Home › Forums › Other › OT: LOL… All you folks that are trying to eat organic from places like Whole Foods….
- This topic has 352 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 5 months ago by DomoArigato.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 28, 2011 at 3:06 PM #691444April 28, 2011 at 3:10 PM #690274ShadowfaxParticipant
Oh, and maybe this is all moot: the GMO/natural debate is pointless if Americans can’t wean ourselves off McDonald’s Super Sized everything. Any health benefits between organic and GMO produce are de minimis in the diets of most Americans who don’t eat much fresh food anyway.
But for those who do, at least you won’t die from cancer from that source. But how pure is the air you breathe, the water you drink, how safe is your car, or your living environment. Something will get each of us someday. You can only rule out so many variables.
April 28, 2011 at 3:10 PM #690342ShadowfaxParticipantOh, and maybe this is all moot: the GMO/natural debate is pointless if Americans can’t wean ourselves off McDonald’s Super Sized everything. Any health benefits between organic and GMO produce are de minimis in the diets of most Americans who don’t eat much fresh food anyway.
But for those who do, at least you won’t die from cancer from that source. But how pure is the air you breathe, the water you drink, how safe is your car, or your living environment. Something will get each of us someday. You can only rule out so many variables.
April 28, 2011 at 3:10 PM #690955ShadowfaxParticipantOh, and maybe this is all moot: the GMO/natural debate is pointless if Americans can’t wean ourselves off McDonald’s Super Sized everything. Any health benefits between organic and GMO produce are de minimis in the diets of most Americans who don’t eat much fresh food anyway.
But for those who do, at least you won’t die from cancer from that source. But how pure is the air you breathe, the water you drink, how safe is your car, or your living environment. Something will get each of us someday. You can only rule out so many variables.
April 28, 2011 at 3:10 PM #691101ShadowfaxParticipantOh, and maybe this is all moot: the GMO/natural debate is pointless if Americans can’t wean ourselves off McDonald’s Super Sized everything. Any health benefits between organic and GMO produce are de minimis in the diets of most Americans who don’t eat much fresh food anyway.
But for those who do, at least you won’t die from cancer from that source. But how pure is the air you breathe, the water you drink, how safe is your car, or your living environment. Something will get each of us someday. You can only rule out so many variables.
April 28, 2011 at 3:10 PM #691449ShadowfaxParticipantOh, and maybe this is all moot: the GMO/natural debate is pointless if Americans can’t wean ourselves off McDonald’s Super Sized everything. Any health benefits between organic and GMO produce are de minimis in the diets of most Americans who don’t eat much fresh food anyway.
But for those who do, at least you won’t die from cancer from that source. But how pure is the air you breathe, the water you drink, how safe is your car, or your living environment. Something will get each of us someday. You can only rule out so many variables.
April 28, 2011 at 3:32 PM #690284enron_by_the_seaParticipant[quote=Shadowfax]
I also find it frightening that humans again think they are so superior that they can defeat 1000s of years of evolution in a petri dish. Certain plant species evolve to adapt to certain environments–to be draught resistant or to survive certain infestations. In the case of Inida, to try to wipe that all out with a man-made GMO crop…it’s the worst kind of arrogance.[/quote]
I understand the sentiment, but the facts are that we have been creating foods not present in the nature for centuries, even before GMO came along.
For example,
Durum wheat or macaroni wheat is the only tetraploid species of wheat of commercial importance that is widely cultivated today. It was developed by artificial selection of the domesticated emmer wheat strains formerly grown in Central Europe and Near East around 7000 B.C., which developed a naked, free-threshing form.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durum
http://www.farm-direct.co.uk/farming/stockcrop/wheat/wheathist.htmlApril 28, 2011 at 3:32 PM #690352enron_by_the_seaParticipant[quote=Shadowfax]
I also find it frightening that humans again think they are so superior that they can defeat 1000s of years of evolution in a petri dish. Certain plant species evolve to adapt to certain environments–to be draught resistant or to survive certain infestations. In the case of Inida, to try to wipe that all out with a man-made GMO crop…it’s the worst kind of arrogance.[/quote]
I understand the sentiment, but the facts are that we have been creating foods not present in the nature for centuries, even before GMO came along.
For example,
Durum wheat or macaroni wheat is the only tetraploid species of wheat of commercial importance that is widely cultivated today. It was developed by artificial selection of the domesticated emmer wheat strains formerly grown in Central Europe and Near East around 7000 B.C., which developed a naked, free-threshing form.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durum
http://www.farm-direct.co.uk/farming/stockcrop/wheat/wheathist.htmlApril 28, 2011 at 3:32 PM #690965enron_by_the_seaParticipant[quote=Shadowfax]
I also find it frightening that humans again think they are so superior that they can defeat 1000s of years of evolution in a petri dish. Certain plant species evolve to adapt to certain environments–to be draught resistant or to survive certain infestations. In the case of Inida, to try to wipe that all out with a man-made GMO crop…it’s the worst kind of arrogance.[/quote]
I understand the sentiment, but the facts are that we have been creating foods not present in the nature for centuries, even before GMO came along.
For example,
Durum wheat or macaroni wheat is the only tetraploid species of wheat of commercial importance that is widely cultivated today. It was developed by artificial selection of the domesticated emmer wheat strains formerly grown in Central Europe and Near East around 7000 B.C., which developed a naked, free-threshing form.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durum
http://www.farm-direct.co.uk/farming/stockcrop/wheat/wheathist.htmlApril 28, 2011 at 3:32 PM #691111enron_by_the_seaParticipant[quote=Shadowfax]
I also find it frightening that humans again think they are so superior that they can defeat 1000s of years of evolution in a petri dish. Certain plant species evolve to adapt to certain environments–to be draught resistant or to survive certain infestations. In the case of Inida, to try to wipe that all out with a man-made GMO crop…it’s the worst kind of arrogance.[/quote]
I understand the sentiment, but the facts are that we have been creating foods not present in the nature for centuries, even before GMO came along.
For example,
Durum wheat or macaroni wheat is the only tetraploid species of wheat of commercial importance that is widely cultivated today. It was developed by artificial selection of the domesticated emmer wheat strains formerly grown in Central Europe and Near East around 7000 B.C., which developed a naked, free-threshing form.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durum
http://www.farm-direct.co.uk/farming/stockcrop/wheat/wheathist.htmlApril 28, 2011 at 3:32 PM #691459enron_by_the_seaParticipant[quote=Shadowfax]
I also find it frightening that humans again think they are so superior that they can defeat 1000s of years of evolution in a petri dish. Certain plant species evolve to adapt to certain environments–to be draught resistant or to survive certain infestations. In the case of Inida, to try to wipe that all out with a man-made GMO crop…it’s the worst kind of arrogance.[/quote]
I understand the sentiment, but the facts are that we have been creating foods not present in the nature for centuries, even before GMO came along.
For example,
Durum wheat or macaroni wheat is the only tetraploid species of wheat of commercial importance that is widely cultivated today. It was developed by artificial selection of the domesticated emmer wheat strains formerly grown in Central Europe and Near East around 7000 B.C., which developed a naked, free-threshing form.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durum
http://www.farm-direct.co.uk/farming/stockcrop/wheat/wheathist.htmlApril 28, 2011 at 3:34 PM #690294ShadowfaxParticipantThere is a difference between 1) cross polinating or animal husbandry (which I have always thought a strange term) and 2) genetic modification of foods–the former might occur in response to “natural” stimuli (and not always with beneficial results), the latter is the forced cross breeding of plants that might not be otherwise compatible, perhaps for very good reasons. We won’t know for sure for decades. We just aren’t very good at projections in this area.
April 28, 2011 at 3:34 PM #690362ShadowfaxParticipantThere is a difference between 1) cross polinating or animal husbandry (which I have always thought a strange term) and 2) genetic modification of foods–the former might occur in response to “natural” stimuli (and not always with beneficial results), the latter is the forced cross breeding of plants that might not be otherwise compatible, perhaps for very good reasons. We won’t know for sure for decades. We just aren’t very good at projections in this area.
April 28, 2011 at 3:34 PM #690975ShadowfaxParticipantThere is a difference between 1) cross polinating or animal husbandry (which I have always thought a strange term) and 2) genetic modification of foods–the former might occur in response to “natural” stimuli (and not always with beneficial results), the latter is the forced cross breeding of plants that might not be otherwise compatible, perhaps for very good reasons. We won’t know for sure for decades. We just aren’t very good at projections in this area.
April 28, 2011 at 3:34 PM #691121ShadowfaxParticipantThere is a difference between 1) cross polinating or animal husbandry (which I have always thought a strange term) and 2) genetic modification of foods–the former might occur in response to “natural” stimuli (and not always with beneficial results), the latter is the forced cross breeding of plants that might not be otherwise compatible, perhaps for very good reasons. We won’t know for sure for decades. We just aren’t very good at projections in this area.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.