OMG – Someone please control Christine O’donnell

[KIBU]

Geez, I think the party picked the wrong one to protect the constitution !

http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_exclusive/20101019/pl_yblog_exclusive/church-state-and-the-first-amendment-what-odonnell-needs-to-know

[Vod-Vil]

How can the Democrats be so dumb to nominate Alvin Greene for Senate?If this is the direction our country is heading under “Democrat” I see trouble ahead.

Alvin Greene on his idea for stimulating the economy…

“Another thing we can do for jobs is make toys of me, especially for the holidays. Little dolls. Me. Like maybe little action dolls. Me in an army uniform, air force uniform, and me in my suit. They can make toys of me and my vehicle, especially for the holidays and Christmas for the kids. That’s something that would create jobs. So you see I think out of the box like that. It’s not something a typical person would bring up. That’s something that could happen, that makes sense. It’s not a joke.”

And you’re calling the tea-baggers stupid.

[Vod-Vil]

How can the Democrats be so dumb to nominate Alvin Greene for Senate?If this is the direction our country is heading under “Democrat” I see trouble ahead.

Alvin Greene on his idea for stimulating the economy…

“Another thing we can do for jobs is make toys of me, especially for the holidays. Little dolls. Me. Like maybe little action dolls. Me in an army uniform, air force uniform, and me in my suit. They can make toys of me and my vehicle, especially for the holidays and Christmas for the kids. That’s something that would create jobs. So you see I think out of the box like that. It’s not something a typical person would bring up. That’s something that could happen, that makes sense. It’s not a joke.”

And you’re calling the tea-baggers stupid.

[Vod-Vil]

How can the Democrats be so dumb to nominate Alvin Greene for Senate?If this is the direction our country is heading under “Democrat” I see trouble ahead.

Alvin Greene on his idea for stimulating the economy…

“Another thing we can do for jobs is make toys of me, especially for the holidays. Little dolls. Me. Like maybe little action dolls. Me in an army uniform, air force uniform, and me in my suit. They can make toys of me and my vehicle, especially for the holidays and Christmas for the kids. That’s something that would create jobs. So you see I think out of the box like that. It’s not something a typical person would bring up. That’s something that could happen, that makes sense. It’s not a joke.”

And you’re calling the tea-baggers stupid.

[Vod-Vil]

How can the Democrats be so dumb to nominate Alvin Greene for Senate?If this is the direction our country is heading under “Democrat” I see trouble ahead.

Alvin Greene on his idea for stimulating the economy…

“Another thing we can do for jobs is make toys of me, especially for the holidays. Little dolls. Me. Like maybe little action dolls. Me in an army uniform, air force uniform, and me in my suit. They can make toys of me and my vehicle, especially for the holidays and Christmas for the kids. That’s something that would create jobs. So you see I think out of the box like that. It’s not something a typical person would bring up. That’s something that could happen, that makes sense. It’s not a joke.”

And you’re calling the tea-baggers stupid.

[Vod-Vil]

How can the Democrats be so dumb to nominate Alvin Greene for Senate?If this is the direction our country is heading under “Democrat” I see trouble ahead.

Alvin Greene on his idea for stimulating the economy…

“Another thing we can do for jobs is make toys of me, especially for the holidays. Little dolls. Me. Like maybe little action dolls. Me in an army uniform, air force uniform, and me in my suit. They can make toys of me and my vehicle, especially for the holidays and Christmas for the kids. That’s something that would create jobs. So you see I think out of the box like that. It’s not something a typical person would bring up. That’s something that could happen, that makes sense. It’s not a joke.”

And you’re calling the tea-baggers stupid.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=faterikcartman]
There is no separation of church and state in the Constitution. In fact, they had to put a free exercise clause in there as many of the original states/colonies were founded around religious lines.

What they feared was a national religion — hence the establishment clause.

The “separation of church and state” was not introduced into the Constitution until the 1940’s by an FDR judge who was a former KKK member and KKK lawyer.

Didn’t some Nazi once say if you repeat a lie often enough people will come to believe it as fact?

Now the separation of church and is believed to be in the Constitution just because some judge said so — even though it is clearly not there. Orwell was right about people believing anything the state tells them.

Supreme Court judges have also said it separate but equal is Constitutional. And that escaped slaves should be returned to their owners under the Constitution. And that we can put Japanese Americans in internment camps according to the Constitution.

So please don’t tell me just because a judge says it’s there it’s there, because even you don’t believe that. Read it for yourselves and see what you’ve been missing.[/quote]

The constitution explicitly states that the USSC decides on constitutional issues.
So if they say that the constitution is to be interpreted a certain way, they are the final word on that.
It can’t be different until the court overrules itself later.
They are the final word.

Also, the phrase in question is from 1802.
Its from a letter written by Jefferson.

Here is good explainer.

http://www.usconstitution.net/jeffwall.html

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=faterikcartman]
There is no separation of church and state in the Constitution. In fact, they had to put a free exercise clause in there as many of the original states/colonies were founded around religious lines.

What they feared was a national religion — hence the establishment clause.

The “separation of church and state” was not introduced into the Constitution until the 1940’s by an FDR judge who was a former KKK member and KKK lawyer.

Didn’t some Nazi once say if you repeat a lie often enough people will come to believe it as fact?

Now the separation of church and is believed to be in the Constitution just because some judge said so — even though it is clearly not there. Orwell was right about people believing anything the state tells them.

Supreme Court judges have also said it separate but equal is Constitutional. And that escaped slaves should be returned to their owners under the Constitution. And that we can put Japanese Americans in internment camps according to the Constitution.

So please don’t tell me just because a judge says it’s there it’s there, because even you don’t believe that. Read it for yourselves and see what you’ve been missing.[/quote]

The constitution explicitly states that the USSC decides on constitutional issues.
So if they say that the constitution is to be interpreted a certain way, they are the final word on that.
It can’t be different until the court overrules itself later.
They are the final word.

Also, the phrase in question is from 1802.
Its from a letter written by Jefferson.

Here is good explainer.

http://www.usconstitution.net/jeffwall.html

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=faterikcartman]
There is no separation of church and state in the Constitution. In fact, they had to put a free exercise clause in there as many of the original states/colonies were founded around religious lines.

What they feared was a national religion — hence the establishment clause.

The “separation of church and state” was not introduced into the Constitution until the 1940’s by an FDR judge who was a former KKK member and KKK lawyer.

Didn’t some Nazi once say if you repeat a lie often enough people will come to believe it as fact?

Now the separation of church and is believed to be in the Constitution just because some judge said so — even though it is clearly not there. Orwell was right about people believing anything the state tells them.

Supreme Court judges have also said it separate but equal is Constitutional. And that escaped slaves should be returned to their owners under the Constitution. And that we can put Japanese Americans in internment camps according to the Constitution.

So please don’t tell me just because a judge says it’s there it’s there, because even you don’t believe that. Read it for yourselves and see what you’ve been missing.[/quote]

The constitution explicitly states that the USSC decides on constitutional issues.
So if they say that the constitution is to be interpreted a certain way, they are the final word on that.
It can’t be different until the court overrules itself later.
They are the final word.

Also, the phrase in question is from 1802.
Its from a letter written by Jefferson.

Here is good explainer.

http://www.usconstitution.net/jeffwall.html

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=faterikcartman]
There is no separation of church and state in the Constitution. In fact, they had to put a free exercise clause in there as many of the original states/colonies were founded around religious lines.

What they feared was a national religion — hence the establishment clause.

The “separation of church and state” was not introduced into the Constitution until the 1940’s by an FDR judge who was a former KKK member and KKK lawyer.

Didn’t some Nazi once say if you repeat a lie often enough people will come to believe it as fact?

Now the separation of church and is believed to be in the Constitution just because some judge said so — even though it is clearly not there. Orwell was right about people believing anything the state tells them.

Supreme Court judges have also said it separate but equal is Constitutional. And that escaped slaves should be returned to their owners under the Constitution. And that we can put Japanese Americans in internment camps according to the Constitution.

So please don’t tell me just because a judge says it’s there it’s there, because even you don’t believe that. Read it for yourselves and see what you’ve been missing.[/quote]

The constitution explicitly states that the USSC decides on constitutional issues.
So if they say that the constitution is to be interpreted a certain way, they are the final word on that.
It can’t be different until the court overrules itself later.
They are the final word.

Also, the phrase in question is from 1802.
Its from a letter written by Jefferson.

Here is good explainer.

http://www.usconstitution.net/jeffwall.html

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=faterikcartman]
There is no separation of church and state in the Constitution. In fact, they had to put a free exercise clause in there as many of the original states/colonies were founded around religious lines.

What they feared was a national religion — hence the establishment clause.

The “separation of church and state” was not introduced into the Constitution until the 1940’s by an FDR judge who was a former KKK member and KKK lawyer.

Didn’t some Nazi once say if you repeat a lie often enough people will come to believe it as fact?

Now the separation of church and is believed to be in the Constitution just because some judge said so — even though it is clearly not there. Orwell was right about people believing anything the state tells them.

Supreme Court judges have also said it separate but equal is Constitutional. And that escaped slaves should be returned to their owners under the Constitution. And that we can put Japanese Americans in internment camps according to the Constitution.

So please don’t tell me just because a judge says it’s there it’s there, because even you don’t believe that. Read it for yourselves and see what you’ve been missing.[/quote]

The constitution explicitly states that the USSC decides on constitutional issues.
So if they say that the constitution is to be interpreted a certain way, they are the final word on that.
It can’t be different until the court overrules itself later.
They are the final word.

Also, the phrase in question is from 1802.
Its from a letter written by Jefferson.

Here is good explainer.

http://www.usconstitution.net/jeffwall.html

[Coronita]

[quote=Vod-Vil]How can the Democrats be so dumb to nominate Alvin Greene for Senate?If this is the direction our country is heading under “Democrat” I see trouble ahead.

Alvin Greene on his idea for stimulating the economy…

“Another thing we can do for jobs is make toys of me, especially for the holidays. Little dolls. Me. Like maybe little action dolls. Me in an army uniform, air force uniform, and me in my suit. They can make toys of me and my vehicle, especially for the holidays and Christmas for the kids. That’s something that would create jobs. So you see I think out of the box like that. It’s not something a typical person would bring up. That’s something that could happen, that makes sense. It’s not a joke.”

And you’re calling the tea-baggers stupid.[/quote]

I’m sorry, but you really can’t defend stupidity…. O’donnell definitely demonstrated, well, stupidity…. as disappointing as it is.

Now if I run under a tea-bagger label, please vote for me. I’ll be sure to answer these questions correctly…

Flu…2010 writein…

(Briansd, you have my permission to have a field day on this one….She kinda earned it….)

[Coronita]

[quote=Vod-Vil]How can the Democrats be so dumb to nominate Alvin Greene for Senate?If this is the direction our country is heading under “Democrat” I see trouble ahead.

Alvin Greene on his idea for stimulating the economy…

“Another thing we can do for jobs is make toys of me, especially for the holidays. Little dolls. Me. Like maybe little action dolls. Me in an army uniform, air force uniform, and me in my suit. They can make toys of me and my vehicle, especially for the holidays and Christmas for the kids. That’s something that would create jobs. So you see I think out of the box like that. It’s not something a typical person would bring up. That’s something that could happen, that makes sense. It’s not a joke.”

And you’re calling the tea-baggers stupid.[/quote]

I’m sorry, but you really can’t defend stupidity…. O’donnell definitely demonstrated, well, stupidity…. as disappointing as it is.

Now if I run under a tea-bagger label, please vote for me. I’ll be sure to answer these questions correctly…

Flu…2010 writein…

(Briansd, you have my permission to have a field day on this one….She kinda earned it….)

[Coronita]

[quote=Vod-Vil]How can the Democrats be so dumb to nominate Alvin Greene for Senate?If this is the direction our country is heading under “Democrat” I see trouble ahead.

Alvin Greene on his idea for stimulating the economy…

“Another thing we can do for jobs is make toys of me, especially for the holidays. Little dolls. Me. Like maybe little action dolls. Me in an army uniform, air force uniform, and me in my suit. They can make toys of me and my vehicle, especially for the holidays and Christmas for the kids. That’s something that would create jobs. So you see I think out of the box like that. It’s not something a typical person would bring up. That’s something that could happen, that makes sense. It’s not a joke.”

And you’re calling the tea-baggers stupid.[/quote]

I’m sorry, but you really can’t defend stupidity…. O’donnell definitely demonstrated, well, stupidity…. as disappointing as it is.

Now if I run under a tea-bagger label, please vote for me. I’ll be sure to answer these questions correctly…

Flu…2010 writein…

(Briansd, you have my permission to have a field day on this one….She kinda earned it….)

[Coronita]

[quote=Vod-Vil]How can the Democrats be so dumb to nominate Alvin Greene for Senate?If this is the direction our country is heading under “Democrat” I see trouble ahead.

Alvin Greene on his idea for stimulating the economy…

“Another thing we can do for jobs is make toys of me, especially for the holidays. Little dolls. Me. Like maybe little action dolls. Me in an army uniform, air force uniform, and me in my suit. They can make toys of me and my vehicle, especially for the holidays and Christmas for the kids. That’s something that would create jobs. So you see I think out of the box like that. It’s not something a typical person would bring up. That’s something that could happen, that makes sense. It’s not a joke.”

And you’re calling the tea-baggers stupid.[/quote]

I’m sorry, but you really can’t defend stupidity…. O’donnell definitely demonstrated, well, stupidity…. as disappointing as it is.

Now if I run under a tea-bagger label, please vote for me. I’ll be sure to answer these questions correctly…

Flu…2010 writein…

(Briansd, you have my permission to have a field day on this one….She kinda earned it….)

[Author]

Posts