- This topic has 55 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 10 months ago by
SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 8, 2008 at 10:49 AM #150184February 8, 2008 at 11:59 AM #149895
betting on fall
ParticipantTotal Jan. sales per Sandicor (all unit types) was 1335. See
http://www.sandicor.com/statistics/stats2008/01-2008/January-2008.pdfSo January saw more “must sell” REO inventory created than total inventory absorbed. I think this shows we are really at the edge of a cliff.
Must sells must sell. Looks like there are still not nearly enough buyers to absorb that inventory at current prices. Demand will need to be created by some serious price cuts. Those comp killing price cuts will lead to more
foreclosures. Lather, Rinse, Repeat. I don’t see how any amount of goverment meddling can slow the process down.February 8, 2008 at 11:59 AM #150152betting on fall
ParticipantTotal Jan. sales per Sandicor (all unit types) was 1335. See
http://www.sandicor.com/statistics/stats2008/01-2008/January-2008.pdfSo January saw more “must sell” REO inventory created than total inventory absorbed. I think this shows we are really at the edge of a cliff.
Must sells must sell. Looks like there are still not nearly enough buyers to absorb that inventory at current prices. Demand will need to be created by some serious price cuts. Those comp killing price cuts will lead to more
foreclosures. Lather, Rinse, Repeat. I don’t see how any amount of goverment meddling can slow the process down.February 8, 2008 at 11:59 AM #150165betting on fall
ParticipantTotal Jan. sales per Sandicor (all unit types) was 1335. See
http://www.sandicor.com/statistics/stats2008/01-2008/January-2008.pdfSo January saw more “must sell” REO inventory created than total inventory absorbed. I think this shows we are really at the edge of a cliff.
Must sells must sell. Looks like there are still not nearly enough buyers to absorb that inventory at current prices. Demand will need to be created by some serious price cuts. Those comp killing price cuts will lead to more
foreclosures. Lather, Rinse, Repeat. I don’t see how any amount of goverment meddling can slow the process down.February 8, 2008 at 11:59 AM #150182betting on fall
ParticipantTotal Jan. sales per Sandicor (all unit types) was 1335. See
http://www.sandicor.com/statistics/stats2008/01-2008/January-2008.pdfSo January saw more “must sell” REO inventory created than total inventory absorbed. I think this shows we are really at the edge of a cliff.
Must sells must sell. Looks like there are still not nearly enough buyers to absorb that inventory at current prices. Demand will need to be created by some serious price cuts. Those comp killing price cuts will lead to more
foreclosures. Lather, Rinse, Repeat. I don’t see how any amount of goverment meddling can slow the process down.February 8, 2008 at 11:59 AM #150254betting on fall
ParticipantTotal Jan. sales per Sandicor (all unit types) was 1335. See
http://www.sandicor.com/statistics/stats2008/01-2008/January-2008.pdfSo January saw more “must sell” REO inventory created than total inventory absorbed. I think this shows we are really at the edge of a cliff.
Must sells must sell. Looks like there are still not nearly enough buyers to absorb that inventory at current prices. Demand will need to be created by some serious price cuts. Those comp killing price cuts will lead to more
foreclosures. Lather, Rinse, Repeat. I don’t see how any amount of goverment meddling can slow the process down.February 8, 2008 at 11:59 AM #149900HereWeGo
ParticipantRight, the Dec numbers weren’t restated, but there was some suspicion that there should be an averaging between the high Dec numbers and the low Nov numbers. Geez, it seems it’s been forever since the Dec numbers were released.
February 8, 2008 at 11:59 AM #150157HereWeGo
ParticipantRight, the Dec numbers weren’t restated, but there was some suspicion that there should be an averaging between the high Dec numbers and the low Nov numbers. Geez, it seems it’s been forever since the Dec numbers were released.
February 8, 2008 at 11:59 AM #150172HereWeGo
ParticipantRight, the Dec numbers weren’t restated, but there was some suspicion that there should be an averaging between the high Dec numbers and the low Nov numbers. Geez, it seems it’s been forever since the Dec numbers were released.
February 8, 2008 at 11:59 AM #150185HereWeGo
ParticipantRight, the Dec numbers weren’t restated, but there was some suspicion that there should be an averaging between the high Dec numbers and the low Nov numbers. Geez, it seems it’s been forever since the Dec numbers were released.
February 8, 2008 at 11:59 AM #150259HereWeGo
ParticipantRight, the Dec numbers weren’t restated, but there was some suspicion that there should be an averaging between the high Dec numbers and the low Nov numbers. Geez, it seems it’s been forever since the Dec numbers were released.
February 12, 2008 at 9:40 PM #152465gdcox
ParticipantRich,
So the MLS data only need to be corrected by adding REOs though auctions?? (still learning the terminology!)
Graham
February 12, 2008 at 9:40 PM #152744gdcox
ParticipantRich,
So the MLS data only need to be corrected by adding REOs though auctions?? (still learning the terminology!)
Graham
February 12, 2008 at 9:40 PM #152749gdcox
ParticipantRich,
So the MLS data only need to be corrected by adding REOs though auctions?? (still learning the terminology!)
Graham
February 12, 2008 at 9:40 PM #152770gdcox
ParticipantRich,
So the MLS data only need to be corrected by adding REOs though auctions?? (still learning the terminology!)
Graham
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
