- This topic has 495 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by equalizer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 2, 2008 at 6:05 PM #297283November 2, 2008 at 6:23 PM #296876jficquetteParticipant
Partypup,
Have you been to these sites???
http://hillbuzz.wordpress.com/
http://hillbuzz.wordpress.com/ten-reasons-democrats-should-support-john-mccain/
http://www.puma08.com/Somewhere in the pages are comments by Hillary supporters who claim that McCain will win huge in the caucus states because of the “dirty campaign tricks” that Obama used.
Also all should remember how they screwed Hillary by not seating the Florida and Michigan delegates at the convention and there are comments in their somewhere about how the PUMA’s in Florida are going to get revenge by voting for McCain.
Also it is discussed in those sites about how the pollsters were in the tank for Obama and skewed the numbers on purpose to hurt Hillary. For instance, the polls had Obama up by 11% in Penn the day before the election and Hillary won by 200k votes. Those Hillary voters are going to vote for McCain.
Partypup, you are so right about things.
John
November 2, 2008 at 6:23 PM #297220jficquetteParticipantPartypup,
Have you been to these sites???
http://hillbuzz.wordpress.com/
http://hillbuzz.wordpress.com/ten-reasons-democrats-should-support-john-mccain/
http://www.puma08.com/Somewhere in the pages are comments by Hillary supporters who claim that McCain will win huge in the caucus states because of the “dirty campaign tricks” that Obama used.
Also all should remember how they screwed Hillary by not seating the Florida and Michigan delegates at the convention and there are comments in their somewhere about how the PUMA’s in Florida are going to get revenge by voting for McCain.
Also it is discussed in those sites about how the pollsters were in the tank for Obama and skewed the numbers on purpose to hurt Hillary. For instance, the polls had Obama up by 11% in Penn the day before the election and Hillary won by 200k votes. Those Hillary voters are going to vote for McCain.
Partypup, you are so right about things.
John
November 2, 2008 at 6:23 PM #297236jficquetteParticipantPartypup,
Have you been to these sites???
http://hillbuzz.wordpress.com/
http://hillbuzz.wordpress.com/ten-reasons-democrats-should-support-john-mccain/
http://www.puma08.com/Somewhere in the pages are comments by Hillary supporters who claim that McCain will win huge in the caucus states because of the “dirty campaign tricks” that Obama used.
Also all should remember how they screwed Hillary by not seating the Florida and Michigan delegates at the convention and there are comments in their somewhere about how the PUMA’s in Florida are going to get revenge by voting for McCain.
Also it is discussed in those sites about how the pollsters were in the tank for Obama and skewed the numbers on purpose to hurt Hillary. For instance, the polls had Obama up by 11% in Penn the day before the election and Hillary won by 200k votes. Those Hillary voters are going to vote for McCain.
Partypup, you are so right about things.
John
November 2, 2008 at 6:23 PM #297249jficquetteParticipantPartypup,
Have you been to these sites???
http://hillbuzz.wordpress.com/
http://hillbuzz.wordpress.com/ten-reasons-democrats-should-support-john-mccain/
http://www.puma08.com/Somewhere in the pages are comments by Hillary supporters who claim that McCain will win huge in the caucus states because of the “dirty campaign tricks” that Obama used.
Also all should remember how they screwed Hillary by not seating the Florida and Michigan delegates at the convention and there are comments in their somewhere about how the PUMA’s in Florida are going to get revenge by voting for McCain.
Also it is discussed in those sites about how the pollsters were in the tank for Obama and skewed the numbers on purpose to hurt Hillary. For instance, the polls had Obama up by 11% in Penn the day before the election and Hillary won by 200k votes. Those Hillary voters are going to vote for McCain.
Partypup, you are so right about things.
John
November 2, 2008 at 6:23 PM #297293jficquetteParticipantPartypup,
Have you been to these sites???
http://hillbuzz.wordpress.com/
http://hillbuzz.wordpress.com/ten-reasons-democrats-should-support-john-mccain/
http://www.puma08.com/Somewhere in the pages are comments by Hillary supporters who claim that McCain will win huge in the caucus states because of the “dirty campaign tricks” that Obama used.
Also all should remember how they screwed Hillary by not seating the Florida and Michigan delegates at the convention and there are comments in their somewhere about how the PUMA’s in Florida are going to get revenge by voting for McCain.
Also it is discussed in those sites about how the pollsters were in the tank for Obama and skewed the numbers on purpose to hurt Hillary. For instance, the polls had Obama up by 11% in Penn the day before the election and Hillary won by 200k votes. Those Hillary voters are going to vote for McCain.
Partypup, you are so right about things.
John
November 2, 2008 at 6:50 PM #296896jficquetteParticipantSvelte
The exit polls show McCain leading in Florida 49-45 amongst early voters.
“A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.”
http://www.floridatoday.com/article/20081029/BREAKINGNEWS/81029048/1006/news01“October 31, 2008 by PUMA Pundit
99% of Democrats support Obama right? Wrong. Take a look at this snippet coming out of Florida:Democrats are beaming that their party is outperforming the Republicans in early voting, releasing numbers Wednesday that show registrants of their party ahead 54 percent to 30 percent among the 1.4 million voters who have gone to the polls early.
but guess what the same article goes on to state?
A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.
So Obama has a 6.4% advantage in turnout , yet is losing by 4%. Who could these democrats who are not voting for Obama possibly be?
Hmmm. Does the word “PUMA” ring a bell?e
If I say “PUMA” you say “Pounce”… PUMA… Pounce… PUMA… Pounce!”
John
November 2, 2008 at 6:50 PM #297240jficquetteParticipantSvelte
The exit polls show McCain leading in Florida 49-45 amongst early voters.
“A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.”
http://www.floridatoday.com/article/20081029/BREAKINGNEWS/81029048/1006/news01“October 31, 2008 by PUMA Pundit
99% of Democrats support Obama right? Wrong. Take a look at this snippet coming out of Florida:Democrats are beaming that their party is outperforming the Republicans in early voting, releasing numbers Wednesday that show registrants of their party ahead 54 percent to 30 percent among the 1.4 million voters who have gone to the polls early.
but guess what the same article goes on to state?
A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.
So Obama has a 6.4% advantage in turnout , yet is losing by 4%. Who could these democrats who are not voting for Obama possibly be?
Hmmm. Does the word “PUMA” ring a bell?e
If I say “PUMA” you say “Pounce”… PUMA… Pounce… PUMA… Pounce!”
John
November 2, 2008 at 6:50 PM #297256jficquetteParticipantSvelte
The exit polls show McCain leading in Florida 49-45 amongst early voters.
“A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.”
http://www.floridatoday.com/article/20081029/BREAKINGNEWS/81029048/1006/news01“October 31, 2008 by PUMA Pundit
99% of Democrats support Obama right? Wrong. Take a look at this snippet coming out of Florida:Democrats are beaming that their party is outperforming the Republicans in early voting, releasing numbers Wednesday that show registrants of their party ahead 54 percent to 30 percent among the 1.4 million voters who have gone to the polls early.
but guess what the same article goes on to state?
A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.
So Obama has a 6.4% advantage in turnout , yet is losing by 4%. Who could these democrats who are not voting for Obama possibly be?
Hmmm. Does the word “PUMA” ring a bell?e
If I say “PUMA” you say “Pounce”… PUMA… Pounce… PUMA… Pounce!”
John
November 2, 2008 at 6:50 PM #297269jficquetteParticipantSvelte
The exit polls show McCain leading in Florida 49-45 amongst early voters.
“A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.”
http://www.floridatoday.com/article/20081029/BREAKINGNEWS/81029048/1006/news01“October 31, 2008 by PUMA Pundit
99% of Democrats support Obama right? Wrong. Take a look at this snippet coming out of Florida:Democrats are beaming that their party is outperforming the Republicans in early voting, releasing numbers Wednesday that show registrants of their party ahead 54 percent to 30 percent among the 1.4 million voters who have gone to the polls early.
but guess what the same article goes on to state?
A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.
So Obama has a 6.4% advantage in turnout , yet is losing by 4%. Who could these democrats who are not voting for Obama possibly be?
Hmmm. Does the word “PUMA” ring a bell?e
If I say “PUMA” you say “Pounce”… PUMA… Pounce… PUMA… Pounce!”
John
November 2, 2008 at 6:50 PM #297313jficquetteParticipantSvelte
The exit polls show McCain leading in Florida 49-45 amongst early voters.
“A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.”
http://www.floridatoday.com/article/20081029/BREAKINGNEWS/81029048/1006/news01“October 31, 2008 by PUMA Pundit
99% of Democrats support Obama right? Wrong. Take a look at this snippet coming out of Florida:Democrats are beaming that their party is outperforming the Republicans in early voting, releasing numbers Wednesday that show registrants of their party ahead 54 percent to 30 percent among the 1.4 million voters who have gone to the polls early.
but guess what the same article goes on to state?
A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.
So Obama has a 6.4% advantage in turnout , yet is losing by 4%. Who could these democrats who are not voting for Obama possibly be?
Hmmm. Does the word “PUMA” ring a bell?e
If I say “PUMA” you say “Pounce”… PUMA… Pounce… PUMA… Pounce!”
John
November 2, 2008 at 6:54 PM #296906EugeneParticipantMcCain Victory No Longer Unikely
Just checked intrade and bodog to see if they agree with that assessment.
McCain’s odds to win (Intrade): 1 to 8.7
McCain’s odds to win (Bodog): 1 to 5.75It seems that McCain’s odds at Bodog have improved a little bit, but his win is still very unlikely.
They also have a list of bets on specific states (those are closed for betting and I don’t know how recent those odds are). Here are the expectations of the sports-betting community:
Obama has better than 5:1 chance to carry each state carried by Kerry in 2004 (252 votes), Colorado, Iowa, New Mexico), and Virginia (34 votes).
Obama has the lead in Florida (27), Missouri (11), Nevada (5), North Carolina (15), Ohio (20).
McCain has the lead in Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Montana, North Dakota.
McCain has better than 5:1 chance to carry all the remaining red states.
The likely outcome is 364 electoral votes for Obama to 174 for McCain.
November 2, 2008 at 6:54 PM #297250EugeneParticipantMcCain Victory No Longer Unikely
Just checked intrade and bodog to see if they agree with that assessment.
McCain’s odds to win (Intrade): 1 to 8.7
McCain’s odds to win (Bodog): 1 to 5.75It seems that McCain’s odds at Bodog have improved a little bit, but his win is still very unlikely.
They also have a list of bets on specific states (those are closed for betting and I don’t know how recent those odds are). Here are the expectations of the sports-betting community:
Obama has better than 5:1 chance to carry each state carried by Kerry in 2004 (252 votes), Colorado, Iowa, New Mexico), and Virginia (34 votes).
Obama has the lead in Florida (27), Missouri (11), Nevada (5), North Carolina (15), Ohio (20).
McCain has the lead in Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Montana, North Dakota.
McCain has better than 5:1 chance to carry all the remaining red states.
The likely outcome is 364 electoral votes for Obama to 174 for McCain.
November 2, 2008 at 6:54 PM #297266EugeneParticipantMcCain Victory No Longer Unikely
Just checked intrade and bodog to see if they agree with that assessment.
McCain’s odds to win (Intrade): 1 to 8.7
McCain’s odds to win (Bodog): 1 to 5.75It seems that McCain’s odds at Bodog have improved a little bit, but his win is still very unlikely.
They also have a list of bets on specific states (those are closed for betting and I don’t know how recent those odds are). Here are the expectations of the sports-betting community:
Obama has better than 5:1 chance to carry each state carried by Kerry in 2004 (252 votes), Colorado, Iowa, New Mexico), and Virginia (34 votes).
Obama has the lead in Florida (27), Missouri (11), Nevada (5), North Carolina (15), Ohio (20).
McCain has the lead in Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Montana, North Dakota.
McCain has better than 5:1 chance to carry all the remaining red states.
The likely outcome is 364 electoral votes for Obama to 174 for McCain.
November 2, 2008 at 6:54 PM #297279EugeneParticipantMcCain Victory No Longer Unikely
Just checked intrade and bodog to see if they agree with that assessment.
McCain’s odds to win (Intrade): 1 to 8.7
McCain’s odds to win (Bodog): 1 to 5.75It seems that McCain’s odds at Bodog have improved a little bit, but his win is still very unlikely.
They also have a list of bets on specific states (those are closed for betting and I don’t know how recent those odds are). Here are the expectations of the sports-betting community:
Obama has better than 5:1 chance to carry each state carried by Kerry in 2004 (252 votes), Colorado, Iowa, New Mexico), and Virginia (34 votes).
Obama has the lead in Florida (27), Missouri (11), Nevada (5), North Carolina (15), Ohio (20).
McCain has the lead in Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Montana, North Dakota.
McCain has better than 5:1 chance to carry all the remaining red states.
The likely outcome is 364 electoral votes for Obama to 174 for McCain.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.