OT – Who will run for President on the Republican side?

[scaredyclassic]

festering is bad.

[Arraya]

[quote=briansd1]

So why not delay the pain and hope for a miracle? [/quote]

That looks to be the current plan. The iron fist of non-change has been ruling for decades and now “change” is going to vomit all over us, in an unpleasant fashion.

[Arraya]

[quote=briansd1]

So why not delay the pain and hope for a miracle? [/quote]

That looks to be the current plan. The iron fist of non-change has been ruling for decades and now “change” is going to vomit all over us, in an unpleasant fashion.

[Arraya]

[quote=briansd1]

So why not delay the pain and hope for a miracle? [/quote]

That looks to be the current plan. The iron fist of non-change has been ruling for decades and now “change” is going to vomit all over us, in an unpleasant fashion.

[Arraya]

[quote=briansd1]

So why not delay the pain and hope for a miracle? [/quote]

That looks to be the current plan. The iron fist of non-change has been ruling for decades and now “change” is going to vomit all over us, in an unpleasant fashion.

[Arraya]

[quote=briansd1]

So why not delay the pain and hope for a miracle? [/quote]

That looks to be the current plan. The iron fist of non-change has been ruling for decades and now “change” is going to vomit all over us, in an unpleasant fashion.

[briansd1]

Ok, Arraya, you’re talking philosophy, sustainability and big-picture stuff. That’s very French.

Allan is too French also. He’s talking about an impending collapse of the Western social order and our society’s inability to cope.

We Americans are wary of big ideas; we want concrete examples.

I’m talking about current economics, politics and the Republican nomination.

One thing at a time here. We has a near economic collapse that was caused by an under- regulated private banking sector. Let’s fix that first, then move on.

How does the fixing the mess at the banks and credit markets equate to the wholesale reform the social safety net? Again, let’s fix one thing a time so that we are not bogged down by the conflation of a host of social and economic issues.

Obama is trying to fix one thing at a time within the powers of the executive office. Things would go faster if Congress would pass laws to accelerate the process of reform.

So Allan and Arraya, if you guys see the future so well, please predict the next Republican nominee.

[briansd1]

Ok, Arraya, you’re talking philosophy, sustainability and big-picture stuff. That’s very French.

Allan is too French also. He’s talking about an impending collapse of the Western social order and our society’s inability to cope.

We Americans are wary of big ideas; we want concrete examples.

I’m talking about current economics, politics and the Republican nomination.

One thing at a time here. We has a near economic collapse that was caused by an under- regulated private banking sector. Let’s fix that first, then move on.

How does the fixing the mess at the banks and credit markets equate to the wholesale reform the social safety net? Again, let’s fix one thing a time so that we are not bogged down by the conflation of a host of social and economic issues.

Obama is trying to fix one thing at a time within the powers of the executive office. Things would go faster if Congress would pass laws to accelerate the process of reform.

So Allan and Arraya, if you guys see the future so well, please predict the next Republican nominee.

[briansd1]

Ok, Arraya, you’re talking philosophy, sustainability and big-picture stuff. That’s very French.

Allan is too French also. He’s talking about an impending collapse of the Western social order and our society’s inability to cope.

We Americans are wary of big ideas; we want concrete examples.

I’m talking about current economics, politics and the Republican nomination.

One thing at a time here. We has a near economic collapse that was caused by an under- regulated private banking sector. Let’s fix that first, then move on.

How does the fixing the mess at the banks and credit markets equate to the wholesale reform the social safety net? Again, let’s fix one thing a time so that we are not bogged down by the conflation of a host of social and economic issues.

Obama is trying to fix one thing at a time within the powers of the executive office. Things would go faster if Congress would pass laws to accelerate the process of reform.

So Allan and Arraya, if you guys see the future so well, please predict the next Republican nominee.

[briansd1]

Ok, Arraya, you’re talking philosophy, sustainability and big-picture stuff. That’s very French.

Allan is too French also. He’s talking about an impending collapse of the Western social order and our society’s inability to cope.

We Americans are wary of big ideas; we want concrete examples.

I’m talking about current economics, politics and the Republican nomination.

One thing at a time here. We has a near economic collapse that was caused by an under- regulated private banking sector. Let’s fix that first, then move on.

How does the fixing the mess at the banks and credit markets equate to the wholesale reform the social safety net? Again, let’s fix one thing a time so that we are not bogged down by the conflation of a host of social and economic issues.

Obama is trying to fix one thing at a time within the powers of the executive office. Things would go faster if Congress would pass laws to accelerate the process of reform.

So Allan and Arraya, if you guys see the future so well, please predict the next Republican nominee.

[briansd1]

Ok, Arraya, you’re talking philosophy, sustainability and big-picture stuff. That’s very French.

Allan is too French also. He’s talking about an impending collapse of the Western social order and our society’s inability to cope.

We Americans are wary of big ideas; we want concrete examples.

I’m talking about current economics, politics and the Republican nomination.

One thing at a time here. We has a near economic collapse that was caused by an under- regulated private banking sector. Let’s fix that first, then move on.

How does the fixing the mess at the banks and credit markets equate to the wholesale reform the social safety net? Again, let’s fix one thing a time so that we are not bogged down by the conflation of a host of social and economic issues.

Obama is trying to fix one thing at a time within the powers of the executive office. Things would go faster if Congress would pass laws to accelerate the process of reform.

So Allan and Arraya, if you guys see the future so well, please predict the next Republican nominee.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
[…]
You want me to continue, or is this enough for you?[/quote]

What I asked to see is where I made the leap from Krugman’s argument about the media to your claim that I said “some people should not be allowed to run for office.”

Allan, I never said anyone should be banned from running – those were your words that you attributed to me. It’s that simple. You can argue all day long, pulling in inferences and irrelevant references, using fancy vocabulary…

But, at the end of the day, I didn’t say it.

Yes, I’m a smart-ass. You are letting that part cloud your judgement and interpretation. If you don’t like the way I phrase it, then read Eaves’ response. She says it better.

It’s a shame that you refuse to consider the point that we are making. There’s some scary shit that’s going on, and it’s bad for our country (no matter where your political leanings are.)

More from Krugman, along the same lines:

BTW: Do you know about this?

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/ClosureOfGuantanamoDetentionFacilities/

Now read this:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hiCyuo47rG5_B_88fhT_MOqZU-Tw

So why haven’t we closed Gitmo?

[Anonymous]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
[…]
You want me to continue, or is this enough for you?[/quote]

What I asked to see is where I made the leap from Krugman’s argument about the media to your claim that I said “some people should not be allowed to run for office.”

Allan, I never said anyone should be banned from running – those were your words that you attributed to me. It’s that simple. You can argue all day long, pulling in inferences and irrelevant references, using fancy vocabulary…

But, at the end of the day, I didn’t say it.

Yes, I’m a smart-ass. You are letting that part cloud your judgement and interpretation. If you don’t like the way I phrase it, then read Eaves’ response. She says it better.

It’s a shame that you refuse to consider the point that we are making. There’s some scary shit that’s going on, and it’s bad for our country (no matter where your political leanings are.)

More from Krugman, along the same lines:

BTW: Do you know about this?

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/ClosureOfGuantanamoDetentionFacilities/

Now read this:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hiCyuo47rG5_B_88fhT_MOqZU-Tw

So why haven’t we closed Gitmo?

[Anonymous]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
[…]
You want me to continue, or is this enough for you?[/quote]

What I asked to see is where I made the leap from Krugman’s argument about the media to your claim that I said “some people should not be allowed to run for office.”

Allan, I never said anyone should be banned from running – those were your words that you attributed to me. It’s that simple. You can argue all day long, pulling in inferences and irrelevant references, using fancy vocabulary…

But, at the end of the day, I didn’t say it.

Yes, I’m a smart-ass. You are letting that part cloud your judgement and interpretation. If you don’t like the way I phrase it, then read Eaves’ response. She says it better.

It’s a shame that you refuse to consider the point that we are making. There’s some scary shit that’s going on, and it’s bad for our country (no matter where your political leanings are.)

More from Krugman, along the same lines:

BTW: Do you know about this?

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/ClosureOfGuantanamoDetentionFacilities/

Now read this:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hiCyuo47rG5_B_88fhT_MOqZU-Tw

So why haven’t we closed Gitmo?

[Anonymous]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
[…]
You want me to continue, or is this enough for you?[/quote]

What I asked to see is where I made the leap from Krugman’s argument about the media to your claim that I said “some people should not be allowed to run for office.”

Allan, I never said anyone should be banned from running – those were your words that you attributed to me. It’s that simple. You can argue all day long, pulling in inferences and irrelevant references, using fancy vocabulary…

But, at the end of the day, I didn’t say it.

Yes, I’m a smart-ass. You are letting that part cloud your judgement and interpretation. If you don’t like the way I phrase it, then read Eaves’ response. She says it better.

It’s a shame that you refuse to consider the point that we are making. There’s some scary shit that’s going on, and it’s bad for our country (no matter where your political leanings are.)

More from Krugman, along the same lines:

BTW: Do you know about this?

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/ClosureOfGuantanamoDetentionFacilities/

Now read this:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hiCyuo47rG5_B_88fhT_MOqZU-Tw

So why haven’t we closed Gitmo?

[Author]

Posts