Proposition 23

[BigGovernmentIsGood]

This is the Proposition financed by Big Oil that would catapult California back into the dark ages of dirty energy. I trust that you all will be voting no on this. You can read more about this effort to stunt the growth of California’s green energy jobs here:

http://www.stopdirtyenergyprop.com/

[enron_by_the_sea]

Usually I vote NO on all propostions unless they can convince me that

1. It needs to be really really really done.
2. It really can only be done by voters i.e. legislature can not/will not do it.

Thus the only proposition worthy of my YES vote this cycle is proposition 20 – the one that takes away the job of redistricting away from CA legislature.

[enron_by_the_sea]

Usually I vote NO on all propostions unless they can convince me that

1. It needs to be really really really done.
2. It really can only be done by voters i.e. legislature can not/will not do it.

Thus the only proposition worthy of my YES vote this cycle is proposition 20 – the one that takes away the job of redistricting away from CA legislature.

[enron_by_the_sea]

Usually I vote NO on all propostions unless they can convince me that

1. It needs to be really really really done.
2. It really can only be done by voters i.e. legislature can not/will not do it.

Thus the only proposition worthy of my YES vote this cycle is proposition 20 – the one that takes away the job of redistricting away from CA legislature.

[enron_by_the_sea]

Usually I vote NO on all propostions unless they can convince me that

1. It needs to be really really really done.
2. It really can only be done by voters i.e. legislature can not/will not do it.

Thus the only proposition worthy of my YES vote this cycle is proposition 20 – the one that takes away the job of redistricting away from CA legislature.

[enron_by_the_sea]

Usually I vote NO on all propostions unless they can convince me that

1. It needs to be really really really done.
2. It really can only be done by voters i.e. legislature can not/will not do it.

Thus the only proposition worthy of my YES vote this cycle is proposition 20 – the one that takes away the job of redistricting away from CA legislature.

[sd_matt]

You might like this. Look up “Should Google go Nuclear” on YouTube. Physics aside Dr. Bussard discusses the politics that help prevent energy breakthroughs. It’s not merely a left or right problem….then again you might really hate this video.

[sd_matt]

You might like this. Look up “Should Google go Nuclear” on YouTube. Physics aside Dr. Bussard discusses the politics that help prevent energy breakthroughs. It’s not merely a left or right problem….then again you might really hate this video.

[sd_matt]

You might like this. Look up “Should Google go Nuclear” on YouTube. Physics aside Dr. Bussard discusses the politics that help prevent energy breakthroughs. It’s not merely a left or right problem….then again you might really hate this video.

[sd_matt]

You might like this. Look up “Should Google go Nuclear” on YouTube. Physics aside Dr. Bussard discusses the politics that help prevent energy breakthroughs. It’s not merely a left or right problem….then again you might really hate this video.

[sd_matt]

You might like this. Look up “Should Google go Nuclear” on YouTube. Physics aside Dr. Bussard discusses the politics that help prevent energy breakthroughs. It’s not merely a left or right problem….then again you might really hate this video.

[EconProf]

Prop 23 clearly seeks to limit the damage done by Proposition 32, which drastically raises the % of power we get from uneconomic, expensive renewable sources. Proposition 32 is a job killer. It is the best way to destroy California short of bombing it. All energy costs would skyrocket, electricity rates will especially bump up, one estimate puts gasoline prices over $9 per gallon.
Proposition 23 would hold off Prop32 until the state’s unemployment rate fell under 5 1/2%.
If you think our current 12% plus unemployment rate is not high enough, vote against Prop. 23.

[EconProf]

Prop 23 clearly seeks to limit the damage done by Proposition 32, which drastically raises the % of power we get from uneconomic, expensive renewable sources. Proposition 32 is a job killer. It is the best way to destroy California short of bombing it. All energy costs would skyrocket, electricity rates will especially bump up, one estimate puts gasoline prices over $9 per gallon.
Proposition 23 would hold off Prop32 until the state’s unemployment rate fell under 5 1/2%.
If you think our current 12% plus unemployment rate is not high enough, vote against Prop. 23.

[EconProf]

Prop 23 clearly seeks to limit the damage done by Proposition 32, which drastically raises the % of power we get from uneconomic, expensive renewable sources. Proposition 32 is a job killer. It is the best way to destroy California short of bombing it. All energy costs would skyrocket, electricity rates will especially bump up, one estimate puts gasoline prices over $9 per gallon.
Proposition 23 would hold off Prop32 until the state’s unemployment rate fell under 5 1/2%.
If you think our current 12% plus unemployment rate is not high enough, vote against Prop. 23.

[EconProf]

Prop 23 clearly seeks to limit the damage done by Proposition 32, which drastically raises the % of power we get from uneconomic, expensive renewable sources. Proposition 32 is a job killer. It is the best way to destroy California short of bombing it. All energy costs would skyrocket, electricity rates will especially bump up, one estimate puts gasoline prices over $9 per gallon.
Proposition 23 would hold off Prop32 until the state’s unemployment rate fell under 5 1/2%.
If you think our current 12% plus unemployment rate is not high enough, vote against Prop. 23.

[Author]

Posts