Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Who’s been to a Wal-Mart Super Center?
- This topic has 270 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 27, 2009 at 10:09 PM #475343October 27, 2009 at 10:12 PM #474504paramountParticipant
[quote=Trojan4Life]I think if Walmart’s 1.5 million US associates were affected by the 12% unemployment rate, we’d be in even a worse mess. I have 500-600 people apply for every vacant job we post. We are not the problem, Captcha…[/quote]
Not sure I would agree with that – isn’t it true that businesses and communities are really negatively impacted in the area around Wal Mart’s?
Also, $11/hour (or slightly more) is not even a living wage IMO.
October 27, 2009 at 10:12 PM #474681paramountParticipant[quote=Trojan4Life]I think if Walmart’s 1.5 million US associates were affected by the 12% unemployment rate, we’d be in even a worse mess. I have 500-600 people apply for every vacant job we post. We are not the problem, Captcha…[/quote]
Not sure I would agree with that – isn’t it true that businesses and communities are really negatively impacted in the area around Wal Mart’s?
Also, $11/hour (or slightly more) is not even a living wage IMO.
October 27, 2009 at 10:12 PM #475045paramountParticipant[quote=Trojan4Life]I think if Walmart’s 1.5 million US associates were affected by the 12% unemployment rate, we’d be in even a worse mess. I have 500-600 people apply for every vacant job we post. We are not the problem, Captcha…[/quote]
Not sure I would agree with that – isn’t it true that businesses and communities are really negatively impacted in the area around Wal Mart’s?
Also, $11/hour (or slightly more) is not even a living wage IMO.
October 27, 2009 at 10:12 PM #475122paramountParticipant[quote=Trojan4Life]I think if Walmart’s 1.5 million US associates were affected by the 12% unemployment rate, we’d be in even a worse mess. I have 500-600 people apply for every vacant job we post. We are not the problem, Captcha…[/quote]
Not sure I would agree with that – isn’t it true that businesses and communities are really negatively impacted in the area around Wal Mart’s?
Also, $11/hour (or slightly more) is not even a living wage IMO.
October 27, 2009 at 10:12 PM #475348paramountParticipant[quote=Trojan4Life]I think if Walmart’s 1.5 million US associates were affected by the 12% unemployment rate, we’d be in even a worse mess. I have 500-600 people apply for every vacant job we post. We are not the problem, Captcha…[/quote]
Not sure I would agree with that – isn’t it true that businesses and communities are really negatively impacted in the area around Wal Mart’s?
Also, $11/hour (or slightly more) is not even a living wage IMO.
October 28, 2009 at 6:12 AM #474549blahblahblahParticipantSome of us remember living in a world before Wal-Mart. Some of us remember living in a world where the average Joe had a good job and got by just fine. Many of the houses in San Diego were owned by average Joes at one time, they fed their families, sent their kids to college, paid off their houses, and took vacations to Yosemite and Las Vegas. That world is long gone. Is Wal-Mart to blame? I don’t think so, I think Wal-Mart is a symptom of the disease. The disease is (pick your term): globalization, privatization, neo-feudalism, NWO, etc… They all basically mean the same thing. Less for us and more for the guys at the top, who grow fewer in number and more powerful day by day.
Back to work, slaves!
October 28, 2009 at 6:12 AM #474726blahblahblahParticipantSome of us remember living in a world before Wal-Mart. Some of us remember living in a world where the average Joe had a good job and got by just fine. Many of the houses in San Diego were owned by average Joes at one time, they fed their families, sent their kids to college, paid off their houses, and took vacations to Yosemite and Las Vegas. That world is long gone. Is Wal-Mart to blame? I don’t think so, I think Wal-Mart is a symptom of the disease. The disease is (pick your term): globalization, privatization, neo-feudalism, NWO, etc… They all basically mean the same thing. Less for us and more for the guys at the top, who grow fewer in number and more powerful day by day.
Back to work, slaves!
October 28, 2009 at 6:12 AM #475090blahblahblahParticipantSome of us remember living in a world before Wal-Mart. Some of us remember living in a world where the average Joe had a good job and got by just fine. Many of the houses in San Diego were owned by average Joes at one time, they fed their families, sent their kids to college, paid off their houses, and took vacations to Yosemite and Las Vegas. That world is long gone. Is Wal-Mart to blame? I don’t think so, I think Wal-Mart is a symptom of the disease. The disease is (pick your term): globalization, privatization, neo-feudalism, NWO, etc… They all basically mean the same thing. Less for us and more for the guys at the top, who grow fewer in number and more powerful day by day.
Back to work, slaves!
October 28, 2009 at 6:12 AM #475167blahblahblahParticipantSome of us remember living in a world before Wal-Mart. Some of us remember living in a world where the average Joe had a good job and got by just fine. Many of the houses in San Diego were owned by average Joes at one time, they fed their families, sent their kids to college, paid off their houses, and took vacations to Yosemite and Las Vegas. That world is long gone. Is Wal-Mart to blame? I don’t think so, I think Wal-Mart is a symptom of the disease. The disease is (pick your term): globalization, privatization, neo-feudalism, NWO, etc… They all basically mean the same thing. Less for us and more for the guys at the top, who grow fewer in number and more powerful day by day.
Back to work, slaves!
October 28, 2009 at 6:12 AM #475393blahblahblahParticipantSome of us remember living in a world before Wal-Mart. Some of us remember living in a world where the average Joe had a good job and got by just fine. Many of the houses in San Diego were owned by average Joes at one time, they fed their families, sent their kids to college, paid off their houses, and took vacations to Yosemite and Las Vegas. That world is long gone. Is Wal-Mart to blame? I don’t think so, I think Wal-Mart is a symptom of the disease. The disease is (pick your term): globalization, privatization, neo-feudalism, NWO, etc… They all basically mean the same thing. Less for us and more for the guys at the top, who grow fewer in number and more powerful day by day.
Back to work, slaves!
October 28, 2009 at 7:12 AM #474564jimmyleParticipantI never shop Vons and Ralphs again. I either shop at Asian Supermarkets, Costco or Walmart. I usually save about 20 to 25% ($150/month) by not shopping at Vons and Ralphs.
Why should I spend $150 extra monthly to help unionized workers at Vons and Ralphs to bag grocery, stock the shelves or clean the floor when they can hire people to do the same things for half the cost? The same thing is happening at unionized GM and Chrysler, why should tax payers giving the two companies more than $50 bil so uneducated workers can make $30/hour in wages + $35/hour in benefits? Can you believe benefits cost more than the salary? Mine is about 35% of my salary and I am happy.
October 28, 2009 at 7:12 AM #474741jimmyleParticipantI never shop Vons and Ralphs again. I either shop at Asian Supermarkets, Costco or Walmart. I usually save about 20 to 25% ($150/month) by not shopping at Vons and Ralphs.
Why should I spend $150 extra monthly to help unionized workers at Vons and Ralphs to bag grocery, stock the shelves or clean the floor when they can hire people to do the same things for half the cost? The same thing is happening at unionized GM and Chrysler, why should tax payers giving the two companies more than $50 bil so uneducated workers can make $30/hour in wages + $35/hour in benefits? Can you believe benefits cost more than the salary? Mine is about 35% of my salary and I am happy.
October 28, 2009 at 7:12 AM #475105jimmyleParticipantI never shop Vons and Ralphs again. I either shop at Asian Supermarkets, Costco or Walmart. I usually save about 20 to 25% ($150/month) by not shopping at Vons and Ralphs.
Why should I spend $150 extra monthly to help unionized workers at Vons and Ralphs to bag grocery, stock the shelves or clean the floor when they can hire people to do the same things for half the cost? The same thing is happening at unionized GM and Chrysler, why should tax payers giving the two companies more than $50 bil so uneducated workers can make $30/hour in wages + $35/hour in benefits? Can you believe benefits cost more than the salary? Mine is about 35% of my salary and I am happy.
October 28, 2009 at 7:12 AM #475182jimmyleParticipantI never shop Vons and Ralphs again. I either shop at Asian Supermarkets, Costco or Walmart. I usually save about 20 to 25% ($150/month) by not shopping at Vons and Ralphs.
Why should I spend $150 extra monthly to help unionized workers at Vons and Ralphs to bag grocery, stock the shelves or clean the floor when they can hire people to do the same things for half the cost? The same thing is happening at unionized GM and Chrysler, why should tax payers giving the two companies more than $50 bil so uneducated workers can make $30/hour in wages + $35/hour in benefits? Can you believe benefits cost more than the salary? Mine is about 35% of my salary and I am happy.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.