Menu

Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › San Diego #11 in 2009 top UHaul Destinations

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 116 total)
1 2 3 4 … 6 7 8
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 6, 2010 at 3:56 PM #537300
    (former)FormerSanDiegan
    Participant

    [quote=EconProf]Not sure this indicator means much about a city’s growth or decline. After all, Las Vegas was the #2 destination, but it was recently reported that Clark County (Las Vegas) had its first population decline in decades last year. It’s ranking as #2 is just a lot of churning as many people are coming and going, but mostly going.
    The better indicator is the occassionally published ratio of the cost of U-haul trucks into a city compared to the cost of a U-haul out. Since the U-haul company varies the price depending on demand, we get a valuable peek into the apparent desirability of a city. By this measure cities in Texas, Idaho, Utah and other economically healthy areas were gaining at the expense of CA, according to data I saw some time ago.
    Anybody have the latest figures?[/quote]

    Yes, I agree those numbers would definitely be more telling. But, I have not found a source, other than some anecdotal articles that are typically several years old.

    April 6, 2010 at 4:01 PM #536369
    Nor-LA-SD-guy
    Participant

    All I can tell you is that yes there is domestic migration out, but immigration these days is more and more coming from Asia , and they generally don’t move to Texas,

    L.A and NYC are the top destinations followed by San Jose.

    April 6, 2010 at 4:01 PM #536495
    Nor-LA-SD-guy
    Participant

    All I can tell you is that yes there is domestic migration out, but immigration these days is more and more coming from Asia , and they generally don’t move to Texas,

    L.A and NYC are the top destinations followed by San Jose.

    April 6, 2010 at 4:01 PM #536950
    Nor-LA-SD-guy
    Participant

    All I can tell you is that yes there is domestic migration out, but immigration these days is more and more coming from Asia , and they generally don’t move to Texas,

    L.A and NYC are the top destinations followed by San Jose.

    April 6, 2010 at 4:01 PM #537047
    Nor-LA-SD-guy
    Participant

    All I can tell you is that yes there is domestic migration out, but immigration these days is more and more coming from Asia , and they generally don’t move to Texas,

    L.A and NYC are the top destinations followed by San Jose.

    April 6, 2010 at 4:01 PM #537310
    Nor-LA-SD-guy
    Participant

    All I can tell you is that yes there is domestic migration out, but immigration these days is more and more coming from Asia , and they generally don’t move to Texas,

    L.A and NYC are the top destinations followed by San Jose.

    April 6, 2010 at 4:06 PM #536384
    (former)FormerSanDiegan
    Participant

    [quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]All I can tell you is that yes there is domestic migration out, but immigration these days is more and more coming from Asia , and they generally don’t move to Texas,

    L.A and NYC are the top destinations followed by San Jose.[/quote]

    Net domestic migration in San Diego county in 2009 was -2588 people (that many more left than came in). However, in the mid 2000’s we were averaging about -35,000 to -38,000 in net domestic migration.

    April 6, 2010 at 4:06 PM #536510
    (former)FormerSanDiegan
    Participant

    [quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]All I can tell you is that yes there is domestic migration out, but immigration these days is more and more coming from Asia , and they generally don’t move to Texas,

    L.A and NYC are the top destinations followed by San Jose.[/quote]

    Net domestic migration in San Diego county in 2009 was -2588 people (that many more left than came in). However, in the mid 2000’s we were averaging about -35,000 to -38,000 in net domestic migration.

    April 6, 2010 at 4:06 PM #536965
    (former)FormerSanDiegan
    Participant

    [quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]All I can tell you is that yes there is domestic migration out, but immigration these days is more and more coming from Asia , and they generally don’t move to Texas,

    L.A and NYC are the top destinations followed by San Jose.[/quote]

    Net domestic migration in San Diego county in 2009 was -2588 people (that many more left than came in). However, in the mid 2000’s we were averaging about -35,000 to -38,000 in net domestic migration.

    April 6, 2010 at 4:06 PM #537061
    (former)FormerSanDiegan
    Participant

    [quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]All I can tell you is that yes there is domestic migration out, but immigration these days is more and more coming from Asia , and they generally don’t move to Texas,

    L.A and NYC are the top destinations followed by San Jose.[/quote]

    Net domestic migration in San Diego county in 2009 was -2588 people (that many more left than came in). However, in the mid 2000’s we were averaging about -35,000 to -38,000 in net domestic migration.

    April 6, 2010 at 4:06 PM #537325
    (former)FormerSanDiegan
    Participant

    [quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]All I can tell you is that yes there is domestic migration out, but immigration these days is more and more coming from Asia , and they generally don’t move to Texas,

    L.A and NYC are the top destinations followed by San Jose.[/quote]

    Net domestic migration in San Diego county in 2009 was -2588 people (that many more left than came in). However, in the mid 2000’s we were averaging about -35,000 to -38,000 in net domestic migration.

    April 6, 2010 at 4:23 PM #536399
    (former)FormerSanDiegan
    Participant

    This is probably a waste of time, but here goes … informal quotes of UHaul rates form their web site.
    17-foot trucks for May 15 pick-up:

    San Diego to Dallas : 1198
    Dallas to San Diego : 724

    Wow the disparity must still exist, but what about other cities …

    San Diego to Kansas City : $1386
    Kansas City to San Diego : $1386

    Hmmmm… Maybe the San Diego/Dallas disparity has more to do with Dallas/Texas inmigration than San Diego outmigration …

    Kansas City to Dallas : 440
    Dallas to Kansas City : 262

    Must be a premium to go to Texas.

    What about SD to/from other regional cities:

    San Diego to Phoenix: 194
    Phoenix to San Diego 224

    San Diego to LA: 110
    LA to San Diego: 173

    San Diego to San Francisco : 269
    San Fran to San Diego : 326

    San Diego to Las Vegas : 227
    Las Vegas to San Diego : 227

    April 6, 2010 at 4:23 PM #536525
    (former)FormerSanDiegan
    Participant

    This is probably a waste of time, but here goes … informal quotes of UHaul rates form their web site.
    17-foot trucks for May 15 pick-up:

    San Diego to Dallas : 1198
    Dallas to San Diego : 724

    Wow the disparity must still exist, but what about other cities …

    San Diego to Kansas City : $1386
    Kansas City to San Diego : $1386

    Hmmmm… Maybe the San Diego/Dallas disparity has more to do with Dallas/Texas inmigration than San Diego outmigration …

    Kansas City to Dallas : 440
    Dallas to Kansas City : 262

    Must be a premium to go to Texas.

    What about SD to/from other regional cities:

    San Diego to Phoenix: 194
    Phoenix to San Diego 224

    San Diego to LA: 110
    LA to San Diego: 173

    San Diego to San Francisco : 269
    San Fran to San Diego : 326

    San Diego to Las Vegas : 227
    Las Vegas to San Diego : 227

    April 6, 2010 at 4:23 PM #536980
    (former)FormerSanDiegan
    Participant

    This is probably a waste of time, but here goes … informal quotes of UHaul rates form their web site.
    17-foot trucks for May 15 pick-up:

    San Diego to Dallas : 1198
    Dallas to San Diego : 724

    Wow the disparity must still exist, but what about other cities …

    San Diego to Kansas City : $1386
    Kansas City to San Diego : $1386

    Hmmmm… Maybe the San Diego/Dallas disparity has more to do with Dallas/Texas inmigration than San Diego outmigration …

    Kansas City to Dallas : 440
    Dallas to Kansas City : 262

    Must be a premium to go to Texas.

    What about SD to/from other regional cities:

    San Diego to Phoenix: 194
    Phoenix to San Diego 224

    San Diego to LA: 110
    LA to San Diego: 173

    San Diego to San Francisco : 269
    San Fran to San Diego : 326

    San Diego to Las Vegas : 227
    Las Vegas to San Diego : 227

    April 6, 2010 at 4:23 PM #537077
    (former)FormerSanDiegan
    Participant

    This is probably a waste of time, but here goes … informal quotes of UHaul rates form their web site.
    17-foot trucks for May 15 pick-up:

    San Diego to Dallas : 1198
    Dallas to San Diego : 724

    Wow the disparity must still exist, but what about other cities …

    San Diego to Kansas City : $1386
    Kansas City to San Diego : $1386

    Hmmmm… Maybe the San Diego/Dallas disparity has more to do with Dallas/Texas inmigration than San Diego outmigration …

    Kansas City to Dallas : 440
    Dallas to Kansas City : 262

    Must be a premium to go to Texas.

    What about SD to/from other regional cities:

    San Diego to Phoenix: 194
    Phoenix to San Diego 224

    San Diego to LA: 110
    LA to San Diego: 173

    San Diego to San Francisco : 269
    San Fran to San Diego : 326

    San Diego to Las Vegas : 227
    Las Vegas to San Diego : 227

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 116 total)
1 2 3 4 … 6 7 8
  • The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.