Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
blahblahblah
Participant[quote=ucodegen]
I am going to add the following – because I just got through dealing with it. We are shipping too much of our labor overseas, and it really doesn’t pay off. Too many companies are looking at the raw labor cost not factoring in production rate and quality. The reason this came up: I had to deal with Oracle support (MOS). On one issue, I had to deal with support based in China. The experience was almost like “Who’s on First”. Fine if I was wanting entertainment, but I have to deal with a system with reduced functionality – needs to be fixed. Part of the discussion ended up with the support person repeating everything I had entered, but in the form of a question.[/quote]I feel your pain UCG, but I’m worried that the outcome will simply be to move everything overseas. Case in point – I know of a couple of projects where everyone involved is in China except project management which is here in the US. They have lots of problems, delays, etc… that all come down to time zone and communications issues. So what’s easier? Move all of the work back here or just hire a PM in China?
Once the big rock starts rolling downhill it’s hard to stop. I’m just trying to get out of the way.
I am heartened by this new show “Hoarders”, though. I think that hoarding cleanup might be a good business to get into.
Participant[quote=afx114]I read a good quote on Andrew Sullivan’s blog today: “Best way to explain it is because Paul’s support is a mile deep and an inch wide. “[/quote]
The opposite is true of Sullivan’s audience.
Participant[quote=afx114]I read a good quote on Andrew Sullivan’s blog today: “Best way to explain it is because Paul’s support is a mile deep and an inch wide. “[/quote]
The opposite is true of Sullivan’s audience.
Participant[quote=afx114]I read a good quote on Andrew Sullivan’s blog today: “Best way to explain it is because Paul’s support is a mile deep and an inch wide. “[/quote]
The opposite is true of Sullivan’s audience.
Participant[quote=afx114]I read a good quote on Andrew Sullivan’s blog today: “Best way to explain it is because Paul’s support is a mile deep and an inch wide. “[/quote]
The opposite is true of Sullivan’s audience.
Participant[quote=afx114]I read a good quote on Andrew Sullivan’s blog today: “Best way to explain it is because Paul’s support is a mile deep and an inch wide. “[/quote]
The opposite is true of Sullivan’s audience.
Participant[quote=UCGal]
Presidents nominate supreme court justices.[/quote]Exactly! That is why they can instantly change any law they want to. When they are elected they can immediately appoint all new supreme court justices who then go to work the next day and change all the laws.
Participant[quote=UCGal]
Presidents nominate supreme court justices.[/quote]Exactly! That is why they can instantly change any law they want to. When they are elected they can immediately appoint all new supreme court justices who then go to work the next day and change all the laws.
Participant[quote=UCGal]
Presidents nominate supreme court justices.[/quote]Exactly! That is why they can instantly change any law they want to. When they are elected they can immediately appoint all new supreme court justices who then go to work the next day and change all the laws.
Participant[quote=UCGal]
Presidents nominate supreme court justices.[/quote]Exactly! That is why they can instantly change any law they want to. When they are elected they can immediately appoint all new supreme court justices who then go to work the next day and change all the laws.
Participant[quote=UCGal]
Presidents nominate supreme court justices.[/quote]Exactly! That is why they can instantly change any law they want to. When they are elected they can immediately appoint all new supreme court justices who then go to work the next day and change all the laws.
ParticipantCertainly one could never vote for a presidential candidate who holds any different views than your own. Everyone knows that if the president wants to, he can instantly change the laws to reflect his personal views. If you are pro-choice, never ever ever vote for someone who is pro-life because if they are elected abortions will immediately become illegal. Conversely, if you are pro-life but vote for a pro-choice president, the day they take office there will be free abortion clinics on every corner.
It is easy to choose who to vote for. Just choose the person who says the most pleasing things, the things that disturb you the least.
ParticipantCertainly one could never vote for a presidential candidate who holds any different views than your own. Everyone knows that if the president wants to, he can instantly change the laws to reflect his personal views. If you are pro-choice, never ever ever vote for someone who is pro-life because if they are elected abortions will immediately become illegal. Conversely, if you are pro-life but vote for a pro-choice president, the day they take office there will be free abortion clinics on every corner.
It is easy to choose who to vote for. Just choose the person who says the most pleasing things, the things that disturb you the least.
ParticipantCertainly one could never vote for a presidential candidate who holds any different views than your own. Everyone knows that if the president wants to, he can instantly change the laws to reflect his personal views. If you are pro-choice, never ever ever vote for someone who is pro-life because if they are elected abortions will immediately become illegal. Conversely, if you are pro-life but vote for a pro-choice president, the day they take office there will be free abortion clinics on every corner.
It is easy to choose who to vote for. Just choose the person who says the most pleasing things, the things that disturb you the least.
-
AuthorPosts
