- This topic has 688 replies, 50 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 5 months ago by
CAwireman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 22, 2008 at 11:15 AM #140902January 22, 2008 at 11:15 AM #140919
Artifact
ParticipantHere are side by side comparisons of 2007 and 2008 – I think now that we are looking at a second years worth of data this is more interesting than the time series. I think the percet change figure is still better plotted as an overall time series though.
NOTE: I plotted this as 52 weeks – for last year we had 3 weeks that sdr dared to be out on vacation – for those weeks I averaged the number from the preceding and following week to get a comparative value.
[img_assist|nid=6264|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=268]
[img_assist|nid=6265|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=268]January 22, 2008 at 11:15 AM #140945Artifact
ParticipantHere are side by side comparisons of 2007 and 2008 – I think now that we are looking at a second years worth of data this is more interesting than the time series. I think the percet change figure is still better plotted as an overall time series though.
NOTE: I plotted this as 52 weeks – for last year we had 3 weeks that sdr dared to be out on vacation – for those weeks I averaged the number from the preceding and following week to get a comparative value.
[img_assist|nid=6264|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=268]
[img_assist|nid=6265|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=268]January 22, 2008 at 11:15 AM #140996Artifact
ParticipantHere are side by side comparisons of 2007 and 2008 – I think now that we are looking at a second years worth of data this is more interesting than the time series. I think the percet change figure is still better plotted as an overall time series though.
NOTE: I plotted this as 52 weeks – for last year we had 3 weeks that sdr dared to be out on vacation – for those weeks I averaged the number from the preceding and following week to get a comparative value.
[img_assist|nid=6264|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=268]
[img_assist|nid=6265|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=268]January 22, 2008 at 2:34 PM #140903SD Realtor
ParticipantOne thing that should be noted. I would be willing to bet that at least half of the short sales already have offers into the lender and are in process.
SD Realtor
January 22, 2008 at 2:34 PM #141126SD Realtor
ParticipantOne thing that should be noted. I would be willing to bet that at least half of the short sales already have offers into the lender and are in process.
SD Realtor
January 22, 2008 at 2:34 PM #141141SD Realtor
ParticipantOne thing that should be noted. I would be willing to bet that at least half of the short sales already have offers into the lender and are in process.
SD Realtor
January 22, 2008 at 2:34 PM #141169SD Realtor
ParticipantOne thing that should be noted. I would be willing to bet that at least half of the short sales already have offers into the lender and are in process.
SD Realtor
January 22, 2008 at 2:34 PM #141225SD Realtor
ParticipantOne thing that should be noted. I would be willing to bet that at least half of the short sales already have offers into the lender and are in process.
SD Realtor
January 28, 2008 at 2:53 PM #144044sdrealtor
ParticipantUpdate time!
Short sales 6,249 up from 6,033.
Countywide we are at 17,233 little change from 17,086 last week.
The short sale count is rising faster than the inventory is in sheer volume. Interesting…..
January 28, 2008 at 2:53 PM #144279sdrealtor
ParticipantUpdate time!
Short sales 6,249 up from 6,033.
Countywide we are at 17,233 little change from 17,086 last week.
The short sale count is rising faster than the inventory is in sheer volume. Interesting…..
January 28, 2008 at 2:53 PM #144282sdrealtor
ParticipantUpdate time!
Short sales 6,249 up from 6,033.
Countywide we are at 17,233 little change from 17,086 last week.
The short sale count is rising faster than the inventory is in sheer volume. Interesting…..
January 28, 2008 at 2:53 PM #144311sdrealtor
ParticipantUpdate time!
Short sales 6,249 up from 6,033.
Countywide we are at 17,233 little change from 17,086 last week.
The short sale count is rising faster than the inventory is in sheer volume. Interesting…..
January 28, 2008 at 2:53 PM #144379sdrealtor
ParticipantUpdate time!
Short sales 6,249 up from 6,033.
Countywide we are at 17,233 little change from 17,086 last week.
The short sale count is rising faster than the inventory is in sheer volume. Interesting…..
January 28, 2008 at 5:49 PM #144211Artifact
ParticipantFigures – short on time – but there is not much new insight to add anyway…
[img_assist|nid=6333|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=239]
[img_assist|nid=6334|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=239]
[img_assist|nid=6335|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=239] -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
