Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Time to buy the stock market?
- This topic has 340 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by afx114.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 2, 2009 at 4:13 PM #340615February 2, 2009 at 4:19 PM #3400874plexownerParticipant
[img_assist|nid=10204|title=Long term Dow|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=400|height=232]
I’m not seeing 8 or 9 years of secular bear market in this chart
must be something wrong with my eyes …
February 2, 2009 at 4:19 PM #3404114plexownerParticipant[img_assist|nid=10204|title=Long term Dow|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=400|height=232]
I’m not seeing 8 or 9 years of secular bear market in this chart
must be something wrong with my eyes …
February 2, 2009 at 4:19 PM #3405094plexownerParticipant[img_assist|nid=10204|title=Long term Dow|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=400|height=232]
I’m not seeing 8 or 9 years of secular bear market in this chart
must be something wrong with my eyes …
February 2, 2009 at 4:19 PM #3405384plexownerParticipant[img_assist|nid=10204|title=Long term Dow|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=400|height=232]
I’m not seeing 8 or 9 years of secular bear market in this chart
must be something wrong with my eyes …
February 2, 2009 at 4:19 PM #3406304plexownerParticipant[img_assist|nid=10204|title=Long term Dow|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=400|height=232]
I’m not seeing 8 or 9 years of secular bear market in this chart
must be something wrong with my eyes …
February 2, 2009 at 4:53 PM #340103(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=4plexowner]”In fact, the recent five-month decline of 31% was the sharpest five months of losses since the bear market of 1937.”
again, from Richard Russell’s Feb 2 missive
notice he didn’t say, “… since the bear market of 2000-2003”
[/quote]Simple. This decline is steeper than the decline in 2000-2003.
It does not mean there was not a bear market during that period.
[img_assist|nid=10205|title=S&P500|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=75]
February 2, 2009 at 4:53 PM #340427(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=4plexowner]”In fact, the recent five-month decline of 31% was the sharpest five months of losses since the bear market of 1937.”
again, from Richard Russell’s Feb 2 missive
notice he didn’t say, “… since the bear market of 2000-2003”
[/quote]Simple. This decline is steeper than the decline in 2000-2003.
It does not mean there was not a bear market during that period.
[img_assist|nid=10205|title=S&P500|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=75]
February 2, 2009 at 4:53 PM #340524(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=4plexowner]”In fact, the recent five-month decline of 31% was the sharpest five months of losses since the bear market of 1937.”
again, from Richard Russell’s Feb 2 missive
notice he didn’t say, “… since the bear market of 2000-2003”
[/quote]Simple. This decline is steeper than the decline in 2000-2003.
It does not mean there was not a bear market during that period.
[img_assist|nid=10205|title=S&P500|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=75]
February 2, 2009 at 4:53 PM #340553(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=4plexowner]”In fact, the recent five-month decline of 31% was the sharpest five months of losses since the bear market of 1937.”
again, from Richard Russell’s Feb 2 missive
notice he didn’t say, “… since the bear market of 2000-2003”
[/quote]Simple. This decline is steeper than the decline in 2000-2003.
It does not mean there was not a bear market during that period.
[img_assist|nid=10205|title=S&P500|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=75]
February 2, 2009 at 4:53 PM #340645(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=4plexowner]”In fact, the recent five-month decline of 31% was the sharpest five months of losses since the bear market of 1937.”
again, from Richard Russell’s Feb 2 missive
notice he didn’t say, “… since the bear market of 2000-2003”
[/quote]Simple. This decline is steeper than the decline in 2000-2003.
It does not mean there was not a bear market during that period.
[img_assist|nid=10205|title=S&P500|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=75]
February 2, 2009 at 5:39 PM #340152(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI see my mistake.
I used a broad stock index.
My bad.
February 2, 2009 at 5:39 PM #340476(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI see my mistake.
I used a broad stock index.
My bad.
February 2, 2009 at 5:39 PM #340574(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI see my mistake.
I used a broad stock index.
My bad.
February 2, 2009 at 5:39 PM #340601(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI see my mistake.
I used a broad stock index.
My bad.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.