- This topic has 495 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by equalizer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 4, 2008 at 10:39 AM #298651November 4, 2008 at 10:47 AM #298238ArrayaParticipant
allen: I’ve only read his work on voter fraud issues which, IMO is pretty good investigative journalism. I know of his peak oil stance which is sadly common or some variation thereof with most “non-establishment” journalism types. IMO, the “establishment” pays attention a little more than they let on about peak oil and so should the journalists.
Here is an open letter to Palast regarding PO.
http://www.energybulletin.net/node/17914
“Dear Greg,
Congratulations on your new book, Armed Madhouse. As with your previous work, I admire your dedication in exposing the machinations of government and corporate miscreants.
However, this time around you’ve also taken a potshot at a target that I happen to know a good deal about and have been closely involved with for a few years—the efforts by a growing number of analysts to forecast the arrival, and prepare the world for the consequences, of Peak Oil. In this instance I think your negative comments about Peak Oil and those of us who study it are not well informed.”Interesting indeed!
November 4, 2008 at 10:47 AM #298587ArrayaParticipantallen: I’ve only read his work on voter fraud issues which, IMO is pretty good investigative journalism. I know of his peak oil stance which is sadly common or some variation thereof with most “non-establishment” journalism types. IMO, the “establishment” pays attention a little more than they let on about peak oil and so should the journalists.
Here is an open letter to Palast regarding PO.
http://www.energybulletin.net/node/17914
“Dear Greg,
Congratulations on your new book, Armed Madhouse. As with your previous work, I admire your dedication in exposing the machinations of government and corporate miscreants.
However, this time around you’ve also taken a potshot at a target that I happen to know a good deal about and have been closely involved with for a few years—the efforts by a growing number of analysts to forecast the arrival, and prepare the world for the consequences, of Peak Oil. In this instance I think your negative comments about Peak Oil and those of us who study it are not well informed.”Interesting indeed!
November 4, 2008 at 10:47 AM #298599ArrayaParticipantallen: I’ve only read his work on voter fraud issues which, IMO is pretty good investigative journalism. I know of his peak oil stance which is sadly common or some variation thereof with most “non-establishment” journalism types. IMO, the “establishment” pays attention a little more than they let on about peak oil and so should the journalists.
Here is an open letter to Palast regarding PO.
http://www.energybulletin.net/node/17914
“Dear Greg,
Congratulations on your new book, Armed Madhouse. As with your previous work, I admire your dedication in exposing the machinations of government and corporate miscreants.
However, this time around you’ve also taken a potshot at a target that I happen to know a good deal about and have been closely involved with for a few years—the efforts by a growing number of analysts to forecast the arrival, and prepare the world for the consequences, of Peak Oil. In this instance I think your negative comments about Peak Oil and those of us who study it are not well informed.”Interesting indeed!
November 4, 2008 at 10:47 AM #298615ArrayaParticipantallen: I’ve only read his work on voter fraud issues which, IMO is pretty good investigative journalism. I know of his peak oil stance which is sadly common or some variation thereof with most “non-establishment” journalism types. IMO, the “establishment” pays attention a little more than they let on about peak oil and so should the journalists.
Here is an open letter to Palast regarding PO.
http://www.energybulletin.net/node/17914
“Dear Greg,
Congratulations on your new book, Armed Madhouse. As with your previous work, I admire your dedication in exposing the machinations of government and corporate miscreants.
However, this time around you’ve also taken a potshot at a target that I happen to know a good deal about and have been closely involved with for a few years—the efforts by a growing number of analysts to forecast the arrival, and prepare the world for the consequences, of Peak Oil. In this instance I think your negative comments about Peak Oil and those of us who study it are not well informed.”Interesting indeed!
November 4, 2008 at 10:47 AM #298661ArrayaParticipantallen: I’ve only read his work on voter fraud issues which, IMO is pretty good investigative journalism. I know of his peak oil stance which is sadly common or some variation thereof with most “non-establishment” journalism types. IMO, the “establishment” pays attention a little more than they let on about peak oil and so should the journalists.
Here is an open letter to Palast regarding PO.
http://www.energybulletin.net/node/17914
“Dear Greg,
Congratulations on your new book, Armed Madhouse. As with your previous work, I admire your dedication in exposing the machinations of government and corporate miscreants.
However, this time around you’ve also taken a potshot at a target that I happen to know a good deal about and have been closely involved with for a few years—the efforts by a growing number of analysts to forecast the arrival, and prepare the world for the consequences, of Peak Oil. In this instance I think your negative comments about Peak Oil and those of us who study it are not well informed.”Interesting indeed!
November 4, 2008 at 11:12 AM #298278partypupParticipant[quote=xironman]Wow,
The must be growing the good stuff in Cali again from what I read here. Like someone said earlier fivethirtyeight has McCain’s chances at 1.9%, that’s not close. Of course they should be preparing to take over and picking a cabinet. It is going to be tough cleaning up after the devastation of the last eight years so there is no time like the present.[/quote]
Xironman, I am smoking a joint called “reality”. You should try it sometime 😉
You are relying on fivethirtyeight which is in turn relying on flawed polling data. Since flawed data doesn’t seem to perturb you, I am sure you feel quite comfortable in an Obama landslide.
But don’t count on it.
McCain’s chances are not greater than Obama’s, but they are MUCh higher than 1.9%.
November 4, 2008 at 11:12 AM #298627partypupParticipant[quote=xironman]Wow,
The must be growing the good stuff in Cali again from what I read here. Like someone said earlier fivethirtyeight has McCain’s chances at 1.9%, that’s not close. Of course they should be preparing to take over and picking a cabinet. It is going to be tough cleaning up after the devastation of the last eight years so there is no time like the present.[/quote]
Xironman, I am smoking a joint called “reality”. You should try it sometime 😉
You are relying on fivethirtyeight which is in turn relying on flawed polling data. Since flawed data doesn’t seem to perturb you, I am sure you feel quite comfortable in an Obama landslide.
But don’t count on it.
McCain’s chances are not greater than Obama’s, but they are MUCh higher than 1.9%.
November 4, 2008 at 11:12 AM #298639partypupParticipant[quote=xironman]Wow,
The must be growing the good stuff in Cali again from what I read here. Like someone said earlier fivethirtyeight has McCain’s chances at 1.9%, that’s not close. Of course they should be preparing to take over and picking a cabinet. It is going to be tough cleaning up after the devastation of the last eight years so there is no time like the present.[/quote]
Xironman, I am smoking a joint called “reality”. You should try it sometime 😉
You are relying on fivethirtyeight which is in turn relying on flawed polling data. Since flawed data doesn’t seem to perturb you, I am sure you feel quite comfortable in an Obama landslide.
But don’t count on it.
McCain’s chances are not greater than Obama’s, but they are MUCh higher than 1.9%.
November 4, 2008 at 11:12 AM #298655partypupParticipant[quote=xironman]Wow,
The must be growing the good stuff in Cali again from what I read here. Like someone said earlier fivethirtyeight has McCain’s chances at 1.9%, that’s not close. Of course they should be preparing to take over and picking a cabinet. It is going to be tough cleaning up after the devastation of the last eight years so there is no time like the present.[/quote]
Xironman, I am smoking a joint called “reality”. You should try it sometime 😉
You are relying on fivethirtyeight which is in turn relying on flawed polling data. Since flawed data doesn’t seem to perturb you, I am sure you feel quite comfortable in an Obama landslide.
But don’t count on it.
McCain’s chances are not greater than Obama’s, but they are MUCh higher than 1.9%.
November 4, 2008 at 11:12 AM #298701partypupParticipant[quote=xironman]Wow,
The must be growing the good stuff in Cali again from what I read here. Like someone said earlier fivethirtyeight has McCain’s chances at 1.9%, that’s not close. Of course they should be preparing to take over and picking a cabinet. It is going to be tough cleaning up after the devastation of the last eight years so there is no time like the present.[/quote]
Xironman, I am smoking a joint called “reality”. You should try it sometime 😉
You are relying on fivethirtyeight which is in turn relying on flawed polling data. Since flawed data doesn’t seem to perturb you, I am sure you feel quite comfortable in an Obama landslide.
But don’t count on it.
McCain’s chances are not greater than Obama’s, but they are MUCh higher than 1.9%.
November 4, 2008 at 11:20 AM #298288mazeltovParticipantThose are the results I predict:
Alabama McCain
Alaska McCain
Arizona McCain
Arkansas McCain
California Obama
Colorado Obama
Connecticut Obama
Delaware Obama
Florida Obama
Georgia McCain
Hawaii Obama
Idaho McCain
Illinois Obama
Indiana Obama
Iowa Obama
Kansas McCain
Kentucky McCain
Louisiana McCain
Maine Obama
Maryland Obama
Massachusetts Obama
Michigan Obama
Minnesota Obama
Mississippi McCain
Missourian McCain
Montana McCain
Nebraska McCain
Nevada Obama
New Hampshire Obama
New jersey Obama
New Mexico Obama
New York Obama
North Carolina Obama
North Dakota Obama
Ohio Obama
Oklahoma McCain
Oregon Obama
Pennsylvania Obama
Rhode Island Obama
South Carolina McCain
South Dakota McCain
Tennessee McCain
Texas McCain
Utah McCain
Vermont Obama
Virginia Obama
Washington Obama
West Virginia McCain
Wisconsin Obama
Wyoming McCainCome back here tomorrow and you will see that I was right about every single state!
November 4, 2008 at 11:20 AM #298637mazeltovParticipantThose are the results I predict:
Alabama McCain
Alaska McCain
Arizona McCain
Arkansas McCain
California Obama
Colorado Obama
Connecticut Obama
Delaware Obama
Florida Obama
Georgia McCain
Hawaii Obama
Idaho McCain
Illinois Obama
Indiana Obama
Iowa Obama
Kansas McCain
Kentucky McCain
Louisiana McCain
Maine Obama
Maryland Obama
Massachusetts Obama
Michigan Obama
Minnesota Obama
Mississippi McCain
Missourian McCain
Montana McCain
Nebraska McCain
Nevada Obama
New Hampshire Obama
New jersey Obama
New Mexico Obama
New York Obama
North Carolina Obama
North Dakota Obama
Ohio Obama
Oklahoma McCain
Oregon Obama
Pennsylvania Obama
Rhode Island Obama
South Carolina McCain
South Dakota McCain
Tennessee McCain
Texas McCain
Utah McCain
Vermont Obama
Virginia Obama
Washington Obama
West Virginia McCain
Wisconsin Obama
Wyoming McCainCome back here tomorrow and you will see that I was right about every single state!
November 4, 2008 at 11:20 AM #298649mazeltovParticipantThose are the results I predict:
Alabama McCain
Alaska McCain
Arizona McCain
Arkansas McCain
California Obama
Colorado Obama
Connecticut Obama
Delaware Obama
Florida Obama
Georgia McCain
Hawaii Obama
Idaho McCain
Illinois Obama
Indiana Obama
Iowa Obama
Kansas McCain
Kentucky McCain
Louisiana McCain
Maine Obama
Maryland Obama
Massachusetts Obama
Michigan Obama
Minnesota Obama
Mississippi McCain
Missourian McCain
Montana McCain
Nebraska McCain
Nevada Obama
New Hampshire Obama
New jersey Obama
New Mexico Obama
New York Obama
North Carolina Obama
North Dakota Obama
Ohio Obama
Oklahoma McCain
Oregon Obama
Pennsylvania Obama
Rhode Island Obama
South Carolina McCain
South Dakota McCain
Tennessee McCain
Texas McCain
Utah McCain
Vermont Obama
Virginia Obama
Washington Obama
West Virginia McCain
Wisconsin Obama
Wyoming McCainCome back here tomorrow and you will see that I was right about every single state!
November 4, 2008 at 11:20 AM #298665mazeltovParticipantThose are the results I predict:
Alabama McCain
Alaska McCain
Arizona McCain
Arkansas McCain
California Obama
Colorado Obama
Connecticut Obama
Delaware Obama
Florida Obama
Georgia McCain
Hawaii Obama
Idaho McCain
Illinois Obama
Indiana Obama
Iowa Obama
Kansas McCain
Kentucky McCain
Louisiana McCain
Maine Obama
Maryland Obama
Massachusetts Obama
Michigan Obama
Minnesota Obama
Mississippi McCain
Missourian McCain
Montana McCain
Nebraska McCain
Nevada Obama
New Hampshire Obama
New jersey Obama
New Mexico Obama
New York Obama
North Carolina Obama
North Dakota Obama
Ohio Obama
Oklahoma McCain
Oregon Obama
Pennsylvania Obama
Rhode Island Obama
South Carolina McCain
South Dakota McCain
Tennessee McCain
Texas McCain
Utah McCain
Vermont Obama
Virginia Obama
Washington Obama
West Virginia McCain
Wisconsin Obama
Wyoming McCainCome back here tomorrow and you will see that I was right about every single state!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.