- This topic has 495 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 1 month ago by
equalizer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 5, 2008 at 9:59 AM #299868November 5, 2008 at 7:30 PM #299842
jetonejet
ParticipantWow, it must feel pretty silly to have been so wrong with this absurd prediction.
November 5, 2008 at 7:30 PM #300200ParticipantWow, it must feel pretty silly to have been so wrong with this absurd prediction.
November 5, 2008 at 7:30 PM #300211ParticipantWow, it must feel pretty silly to have been so wrong with this absurd prediction.
November 5, 2008 at 7:30 PM #300224ParticipantWow, it must feel pretty silly to have been so wrong with this absurd prediction.
November 5, 2008 at 7:30 PM #300273ParticipantWow, it must feel pretty silly to have been so wrong with this absurd prediction.
November 6, 2008 at 2:32 PM #300382Kilohana
ParticipantNot sure linking to another blog is appropriate here, but I thought this was an interesting introspection from a redstate.com republican:
http://www.redstate.com/diaries/dave_in_fla/2008/nov/05/can-we-now-dispense-with-some-myths/#c75462
The poster is named “nephewmiltie” and he brings up some interesting arguments regarding the socialism boogeyman.
The bottom line is that the GOP successfully framed the Dem candidate as a socialist – yet he STILL WON. They lost to socialism. Now they need to figure out why…
No doubt that had the Bush presidency ended on more prosperous economical note, the outcome of the election might have been different.
But here we are and it’s incredibly interesting to decide what it means and what America really wants. I know for certain they don’t like being told what they want by their politicians.
November 6, 2008 at 2:32 PM #300739ParticipantNot sure linking to another blog is appropriate here, but I thought this was an interesting introspection from a redstate.com republican:
http://www.redstate.com/diaries/dave_in_fla/2008/nov/05/can-we-now-dispense-with-some-myths/#c75462
The poster is named “nephewmiltie” and he brings up some interesting arguments regarding the socialism boogeyman.
The bottom line is that the GOP successfully framed the Dem candidate as a socialist – yet he STILL WON. They lost to socialism. Now they need to figure out why…
No doubt that had the Bush presidency ended on more prosperous economical note, the outcome of the election might have been different.
But here we are and it’s incredibly interesting to decide what it means and what America really wants. I know for certain they don’t like being told what they want by their politicians.
November 6, 2008 at 2:32 PM #300748ParticipantNot sure linking to another blog is appropriate here, but I thought this was an interesting introspection from a redstate.com republican:
http://www.redstate.com/diaries/dave_in_fla/2008/nov/05/can-we-now-dispense-with-some-myths/#c75462
The poster is named “nephewmiltie” and he brings up some interesting arguments regarding the socialism boogeyman.
The bottom line is that the GOP successfully framed the Dem candidate as a socialist – yet he STILL WON. They lost to socialism. Now they need to figure out why…
No doubt that had the Bush presidency ended on more prosperous economical note, the outcome of the election might have been different.
But here we are and it’s incredibly interesting to decide what it means and what America really wants. I know for certain they don’t like being told what they want by their politicians.
November 6, 2008 at 2:32 PM #300765ParticipantNot sure linking to another blog is appropriate here, but I thought this was an interesting introspection from a redstate.com republican:
http://www.redstate.com/diaries/dave_in_fla/2008/nov/05/can-we-now-dispense-with-some-myths/#c75462
The poster is named “nephewmiltie” and he brings up some interesting arguments regarding the socialism boogeyman.
The bottom line is that the GOP successfully framed the Dem candidate as a socialist – yet he STILL WON. They lost to socialism. Now they need to figure out why…
No doubt that had the Bush presidency ended on more prosperous economical note, the outcome of the election might have been different.
But here we are and it’s incredibly interesting to decide what it means and what America really wants. I know for certain they don’t like being told what they want by their politicians.
November 6, 2008 at 2:32 PM #300817ParticipantNot sure linking to another blog is appropriate here, but I thought this was an interesting introspection from a redstate.com republican:
http://www.redstate.com/diaries/dave_in_fla/2008/nov/05/can-we-now-dispense-with-some-myths/#c75462
The poster is named “nephewmiltie” and he brings up some interesting arguments regarding the socialism boogeyman.
The bottom line is that the GOP successfully framed the Dem candidate as a socialist – yet he STILL WON. They lost to socialism. Now they need to figure out why…
No doubt that had the Bush presidency ended on more prosperous economical note, the outcome of the election might have been different.
But here we are and it’s incredibly interesting to decide what it means and what America really wants. I know for certain they don’t like being told what they want by their politicians.
November 7, 2008 at 11:23 PM #301306equalizer
Participantobama lost white men and white women vote. He would have lost without huge minority and young turnout that are very unreliable. Thus, the odds were higher than 10%. Why cant dems get white vote? So there was no real revolution, just a minor temp shift.
November 7, 2008 at 11:23 PM #301665Participantobama lost white men and white women vote. He would have lost without huge minority and young turnout that are very unreliable. Thus, the odds were higher than 10%. Why cant dems get white vote? So there was no real revolution, just a minor temp shift.
November 7, 2008 at 11:23 PM #301671Participantobama lost white men and white women vote. He would have lost without huge minority and young turnout that are very unreliable. Thus, the odds were higher than 10%. Why cant dems get white vote? So there was no real revolution, just a minor temp shift.
November 7, 2008 at 11:23 PM #301689Participantobama lost white men and white women vote. He would have lost without huge minority and young turnout that are very unreliable. Thus, the odds were higher than 10%. Why cant dems get white vote? So there was no real revolution, just a minor temp shift.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
