7/05 (-20%)
871 Antilla – $750K – $220 sq/ft – Sold $865K 3/05 (-13%)
1419 Eclipse – $750K – $229 sq/ft – Sold $885K 10/06 (-15%)On track to sell by 2020:
1005 Brightwood – $699K – $243 sq/ft – Sold $856K 3/05 (-18%)
1089 Brightwood – $699K – $246 sq/ft – Sold $800K 11/04 (-13%)
1474 Anchor – $725K – $258 sq/ft – No sale available (Gorgeous house with ocean view but get real)
1085 Brightwood – $699K – $264 sq/ft – Sold $745K 11/04 (-6%)
1079 Grain Mill – $699K – $270 sq/ft – Sold $654K 6/05 (+7%)
948 Citrine – $750K – $283 sq/ft – Sold $717K 4/06 (+5%) -
December 1, 2007 at 9:42 AM #106375
waiting for bottom
Participant92009 and 92078 SEH drop not much too?
Below is a link to an SEH analysis, see data also. If houses selling 25% below 2005 levels isn’t much to you, then I guess your statement was correct.
http://piggington.com/san_elijo_hills_analysis
Selling for less than purchase price:
1531 Clifftop – $590K – $223 sq/ft – Sold $782K 3/05 (-25%)
1098 Brightwood – $599K – $233 sq/ft – Sold $762K 11/04 (-21%)
704 Hollowbrook – $635K – $226 sq/ft – Sold $754K 1/06 (-16%)
726 Leeward – $648K – $216 sq/ft – Sold $760K 3/06 (-15%)
979 Baylor – $727K – $217 sq/ft – Sold $771K 6/04 (-6%) PENDING SALE – Congrats, good luck with that one.
878 Antilla – $740K – $224 sq/ft – Sold $819K 4/05 (-10%)
855 Antilla – $699K – $194 sq/ft – Sold $872K 7/05 (-20%)
871 Antilla – $750K – $220 sq/ft – Sold $865K 3/05 (-13%)
1419 Eclipse – $750K – $229 sq/ft – Sold $885K 10/06 (-15%)On track to sell by 2020:
1005 Brightwood – $699K – $243 sq/ft – Sold $856K 3/05 (-18%)
1089 Brightwood – $699K – $246 sq/ft – Sold $800K 11/04 (-13%)
1474 Anchor – $725K – $258 sq/ft – No sale available (Gorgeous house with ocean view but get real)
1085 Brightwood – $699K – $264 sq/ft – Sold $745K 11/04 (-6%)
1079 Grain Mill – $699K – $270 sq/ft – Sold $654K 6/05 (+7%)
948 Citrine – $750K – $283 sq/ft – Sold $717K 4/06 (+5%)
-
-
December 1, 2007 at 12:32 AM #106191
niy38
Participant92011 drop little, compared to 92081,92069.
92009 and 92078 SEH drop not much too -
December 1, 2007 at 12:32 AM #106225
niy38
Participant92011 drop little, compared to 92081,92069.
92009 and 92078 SEH drop not much too -
December 1, 2007 at 12:32 AM #106233
niy38
Participant92011 drop little, compared to 92081,92069.
92009 and 92078 SEH drop not much too -
December 1, 2007 at 12:32 AM #106249
niy38
Participant92011 drop little, compared to 92081,92069.
92009 and 92078 SEH drop not much too -
December 1, 2007 at 3:12 PM #106551
niy38
Participanthttp://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-071080892-7017_Snapdragon_Dr_Carlsbad_CA_92011
this owner is still in denial stage.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:12 PM #106647
niy38
Participanthttp://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-071080892-7017_Snapdragon_Dr_Carlsbad_CA_92011
this owner is still in denial stage.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:12 PM #106679
niy38
Participanthttp://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-071080892-7017_Snapdragon_Dr_Carlsbad_CA_92011
this owner is still in denial stage.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:12 PM #106687
niy38
Participanthttp://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-071080892-7017_Snapdragon_Dr_Carlsbad_CA_92011
this owner is still in denial stage.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:12 PM #106708
niy38
Participanthttp://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-071080892-7017_Snapdragon_Dr_Carlsbad_CA_92011
this owner is still in denial stage.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:48 PM #106675
niy38
ParticipantCarlsbad is holding well and just start to show declining.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:48 PM #106773
niy38
ParticipantCarlsbad is holding well and just start to show declining.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:48 PM #106804
niy38
ParticipantCarlsbad is holding well and just start to show declining.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:48 PM #106812
niy38
ParticipantCarlsbad is holding well and just start to show declining.
-
December 1, 2007 at 3:48 PM #106833
niy38
ParticipantCarlsbad is holding well and just start to show declining.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.