Menu

Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › NY Appellate court overthrows MERS…

  • This topic has 40 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by PCinSD.
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 41 total)
1 2 3
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 13, 2011 at 4:43 PM #703703
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    [quote=patb] . . . They may appeal into the court of appeals, but, it’s binding now on all the 62 supreme courts.[/quote]

    patb, I don’t know how the court hierarchy is structured in NY, but, based on your post, I don’t see how one “Supreme” court’s decision in one county in NY could be binding upon other judges in the same state. Is the opinion published? Acc to your post, it hasn’t even been appealed yet. Defendants MERS (and lender) have a right of appeal and they may very well do so. It sounds like the “fat lady” has not yet sung on this one.

    June 13, 2011 at 6:05 PM #703896
    patb
    Participant

    [quote=bearishgurl][quote=patb] . . . They may appeal into the court of appeals, but, it’s binding now on all the 62 supreme courts.[/quote]

    patb, I don’t know how the court hierarchy is structured in NY, but, based on your post, I don’t see how one “Supreme” court’s decision in one county in NY could be binding upon other judges in the same state. Is the opinion published? Acc to your post, it hasn’t even been appealed yet. Defendants MERS (and lender) have a right of appeal and they may very well do so. It sounds like the “fat lady” has not yet sung on this one.[/quote]

    you didn’t read the original post at all.
    This is a NY State Appelatte ruling and will
    be binding statewide unless appealled to the court of appeals.

    this was a 4 judge panel with unanimous hearing, unless they can get leave to appeal or a
    contrary ruling appears in one of the other departments that’s it.

    June 13, 2011 at 6:05 PM #704255
    patb
    Participant

    [quote=bearishgurl][quote=patb] . . . They may appeal into the court of appeals, but, it’s binding now on all the 62 supreme courts.[/quote]

    patb, I don’t know how the court hierarchy is structured in NY, but, based on your post, I don’t see how one “Supreme” court’s decision in one county in NY could be binding upon other judges in the same state. Is the opinion published? Acc to your post, it hasn’t even been appealed yet. Defendants MERS (and lender) have a right of appeal and they may very well do so. It sounds like the “fat lady” has not yet sung on this one.[/quote]

    you didn’t read the original post at all.
    This is a NY State Appelatte ruling and will
    be binding statewide unless appealled to the court of appeals.

    this was a 4 judge panel with unanimous hearing, unless they can get leave to appeal or a
    contrary ruling appears in one of the other departments that’s it.

    June 13, 2011 at 6:05 PM #703748
    patb
    Participant

    [quote=bearishgurl][quote=patb] . . . They may appeal into the court of appeals, but, it’s binding now on all the 62 supreme courts.[/quote]

    patb, I don’t know how the court hierarchy is structured in NY, but, based on your post, I don’t see how one “Supreme” court’s decision in one county in NY could be binding upon other judges in the same state. Is the opinion published? Acc to your post, it hasn’t even been appealed yet. Defendants MERS (and lender) have a right of appeal and they may very well do so. It sounds like the “fat lady” has not yet sung on this one.[/quote]

    you didn’t read the original post at all.
    This is a NY State Appelatte ruling and will
    be binding statewide unless appealled to the court of appeals.

    this was a 4 judge panel with unanimous hearing, unless they can get leave to appeal or a
    contrary ruling appears in one of the other departments that’s it.

    June 13, 2011 at 6:05 PM #703158
    patb
    Participant

    [quote=bearishgurl][quote=patb] . . . They may appeal into the court of appeals, but, it’s binding now on all the 62 supreme courts.[/quote]

    patb, I don’t know how the court hierarchy is structured in NY, but, based on your post, I don’t see how one “Supreme” court’s decision in one county in NY could be binding upon other judges in the same state. Is the opinion published? Acc to your post, it hasn’t even been appealed yet. Defendants MERS (and lender) have a right of appeal and they may very well do so. It sounds like the “fat lady” has not yet sung on this one.[/quote]

    you didn’t read the original post at all.
    This is a NY State Appelatte ruling and will
    be binding statewide unless appealled to the court of appeals.

    this was a 4 judge panel with unanimous hearing, unless they can get leave to appeal or a
    contrary ruling appears in one of the other departments that’s it.

    June 13, 2011 at 6:05 PM #703061
    patb
    Participant

    [quote=bearishgurl][quote=patb] . . . They may appeal into the court of appeals, but, it’s binding now on all the 62 supreme courts.[/quote]

    patb, I don’t know how the court hierarchy is structured in NY, but, based on your post, I don’t see how one “Supreme” court’s decision in one county in NY could be binding upon other judges in the same state. Is the opinion published? Acc to your post, it hasn’t even been appealed yet. Defendants MERS (and lender) have a right of appeal and they may very well do so. It sounds like the “fat lady” has not yet sung on this one.[/quote]

    you didn’t read the original post at all.
    This is a NY State Appelatte ruling and will
    be binding statewide unless appealled to the court of appeals.

    this was a 4 judge panel with unanimous hearing, unless they can get leave to appeal or a
    contrary ruling appears in one of the other departments that’s it.

    June 13, 2011 at 6:24 PM #703758
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    [quote=patb][quote=bearishgurl][quote=patb] . . . They may appeal into the court of appeals, but, it’s binding now on all the 62 supreme courts.[/quote]

    patb, I don’t know how the court hierarchy is structured in NY, but, based on your post, I don’t see how one “Supreme” court’s decision in one county in NY could be binding upon other judges in the same state. Is the opinion published? Acc to your post, it hasn’t even been appealed yet. Defendants MERS (and lender) have a right of appeal and they may very well do so. It sounds like the “fat lady” has not yet sung on this one.[/quote]

    No I didn’t read it, patb. Okay, but “strange” in that, from your post, it seemed that “Supreme Ct” in NY handles cases at the same level as “Superior Ct” in CA. Can the case still be appealed within the State of NY?

    you didn’t read the original post at all.
    This is a NY State Appelatte ruling and will
    be binding statewide unless appealled to the court of appeals.

    this was a 4 judge panel with unanimous hearing, unless they can get leave to appeal or a
    contrary ruling appears in one of the other departments that’s it.[/quote]

    June 13, 2011 at 6:24 PM #704265
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    [quote=patb][quote=bearishgurl][quote=patb] . . . They may appeal into the court of appeals, but, it’s binding now on all the 62 supreme courts.[/quote]

    patb, I don’t know how the court hierarchy is structured in NY, but, based on your post, I don’t see how one “Supreme” court’s decision in one county in NY could be binding upon other judges in the same state. Is the opinion published? Acc to your post, it hasn’t even been appealed yet. Defendants MERS (and lender) have a right of appeal and they may very well do so. It sounds like the “fat lady” has not yet sung on this one.[/quote]

    No I didn’t read it, patb. Okay, but “strange” in that, from your post, it seemed that “Supreme Ct” in NY handles cases at the same level as “Superior Ct” in CA. Can the case still be appealed within the State of NY?

    you didn’t read the original post at all.
    This is a NY State Appelatte ruling and will
    be binding statewide unless appealled to the court of appeals.

    this was a 4 judge panel with unanimous hearing, unless they can get leave to appeal or a
    contrary ruling appears in one of the other departments that’s it.[/quote]

    June 13, 2011 at 6:24 PM #703168
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    [quote=patb][quote=bearishgurl][quote=patb] . . . They may appeal into the court of appeals, but, it’s binding now on all the 62 supreme courts.[/quote]

    patb, I don’t know how the court hierarchy is structured in NY, but, based on your post, I don’t see how one “Supreme” court’s decision in one county in NY could be binding upon other judges in the same state. Is the opinion published? Acc to your post, it hasn’t even been appealed yet. Defendants MERS (and lender) have a right of appeal and they may very well do so. It sounds like the “fat lady” has not yet sung on this one.[/quote]

    No I didn’t read it, patb. Okay, but “strange” in that, from your post, it seemed that “Supreme Ct” in NY handles cases at the same level as “Superior Ct” in CA. Can the case still be appealed within the State of NY?

    you didn’t read the original post at all.
    This is a NY State Appelatte ruling and will
    be binding statewide unless appealled to the court of appeals.

    this was a 4 judge panel with unanimous hearing, unless they can get leave to appeal or a
    contrary ruling appears in one of the other departments that’s it.[/quote]

    June 13, 2011 at 6:24 PM #703906
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    [quote=patb][quote=bearishgurl][quote=patb] . . . They may appeal into the court of appeals, but, it’s binding now on all the 62 supreme courts.[/quote]

    patb, I don’t know how the court hierarchy is structured in NY, but, based on your post, I don’t see how one “Supreme” court’s decision in one county in NY could be binding upon other judges in the same state. Is the opinion published? Acc to your post, it hasn’t even been appealed yet. Defendants MERS (and lender) have a right of appeal and they may very well do so. It sounds like the “fat lady” has not yet sung on this one.[/quote]

    No I didn’t read it, patb. Okay, but “strange” in that, from your post, it seemed that “Supreme Ct” in NY handles cases at the same level as “Superior Ct” in CA. Can the case still be appealed within the State of NY?

    you didn’t read the original post at all.
    This is a NY State Appelatte ruling and will
    be binding statewide unless appealled to the court of appeals.

    this was a 4 judge panel with unanimous hearing, unless they can get leave to appeal or a
    contrary ruling appears in one of the other departments that’s it.[/quote]

    June 13, 2011 at 6:24 PM #703071
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    [quote=patb][quote=bearishgurl][quote=patb] . . . They may appeal into the court of appeals, but, it’s binding now on all the 62 supreme courts.[/quote]

    patb, I don’t know how the court hierarchy is structured in NY, but, based on your post, I don’t see how one “Supreme” court’s decision in one county in NY could be binding upon other judges in the same state. Is the opinion published? Acc to your post, it hasn’t even been appealed yet. Defendants MERS (and lender) have a right of appeal and they may very well do so. It sounds like the “fat lady” has not yet sung on this one.[/quote]

    No I didn’t read it, patb. Okay, but “strange” in that, from your post, it seemed that “Supreme Ct” in NY handles cases at the same level as “Superior Ct” in CA. Can the case still be appealed within the State of NY?

    you didn’t read the original post at all.
    This is a NY State Appelatte ruling and will
    be binding statewide unless appealled to the court of appeals.

    this was a 4 judge panel with unanimous hearing, unless they can get leave to appeal or a
    contrary ruling appears in one of the other departments that’s it.[/quote]

    June 13, 2011 at 6:35 PM #703763
    PCinSD
    Guest

    Still one level of appeal left to the Defendants.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Supreme_Court

    Google is your friend.

    June 13, 2011 at 6:35 PM #704270
    PCinSD
    Guest

    Still one level of appeal left to the Defendants.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Supreme_Court

    Google is your friend.

    June 13, 2011 at 6:35 PM #703173
    PCinSD
    Guest

    Still one level of appeal left to the Defendants.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Supreme_Court

    Google is your friend.

    June 13, 2011 at 6:35 PM #703911
    PCinSD
    Guest

    Still one level of appeal left to the Defendants.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Supreme_Court

    Google is your friend.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 41 total)
1 2 3
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.