OT: Estimated state budget deficit reaches $25.4 billion

[EconProf]

We in California have done this to ourselves. The leftward lurch in this state that has lavished pay and benefits on state and local workers was just reinforced by the recent election. While the rest of the nation wakes up to the folly of big government, CA sends dimwits like Boxer back to the senate while other states boot her type out.
There is little hope for change, since our demographic trends are to repel our middle class taxpayers and attract the tax users from other states and countries. We are doomed.

[paramount]

[quote=jficquette]Skip. Plus it’s such joke. 80% of it will go to pay and benefits for employees. No way.

When will people get how the state is fleecing private sector employees???

Everytime you see where they need money for parks, health care etc remember 80% goes to union employees so they can afford to walk on the beach for 50 years.

John[/quote]

Couldn’t have said it better myself, thank you!!

[paramount]

[quote=jficquette]Skip. Plus it’s such joke. 80% of it will go to pay and benefits for employees. No way.

When will people get how the state is fleecing private sector employees???

Everytime you see where they need money for parks, health care etc remember 80% goes to union employees so they can afford to walk on the beach for 50 years.

John[/quote]

Couldn’t have said it better myself, thank you!!

[paramount]

[quote=jficquette]Skip. Plus it’s such joke. 80% of it will go to pay and benefits for employees. No way.

When will people get how the state is fleecing private sector employees???

Everytime you see where they need money for parks, health care etc remember 80% goes to union employees so they can afford to walk on the beach for 50 years.

John[/quote]

Couldn’t have said it better myself, thank you!!

[paramount]

[quote=jficquette]Skip. Plus it’s such joke. 80% of it will go to pay and benefits for employees. No way.

When will people get how the state is fleecing private sector employees???

Everytime you see where they need money for parks, health care etc remember 80% goes to union employees so they can afford to walk on the beach for 50 years.

John[/quote]

Couldn’t have said it better myself, thank you!!

[paramount]

[quote=jficquette]Skip. Plus it’s such joke. 80% of it will go to pay and benefits for employees. No way.

When will people get how the state is fleecing private sector employees???

Everytime you see where they need money for parks, health care etc remember 80% goes to union employees so they can afford to walk on the beach for 50 years.

John[/quote]

Couldn’t have said it better myself, thank you!!

[Anonymous]

[quote=EconProf]CA sends dimwits like Boxer back to the senate[/quote]

Uh, Boxer doesn’t have much influence on the state budget.

Plus the alternative was Fiorina, who was not only running for Senate, she was also running for the title of “queen of failing up.”

Our professor doesn’t have much substance in his lesson plan. Seems like every post is just a trite jab at the left.

[Anonymous]

[quote=EconProf]CA sends dimwits like Boxer back to the senate[/quote]

Uh, Boxer doesn’t have much influence on the state budget.

Plus the alternative was Fiorina, who was not only running for Senate, she was also running for the title of “queen of failing up.”

Our professor doesn’t have much substance in his lesson plan. Seems like every post is just a trite jab at the left.

[Anonymous]

[quote=EconProf]CA sends dimwits like Boxer back to the senate[/quote]

Uh, Boxer doesn’t have much influence on the state budget.

Plus the alternative was Fiorina, who was not only running for Senate, she was also running for the title of “queen of failing up.”

Our professor doesn’t have much substance in his lesson plan. Seems like every post is just a trite jab at the left.

[Anonymous]

[quote=EconProf]CA sends dimwits like Boxer back to the senate[/quote]

Uh, Boxer doesn’t have much influence on the state budget.

Plus the alternative was Fiorina, who was not only running for Senate, she was also running for the title of “queen of failing up.”

Our professor doesn’t have much substance in his lesson plan. Seems like every post is just a trite jab at the left.

[Anonymous]

[quote=EconProf]CA sends dimwits like Boxer back to the senate[/quote]

Uh, Boxer doesn’t have much influence on the state budget.

Plus the alternative was Fiorina, who was not only running for Senate, she was also running for the title of “queen of failing up.”

Our professor doesn’t have much substance in his lesson plan. Seems like every post is just a trite jab at the left.

[joec]

Do people think Whitman would’ve had a better chance to win in the Senate race vs. the governor race?

There is a big difference in the 2 positions, but it seems elections are won by who people hate less / lesser of two evils and a lot of folks probably didn’t vote for Fiorina for what happened at HP and I didn’t vote for her for that reason as well.

[joec]

Do people think Whitman would’ve had a better chance to win in the Senate race vs. the governor race?

There is a big difference in the 2 positions, but it seems elections are won by who people hate less / lesser of two evils and a lot of folks probably didn’t vote for Fiorina for what happened at HP and I didn’t vote for her for that reason as well.

[joec]

Do people think Whitman would’ve had a better chance to win in the Senate race vs. the governor race?

There is a big difference in the 2 positions, but it seems elections are won by who people hate less / lesser of two evils and a lot of folks probably didn’t vote for Fiorina for what happened at HP and I didn’t vote for her for that reason as well.

[joec]

Do people think Whitman would’ve had a better chance to win in the Senate race vs. the governor race?

There is a big difference in the 2 positions, but it seems elections are won by who people hate less / lesser of two evils and a lot of folks probably didn’t vote for Fiorina for what happened at HP and I didn’t vote for her for that reason as well.

[Author]

Posts