- This topic has 740 replies, 31 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 4 months ago by sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 8, 2011 at 1:29 PM #650405January 8, 2011 at 1:45 PM #649302Rich ToscanoKeymaster
[quote=ILoveRegulation]
Just quoting this so you can’t change it. I’ve emailed Rich to see if he will ban you.[/quote]
Yes ILoveRegulation, I got your message, in which you asked:
“Is this worthy of a banishment or is flu one of the privileged posters who is above the rules?”
Those with reading comprehension skills will notice that you implicitly accused me of allowing “privileged users” to operate “above the rules.”
That is pretty funny coming from a user whose handle is 16 hours old.
If you are truly a new user, what is it that makes you think that you can lecture me about the site rules? You clearly have no idea what they are. I have never made rules on profanity or insults — the sole “rule” applies to political threadjacking as outlined here:
http://piggington.com/threadjackers_will_be_persecuted_maybe_even_prosecuted?page=4
If you are not as new to the forum as your 16-hour-old handle would imply, then are you one of these serial threadjackers who occasionally creates a new account with a vaguely provocative username just to start flame wars?
If it’s the latter, I would read above linked post very carefully.
If it’s the former, then welcome… but in the future, please don’t waste my time with semi-insulting requests to intervene just because someone offended your delicate sensibilities.
Rich
January 8, 2011 at 1:45 PM #649373Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=ILoveRegulation]
Just quoting this so you can’t change it. I’ve emailed Rich to see if he will ban you.[/quote]
Yes ILoveRegulation, I got your message, in which you asked:
“Is this worthy of a banishment or is flu one of the privileged posters who is above the rules?”
Those with reading comprehension skills will notice that you implicitly accused me of allowing “privileged users” to operate “above the rules.”
That is pretty funny coming from a user whose handle is 16 hours old.
If you are truly a new user, what is it that makes you think that you can lecture me about the site rules? You clearly have no idea what they are. I have never made rules on profanity or insults — the sole “rule” applies to political threadjacking as outlined here:
http://piggington.com/threadjackers_will_be_persecuted_maybe_even_prosecuted?page=4
If you are not as new to the forum as your 16-hour-old handle would imply, then are you one of these serial threadjackers who occasionally creates a new account with a vaguely provocative username just to start flame wars?
If it’s the latter, I would read above linked post very carefully.
If it’s the former, then welcome… but in the future, please don’t waste my time with semi-insulting requests to intervene just because someone offended your delicate sensibilities.
Rich
January 8, 2011 at 1:45 PM #649959Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=ILoveRegulation]
Just quoting this so you can’t change it. I’ve emailed Rich to see if he will ban you.[/quote]
Yes ILoveRegulation, I got your message, in which you asked:
“Is this worthy of a banishment or is flu one of the privileged posters who is above the rules?”
Those with reading comprehension skills will notice that you implicitly accused me of allowing “privileged users” to operate “above the rules.”
That is pretty funny coming from a user whose handle is 16 hours old.
If you are truly a new user, what is it that makes you think that you can lecture me about the site rules? You clearly have no idea what they are. I have never made rules on profanity or insults — the sole “rule” applies to political threadjacking as outlined here:
http://piggington.com/threadjackers_will_be_persecuted_maybe_even_prosecuted?page=4
If you are not as new to the forum as your 16-hour-old handle would imply, then are you one of these serial threadjackers who occasionally creates a new account with a vaguely provocative username just to start flame wars?
If it’s the latter, I would read above linked post very carefully.
If it’s the former, then welcome… but in the future, please don’t waste my time with semi-insulting requests to intervene just because someone offended your delicate sensibilities.
Rich
January 8, 2011 at 1:45 PM #650095Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=ILoveRegulation]
Just quoting this so you can’t change it. I’ve emailed Rich to see if he will ban you.[/quote]
Yes ILoveRegulation, I got your message, in which you asked:
“Is this worthy of a banishment or is flu one of the privileged posters who is above the rules?”
Those with reading comprehension skills will notice that you implicitly accused me of allowing “privileged users” to operate “above the rules.”
That is pretty funny coming from a user whose handle is 16 hours old.
If you are truly a new user, what is it that makes you think that you can lecture me about the site rules? You clearly have no idea what they are. I have never made rules on profanity or insults — the sole “rule” applies to political threadjacking as outlined here:
http://piggington.com/threadjackers_will_be_persecuted_maybe_even_prosecuted?page=4
If you are not as new to the forum as your 16-hour-old handle would imply, then are you one of these serial threadjackers who occasionally creates a new account with a vaguely provocative username just to start flame wars?
If it’s the latter, I would read above linked post very carefully.
If it’s the former, then welcome… but in the future, please don’t waste my time with semi-insulting requests to intervene just because someone offended your delicate sensibilities.
Rich
January 8, 2011 at 1:45 PM #650420Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=ILoveRegulation]
Just quoting this so you can’t change it. I’ve emailed Rich to see if he will ban you.[/quote]
Yes ILoveRegulation, I got your message, in which you asked:
“Is this worthy of a banishment or is flu one of the privileged posters who is above the rules?”
Those with reading comprehension skills will notice that you implicitly accused me of allowing “privileged users” to operate “above the rules.”
That is pretty funny coming from a user whose handle is 16 hours old.
If you are truly a new user, what is it that makes you think that you can lecture me about the site rules? You clearly have no idea what they are. I have never made rules on profanity or insults — the sole “rule” applies to political threadjacking as outlined here:
http://piggington.com/threadjackers_will_be_persecuted_maybe_even_prosecuted?page=4
If you are not as new to the forum as your 16-hour-old handle would imply, then are you one of these serial threadjackers who occasionally creates a new account with a vaguely provocative username just to start flame wars?
If it’s the latter, I would read above linked post very carefully.
If it’s the former, then welcome… but in the future, please don’t waste my time with semi-insulting requests to intervene just because someone offended your delicate sensibilities.
Rich
January 8, 2011 at 1:46 PM #649312ILoveRegulationParticipantRich,
Thanks for clearing things up.
January 8, 2011 at 1:46 PM #649383ILoveRegulationParticipantRich,
Thanks for clearing things up.
January 8, 2011 at 1:46 PM #649969ILoveRegulationParticipantRich,
Thanks for clearing things up.
January 8, 2011 at 1:46 PM #650105ILoveRegulationParticipantRich,
Thanks for clearing things up.
January 8, 2011 at 1:46 PM #650430ILoveRegulationParticipantRich,
Thanks for clearing things up.
January 8, 2011 at 1:47 PM #649317ILoveRegulationParticipantFlu,
Go fvck yourself.
January 8, 2011 at 1:47 PM #649388ILoveRegulationParticipantFlu,
Go fvck yourself.
January 8, 2011 at 1:47 PM #649974ILoveRegulationParticipantFlu,
Go fvck yourself.
January 8, 2011 at 1:47 PM #650110ILoveRegulationParticipantFlu,
Go fvck yourself.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.