Southpointe property in La Jolla

[Scarlett]

Kitchen was a decent size I thought. I lived in apartments quite a bit and I thought it was larger than an apt. Not huge mind you. I am renting in a 1700 sf townhome, and the kitchen it’s at least as big as the current one. A bit light in cabinet space. I liked the pantry and the fact that it’s open.

A negative point is the opening of the kitchen to a dining area. When you have guests and a more formal holiday meal, seeing the kitchen right there basically in the same room isn’t appealing…

I don’t care much about the many stairs. I currenly live in a similar stair-wise townhome and it doesn’t bother me.

As I recall the main entrance on this unit is around the corner from the garage. The deck is above the garage. The cul de sac is lined up with the garages so they face each others but I also saw the steps leading to the main entrances which were on the sides of the building. Not sure I can explain.

It felt bigger than 1600 sq. I owned a 1600 sf townhome before so I know.

[bearishgurl]

Scarlett, I think I may have mentioned this before on another thread, but I dog-sat for ten days many years ago in A VERY LARGE unit on Mahaila Ave (92122). I do not know the same of the complex but the landscaping was beautiful, the pool area was very well maintained at the time and the unit was between 1750-1900 sf, I think, and the inside was absolutely superior to your Southpointe unit in every way, shape and form. I do NOT know what the current dues in this complex would be now but the unit felt like a house and was VERY livable for a family if you wanted to stay in that area.

[bearishgurl]

Scarlett, I think I may have mentioned this before on another thread, but I dog-sat for ten days many years ago in A VERY LARGE unit on Mahaila Ave (92122). I do not know the same of the complex but the landscaping was beautiful, the pool area was very well maintained at the time and the unit was between 1750-1900 sf, I think, and the inside was absolutely superior to your Southpointe unit in every way, shape and form. I do NOT know what the current dues in this complex would be now but the unit felt like a house and was VERY livable for a family if you wanted to stay in that area.

[bearishgurl]

Scarlett, I think I may have mentioned this before on another thread, but I dog-sat for ten days many years ago in A VERY LARGE unit on Mahaila Ave (92122). I do not know the same of the complex but the landscaping was beautiful, the pool area was very well maintained at the time and the unit was between 1750-1900 sf, I think, and the inside was absolutely superior to your Southpointe unit in every way, shape and form. I do NOT know what the current dues in this complex would be now but the unit felt like a house and was VERY livable for a family if you wanted to stay in that area.

[bearishgurl]

Scarlett, I think I may have mentioned this before on another thread, but I dog-sat for ten days many years ago in A VERY LARGE unit on Mahaila Ave (92122). I do not know the same of the complex but the landscaping was beautiful, the pool area was very well maintained at the time and the unit was between 1750-1900 sf, I think, and the inside was absolutely superior to your Southpointe unit in every way, shape and form. I do NOT know what the current dues in this complex would be now but the unit felt like a house and was VERY livable for a family if you wanted to stay in that area.

[bearishgurl]

Scarlett, I think I may have mentioned this before on another thread, but I dog-sat for ten days many years ago in A VERY LARGE unit on Mahaila Ave (92122). I do not know the same of the complex but the landscaping was beautiful, the pool area was very well maintained at the time and the unit was between 1750-1900 sf, I think, and the inside was absolutely superior to your Southpointe unit in every way, shape and form. I do NOT know what the current dues in this complex would be now but the unit felt like a house and was VERY livable for a family if you wanted to stay in that area.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=Scarlett]About schools that’s a good point. But if the kids automatically enroll in La Jolla elementary and middle school (and it is zipcode 92037), the only choice that could disappear would be the UC high one which doesn’t make much sense. (Why would a kid go from Muirlands LJ middle to UC high???)[/quote]

If you read the “Optional Enrollment” section of your sandi-net link, you cannot enroll in the option until it is time to attend.

In SDUSD, a “zip code” has nothing to do with the price of tea in China.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=Scarlett]About schools that’s a good point. But if the kids automatically enroll in La Jolla elementary and middle school (and it is zipcode 92037), the only choice that could disappear would be the UC high one which doesn’t make much sense. (Why would a kid go from Muirlands LJ middle to UC high???)[/quote]

If you read the “Optional Enrollment” section of your sandi-net link, you cannot enroll in the option until it is time to attend.

In SDUSD, a “zip code” has nothing to do with the price of tea in China.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=Scarlett]About schools that’s a good point. But if the kids automatically enroll in La Jolla elementary and middle school (and it is zipcode 92037), the only choice that could disappear would be the UC high one which doesn’t make much sense. (Why would a kid go from Muirlands LJ middle to UC high???)[/quote]

If you read the “Optional Enrollment” section of your sandi-net link, you cannot enroll in the option until it is time to attend.

In SDUSD, a “zip code” has nothing to do with the price of tea in China.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=Scarlett]About schools that’s a good point. But if the kids automatically enroll in La Jolla elementary and middle school (and it is zipcode 92037), the only choice that could disappear would be the UC high one which doesn’t make much sense. (Why would a kid go from Muirlands LJ middle to UC high???)[/quote]

If you read the “Optional Enrollment” section of your sandi-net link, you cannot enroll in the option until it is time to attend.

In SDUSD, a “zip code” has nothing to do with the price of tea in China.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=Scarlett]About schools that’s a good point. But if the kids automatically enroll in La Jolla elementary and middle school (and it is zipcode 92037), the only choice that could disappear would be the UC high one which doesn’t make much sense. (Why would a kid go from Muirlands LJ middle to UC high???)[/quote]

If you read the “Optional Enrollment” section of your sandi-net link, you cannot enroll in the option until it is time to attend.

In SDUSD, a “zip code” has nothing to do with the price of tea in China.

[Scarlett]

[quote=bearishgurl][quote=Scarlett]About schools that’s a good point. But if the kids automatically enroll in La Jolla elementary and middle school (and it is zipcode 92037), the only choice that could disappear would be the UC high one which doesn’t make much sense. (Why would a kid go from Muirlands LJ middle to UC high???)[/quote]

If you read the “Optional Enrollment” section of your sandi-net link, you cannot enroll in the option until it is time to attend.

In SDUSD, a “zip code” has nothing to do with the price of tea in China.[/quote]
I know but my point there is no choice where to go to elementary or middle schools. The middle school feeds into LJ High. UC high is an option if one really wants it. LJ High is the default.

[Scarlett]

[quote=bearishgurl][quote=Scarlett]About schools that’s a good point. But if the kids automatically enroll in La Jolla elementary and middle school (and it is zipcode 92037), the only choice that could disappear would be the UC high one which doesn’t make much sense. (Why would a kid go from Muirlands LJ middle to UC high???)[/quote]

If you read the “Optional Enrollment” section of your sandi-net link, you cannot enroll in the option until it is time to attend.

In SDUSD, a “zip code” has nothing to do with the price of tea in China.[/quote]
I know but my point there is no choice where to go to elementary or middle schools. The middle school feeds into LJ High. UC high is an option if one really wants it. LJ High is the default.

[Scarlett]

[quote=bearishgurl][quote=Scarlett]About schools that’s a good point. But if the kids automatically enroll in La Jolla elementary and middle school (and it is zipcode 92037), the only choice that could disappear would be the UC high one which doesn’t make much sense. (Why would a kid go from Muirlands LJ middle to UC high???)[/quote]

If you read the “Optional Enrollment” section of your sandi-net link, you cannot enroll in the option until it is time to attend.

In SDUSD, a “zip code” has nothing to do with the price of tea in China.[/quote]
I know but my point there is no choice where to go to elementary or middle schools. The middle school feeds into LJ High. UC high is an option if one really wants it. LJ High is the default.

[Scarlett]

[quote=bearishgurl][quote=Scarlett]About schools that’s a good point. But if the kids automatically enroll in La Jolla elementary and middle school (and it is zipcode 92037), the only choice that could disappear would be the UC high one which doesn’t make much sense. (Why would a kid go from Muirlands LJ middle to UC high???)[/quote]

If you read the “Optional Enrollment” section of your sandi-net link, you cannot enroll in the option until it is time to attend.

In SDUSD, a “zip code” has nothing to do with the price of tea in China.[/quote]
I know but my point there is no choice where to go to elementary or middle schools. The middle school feeds into LJ High. UC high is an option if one really wants it. LJ High is the default.

[Author]

Posts