- This topic has 1,305 replies, 59 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by
34f3f3f.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 18, 2009 at 3:53 PM #370022March 20, 2009 at 1:26 PM #370493
Sandi Egan
ParticipantSDR, I see what you are saying: “reasonable pricing” is a relative if not a subjective term. What I mean is, top 20% of price/sqft leaders get 80% of offers in a given neighborhood.
[quote=SD Realtor] Give me a specific area and type of house and I can give you a little bit more of a specific answer. [/quote]
How about Poway school district, 2500-3000 sqft SFR?March 20, 2009 at 1:26 PM #370778Sandi Egan
ParticipantSDR, I see what you are saying: “reasonable pricing” is a relative if not a subjective term. What I mean is, top 20% of price/sqft leaders get 80% of offers in a given neighborhood.
[quote=SD Realtor] Give me a specific area and type of house and I can give you a little bit more of a specific answer. [/quote]
How about Poway school district, 2500-3000 sqft SFR?March 20, 2009 at 1:26 PM #370945Sandi Egan
ParticipantSDR, I see what you are saying: “reasonable pricing” is a relative if not a subjective term. What I mean is, top 20% of price/sqft leaders get 80% of offers in a given neighborhood.
[quote=SD Realtor] Give me a specific area and type of house and I can give you a little bit more of a specific answer. [/quote]
How about Poway school district, 2500-3000 sqft SFR?March 20, 2009 at 1:26 PM #370988Sandi Egan
ParticipantSDR, I see what you are saying: “reasonable pricing” is a relative if not a subjective term. What I mean is, top 20% of price/sqft leaders get 80% of offers in a given neighborhood.
[quote=SD Realtor] Give me a specific area and type of house and I can give you a little bit more of a specific answer. [/quote]
How about Poway school district, 2500-3000 sqft SFR?March 20, 2009 at 1:26 PM #371101Sandi Egan
ParticipantSDR, I see what you are saying: “reasonable pricing” is a relative if not a subjective term. What I mean is, top 20% of price/sqft leaders get 80% of offers in a given neighborhood.
[quote=SD Realtor] Give me a specific area and type of house and I can give you a little bit more of a specific answer. [/quote]
How about Poway school district, 2500-3000 sqft SFR?March 20, 2009 at 2:09 PM #370533SD Realtor
ParticipantHi Sandi
Just taking the raw numbers from the inventory thread I recently posted, look at the 3 PUSD zip codes,
2009 2008
92127 198 actives 293 actives
92064 170 actives 227 actives
92129 81 actives 137 activesDoesn’t that seem to you that this is a non trivial inventory reduction?
Now take into account the lower interest rates, and the lower median prices.
So yes there is no doubt that the lower ppsf homes will go faster but no chance do I agree that it is an 80% clip. I think to ignore lot size, quality of the home, orientation and other features that may drive up the ppsf is something that should not be ignored. Is the ratio an even bell curve? Not a chance. Is it maybe 60%? Perhaps.
Also what I am personally seeing is that most all listings are seeing alot of traffic when compared to the past 3 years.
At any rate these constraints are putting a squeeze on that for one, would recommend frugal buyers take a pass on for now. At any rate I will look at the pendings and actives for the zips you mentioned late tonite and see if I can give you a ratio breakdown of what the ppsf is for what you have classified.
March 20, 2009 at 2:09 PM #370817SD Realtor
ParticipantHi Sandi
Just taking the raw numbers from the inventory thread I recently posted, look at the 3 PUSD zip codes,
2009 2008
92127 198 actives 293 actives
92064 170 actives 227 actives
92129 81 actives 137 activesDoesn’t that seem to you that this is a non trivial inventory reduction?
Now take into account the lower interest rates, and the lower median prices.
So yes there is no doubt that the lower ppsf homes will go faster but no chance do I agree that it is an 80% clip. I think to ignore lot size, quality of the home, orientation and other features that may drive up the ppsf is something that should not be ignored. Is the ratio an even bell curve? Not a chance. Is it maybe 60%? Perhaps.
Also what I am personally seeing is that most all listings are seeing alot of traffic when compared to the past 3 years.
At any rate these constraints are putting a squeeze on that for one, would recommend frugal buyers take a pass on for now. At any rate I will look at the pendings and actives for the zips you mentioned late tonite and see if I can give you a ratio breakdown of what the ppsf is for what you have classified.
March 20, 2009 at 2:09 PM #370984SD Realtor
ParticipantHi Sandi
Just taking the raw numbers from the inventory thread I recently posted, look at the 3 PUSD zip codes,
2009 2008
92127 198 actives 293 actives
92064 170 actives 227 actives
92129 81 actives 137 activesDoesn’t that seem to you that this is a non trivial inventory reduction?
Now take into account the lower interest rates, and the lower median prices.
So yes there is no doubt that the lower ppsf homes will go faster but no chance do I agree that it is an 80% clip. I think to ignore lot size, quality of the home, orientation and other features that may drive up the ppsf is something that should not be ignored. Is the ratio an even bell curve? Not a chance. Is it maybe 60%? Perhaps.
Also what I am personally seeing is that most all listings are seeing alot of traffic when compared to the past 3 years.
At any rate these constraints are putting a squeeze on that for one, would recommend frugal buyers take a pass on for now. At any rate I will look at the pendings and actives for the zips you mentioned late tonite and see if I can give you a ratio breakdown of what the ppsf is for what you have classified.
March 20, 2009 at 2:09 PM #371028SD Realtor
ParticipantHi Sandi
Just taking the raw numbers from the inventory thread I recently posted, look at the 3 PUSD zip codes,
2009 2008
92127 198 actives 293 actives
92064 170 actives 227 actives
92129 81 actives 137 activesDoesn’t that seem to you that this is a non trivial inventory reduction?
Now take into account the lower interest rates, and the lower median prices.
So yes there is no doubt that the lower ppsf homes will go faster but no chance do I agree that it is an 80% clip. I think to ignore lot size, quality of the home, orientation and other features that may drive up the ppsf is something that should not be ignored. Is the ratio an even bell curve? Not a chance. Is it maybe 60%? Perhaps.
Also what I am personally seeing is that most all listings are seeing alot of traffic when compared to the past 3 years.
At any rate these constraints are putting a squeeze on that for one, would recommend frugal buyers take a pass on for now. At any rate I will look at the pendings and actives for the zips you mentioned late tonite and see if I can give you a ratio breakdown of what the ppsf is for what you have classified.
March 20, 2009 at 2:09 PM #371141SD Realtor
ParticipantHi Sandi
Just taking the raw numbers from the inventory thread I recently posted, look at the 3 PUSD zip codes,
2009 2008
92127 198 actives 293 actives
92064 170 actives 227 actives
92129 81 actives 137 activesDoesn’t that seem to you that this is a non trivial inventory reduction?
Now take into account the lower interest rates, and the lower median prices.
So yes there is no doubt that the lower ppsf homes will go faster but no chance do I agree that it is an 80% clip. I think to ignore lot size, quality of the home, orientation and other features that may drive up the ppsf is something that should not be ignored. Is the ratio an even bell curve? Not a chance. Is it maybe 60%? Perhaps.
Also what I am personally seeing is that most all listings are seeing alot of traffic when compared to the past 3 years.
At any rate these constraints are putting a squeeze on that for one, would recommend frugal buyers take a pass on for now. At any rate I will look at the pendings and actives for the zips you mentioned late tonite and see if I can give you a ratio breakdown of what the ppsf is for what you have classified.
March 30, 2009 at 9:44 PM #374842sdrealtor
Participantbump
Its here and its happening………….
March 30, 2009 at 9:44 PM #375123sdrealtor
Participantbump
Its here and its happening………….
March 30, 2009 at 9:44 PM #375302sdrealtor
Participantbump
Its here and its happening………….
March 30, 2009 at 9:44 PM #375345sdrealtor
Participantbump
Its here and its happening………….
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
