- This topic has 1,770 replies, 36 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by GH.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 1, 2010 at 8:54 AM #626100November 1, 2010 at 3:36 PM #625250permabearParticipant
There are some interesting points in there, but all I keep seeing is “payed”.
The word is “paid”.
November 1, 2010 at 3:36 PM #625333permabearParticipantThere are some interesting points in there, but all I keep seeing is “payed”.
The word is “paid”.
November 1, 2010 at 3:36 PM #625885permabearParticipantThere are some interesting points in there, but all I keep seeing is “payed”.
The word is “paid”.
November 1, 2010 at 3:36 PM #626005permabearParticipantThere are some interesting points in there, but all I keep seeing is “payed”.
The word is “paid”.
November 1, 2010 at 3:36 PM #626314permabearParticipantThere are some interesting points in there, but all I keep seeing is “payed”.
The word is “paid”.
November 1, 2010 at 4:34 PM #625279jstoeszParticipantdang it…
I will now edit my post out of embarrassment. Are there any other grammatical errors that I missed after my third proof read?
Are there improvements I can make to my thesis statement? Maybe the subject was not limited enough? Or I did not have sufficient supporting details.
After the shame of my failed grammar, I guess I will just have to rely on the old crutch…Hitler and Latin.
http://psy.otago.ac.nz/r_oshea/WFP/WFP2e/argument.html
Edit: Looks like I can not change my previous post…oh well I got 1 out of 3 right…
November 1, 2010 at 4:34 PM #625358jstoeszParticipantdang it…
I will now edit my post out of embarrassment. Are there any other grammatical errors that I missed after my third proof read?
Are there improvements I can make to my thesis statement? Maybe the subject was not limited enough? Or I did not have sufficient supporting details.
After the shame of my failed grammar, I guess I will just have to rely on the old crutch…Hitler and Latin.
http://psy.otago.ac.nz/r_oshea/WFP/WFP2e/argument.html
Edit: Looks like I can not change my previous post…oh well I got 1 out of 3 right…
November 1, 2010 at 4:34 PM #625910jstoeszParticipantdang it…
I will now edit my post out of embarrassment. Are there any other grammatical errors that I missed after my third proof read?
Are there improvements I can make to my thesis statement? Maybe the subject was not limited enough? Or I did not have sufficient supporting details.
After the shame of my failed grammar, I guess I will just have to rely on the old crutch…Hitler and Latin.
http://psy.otago.ac.nz/r_oshea/WFP/WFP2e/argument.html
Edit: Looks like I can not change my previous post…oh well I got 1 out of 3 right…
November 1, 2010 at 4:34 PM #626033jstoeszParticipantdang it…
I will now edit my post out of embarrassment. Are there any other grammatical errors that I missed after my third proof read?
Are there improvements I can make to my thesis statement? Maybe the subject was not limited enough? Or I did not have sufficient supporting details.
After the shame of my failed grammar, I guess I will just have to rely on the old crutch…Hitler and Latin.
http://psy.otago.ac.nz/r_oshea/WFP/WFP2e/argument.html
Edit: Looks like I can not change my previous post…oh well I got 1 out of 3 right…
November 1, 2010 at 4:34 PM #626341jstoeszParticipantdang it…
I will now edit my post out of embarrassment. Are there any other grammatical errors that I missed after my third proof read?
Are there improvements I can make to my thesis statement? Maybe the subject was not limited enough? Or I did not have sufficient supporting details.
After the shame of my failed grammar, I guess I will just have to rely on the old crutch…Hitler and Latin.
http://psy.otago.ac.nz/r_oshea/WFP/WFP2e/argument.html
Edit: Looks like I can not change my previous post…oh well I got 1 out of 3 right…
May 12, 2011 at 10:52 AM #694838daveljParticipant6-figure lifeguards… what does this no longer surprise…
http://taxdollars.ocregister.com/2011/05/12/o-c-s-200k-lifeguards-spark-international-shock/82891/
May 12, 2011 at 10:52 AM #694925daveljParticipant6-figure lifeguards… what does this no longer surprise…
http://taxdollars.ocregister.com/2011/05/12/o-c-s-200k-lifeguards-spark-international-shock/82891/
May 12, 2011 at 10:52 AM #695528daveljParticipant6-figure lifeguards… what does this no longer surprise…
http://taxdollars.ocregister.com/2011/05/12/o-c-s-200k-lifeguards-spark-international-shock/82891/
May 12, 2011 at 10:52 AM #695675daveljParticipant6-figure lifeguards… what does this no longer surprise…
http://taxdollars.ocregister.com/2011/05/12/o-c-s-200k-lifeguards-spark-international-shock/82891/
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.