Obama lacks decorum

[briansd1]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]I cannot imagine any of the women I know, countenancing that crap for a moment. I have a good friend, who is Stanford educated and a business professional, and she would verbally disembowel poor Brian if he trotted that position out to her.[/quote]

Read the context of the thread.

A well-educated woman would not be the kind to agitate for her husband to buy her a big house that he would worry about paying. She would automatically go out and earn the money to contribute to purchasing the house; and she’ll make the decision concurrent with her husband. And she’ll know to live within her means.

Scaredcat, the OP, knows that also. I believe his thread is supposed to be humorous.

http://piggington.com/big_house

[Anonymous]

Allan, I remember the one about “laying down the law” with women. That one made me laugh out loud as well.

Of course I still haven’t figured out women either. But I’ve learned enough to know that will never work.

[Anonymous]

Allan, I remember the one about “laying down the law” with women. That one made me laugh out loud as well.

Of course I still haven’t figured out women either. But I’ve learned enough to know that will never work.

[Anonymous]

Allan, I remember the one about “laying down the law” with women. That one made me laugh out loud as well.

Of course I still haven’t figured out women either. But I’ve learned enough to know that will never work.

[Anonymous]

Allan, I remember the one about “laying down the law” with women. That one made me laugh out loud as well.

Of course I still haven’t figured out women either. But I’ve learned enough to know that will never work.

[Anonymous]

Allan, I remember the one about “laying down the law” with women. That one made me laugh out loud as well.

Of course I still haven’t figured out women either. But I’ve learned enough to know that will never work.

[Arraya]

Don’t hate

Brian’s Pimp Hand is strong.

Pimp Hand –

1. (n.) A sign of virility, strength or social efficacy. An informal measure of one’s ability to mack, pimp, or generally to get play, action or get your freak on. Generally characterized as “strong” or “weak.”
2. To “exercise one’s pimp hand”: to increase one’s skill at short-term sexual interactions, or to demonstrate such.
3. One’s ability to control one’s bitches.
4. A back-handed slap, used to emphasize superiority, or a forthcoming need to choke a bitch.

[Arraya]

Don’t hate

Brian’s Pimp Hand is strong.

Pimp Hand –

1. (n.) A sign of virility, strength or social efficacy. An informal measure of one’s ability to mack, pimp, or generally to get play, action or get your freak on. Generally characterized as “strong” or “weak.”
2. To “exercise one’s pimp hand”: to increase one’s skill at short-term sexual interactions, or to demonstrate such.
3. One’s ability to control one’s bitches.
4. A back-handed slap, used to emphasize superiority, or a forthcoming need to choke a bitch.

[Arraya]

Don’t hate

Brian’s Pimp Hand is strong.

Pimp Hand –

1. (n.) A sign of virility, strength or social efficacy. An informal measure of one’s ability to mack, pimp, or generally to get play, action or get your freak on. Generally characterized as “strong” or “weak.”
2. To “exercise one’s pimp hand”: to increase one’s skill at short-term sexual interactions, or to demonstrate such.
3. One’s ability to control one’s bitches.
4. A back-handed slap, used to emphasize superiority, or a forthcoming need to choke a bitch.

[Arraya]

Don’t hate

Brian’s Pimp Hand is strong.

Pimp Hand –

1. (n.) A sign of virility, strength or social efficacy. An informal measure of one’s ability to mack, pimp, or generally to get play, action or get your freak on. Generally characterized as “strong” or “weak.”
2. To “exercise one’s pimp hand”: to increase one’s skill at short-term sexual interactions, or to demonstrate such.
3. One’s ability to control one’s bitches.
4. A back-handed slap, used to emphasize superiority, or a forthcoming need to choke a bitch.

[Arraya]

Don’t hate

Brian’s Pimp Hand is strong.

Pimp Hand –

1. (n.) A sign of virility, strength or social efficacy. An informal measure of one’s ability to mack, pimp, or generally to get play, action or get your freak on. Generally characterized as “strong” or “weak.”
2. To “exercise one’s pimp hand”: to increase one’s skill at short-term sexual interactions, or to demonstrate such.
3. One’s ability to control one’s bitches.
4. A back-handed slap, used to emphasize superiority, or a forthcoming need to choke a bitch.

[briansd1]

[quote=pri_dk]
What I find to more amusing is that we have posters who lack any sense of proportion in the issues at hand. In one thread we have the “debtocalypse” and then in the next we have breaches of decorum. The world is coming to an end, and we are worried about the details of protocol?
[/quote]

I find that amusing also.

But that’s fine with me if those are activists who are posting for effect so that we consider serious issues.

Zeitgeist, however, sounds like a Republican operative who’s spamming the web on orders of her church.

[quote=pri_dk]
Yeah, Brian says some odd things on these threads, but I don’t think he’s that much more clueless than the rest of us.
[/quote]

Some of things I say for effect and with humor. It’s up to the reader to pick them out. I know that humor doesn’t always convey well on blogs where brevity is key.

Some conservatives want a culture war. Let’s give it to them and let’s have some fun at it too.

[quote=pri_dk]
(I agree that the phrase “conserving back in time” really doesn’t make any sense.)
[/quote]

Consider the Republicans in Congress right now. They didn’t vote for the stimulus plan. They didn’t propose anything new but obstruct. That’s conserving back in time (at least not progressing) in my view.

[briansd1]

[quote=pri_dk]
What I find to more amusing is that we have posters who lack any sense of proportion in the issues at hand. In one thread we have the “debtocalypse” and then in the next we have breaches of decorum. The world is coming to an end, and we are worried about the details of protocol?
[/quote]

I find that amusing also.

But that’s fine with me if those are activists who are posting for effect so that we consider serious issues.

Zeitgeist, however, sounds like a Republican operative who’s spamming the web on orders of her church.

[quote=pri_dk]
Yeah, Brian says some odd things on these threads, but I don’t think he’s that much more clueless than the rest of us.
[/quote]

Some of things I say for effect and with humor. It’s up to the reader to pick them out. I know that humor doesn’t always convey well on blogs where brevity is key.

Some conservatives want a culture war. Let’s give it to them and let’s have some fun at it too.

[quote=pri_dk]
(I agree that the phrase “conserving back in time” really doesn’t make any sense.)
[/quote]

Consider the Republicans in Congress right now. They didn’t vote for the stimulus plan. They didn’t propose anything new but obstruct. That’s conserving back in time (at least not progressing) in my view.

[briansd1]

[quote=pri_dk]
What I find to more amusing is that we have posters who lack any sense of proportion in the issues at hand. In one thread we have the “debtocalypse” and then in the next we have breaches of decorum. The world is coming to an end, and we are worried about the details of protocol?
[/quote]

I find that amusing also.

But that’s fine with me if those are activists who are posting for effect so that we consider serious issues.

Zeitgeist, however, sounds like a Republican operative who’s spamming the web on orders of her church.

[quote=pri_dk]
Yeah, Brian says some odd things on these threads, but I don’t think he’s that much more clueless than the rest of us.
[/quote]

Some of things I say for effect and with humor. It’s up to the reader to pick them out. I know that humor doesn’t always convey well on blogs where brevity is key.

Some conservatives want a culture war. Let’s give it to them and let’s have some fun at it too.

[quote=pri_dk]
(I agree that the phrase “conserving back in time” really doesn’t make any sense.)
[/quote]

Consider the Republicans in Congress right now. They didn’t vote for the stimulus plan. They didn’t propose anything new but obstruct. That’s conserving back in time (at least not progressing) in my view.

[briansd1]

[quote=pri_dk]
What I find to more amusing is that we have posters who lack any sense of proportion in the issues at hand. In one thread we have the “debtocalypse” and then in the next we have breaches of decorum. The world is coming to an end, and we are worried about the details of protocol?
[/quote]

I find that amusing also.

But that’s fine with me if those are activists who are posting for effect so that we consider serious issues.

Zeitgeist, however, sounds like a Republican operative who’s spamming the web on orders of her church.

[quote=pri_dk]
Yeah, Brian says some odd things on these threads, but I don’t think he’s that much more clueless than the rest of us.
[/quote]

Some of things I say for effect and with humor. It’s up to the reader to pick them out. I know that humor doesn’t always convey well on blogs where brevity is key.

Some conservatives want a culture war. Let’s give it to them and let’s have some fun at it too.

[quote=pri_dk]
(I agree that the phrase “conserving back in time” really doesn’t make any sense.)
[/quote]

Consider the Republicans in Congress right now. They didn’t vote for the stimulus plan. They didn’t propose anything new but obstruct. That’s conserving back in time (at least not progressing) in my view.

[Author]

Posts