- This topic has 645 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by fredo4.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 11, 2010 at 2:11 PM #563674June 11, 2010 at 2:26 PM #562696briansd1Guest
[quote=ucodegen]
To be honest though, it was a case of bully against bully. “briansd1” tries(ed) to turn almost every discussion into a Democrat vs Republican mudthrowing contest.
sduuuude has been on this board far longer than briansd1 and we haven’t had that much of a problem with sdduuuude before.[/quote]
That’s because, before I started posting, and before I started responding in kind, the other side had no opposition.
[quote=ucodegen]
That said, I think briansd1 will have a problem resisting the temptation. I get the feeling he likes the attention that ‘stirring the pot’ gives him, almost at an OCD level.[/quote]I like stirring the pot almost a much as the other side likes to stir the pot.
I’m perfectly capable of intellectual adult discussions. I just think that partisan attacks deserve responses.
The rules have changed now and I’m happy to abide by them.
June 11, 2010 at 2:26 PM #562794briansd1Guest[quote=ucodegen]
To be honest though, it was a case of bully against bully. “briansd1” tries(ed) to turn almost every discussion into a Democrat vs Republican mudthrowing contest.
sduuuude has been on this board far longer than briansd1 and we haven’t had that much of a problem with sdduuuude before.[/quote]
That’s because, before I started posting, and before I started responding in kind, the other side had no opposition.
[quote=ucodegen]
That said, I think briansd1 will have a problem resisting the temptation. I get the feeling he likes the attention that ‘stirring the pot’ gives him, almost at an OCD level.[/quote]I like stirring the pot almost a much as the other side likes to stir the pot.
I’m perfectly capable of intellectual adult discussions. I just think that partisan attacks deserve responses.
The rules have changed now and I’m happy to abide by them.
June 11, 2010 at 2:26 PM #563301briansd1Guest[quote=ucodegen]
To be honest though, it was a case of bully against bully. “briansd1” tries(ed) to turn almost every discussion into a Democrat vs Republican mudthrowing contest.
sduuuude has been on this board far longer than briansd1 and we haven’t had that much of a problem with sdduuuude before.[/quote]
That’s because, before I started posting, and before I started responding in kind, the other side had no opposition.
[quote=ucodegen]
That said, I think briansd1 will have a problem resisting the temptation. I get the feeling he likes the attention that ‘stirring the pot’ gives him, almost at an OCD level.[/quote]I like stirring the pot almost a much as the other side likes to stir the pot.
I’m perfectly capable of intellectual adult discussions. I just think that partisan attacks deserve responses.
The rules have changed now and I’m happy to abide by them.
June 11, 2010 at 2:26 PM #563407briansd1Guest[quote=ucodegen]
To be honest though, it was a case of bully against bully. “briansd1” tries(ed) to turn almost every discussion into a Democrat vs Republican mudthrowing contest.
sduuuude has been on this board far longer than briansd1 and we haven’t had that much of a problem with sdduuuude before.[/quote]
That’s because, before I started posting, and before I started responding in kind, the other side had no opposition.
[quote=ucodegen]
That said, I think briansd1 will have a problem resisting the temptation. I get the feeling he likes the attention that ‘stirring the pot’ gives him, almost at an OCD level.[/quote]I like stirring the pot almost a much as the other side likes to stir the pot.
I’m perfectly capable of intellectual adult discussions. I just think that partisan attacks deserve responses.
The rules have changed now and I’m happy to abide by them.
June 11, 2010 at 2:26 PM #563694briansd1Guest[quote=ucodegen]
To be honest though, it was a case of bully against bully. “briansd1” tries(ed) to turn almost every discussion into a Democrat vs Republican mudthrowing contest.
sduuuude has been on this board far longer than briansd1 and we haven’t had that much of a problem with sdduuuude before.[/quote]
That’s because, before I started posting, and before I started responding in kind, the other side had no opposition.
[quote=ucodegen]
That said, I think briansd1 will have a problem resisting the temptation. I get the feeling he likes the attention that ‘stirring the pot’ gives him, almost at an OCD level.[/quote]I like stirring the pot almost a much as the other side likes to stir the pot.
I’m perfectly capable of intellectual adult discussions. I just think that partisan attacks deserve responses.
The rules have changed now and I’m happy to abide by them.
June 11, 2010 at 2:36 PM #562711ucodegenParticipant[quote ucodegen]
That said, I think briansd1 will have a problem resisting the temptation. I get the feeling he likes the attention that ‘stirring the pot’ gives him, almost at an OCD level.
[/quote]8-]
.: QED – quod erat demonstrandum
as above..June 11, 2010 at 2:36 PM #562809ucodegenParticipant[quote ucodegen]
That said, I think briansd1 will have a problem resisting the temptation. I get the feeling he likes the attention that ‘stirring the pot’ gives him, almost at an OCD level.
[/quote]8-]
.: QED – quod erat demonstrandum
as above..June 11, 2010 at 2:36 PM #563316ucodegenParticipant[quote ucodegen]
That said, I think briansd1 will have a problem resisting the temptation. I get the feeling he likes the attention that ‘stirring the pot’ gives him, almost at an OCD level.
[/quote]8-]
.: QED – quod erat demonstrandum
as above..June 11, 2010 at 2:36 PM #563422ucodegenParticipant[quote ucodegen]
That said, I think briansd1 will have a problem resisting the temptation. I get the feeling he likes the attention that ‘stirring the pot’ gives him, almost at an OCD level.
[/quote]8-]
.: QED – quod erat demonstrandum
as above..June 11, 2010 at 2:36 PM #563709ucodegenParticipant[quote ucodegen]
That said, I think briansd1 will have a problem resisting the temptation. I get the feeling he likes the attention that ‘stirring the pot’ gives him, almost at an OCD level.
[/quote]8-]
.: QED – quod erat demonstrandum
as above..June 11, 2010 at 3:04 PM #562786Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=briansd1]
I just think that partisan attacks deserve responses.
[/quote]Since the whole issue here is STARTING political flamewars, this is meaningless and/or a mischaracterization.
But whatever. The guidelines should be clear now.
June 11, 2010 at 3:04 PM #562884Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=briansd1]
I just think that partisan attacks deserve responses.
[/quote]Since the whole issue here is STARTING political flamewars, this is meaningless and/or a mischaracterization.
But whatever. The guidelines should be clear now.
June 11, 2010 at 3:04 PM #563391Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=briansd1]
I just think that partisan attacks deserve responses.
[/quote]Since the whole issue here is STARTING political flamewars, this is meaningless and/or a mischaracterization.
But whatever. The guidelines should be clear now.
June 11, 2010 at 3:04 PM #563496Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=briansd1]
I just think that partisan attacks deserve responses.
[/quote]Since the whole issue here is STARTING political flamewars, this is meaningless and/or a mischaracterization.
But whatever. The guidelines should be clear now.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.