- This topic has 250 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by waiting for bottom.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 25, 2008 at 6:59 PM #176697March 26, 2008 at 4:26 AM #176308tothjjParticipant
Well, the thing about that house is it had a great location as I remember. So take a house that was big, showed very nicely and was a primo location and you have a house at the top of the food chain. I would suspect that most other places do not have the allure of this house so it’s all downhill from that sales price.
March 26, 2008 at 4:26 AM #176662tothjjParticipantWell, the thing about that house is it had a great location as I remember. So take a house that was big, showed very nicely and was a primo location and you have a house at the top of the food chain. I would suspect that most other places do not have the allure of this house so it’s all downhill from that sales price.
March 26, 2008 at 4:26 AM #176665tothjjParticipantWell, the thing about that house is it had a great location as I remember. So take a house that was big, showed very nicely and was a primo location and you have a house at the top of the food chain. I would suspect that most other places do not have the allure of this house so it’s all downhill from that sales price.
March 26, 2008 at 4:26 AM #176670tothjjParticipantWell, the thing about that house is it had a great location as I remember. So take a house that was big, showed very nicely and was a primo location and you have a house at the top of the food chain. I would suspect that most other places do not have the allure of this house so it’s all downhill from that sales price.
March 26, 2008 at 4:26 AM #176762tothjjParticipantWell, the thing about that house is it had a great location as I remember. So take a house that was big, showed very nicely and was a primo location and you have a house at the top of the food chain. I would suspect that most other places do not have the allure of this house so it’s all downhill from that sales price.
March 26, 2008 at 2:02 PM #176606EugeneParticipantNext door neighbor closed today at 680k. A 15% cut from 11-2004 sales price, but still outrageously expensive.
March 26, 2008 at 2:02 PM #176957EugeneParticipantNext door neighbor closed today at 680k. A 15% cut from 11-2004 sales price, but still outrageously expensive.
March 26, 2008 at 2:02 PM #176959EugeneParticipantNext door neighbor closed today at 680k. A 15% cut from 11-2004 sales price, but still outrageously expensive.
March 26, 2008 at 2:02 PM #176963EugeneParticipantNext door neighbor closed today at 680k. A 15% cut from 11-2004 sales price, but still outrageously expensive.
March 26, 2008 at 2:02 PM #177056EugeneParticipantNext door neighbor closed today at 680k. A 15% cut from 11-2004 sales price, but still outrageously expensive.
March 26, 2008 at 8:56 PM #176763waiting for bottomParticipantun-believable. These knife catchers just prolong the agony for all of us.
March 26, 2008 at 8:56 PM #177117waiting for bottomParticipantun-believable. These knife catchers just prolong the agony for all of us.
March 26, 2008 at 8:56 PM #177125waiting for bottomParticipantun-believable. These knife catchers just prolong the agony for all of us.
March 26, 2008 at 8:56 PM #177129waiting for bottomParticipantun-believable. These knife catchers just prolong the agony for all of us.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.