- This topic has 478 replies, 37 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 5 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 29, 2007 at 9:03 AM #9174May 29, 2007 at 9:27 AM #55357AnonymousGuest
It appears that prices are already at 2004 levels in many parts of San Diego. I think Mr. Thornberg is living in a time warp.
May 29, 2007 at 9:27 AM #55373AnonymousGuestIt appears that prices are already at 2004 levels in many parts of San Diego. I think Mr. Thornberg is living in a time warp.
May 29, 2007 at 9:43 AM #55365(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant“It appears that prices are already at 2004 levels in many parts of San Diego. I think Mr. Thornberg is living in a time warp.”
Sounds like think his thoughts/advice were for CA, not specifically for San Diego. In this cycle SD will fare the worst, IMO.
May 29, 2007 at 9:43 AM #55381(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant“It appears that prices are already at 2004 levels in many parts of San Diego. I think Mr. Thornberg is living in a time warp.”
Sounds like think his thoughts/advice were for CA, not specifically for San Diego. In this cycle SD will fare the worst, IMO.
May 29, 2007 at 9:46 AM #55367no_such_realityParticipantSD will be fine compared to Sacramento, the IE, Bakersfield, etc.
May 29, 2007 at 9:46 AM #55383no_such_realityParticipantSD will be fine compared to Sacramento, the IE, Bakersfield, etc.
May 29, 2007 at 10:40 AM #55375BugsParticipantIf I were a professional economist and my reputation mattered to me, I’d be a bit circumspect, too. Since nobody knows or cares who I am I can get away with not having to worry about that on this blog.
He somewhat has to express his public opinions in conservative tones. Nobody can account for the unforseeable. Better to be wrong by degree than by direction. He gets almost full credit for being right even if the market winds up overshooting his initial projections.
As for where it settles, I spent a couple hours over the weekend looking at all the closed sales so far from May 2007 in the MLS for Carlsbad and Oceanside. I was looking for properties with recent prior sales from 2003-2006. I found a number of examples of current sale prices matching previous sales prices on the same home from mid to late 2004. That doesn’t include the losses from 2005 and 2006.
The 05/2007 price didn’t retract to the 2004 price in 100% of the examples I saw, but it was more than 70%.
May 29, 2007 at 10:40 AM #55391BugsParticipantIf I were a professional economist and my reputation mattered to me, I’d be a bit circumspect, too. Since nobody knows or cares who I am I can get away with not having to worry about that on this blog.
He somewhat has to express his public opinions in conservative tones. Nobody can account for the unforseeable. Better to be wrong by degree than by direction. He gets almost full credit for being right even if the market winds up overshooting his initial projections.
As for where it settles, I spent a couple hours over the weekend looking at all the closed sales so far from May 2007 in the MLS for Carlsbad and Oceanside. I was looking for properties with recent prior sales from 2003-2006. I found a number of examples of current sale prices matching previous sales prices on the same home from mid to late 2004. That doesn’t include the losses from 2005 and 2006.
The 05/2007 price didn’t retract to the 2004 price in 100% of the examples I saw, but it was more than 70%.
May 29, 2007 at 10:45 AM #55377AnonymousGuestI agree that a publicly watched economist must be somewhat cautious on the doom and gloom scenarios. But to predict a return to 2004 prices, give me a break. That is pure incompetance. Most of these so called economists provide no value. If they are unwilling to make a realistic prediction, then they should find another line of work.
May 29, 2007 at 10:45 AM #55393AnonymousGuestI agree that a publicly watched economist must be somewhat cautious on the doom and gloom scenarios. But to predict a return to 2004 prices, give me a break. That is pure incompetance. Most of these so called economists provide no value. If they are unwilling to make a realistic prediction, then they should find another line of work.
May 29, 2007 at 10:58 AM #55382barnaby33ParticipantI remember PS analysis of his symposium a year or so ago. Even then that was his prediction. No massive retrenchment, just a slow lowering of prices over the next couple of years. Yes he left himself several defensive caveats, like if the economy tanks all bets are off.
I enjoyed the videos very much but do tend to agree that his predictions are far to conservative in light of what is happening in credit markets. Let alone a coming general recession in our economy.
Josh
May 29, 2007 at 10:58 AM #55398barnaby33ParticipantI remember PS analysis of his symposium a year or so ago. Even then that was his prediction. No massive retrenchment, just a slow lowering of prices over the next couple of years. Yes he left himself several defensive caveats, like if the economy tanks all bets are off.
I enjoyed the videos very much but do tend to agree that his predictions are far to conservative in light of what is happening in credit markets. Let alone a coming general recession in our economy.
Josh
May 29, 2007 at 11:15 AM #55386PerryChaseParticipantI pretty much agree with Thornberg and Bugs.
Negativity is frowned upon and one never predicts gloom and doom because, if one is not 100% right, one will get crucified. On the other hand, predicting pie-in-the-sky without backing it up with hard facts is OK. You can always come back with reasons why. Think Iraq.
By all account, we’re already at 2004 prices. I think that we can expect house prices sliding and stagnating for years to come. In the mean time, new products will built (for you guys looking for brand new houses). Think buying a large screen plasma or LCD in 2005.
May 29, 2007 at 11:15 AM #55402PerryChaseParticipantI pretty much agree with Thornberg and Bugs.
Negativity is frowned upon and one never predicts gloom and doom because, if one is not 100% right, one will get crucified. On the other hand, predicting pie-in-the-sky without backing it up with hard facts is OK. You can always come back with reasons why. Think Iraq.
By all account, we’re already at 2004 prices. I think that we can expect house prices sliding and stagnating for years to come. In the mean time, new products will built (for you guys looking for brand new houses). Think buying a large screen plasma or LCD in 2005.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.