Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
4runner
ParticipantWe will still enjoy a higher standard of living than the majority of the world.
YEEE-HAAA!!!! We’re above average!!!! U-S-A!!! U-S-A!!! U-S-A!!!
ParticipantWe will still enjoy a higher standard of living than the majority of the world.
YEEE-HAAA!!!! We’re above average!!!! U-S-A!!! U-S-A!!! U-S-A!!!
ParticipantWe will still enjoy a higher standard of living than the majority of the world.
YEEE-HAAA!!!! We’re above average!!!! U-S-A!!! U-S-A!!! U-S-A!!!
October 29, 2007 at 6:23 PM in reply to: New Contest – Best example of chasing the market down #93021ParticipantYou can’t start a contest thread when you are sure to win…
October 29, 2007 at 6:23 PM in reply to: New Contest – Best example of chasing the market down #93055ParticipantYou can’t start a contest thread when you are sure to win…
October 29, 2007 at 6:23 PM in reply to: New Contest – Best example of chasing the market down #93067ParticipantYou can’t start a contest thread when you are sure to win…
Participantmedian won’t be dropping very much because people like me don’t decrease their price range,
A year ago, you could finance 5-6 times your income by avoiding having to document it. As standards tighten up, borrowers will presumably be limited to 3 times their income.
In other words, people will have to decrease their price range whether they want to or not…
Participantmedian won’t be dropping very much because people like me don’t decrease their price range,
A year ago, you could finance 5-6 times your income by avoiding having to document it. As standards tighten up, borrowers will presumably be limited to 3 times their income.
In other words, people will have to decrease their price range whether they want to or not…
ParticipantCan someone explain why this isn’t an antitrust violation?
ParticipantCan someone explain why this isn’t an antitrust violation?
October 8, 2007 at 10:29 AM in reply to: Biggest percentage loss in San Diego, purchased price vs. list or sold price #87337ParticipantHere’s a 3 bedroom in “South Mission Hills” (i.e., Middleton).
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-63DC2E3A-3603_Union_St_San_Diego_CA_92103
Prior sale: 03/21/2006 $850,000
It was listed for $589,500. The last sale hasn’t shown up, but it is now assessed at $528,850.
The loss is in the 30-37% range…
October 8, 2007 at 10:29 AM in reply to: Biggest percentage loss in San Diego, purchased price vs. list or sold price #87344ParticipantHere’s a 3 bedroom in “South Mission Hills” (i.e., Middleton).
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-63DC2E3A-3603_Union_St_San_Diego_CA_92103
Prior sale: 03/21/2006 $850,000
It was listed for $589,500. The last sale hasn’t shown up, but it is now assessed at $528,850.
The loss is in the 30-37% range…
ParticipantI do think something needs to be done about the education of the borrower though.
There is much too much blame being directed at the borrowers. The Wall street geniuses who lent money to these borrowers couldn’t figure out that the borrowers were unlikely to be able to pay.
You expect the borrowers to figure that out on their own?
ParticipantRe: some banks dumping
Bugs, TMC: Is there any correlation between which banks are dumping and the size of their REO holdings?
-
AuthorPosts
