[4plexowner]

that’s what I get for believing a Reader article from 18 years ago – perhaps the article was more accurate at the time

to each their own – you still won’t see me swimming in Mission Bay and I will continue to tell my kids and guests that there are cleaner places to swim and play in the water

neither of the articles addressed tidal flushing or the circulation in the Bay other than to say that lack of circulation makes enclosed bays more of a challenge to keep clean

I threw in the offshore water quality issue because I was talking about water quality in San Diego – and no, the offshore water quality has nothing to do with Mission Bay

[4plexowner]

that’s what I get for believing a Reader article from 18 years ago – perhaps the article was more accurate at the time

to each their own – you still won’t see me swimming in Mission Bay and I will continue to tell my kids and guests that there are cleaner places to swim and play in the water

neither of the articles addressed tidal flushing or the circulation in the Bay other than to say that lack of circulation makes enclosed bays more of a challenge to keep clean

I threw in the offshore water quality issue because I was talking about water quality in San Diego – and no, the offshore water quality has nothing to do with Mission Bay

[4plexowner]

that’s what I get for believing a Reader article from 18 years ago – perhaps the article was more accurate at the time

to each their own – you still won’t see me swimming in Mission Bay and I will continue to tell my kids and guests that there are cleaner places to swim and play in the water

neither of the articles addressed tidal flushing or the circulation in the Bay other than to say that lack of circulation makes enclosed bays more of a challenge to keep clean

I threw in the offshore water quality issue because I was talking about water quality in San Diego – and no, the offshore water quality has nothing to do with Mission Bay

[4plexowner]

that’s what I get for believing a Reader article from 18 years ago – perhaps the article was more accurate at the time

to each their own – you still won’t see me swimming in Mission Bay and I will continue to tell my kids and guests that there are cleaner places to swim and play in the water

neither of the articles addressed tidal flushing or the circulation in the Bay other than to say that lack of circulation makes enclosed bays more of a challenge to keep clean

I threw in the offshore water quality issue because I was talking about water quality in San Diego – and no, the offshore water quality has nothing to do with Mission Bay

[4plexowner]

that’s what I get for believing a Reader article from 18 years ago – perhaps the article was more accurate at the time

to each their own – you still won’t see me swimming in Mission Bay and I will continue to tell my kids and guests that there are cleaner places to swim and play in the water

neither of the articles addressed tidal flushing or the circulation in the Bay other than to say that lack of circulation makes enclosed bays more of a challenge to keep clean

I threw in the offshore water quality issue because I was talking about water quality in San Diego – and no, the offshore water quality has nothing to do with Mission Bay

[4plexowner]

here’s the math

peak in 2006/7

typical time from peak to trough in SoCal is 6 or 7 years

2006/7 plus 6 or 7 takes us to 2012 to 2014 for the next trough

then we scrape along the bottom for 2 or 3 years so we are looking at 2014 to 2017 when the next appreciation cycle starts (not peaks)

~

it isn’t relevant to this thread but I don’t understand how people can think we have reached a bottom in 2009 only 2 or 3 years after the peak

and that’s without going into the magnitude of the cycle that peaked in 2006/7 – it might be reasonable to expect a larger (longer?) than normal down cycle after the bursting of the largest real estate bubble the planet has ever seen

[4plexowner]

here’s the math

peak in 2006/7

typical time from peak to trough in SoCal is 6 or 7 years

2006/7 plus 6 or 7 takes us to 2012 to 2014 for the next trough

then we scrape along the bottom for 2 or 3 years so we are looking at 2014 to 2017 when the next appreciation cycle starts (not peaks)

~

it isn’t relevant to this thread but I don’t understand how people can think we have reached a bottom in 2009 only 2 or 3 years after the peak

and that’s without going into the magnitude of the cycle that peaked in 2006/7 – it might be reasonable to expect a larger (longer?) than normal down cycle after the bursting of the largest real estate bubble the planet has ever seen

[4plexowner]

here’s the math

peak in 2006/7

typical time from peak to trough in SoCal is 6 or 7 years

2006/7 plus 6 or 7 takes us to 2012 to 2014 for the next trough

then we scrape along the bottom for 2 or 3 years so we are looking at 2014 to 2017 when the next appreciation cycle starts (not peaks)

~

it isn’t relevant to this thread but I don’t understand how people can think we have reached a bottom in 2009 only 2 or 3 years after the peak

and that’s without going into the magnitude of the cycle that peaked in 2006/7 – it might be reasonable to expect a larger (longer?) than normal down cycle after the bursting of the largest real estate bubble the planet has ever seen

[4plexowner]

here’s the math

peak in 2006/7

typical time from peak to trough in SoCal is 6 or 7 years

2006/7 plus 6 or 7 takes us to 2012 to 2014 for the next trough

then we scrape along the bottom for 2 or 3 years so we are looking at 2014 to 2017 when the next appreciation cycle starts (not peaks)

~

it isn’t relevant to this thread but I don’t understand how people can think we have reached a bottom in 2009 only 2 or 3 years after the peak

and that’s without going into the magnitude of the cycle that peaked in 2006/7 – it might be reasonable to expect a larger (longer?) than normal down cycle after the bursting of the largest real estate bubble the planet has ever seen

[4plexowner]

here’s the math

peak in 2006/7

typical time from peak to trough in SoCal is 6 or 7 years

2006/7 plus 6 or 7 takes us to 2012 to 2014 for the next trough

then we scrape along the bottom for 2 or 3 years so we are looking at 2014 to 2017 when the next appreciation cycle starts (not peaks)

~

it isn’t relevant to this thread but I don’t understand how people can think we have reached a bottom in 2009 only 2 or 3 years after the peak

and that’s without going into the magnitude of the cycle that peaked in 2006/7 – it might be reasonable to expect a larger (longer?) than normal down cycle after the bursting of the largest real estate bubble the planet has ever seen

[4plexowner]

“The median price for a single-family home was $327,300 in the first quarter, the company said. Based on historic trends for household income, affordability and appreciation, the “normal” value should have been $415,300.”

the methodology is based on median prices – enough time wasted here – the article is garbage

[4plexowner]

“The median price for a single-family home was $327,300 in the first quarter, the company said. Based on historic trends for household income, affordability and appreciation, the “normal” value should have been $415,300.”

the methodology is based on median prices – enough time wasted here – the article is garbage

[4plexowner]

“The median price for a single-family home was $327,300 in the first quarter, the company said. Based on historic trends for household income, affordability and appreciation, the “normal” value should have been $415,300.”

the methodology is based on median prices – enough time wasted here – the article is garbage

[4plexowner]

“The median price for a single-family home was $327,300 in the first quarter, the company said. Based on historic trends for household income, affordability and appreciation, the “normal” value should have been $415,300.”

the methodology is based on median prices – enough time wasted here – the article is garbage

[4plexowner]

“The median price for a single-family home was $327,300 in the first quarter, the company said. Based on historic trends for household income, affordability and appreciation, the “normal” value should have been $415,300.”

the methodology is based on median prices – enough time wasted here – the article is garbage

[Author]

Posts