[bubble_contagion]

This should work:

http://www.barnowlboxes.com/

[bubble_contagion]

This should work:

http://www.barnowlboxes.com/

[bubble_contagion]

This should work:

http://www.barnowlboxes.com/

[bubble_contagion]

This should work:

http://www.barnowlboxes.com/

[bubble_contagion]

Maybe Americans should outsource their children’s parenting to the Chinese. I see a business opportunity here.

[bubble_contagion]

Maybe Americans should outsource their children’s parenting to the Chinese. I see a business opportunity here.

[bubble_contagion]

Maybe Americans should outsource their children’s parenting to the Chinese. I see a business opportunity here.

[bubble_contagion]

Maybe Americans should outsource their children’s parenting to the Chinese. I see a business opportunity here.

[bubble_contagion]

Maybe Americans should outsource their children’s parenting to the Chinese. I see a business opportunity here.

[bubble_contagion]

Just keep in mind that housing prices and interest rates have no relationship. I have read this from several sources including Calculated Risk and Rich. The following quote is from the latest Nov 10 data rodeo:

“I firmly disagree with the idea that there is a one-to-one relationship between rates and prices, such that if rates increase a certain percent, prices should be expected to decline by that percent or anywhere near it. The historical data clearly demonstrates that there is no such correlation. However, there is no question that sustained higher rates will reduce demand, all other thing being equal, just as super-low rates have in recent times boosted housing activity above what it otherwise would have been.”

From CR:

“I’ve tried to explain this several times in several different ways. Price is what you pay for something. Interest rates are related to how the item is financed. Some people pay cash for a house. Would they pay more because interest rates are low? Nope.

Imagine just one buyer gets a special interest rate. Would that lucky buyer be willing to pay more than all other buyers for the same property? Nope.

It is true that low rates make buying more attractive as compared to renting. And that can increase the demand for buying – and more demand might mean slightly higher prices. But if rates are low, a rational buyer will expect mortgages rates to rise when they sell the property, and under the theory that mortgage rates impact price, the price will then fall in the future. That makes the property less attractive, and the buyer in the low interest rate environment will not want to overpay for the house.

So the buyer needs to consider both current interest rates and future interest rates, and by the time they are done doing all the calculations, you get the graph that Leonhardt shows. And that is exactly what I’d expect – there is little relationship between house prices and mortgage rates. That doesn’t surprise me at all.”

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/09/mortgage-rates-and-home-prices.html

I am suspect that there is truly no relationship but the data seems to be clear on this.

[bubble_contagion]

Just keep in mind that housing prices and interest rates have no relationship. I have read this from several sources including Calculated Risk and Rich. The following quote is from the latest Nov 10 data rodeo:

“I firmly disagree with the idea that there is a one-to-one relationship between rates and prices, such that if rates increase a certain percent, prices should be expected to decline by that percent or anywhere near it. The historical data clearly demonstrates that there is no such correlation. However, there is no question that sustained higher rates will reduce demand, all other thing being equal, just as super-low rates have in recent times boosted housing activity above what it otherwise would have been.”

From CR:

“I’ve tried to explain this several times in several different ways. Price is what you pay for something. Interest rates are related to how the item is financed. Some people pay cash for a house. Would they pay more because interest rates are low? Nope.

Imagine just one buyer gets a special interest rate. Would that lucky buyer be willing to pay more than all other buyers for the same property? Nope.

It is true that low rates make buying more attractive as compared to renting. And that can increase the demand for buying – and more demand might mean slightly higher prices. But if rates are low, a rational buyer will expect mortgages rates to rise when they sell the property, and under the theory that mortgage rates impact price, the price will then fall in the future. That makes the property less attractive, and the buyer in the low interest rate environment will not want to overpay for the house.

So the buyer needs to consider both current interest rates and future interest rates, and by the time they are done doing all the calculations, you get the graph that Leonhardt shows. And that is exactly what I’d expect – there is little relationship between house prices and mortgage rates. That doesn’t surprise me at all.”

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/09/mortgage-rates-and-home-prices.html

I am suspect that there is truly no relationship but the data seems to be clear on this.

[bubble_contagion]

Just keep in mind that housing prices and interest rates have no relationship. I have read this from several sources including Calculated Risk and Rich. The following quote is from the latest Nov 10 data rodeo:

“I firmly disagree with the idea that there is a one-to-one relationship between rates and prices, such that if rates increase a certain percent, prices should be expected to decline by that percent or anywhere near it. The historical data clearly demonstrates that there is no such correlation. However, there is no question that sustained higher rates will reduce demand, all other thing being equal, just as super-low rates have in recent times boosted housing activity above what it otherwise would have been.”

From CR:

“I’ve tried to explain this several times in several different ways. Price is what you pay for something. Interest rates are related to how the item is financed. Some people pay cash for a house. Would they pay more because interest rates are low? Nope.

Imagine just one buyer gets a special interest rate. Would that lucky buyer be willing to pay more than all other buyers for the same property? Nope.

It is true that low rates make buying more attractive as compared to renting. And that can increase the demand for buying – and more demand might mean slightly higher prices. But if rates are low, a rational buyer will expect mortgages rates to rise when they sell the property, and under the theory that mortgage rates impact price, the price will then fall in the future. That makes the property less attractive, and the buyer in the low interest rate environment will not want to overpay for the house.

So the buyer needs to consider both current interest rates and future interest rates, and by the time they are done doing all the calculations, you get the graph that Leonhardt shows. And that is exactly what I’d expect – there is little relationship between house prices and mortgage rates. That doesn’t surprise me at all.”

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/09/mortgage-rates-and-home-prices.html

I am suspect that there is truly no relationship but the data seems to be clear on this.

[bubble_contagion]

Just keep in mind that housing prices and interest rates have no relationship. I have read this from several sources including Calculated Risk and Rich. The following quote is from the latest Nov 10 data rodeo:

“I firmly disagree with the idea that there is a one-to-one relationship between rates and prices, such that if rates increase a certain percent, prices should be expected to decline by that percent or anywhere near it. The historical data clearly demonstrates that there is no such correlation. However, there is no question that sustained higher rates will reduce demand, all other thing being equal, just as super-low rates have in recent times boosted housing activity above what it otherwise would have been.”

From CR:

“I’ve tried to explain this several times in several different ways. Price is what you pay for something. Interest rates are related to how the item is financed. Some people pay cash for a house. Would they pay more because interest rates are low? Nope.

Imagine just one buyer gets a special interest rate. Would that lucky buyer be willing to pay more than all other buyers for the same property? Nope.

It is true that low rates make buying more attractive as compared to renting. And that can increase the demand for buying – and more demand might mean slightly higher prices. But if rates are low, a rational buyer will expect mortgages rates to rise when they sell the property, and under the theory that mortgage rates impact price, the price will then fall in the future. That makes the property less attractive, and the buyer in the low interest rate environment will not want to overpay for the house.

So the buyer needs to consider both current interest rates and future interest rates, and by the time they are done doing all the calculations, you get the graph that Leonhardt shows. And that is exactly what I’d expect – there is little relationship between house prices and mortgage rates. That doesn’t surprise me at all.”

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/09/mortgage-rates-and-home-prices.html

I am suspect that there is truly no relationship but the data seems to be clear on this.

[bubble_contagion]

Just keep in mind that housing prices and interest rates have no relationship. I have read this from several sources including Calculated Risk and Rich. The following quote is from the latest Nov 10 data rodeo:

“I firmly disagree with the idea that there is a one-to-one relationship between rates and prices, such that if rates increase a certain percent, prices should be expected to decline by that percent or anywhere near it. The historical data clearly demonstrates that there is no such correlation. However, there is no question that sustained higher rates will reduce demand, all other thing being equal, just as super-low rates have in recent times boosted housing activity above what it otherwise would have been.”

From CR:

“I’ve tried to explain this several times in several different ways. Price is what you pay for something. Interest rates are related to how the item is financed. Some people pay cash for a house. Would they pay more because interest rates are low? Nope.

Imagine just one buyer gets a special interest rate. Would that lucky buyer be willing to pay more than all other buyers for the same property? Nope.

It is true that low rates make buying more attractive as compared to renting. And that can increase the demand for buying – and more demand might mean slightly higher prices. But if rates are low, a rational buyer will expect mortgages rates to rise when they sell the property, and under the theory that mortgage rates impact price, the price will then fall in the future. That makes the property less attractive, and the buyer in the low interest rate environment will not want to overpay for the house.

So the buyer needs to consider both current interest rates and future interest rates, and by the time they are done doing all the calculations, you get the graph that Leonhardt shows. And that is exactly what I’d expect – there is little relationship between house prices and mortgage rates. That doesn’t surprise me at all.”

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/09/mortgage-rates-and-home-prices.html

I am suspect that there is truly no relationship but the data seems to be clear on this.

[bubble_contagion]

Last December I bough a plasma at Best Buy. Three weeks later the price dropped and I went for a refund. I check prices just before the price match period ends. Usually about 30 days.

[Author]

Posts