- This topic has 735 replies, 40 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 10 months ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 7, 2009 at 1:53 PM #427198July 7, 2009 at 2:05 PM #426461
urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=kcal09][quote=afx114][quote=North15]Why are liberals afraid of Sarah Palin and continue the discrediting campaign?[/quote]
You have it completely wrong. Liberals LOVE Palin. We don’t want her to go away. Ever. That should be your first clue that she is bad for conservatives and their movement.[/quote]
I completely agree. Liberals must be very happy that Sarah Palin exists. It makes them look much more competent and smarter…[/quote]
As a liberal, I agree.
Our candidates are often in need of looking smarter or more competent.
EG: John Kerry, Joe Biden, Jimmy Carter, Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, Dennis Kucinich… (the list goes on).
Sarah Palin is a sweet treat and low-hanging fruit.
She shores up the conservative base and alienates everyone else and generally looks as high quality as Hillary without a handler (and I like Hillary).July 7, 2009 at 2:05 PM #426688Participant[quote=kcal09][quote=afx114][quote=North15]Why are liberals afraid of Sarah Palin and continue the discrediting campaign?[/quote]
You have it completely wrong. Liberals LOVE Palin. We don’t want her to go away. Ever. That should be your first clue that she is bad for conservatives and their movement.[/quote]
I completely agree. Liberals must be very happy that Sarah Palin exists. It makes them look much more competent and smarter…[/quote]
As a liberal, I agree.
Our candidates are often in need of looking smarter or more competent.
EG: John Kerry, Joe Biden, Jimmy Carter, Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, Dennis Kucinich… (the list goes on).
Sarah Palin is a sweet treat and low-hanging fruit.
She shores up the conservative base and alienates everyone else and generally looks as high quality as Hillary without a handler (and I like Hillary).July 7, 2009 at 2:05 PM #426974Participant[quote=kcal09][quote=afx114][quote=North15]Why are liberals afraid of Sarah Palin and continue the discrediting campaign?[/quote]
You have it completely wrong. Liberals LOVE Palin. We don’t want her to go away. Ever. That should be your first clue that she is bad for conservatives and their movement.[/quote]
I completely agree. Liberals must be very happy that Sarah Palin exists. It makes them look much more competent and smarter…[/quote]
As a liberal, I agree.
Our candidates are often in need of looking smarter or more competent.
EG: John Kerry, Joe Biden, Jimmy Carter, Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, Dennis Kucinich… (the list goes on).
Sarah Palin is a sweet treat and low-hanging fruit.
She shores up the conservative base and alienates everyone else and generally looks as high quality as Hillary without a handler (and I like Hillary).July 7, 2009 at 2:05 PM #427046Participant[quote=kcal09][quote=afx114][quote=North15]Why are liberals afraid of Sarah Palin and continue the discrediting campaign?[/quote]
You have it completely wrong. Liberals LOVE Palin. We don’t want her to go away. Ever. That should be your first clue that she is bad for conservatives and their movement.[/quote]
I completely agree. Liberals must be very happy that Sarah Palin exists. It makes them look much more competent and smarter…[/quote]
As a liberal, I agree.
Our candidates are often in need of looking smarter or more competent.
EG: John Kerry, Joe Biden, Jimmy Carter, Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, Dennis Kucinich… (the list goes on).
Sarah Palin is a sweet treat and low-hanging fruit.
She shores up the conservative base and alienates everyone else and generally looks as high quality as Hillary without a handler (and I like Hillary).July 7, 2009 at 2:05 PM #427208Participant[quote=kcal09][quote=afx114][quote=North15]Why are liberals afraid of Sarah Palin and continue the discrediting campaign?[/quote]
You have it completely wrong. Liberals LOVE Palin. We don’t want her to go away. Ever. That should be your first clue that she is bad for conservatives and their movement.[/quote]
I completely agree. Liberals must be very happy that Sarah Palin exists. It makes them look much more competent and smarter…[/quote]
As a liberal, I agree.
Our candidates are often in need of looking smarter or more competent.
EG: John Kerry, Joe Biden, Jimmy Carter, Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, Dennis Kucinich… (the list goes on).
Sarah Palin is a sweet treat and low-hanging fruit.
She shores up the conservative base and alienates everyone else and generally looks as high quality as Hillary without a handler (and I like Hillary).July 7, 2009 at 2:53 PM #426487scaredyclassic
ParticipantI am super liberal. I think she’s cute, annoying and a little irritating. I don’t feel threatened by her. I think the rumors about the FBI probe will probably end up being true and she’ll probably be indicted. She was small time back then and probabyl figured no one would look too hard at her lake house. Not for sure, but probably. Pretty funny, really. Barack may not be the messiah, but at least he’s not a cheesy little cheat. More likely than not, i’m saying. it could all be liberal-media rumors. But probably not. I don’t think it matters who the president is. I think politicians shouldn’t cheat for such small amounts, in part because it’s ethically wrong, and partly because it’s such a potential game-ender for them. it’s kind fo pathetic just how lttle it takes to buy them off.
July 7, 2009 at 2:53 PM #426713ParticipantI am super liberal. I think she’s cute, annoying and a little irritating. I don’t feel threatened by her. I think the rumors about the FBI probe will probably end up being true and she’ll probably be indicted. She was small time back then and probabyl figured no one would look too hard at her lake house. Not for sure, but probably. Pretty funny, really. Barack may not be the messiah, but at least he’s not a cheesy little cheat. More likely than not, i’m saying. it could all be liberal-media rumors. But probably not. I don’t think it matters who the president is. I think politicians shouldn’t cheat for such small amounts, in part because it’s ethically wrong, and partly because it’s such a potential game-ender for them. it’s kind fo pathetic just how lttle it takes to buy them off.
July 7, 2009 at 2:53 PM #426999ParticipantI am super liberal. I think she’s cute, annoying and a little irritating. I don’t feel threatened by her. I think the rumors about the FBI probe will probably end up being true and she’ll probably be indicted. She was small time back then and probabyl figured no one would look too hard at her lake house. Not for sure, but probably. Pretty funny, really. Barack may not be the messiah, but at least he’s not a cheesy little cheat. More likely than not, i’m saying. it could all be liberal-media rumors. But probably not. I don’t think it matters who the president is. I think politicians shouldn’t cheat for such small amounts, in part because it’s ethically wrong, and partly because it’s such a potential game-ender for them. it’s kind fo pathetic just how lttle it takes to buy them off.
July 7, 2009 at 2:53 PM #427071ParticipantI am super liberal. I think she’s cute, annoying and a little irritating. I don’t feel threatened by her. I think the rumors about the FBI probe will probably end up being true and she’ll probably be indicted. She was small time back then and probabyl figured no one would look too hard at her lake house. Not for sure, but probably. Pretty funny, really. Barack may not be the messiah, but at least he’s not a cheesy little cheat. More likely than not, i’m saying. it could all be liberal-media rumors. But probably not. I don’t think it matters who the president is. I think politicians shouldn’t cheat for such small amounts, in part because it’s ethically wrong, and partly because it’s such a potential game-ender for them. it’s kind fo pathetic just how lttle it takes to buy them off.
July 7, 2009 at 2:53 PM #427233ParticipantI am super liberal. I think she’s cute, annoying and a little irritating. I don’t feel threatened by her. I think the rumors about the FBI probe will probably end up being true and she’ll probably be indicted. She was small time back then and probabyl figured no one would look too hard at her lake house. Not for sure, but probably. Pretty funny, really. Barack may not be the messiah, but at least he’s not a cheesy little cheat. More likely than not, i’m saying. it could all be liberal-media rumors. But probably not. I don’t think it matters who the president is. I think politicians shouldn’t cheat for such small amounts, in part because it’s ethically wrong, and partly because it’s such a potential game-ender for them. it’s kind fo pathetic just how lttle it takes to buy them off.
July 7, 2009 at 3:25 PM #426497Zeitgeist
ParticipantHypocrite!
8 things you need to know about Obama and Rezkohttp://www.suntimes.com/news/watchdogs/757340,CST-NWS-watchdog24.article
July 7, 2009 at 3:25 PM #426723ParticipantHypocrite!
8 things you need to know about Obama and Rezkohttp://www.suntimes.com/news/watchdogs/757340,CST-NWS-watchdog24.article
July 7, 2009 at 3:25 PM #427009ParticipantHypocrite!
8 things you need to know about Obama and Rezkohttp://www.suntimes.com/news/watchdogs/757340,CST-NWS-watchdog24.article
July 7, 2009 at 3:25 PM #427081ParticipantHypocrite!
8 things you need to know about Obama and Rezkohttp://www.suntimes.com/news/watchdogs/757340,CST-NWS-watchdog24.article
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.