Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
bsrsharma
ParticipantThough I think highly of BB, I think this assessment was purely political. All indicators seem to be worse than in the ’70s. If we can get away with a repeat of 1974-82, we should count ourselves lucky!
bsrsharma
ParticipantThough I think highly of BB, I think this assessment was purely political. All indicators seem to be worse than in the ’70s. If we can get away with a repeat of 1974-82, we should count ourselves lucky!
bsrsharma
ParticipantThough I think highly of BB, I think this assessment was purely political. All indicators seem to be worse than in the ’70s. If we can get away with a repeat of 1974-82, we should count ourselves lucky!
bsrsharma
ParticipantThough I think highly of BB, I think this assessment was purely political. All indicators seem to be worse than in the ’70s. If we can get away with a repeat of 1974-82, we should count ourselves lucky!
bsrsharma
ParticipantThough I think highly of BB, I think this assessment was purely political. All indicators seem to be worse than in the ’70s. If we can get away with a repeat of 1974-82, we should count ourselves lucky!
bsrsharma
Participanttechnologies that are very close ie.. cheap lithium ion batteries. nanoparticles that could make hydrogen cheaper than gasoline..
Sadly, as a technologist, I should disagree with the "very close" description. We still have to depend on public transport, rail and conservation for near future. Battery and Hydrogen are nowhere near maturity to replace oil. The capital costs to build & replace the batteries and charging systems are still not well understood. e.g. we all know about CO2 emission/green house effect/global warming etc, but can anyone tell the effect of scrapping, say, tens of millions of high capacity lithium batteries per year? What are its impacts on air & water pollution? health impacts (cancer/birth defects/mental retardation? – Lithium is used in psychiatric medicine) We may get stuck with problems like nuclear waste or asbestos.
bsrsharma
Participanttechnologies that are very close ie.. cheap lithium ion batteries. nanoparticles that could make hydrogen cheaper than gasoline..
Sadly, as a technologist, I should disagree with the "very close" description. We still have to depend on public transport, rail and conservation for near future. Battery and Hydrogen are nowhere near maturity to replace oil. The capital costs to build & replace the batteries and charging systems are still not well understood. e.g. we all know about CO2 emission/green house effect/global warming etc, but can anyone tell the effect of scrapping, say, tens of millions of high capacity lithium batteries per year? What are its impacts on air & water pollution? health impacts (cancer/birth defects/mental retardation? – Lithium is used in psychiatric medicine) We may get stuck with problems like nuclear waste or asbestos.
bsrsharma
Participanttechnologies that are very close ie.. cheap lithium ion batteries. nanoparticles that could make hydrogen cheaper than gasoline..
Sadly, as a technologist, I should disagree with the "very close" description. We still have to depend on public transport, rail and conservation for near future. Battery and Hydrogen are nowhere near maturity to replace oil. The capital costs to build & replace the batteries and charging systems are still not well understood. e.g. we all know about CO2 emission/green house effect/global warming etc, but can anyone tell the effect of scrapping, say, tens of millions of high capacity lithium batteries per year? What are its impacts on air & water pollution? health impacts (cancer/birth defects/mental retardation? – Lithium is used in psychiatric medicine) We may get stuck with problems like nuclear waste or asbestos.
bsrsharma
Participanttechnologies that are very close ie.. cheap lithium ion batteries. nanoparticles that could make hydrogen cheaper than gasoline..
Sadly, as a technologist, I should disagree with the "very close" description. We still have to depend on public transport, rail and conservation for near future. Battery and Hydrogen are nowhere near maturity to replace oil. The capital costs to build & replace the batteries and charging systems are still not well understood. e.g. we all know about CO2 emission/green house effect/global warming etc, but can anyone tell the effect of scrapping, say, tens of millions of high capacity lithium batteries per year? What are its impacts on air & water pollution? health impacts (cancer/birth defects/mental retardation? – Lithium is used in psychiatric medicine) We may get stuck with problems like nuclear waste or asbestos.
bsrsharma
Participanttechnologies that are very close ie.. cheap lithium ion batteries. nanoparticles that could make hydrogen cheaper than gasoline..
Sadly, as a technologist, I should disagree with the "very close" description. We still have to depend on public transport, rail and conservation for near future. Battery and Hydrogen are nowhere near maturity to replace oil. The capital costs to build & replace the batteries and charging systems are still not well understood. e.g. we all know about CO2 emission/green house effect/global warming etc, but can anyone tell the effect of scrapping, say, tens of millions of high capacity lithium batteries per year? What are its impacts on air & water pollution? health impacts (cancer/birth defects/mental retardation? – Lithium is used in psychiatric medicine) We may get stuck with problems like nuclear waste or asbestos.
bsrsharma
ParticipantCongressman Paul is an intelligent man; but to say that an obstetrician by training “schooled” Bernanke, an ex Princeton professor and author of textbooks on monitary policy is sheer chutzpah!
bsrsharma
ParticipantCongressman Paul is an intelligent man; but to say that an obstetrician by training “schooled” Bernanke, an ex Princeton professor and author of textbooks on monitary policy is sheer chutzpah!
bsrsharma
ParticipantCongressman Paul is an intelligent man; but to say that an obstetrician by training “schooled” Bernanke, an ex Princeton professor and author of textbooks on monitary policy is sheer chutzpah!
bsrsharma
ParticipantCongressman Paul is an intelligent man; but to say that an obstetrician by training “schooled” Bernanke, an ex Princeton professor and author of textbooks on monitary policy is sheer chutzpah!
-
AuthorPosts
