- This topic has 220 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 21, 2010 at 2:40 PM #622400October 21, 2010 at 2:51 PM #621322ArrayaParticipant
I’m with George Carlin on this…
October 21, 2010 at 2:51 PM #621403ArrayaParticipantI’m with George Carlin on this…
October 21, 2010 at 2:51 PM #621964ArrayaParticipantI’m with George Carlin on this…
October 21, 2010 at 2:51 PM #622086ArrayaParticipantI’m with George Carlin on this…
October 21, 2010 at 2:51 PM #622405ArrayaParticipantI’m with George Carlin on this…
October 23, 2010 at 6:21 AM #621838scaredyclassicParticipantyeah! George Carlin for president! Where in the Constitution does it explictly say that the President must be a living person. I think it only says he has to be over 35 years old. Why cannot we be ruled by video clips on youtube? Maybe we are already.
October 23, 2010 at 6:21 AM #621922scaredyclassicParticipantyeah! George Carlin for president! Where in the Constitution does it explictly say that the President must be a living person. I think it only says he has to be over 35 years old. Why cannot we be ruled by video clips on youtube? Maybe we are already.
October 23, 2010 at 6:21 AM #622482scaredyclassicParticipantyeah! George Carlin for president! Where in the Constitution does it explictly say that the President must be a living person. I think it only says he has to be over 35 years old. Why cannot we be ruled by video clips on youtube? Maybe we are already.
October 23, 2010 at 6:21 AM #622605scaredyclassicParticipantyeah! George Carlin for president! Where in the Constitution does it explictly say that the President must be a living person. I think it only says he has to be over 35 years old. Why cannot we be ruled by video clips on youtube? Maybe we are already.
October 23, 2010 at 6:21 AM #622924scaredyclassicParticipantyeah! George Carlin for president! Where in the Constitution does it explictly say that the President must be a living person. I think it only says he has to be over 35 years old. Why cannot we be ruled by video clips on youtube? Maybe we are already.
October 23, 2010 at 9:55 PM #622049paramountParticipantTo me it’s about bringing gov’t worker benefits and salaries back down to reality. Shrinking the size of gov’t.
The strike in France has it’s roots in the same issue, although were not being told that in general.
NPR made that point last week, I haven’t heard that anywhere else.
October 23, 2010 at 9:55 PM #622132paramountParticipantTo me it’s about bringing gov’t worker benefits and salaries back down to reality. Shrinking the size of gov’t.
The strike in France has it’s roots in the same issue, although were not being told that in general.
NPR made that point last week, I haven’t heard that anywhere else.
October 23, 2010 at 9:55 PM #622692paramountParticipantTo me it’s about bringing gov’t worker benefits and salaries back down to reality. Shrinking the size of gov’t.
The strike in France has it’s roots in the same issue, although were not being told that in general.
NPR made that point last week, I haven’t heard that anywhere else.
October 23, 2010 at 9:55 PM #622816paramountParticipantTo me it’s about bringing gov’t worker benefits and salaries back down to reality. Shrinking the size of gov’t.
The strike in France has it’s roots in the same issue, although were not being told that in general.
NPR made that point last week, I haven’t heard that anywhere else.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.