OT: McCain Victory No Longer Unikely

[afx114]

For the record, I wanted to point out that 538 was pretty much spot on each and every one of their predictions.

[jetonejet]

Wow, it must feel pretty silly to have been so wrong with this absurd prediction.

[jetonejet]

Wow, it must feel pretty silly to have been so wrong with this absurd prediction.

[jetonejet]

Wow, it must feel pretty silly to have been so wrong with this absurd prediction.

[jetonejet]

Wow, it must feel pretty silly to have been so wrong with this absurd prediction.

[jetonejet]

Wow, it must feel pretty silly to have been so wrong with this absurd prediction.

[Kilohana]

Not sure linking to another blog is appropriate here, but I thought this was an interesting introspection from a redstate.com republican:

http://www.redstate.com/diaries/dave_in_fla/2008/nov/05/can-we-now-dispense-with-some-myths/#c75462

The poster is named “nephewmiltie” and he brings up some interesting arguments regarding the socialism boogeyman.

The bottom line is that the GOP successfully framed the Dem candidate as a socialist – yet he STILL WON. They lost to socialism. Now they need to figure out why…

No doubt that had the Bush presidency ended on more prosperous economical note, the outcome of the election might have been different.

But here we are and it’s incredibly interesting to decide what it means and what America really wants. I know for certain they don’t like being told what they want by their politicians.

[Kilohana]

Not sure linking to another blog is appropriate here, but I thought this was an interesting introspection from a redstate.com republican:

http://www.redstate.com/diaries/dave_in_fla/2008/nov/05/can-we-now-dispense-with-some-myths/#c75462

The poster is named “nephewmiltie” and he brings up some interesting arguments regarding the socialism boogeyman.

The bottom line is that the GOP successfully framed the Dem candidate as a socialist – yet he STILL WON. They lost to socialism. Now they need to figure out why…

No doubt that had the Bush presidency ended on more prosperous economical note, the outcome of the election might have been different.

But here we are and it’s incredibly interesting to decide what it means and what America really wants. I know for certain they don’t like being told what they want by their politicians.

[Kilohana]

Not sure linking to another blog is appropriate here, but I thought this was an interesting introspection from a redstate.com republican:

http://www.redstate.com/diaries/dave_in_fla/2008/nov/05/can-we-now-dispense-with-some-myths/#c75462

The poster is named “nephewmiltie” and he brings up some interesting arguments regarding the socialism boogeyman.

The bottom line is that the GOP successfully framed the Dem candidate as a socialist – yet he STILL WON. They lost to socialism. Now they need to figure out why…

No doubt that had the Bush presidency ended on more prosperous economical note, the outcome of the election might have been different.

But here we are and it’s incredibly interesting to decide what it means and what America really wants. I know for certain they don’t like being told what they want by their politicians.

[Kilohana]

Not sure linking to another blog is appropriate here, but I thought this was an interesting introspection from a redstate.com republican:

http://www.redstate.com/diaries/dave_in_fla/2008/nov/05/can-we-now-dispense-with-some-myths/#c75462

The poster is named “nephewmiltie” and he brings up some interesting arguments regarding the socialism boogeyman.

The bottom line is that the GOP successfully framed the Dem candidate as a socialist – yet he STILL WON. They lost to socialism. Now they need to figure out why…

No doubt that had the Bush presidency ended on more prosperous economical note, the outcome of the election might have been different.

But here we are and it’s incredibly interesting to decide what it means and what America really wants. I know for certain they don’t like being told what they want by their politicians.

[Kilohana]

Not sure linking to another blog is appropriate here, but I thought this was an interesting introspection from a redstate.com republican:

http://www.redstate.com/diaries/dave_in_fla/2008/nov/05/can-we-now-dispense-with-some-myths/#c75462

The poster is named “nephewmiltie” and he brings up some interesting arguments regarding the socialism boogeyman.

The bottom line is that the GOP successfully framed the Dem candidate as a socialist – yet he STILL WON. They lost to socialism. Now they need to figure out why…

No doubt that had the Bush presidency ended on more prosperous economical note, the outcome of the election might have been different.

But here we are and it’s incredibly interesting to decide what it means and what America really wants. I know for certain they don’t like being told what they want by their politicians.

[equalizer]

obama lost white men and white women vote. He would have lost without huge minority and young turnout that are very unreliable. Thus, the odds were higher than 10%. Why cant dems get white vote? So there was no real revolution, just a minor temp shift.

[equalizer]

obama lost white men and white women vote. He would have lost without huge minority and young turnout that are very unreliable. Thus, the odds were higher than 10%. Why cant dems get white vote? So there was no real revolution, just a minor temp shift.

[equalizer]

obama lost white men and white women vote. He would have lost without huge minority and young turnout that are very unreliable. Thus, the odds were higher than 10%. Why cant dems get white vote? So there was no real revolution, just a minor temp shift.

[equalizer]

obama lost white men and white women vote. He would have lost without huge minority and young turnout that are very unreliable. Thus, the odds were higher than 10%. Why cant dems get white vote? So there was no real revolution, just a minor temp shift.

[Author]

Posts