- This topic has 570 replies, 33 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 30, 2010 at 7:34 AM #612127September 30, 2010 at 7:47 AM #611076(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant
[quote=Hobie]I would have thought the Whitman campaign would have anticipated this and would have a pre-planned counter attack. Her response in just denying it while true, appears weak.[/quote]
If you think about it, it’s the only thing she could have done. Imagine the damage to her campaign (particularly in the primary) if she would have hired immigration attorneys to assist her illegal immigrant employee. Soft on immigration does not play to her base.
It’s a catch-22.
What are we supposed to do as citizens if/when we find out that our employees are here illegally ?
The reality is that in practice immigration policy in this state is equivalent to the don’t ask, don’t tell policy.
We are too weak to change the law to allow legalization and we are too weak to enforce the current law and deport everybody.
September 30, 2010 at 7:47 AM #611163(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=Hobie]I would have thought the Whitman campaign would have anticipated this and would have a pre-planned counter attack. Her response in just denying it while true, appears weak.[/quote]
If you think about it, it’s the only thing she could have done. Imagine the damage to her campaign (particularly in the primary) if she would have hired immigration attorneys to assist her illegal immigrant employee. Soft on immigration does not play to her base.
It’s a catch-22.
What are we supposed to do as citizens if/when we find out that our employees are here illegally ?
The reality is that in practice immigration policy in this state is equivalent to the don’t ask, don’t tell policy.
We are too weak to change the law to allow legalization and we are too weak to enforce the current law and deport everybody.
September 30, 2010 at 7:47 AM #611707(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=Hobie]I would have thought the Whitman campaign would have anticipated this and would have a pre-planned counter attack. Her response in just denying it while true, appears weak.[/quote]
If you think about it, it’s the only thing she could have done. Imagine the damage to her campaign (particularly in the primary) if she would have hired immigration attorneys to assist her illegal immigrant employee. Soft on immigration does not play to her base.
It’s a catch-22.
What are we supposed to do as citizens if/when we find out that our employees are here illegally ?
The reality is that in practice immigration policy in this state is equivalent to the don’t ask, don’t tell policy.
We are too weak to change the law to allow legalization and we are too weak to enforce the current law and deport everybody.
September 30, 2010 at 7:47 AM #611821(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=Hobie]I would have thought the Whitman campaign would have anticipated this and would have a pre-planned counter attack. Her response in just denying it while true, appears weak.[/quote]
If you think about it, it’s the only thing she could have done. Imagine the damage to her campaign (particularly in the primary) if she would have hired immigration attorneys to assist her illegal immigrant employee. Soft on immigration does not play to her base.
It’s a catch-22.
What are we supposed to do as citizens if/when we find out that our employees are here illegally ?
The reality is that in practice immigration policy in this state is equivalent to the don’t ask, don’t tell policy.
We are too weak to change the law to allow legalization and we are too weak to enforce the current law and deport everybody.
September 30, 2010 at 7:47 AM #612137(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=Hobie]I would have thought the Whitman campaign would have anticipated this and would have a pre-planned counter attack. Her response in just denying it while true, appears weak.[/quote]
If you think about it, it’s the only thing she could have done. Imagine the damage to her campaign (particularly in the primary) if she would have hired immigration attorneys to assist her illegal immigrant employee. Soft on immigration does not play to her base.
It’s a catch-22.
What are we supposed to do as citizens if/when we find out that our employees are here illegally ?
The reality is that in practice immigration policy in this state is equivalent to the don’t ask, don’t tell policy.
We are too weak to change the law to allow legalization and we are too weak to enforce the current law and deport everybody.
September 30, 2010 at 7:51 AM #611081scaredyclassicParticipantWhat were campaigns like back in the old days? If people could be transported from the past to view some of our election issues, would they think the country has become mentally defective? I have no idea, but they’d definitely be impressed by ebay, i’ll tell you that.
September 30, 2010 at 7:51 AM #611168scaredyclassicParticipantWhat were campaigns like back in the old days? If people could be transported from the past to view some of our election issues, would they think the country has become mentally defective? I have no idea, but they’d definitely be impressed by ebay, i’ll tell you that.
September 30, 2010 at 7:51 AM #611712scaredyclassicParticipantWhat were campaigns like back in the old days? If people could be transported from the past to view some of our election issues, would they think the country has become mentally defective? I have no idea, but they’d definitely be impressed by ebay, i’ll tell you that.
September 30, 2010 at 7:51 AM #611826scaredyclassicParticipantWhat were campaigns like back in the old days? If people could be transported from the past to view some of our election issues, would they think the country has become mentally defective? I have no idea, but they’d definitely be impressed by ebay, i’ll tell you that.
September 30, 2010 at 7:51 AM #612142scaredyclassicParticipantWhat were campaigns like back in the old days? If people could be transported from the past to view some of our election issues, would they think the country has become mentally defective? I have no idea, but they’d definitely be impressed by ebay, i’ll tell you that.
September 30, 2010 at 8:37 AM #611086sdduuuudeParticipantThis thread is one massive troll buffet line. All you can eat.
September 30, 2010 at 8:37 AM #611173sdduuuudeParticipantThis thread is one massive troll buffet line. All you can eat.
September 30, 2010 at 8:37 AM #611717sdduuuudeParticipantThis thread is one massive troll buffet line. All you can eat.
September 30, 2010 at 8:37 AM #611831sdduuuudeParticipantThis thread is one massive troll buffet line. All you can eat.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.