Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 28, 2008 at 10:27 PM in reply to: Real-estate ad offers buyer opportunity to marry ‘Princess Lost in America’ #230727
bsrsharma
ParticipantUnless stated so clearly, most money market funds are not FDIC insured. However, it may be covered by SIPC.
See http://www.sipc.org/how/covers.cfm
I think my IRA would be protected by SIPC; but don’t want to test it! In case of massive failure, I don’t know how well SIPC can hold up. At least FDIC is taxpayer backed.
ParticipantUnless stated so clearly, most money market funds are not FDIC insured. However, it may be covered by SIPC.
See http://www.sipc.org/how/covers.cfm
I think my IRA would be protected by SIPC; but don’t want to test it! In case of massive failure, I don’t know how well SIPC can hold up. At least FDIC is taxpayer backed.
ParticipantUnless stated so clearly, most money market funds are not FDIC insured. However, it may be covered by SIPC.
See http://www.sipc.org/how/covers.cfm
I think my IRA would be protected by SIPC; but don’t want to test it! In case of massive failure, I don’t know how well SIPC can hold up. At least FDIC is taxpayer backed.
ParticipantUnless stated so clearly, most money market funds are not FDIC insured. However, it may be covered by SIPC.
See http://www.sipc.org/how/covers.cfm
I think my IRA would be protected by SIPC; but don’t want to test it! In case of massive failure, I don’t know how well SIPC can hold up. At least FDIC is taxpayer backed.
ParticipantUnless stated so clearly, most money market funds are not FDIC insured. However, it may be covered by SIPC.
See http://www.sipc.org/how/covers.cfm
I think my IRA would be protected by SIPC; but don’t want to test it! In case of massive failure, I don’t know how well SIPC can hold up. At least FDIC is taxpayer backed.
ParticipantAny updates on Wachovia?
I have an IRA with A.G.Edwards that was taken over by Wachovia. I know WB is neck deep in mortgage mess and sinking; should I be worried about it going under? Cramer wrote recently that GM, Citigroup, Wachovia, Wamu are all pretty much done.
ParticipantAny updates on Wachovia?
I have an IRA with A.G.Edwards that was taken over by Wachovia. I know WB is neck deep in mortgage mess and sinking; should I be worried about it going under? Cramer wrote recently that GM, Citigroup, Wachovia, Wamu are all pretty much done.
ParticipantAny updates on Wachovia?
I have an IRA with A.G.Edwards that was taken over by Wachovia. I know WB is neck deep in mortgage mess and sinking; should I be worried about it going under? Cramer wrote recently that GM, Citigroup, Wachovia, Wamu are all pretty much done.
ParticipantAny updates on Wachovia?
I have an IRA with A.G.Edwards that was taken over by Wachovia. I know WB is neck deep in mortgage mess and sinking; should I be worried about it going under? Cramer wrote recently that GM, Citigroup, Wachovia, Wamu are all pretty much done.
ParticipantAny updates on Wachovia?
I have an IRA with A.G.Edwards that was taken over by Wachovia. I know WB is neck deep in mortgage mess and sinking; should I be worried about it going under? Cramer wrote recently that GM, Citigroup, Wachovia, Wamu are all pretty much done.
June 28, 2008 at 6:23 PM in reply to: Birth Certificate suggest Obama may not be a natural born US citizen #230393ParticipantA little common sense may help:
1. Let us assume he is not a natural born citizen.
2. Then he is:
3. Either an illegal immigrant (and an alien)
4. or a legal immigrant (and an alien)
5. or a naturalized citizen.
6. But he has a U.S. State department issued passport
7. So he is not 3 or 4.
8. If he is 5, there would be naturalization records and it would be easily accessible. None are known.
9. He has to be natural born. Otherwise, US State department is dumb as doornail to issue a passport to a foreigner. Also, the State of Illinois is careless enough to elect a foreigner for State & federal Senate. In which case, why bother to even worry? what is there to defend?
June 28, 2008 at 6:23 PM in reply to: Birth Certificate suggest Obama may not be a natural born US citizen #230515ParticipantA little common sense may help:
1. Let us assume he is not a natural born citizen.
2. Then he is:
3. Either an illegal immigrant (and an alien)
4. or a legal immigrant (and an alien)
5. or a naturalized citizen.
6. But he has a U.S. State department issued passport
7. So he is not 3 or 4.
8. If he is 5, there would be naturalization records and it would be easily accessible. None are known.
9. He has to be natural born. Otherwise, US State department is dumb as doornail to issue a passport to a foreigner. Also, the State of Illinois is careless enough to elect a foreigner for State & federal Senate. In which case, why bother to even worry? what is there to defend?
June 28, 2008 at 6:23 PM in reply to: Birth Certificate suggest Obama may not be a natural born US citizen #230525ParticipantA little common sense may help:
1. Let us assume he is not a natural born citizen.
2. Then he is:
3. Either an illegal immigrant (and an alien)
4. or a legal immigrant (and an alien)
5. or a naturalized citizen.
6. But he has a U.S. State department issued passport
7. So he is not 3 or 4.
8. If he is 5, there would be naturalization records and it would be easily accessible. None are known.
9. He has to be natural born. Otherwise, US State department is dumb as doornail to issue a passport to a foreigner. Also, the State of Illinois is careless enough to elect a foreigner for State & federal Senate. In which case, why bother to even worry? what is there to defend?
June 28, 2008 at 6:23 PM in reply to: Birth Certificate suggest Obama may not be a natural born US citizen #230560ParticipantA little common sense may help:
1. Let us assume he is not a natural born citizen.
2. Then he is:
3. Either an illegal immigrant (and an alien)
4. or a legal immigrant (and an alien)
5. or a naturalized citizen.
6. But he has a U.S. State department issued passport
7. So he is not 3 or 4.
8. If he is 5, there would be naturalization records and it would be easily accessible. None are known.
9. He has to be natural born. Otherwise, US State department is dumb as doornail to issue a passport to a foreigner. Also, the State of Illinois is careless enough to elect a foreigner for State & federal Senate. In which case, why bother to even worry? what is there to defend?
-
AuthorPosts
