- This topic has 1,860 replies, 31 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 6 months ago by
UCGal.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 14, 2010 at 3:06 PM #605771September 14, 2010 at 3:16 PM #604718
sdrealtor
ParticipantCAR
Just curious as to what you think a fair market price for the Parkwood house should have been. I expect that as conservative a buyer as you are, there are likely plenty others who would pay more but think a price you would pay really speaks to a bottomline value for a house like that. Of course you would love to pay that or less but what would you have been willing to pay for that house?sdr
P.S. Unfortunately the market doesnt always get a chance to speak its mind and this was one of those cases.
September 14, 2010 at 3:16 PM #604807sdrealtor
ParticipantCAR
Just curious as to what you think a fair market price for the Parkwood house should have been. I expect that as conservative a buyer as you are, there are likely plenty others who would pay more but think a price you would pay really speaks to a bottomline value for a house like that. Of course you would love to pay that or less but what would you have been willing to pay for that house?sdr
P.S. Unfortunately the market doesnt always get a chance to speak its mind and this was one of those cases.
September 14, 2010 at 3:16 PM #605357sdrealtor
ParticipantCAR
Just curious as to what you think a fair market price for the Parkwood house should have been. I expect that as conservative a buyer as you are, there are likely plenty others who would pay more but think a price you would pay really speaks to a bottomline value for a house like that. Of course you would love to pay that or less but what would you have been willing to pay for that house?sdr
P.S. Unfortunately the market doesnt always get a chance to speak its mind and this was one of those cases.
September 14, 2010 at 3:16 PM #605464sdrealtor
ParticipantCAR
Just curious as to what you think a fair market price for the Parkwood house should have been. I expect that as conservative a buyer as you are, there are likely plenty others who would pay more but think a price you would pay really speaks to a bottomline value for a house like that. Of course you would love to pay that or less but what would you have been willing to pay for that house?sdr
P.S. Unfortunately the market doesnt always get a chance to speak its mind and this was one of those cases.
September 14, 2010 at 3:16 PM #605781sdrealtor
ParticipantCAR
Just curious as to what you think a fair market price for the Parkwood house should have been. I expect that as conservative a buyer as you are, there are likely plenty others who would pay more but think a price you would pay really speaks to a bottomline value for a house like that. Of course you would love to pay that or less but what would you have been willing to pay for that house?sdr
P.S. Unfortunately the market doesnt always get a chance to speak its mind and this was one of those cases.
September 14, 2010 at 3:16 PM #604713Coronita
ParticipantAs a “worker bee”, my observation in hallways is that is seems like it’s all tied to the perception of the economy….
Probably last year, there was a panic about “layoffs” etc here in SD, a tanking equity market,etc..
But around this time (while I don’t necessarily thing the economy is necessarily stronger), I think a good portion of this fear has subsided…
I mean, I see a bunch of dual income works with house hold incomes above $250k with sizeable downpayments looking in 4S/CV/LJ at my full time gig…It seems like with the prospects of the the economy, they seem to be less hesitant to purchase now then they did last year..And it seems like it feeds off of each other (people X aren’t worked, hence why should I?)September 14, 2010 at 3:16 PM #604802Coronita
ParticipantAs a “worker bee”, my observation in hallways is that is seems like it’s all tied to the perception of the economy….
Probably last year, there was a panic about “layoffs” etc here in SD, a tanking equity market,etc..
But around this time (while I don’t necessarily thing the economy is necessarily stronger), I think a good portion of this fear has subsided…
I mean, I see a bunch of dual income works with house hold incomes above $250k with sizeable downpayments looking in 4S/CV/LJ at my full time gig…It seems like with the prospects of the the economy, they seem to be less hesitant to purchase now then they did last year..And it seems like it feeds off of each other (people X aren’t worked, hence why should I?)September 14, 2010 at 3:16 PM #605352Coronita
ParticipantAs a “worker bee”, my observation in hallways is that is seems like it’s all tied to the perception of the economy….
Probably last year, there was a panic about “layoffs” etc here in SD, a tanking equity market,etc..
But around this time (while I don’t necessarily thing the economy is necessarily stronger), I think a good portion of this fear has subsided…
I mean, I see a bunch of dual income works with house hold incomes above $250k with sizeable downpayments looking in 4S/CV/LJ at my full time gig…It seems like with the prospects of the the economy, they seem to be less hesitant to purchase now then they did last year..And it seems like it feeds off of each other (people X aren’t worked, hence why should I?)September 14, 2010 at 3:16 PM #605459Coronita
ParticipantAs a “worker bee”, my observation in hallways is that is seems like it’s all tied to the perception of the economy….
Probably last year, there was a panic about “layoffs” etc here in SD, a tanking equity market,etc..
But around this time (while I don’t necessarily thing the economy is necessarily stronger), I think a good portion of this fear has subsided…
I mean, I see a bunch of dual income works with house hold incomes above $250k with sizeable downpayments looking in 4S/CV/LJ at my full time gig…It seems like with the prospects of the the economy, they seem to be less hesitant to purchase now then they did last year..And it seems like it feeds off of each other (people X aren’t worked, hence why should I?)September 14, 2010 at 3:16 PM #605776Coronita
ParticipantAs a “worker bee”, my observation in hallways is that is seems like it’s all tied to the perception of the economy….
Probably last year, there was a panic about “layoffs” etc here in SD, a tanking equity market,etc..
But around this time (while I don’t necessarily thing the economy is necessarily stronger), I think a good portion of this fear has subsided…
I mean, I see a bunch of dual income works with house hold incomes above $250k with sizeable downpayments looking in 4S/CV/LJ at my full time gig…It seems like with the prospects of the the economy, they seem to be less hesitant to purchase now then they did last year..And it seems like it feeds off of each other (people X aren’t worked, hence why should I?)September 14, 2010 at 4:54 PM #604753CA renter
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]CAR
Just curious as to what you think a fair market price for the Parkwood house should have been. I expect that as conservative a buyer as you are, there are likely plenty others who would pay more but think a price you would pay really speaks to a bottomline value for a house like that. Of course you would love to pay that or less but what would you have been willing to pay for that house?sdr
P.S. Unfortunately the market doesnt always get a chance to speak its mind and this was one of those cases.[/quote]
sdr,
With the limited knowledge I had about that property (structural problems, etc.), it’s hard to say for sure; but if there was very little structural work to be done, we probably would have paid up to $650K.
One thing I have to say, though…believe it or not, we *are* willing to pay a premium for the right location/lot/layout, so our price might not be a true “bottom” price.
We have enough money to do some major repairs or to do some adding-on, etc. Because of this, we might be willing to pay a bit more for a fixer than a flipper would (maybe). Also, because we don’t need to finance upgrades or repairs (which is what buyers do when they pay a premium to flippers), we are very open to fixers with the right location/lot — a good layout is icing on the cake. In other words, our price would probably lie somewhere between what a flipper would pay (only for the right location/lot), and what another end-user — without the means to fix it up — might pay.
September 14, 2010 at 4:54 PM #604842CA renter
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]CAR
Just curious as to what you think a fair market price for the Parkwood house should have been. I expect that as conservative a buyer as you are, there are likely plenty others who would pay more but think a price you would pay really speaks to a bottomline value for a house like that. Of course you would love to pay that or less but what would you have been willing to pay for that house?sdr
P.S. Unfortunately the market doesnt always get a chance to speak its mind and this was one of those cases.[/quote]
sdr,
With the limited knowledge I had about that property (structural problems, etc.), it’s hard to say for sure; but if there was very little structural work to be done, we probably would have paid up to $650K.
One thing I have to say, though…believe it or not, we *are* willing to pay a premium for the right location/lot/layout, so our price might not be a true “bottom” price.
We have enough money to do some major repairs or to do some adding-on, etc. Because of this, we might be willing to pay a bit more for a fixer than a flipper would (maybe). Also, because we don’t need to finance upgrades or repairs (which is what buyers do when they pay a premium to flippers), we are very open to fixers with the right location/lot — a good layout is icing on the cake. In other words, our price would probably lie somewhere between what a flipper would pay (only for the right location/lot), and what another end-user — without the means to fix it up — might pay.
September 14, 2010 at 4:54 PM #605392CA renter
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]CAR
Just curious as to what you think a fair market price for the Parkwood house should have been. I expect that as conservative a buyer as you are, there are likely plenty others who would pay more but think a price you would pay really speaks to a bottomline value for a house like that. Of course you would love to pay that or less but what would you have been willing to pay for that house?sdr
P.S. Unfortunately the market doesnt always get a chance to speak its mind and this was one of those cases.[/quote]
sdr,
With the limited knowledge I had about that property (structural problems, etc.), it’s hard to say for sure; but if there was very little structural work to be done, we probably would have paid up to $650K.
One thing I have to say, though…believe it or not, we *are* willing to pay a premium for the right location/lot/layout, so our price might not be a true “bottom” price.
We have enough money to do some major repairs or to do some adding-on, etc. Because of this, we might be willing to pay a bit more for a fixer than a flipper would (maybe). Also, because we don’t need to finance upgrades or repairs (which is what buyers do when they pay a premium to flippers), we are very open to fixers with the right location/lot — a good layout is icing on the cake. In other words, our price would probably lie somewhere between what a flipper would pay (only for the right location/lot), and what another end-user — without the means to fix it up — might pay.
September 14, 2010 at 4:54 PM #605499CA renter
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]CAR
Just curious as to what you think a fair market price for the Parkwood house should have been. I expect that as conservative a buyer as you are, there are likely plenty others who would pay more but think a price you would pay really speaks to a bottomline value for a house like that. Of course you would love to pay that or less but what would you have been willing to pay for that house?sdr
P.S. Unfortunately the market doesnt always get a chance to speak its mind and this was one of those cases.[/quote]
sdr,
With the limited knowledge I had about that property (structural problems, etc.), it’s hard to say for sure; but if there was very little structural work to be done, we probably would have paid up to $650K.
One thing I have to say, though…believe it or not, we *are* willing to pay a premium for the right location/lot/layout, so our price might not be a true “bottom” price.
We have enough money to do some major repairs or to do some adding-on, etc. Because of this, we might be willing to pay a bit more for a fixer than a flipper would (maybe). Also, because we don’t need to finance upgrades or repairs (which is what buyers do when they pay a premium to flippers), we are very open to fixers with the right location/lot — a good layout is icing on the cake. In other words, our price would probably lie somewhere between what a flipper would pay (only for the right location/lot), and what another end-user — without the means to fix it up — might pay.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.