- This topic has 645 replies, 34 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 11 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 7, 2010 at 3:43 PM #500776January 7, 2010 at 4:11 PM #499890
IT.MOM
ParticipantIt is their job to try to create a better life for themselves and their children.
It is banker’s job to assess if they got the ability to pay back the loan.
They were doing their job.
Bankers were too greedy to do theirs.January 7, 2010 at 4:11 PM #500042ParticipantIt is their job to try to create a better life for themselves and their children.
It is banker’s job to assess if they got the ability to pay back the loan.
They were doing their job.
Bankers were too greedy to do theirs.January 7, 2010 at 4:11 PM #500440ParticipantIt is their job to try to create a better life for themselves and their children.
It is banker’s job to assess if they got the ability to pay back the loan.
They were doing their job.
Bankers were too greedy to do theirs.January 7, 2010 at 4:11 PM #500533ParticipantIt is their job to try to create a better life for themselves and their children.
It is banker’s job to assess if they got the ability to pay back the loan.
They were doing their job.
Bankers were too greedy to do theirs.January 7, 2010 at 4:11 PM #500781ParticipantIt is their job to try to create a better life for themselves and their children.
It is banker’s job to assess if they got the ability to pay back the loan.
They were doing their job.
Bankers were too greedy to do theirs.January 7, 2010 at 6:13 PM #499941UCGal
Participant[quote=IT.MOM]It is their job to try to create a better life for themselves and their children.
It is banker’s job to assess if they got the ability to pay back the loan.
They were doing their job.
Bankers were too greedy to do theirs.[/quote]
How is gathering debt in far greater amounts than their income could support creating a better life for their kids? It seems to me that living within one’s means is a much better way to create a better life for oneself and one’s children.Enough blame to go around here… Banks bear the loss on the loans they made. The family loses the house they never could afford. If the Daniels accepted their responsibility, it would be one thing… but with Lisa out complaining that she’s entitled to handouts from Obama… I don’t see it.
January 7, 2010 at 6:13 PM #500091Participant[quote=IT.MOM]It is their job to try to create a better life for themselves and their children.
It is banker’s job to assess if they got the ability to pay back the loan.
They were doing their job.
Bankers were too greedy to do theirs.[/quote]
How is gathering debt in far greater amounts than their income could support creating a better life for their kids? It seems to me that living within one’s means is a much better way to create a better life for oneself and one’s children.Enough blame to go around here… Banks bear the loss on the loans they made. The family loses the house they never could afford. If the Daniels accepted their responsibility, it would be one thing… but with Lisa out complaining that she’s entitled to handouts from Obama… I don’t see it.
January 7, 2010 at 6:13 PM #500490Participant[quote=IT.MOM]It is their job to try to create a better life for themselves and their children.
It is banker’s job to assess if they got the ability to pay back the loan.
They were doing their job.
Bankers were too greedy to do theirs.[/quote]
How is gathering debt in far greater amounts than their income could support creating a better life for their kids? It seems to me that living within one’s means is a much better way to create a better life for oneself and one’s children.Enough blame to go around here… Banks bear the loss on the loans they made. The family loses the house they never could afford. If the Daniels accepted their responsibility, it would be one thing… but with Lisa out complaining that she’s entitled to handouts from Obama… I don’t see it.
January 7, 2010 at 6:13 PM #500583Participant[quote=IT.MOM]It is their job to try to create a better life for themselves and their children.
It is banker’s job to assess if they got the ability to pay back the loan.
They were doing their job.
Bankers were too greedy to do theirs.[/quote]
How is gathering debt in far greater amounts than their income could support creating a better life for their kids? It seems to me that living within one’s means is a much better way to create a better life for oneself and one’s children.Enough blame to go around here… Banks bear the loss on the loans they made. The family loses the house they never could afford. If the Daniels accepted their responsibility, it would be one thing… but with Lisa out complaining that she’s entitled to handouts from Obama… I don’t see it.
January 7, 2010 at 6:13 PM #500830Participant[quote=IT.MOM]It is their job to try to create a better life for themselves and their children.
It is banker’s job to assess if they got the ability to pay back the loan.
They were doing their job.
Bankers were too greedy to do theirs.[/quote]
How is gathering debt in far greater amounts than their income could support creating a better life for their kids? It seems to me that living within one’s means is a much better way to create a better life for oneself and one’s children.Enough blame to go around here… Banks bear the loss on the loans they made. The family loses the house they never could afford. If the Daniels accepted their responsibility, it would be one thing… but with Lisa out complaining that she’s entitled to handouts from Obama… I don’t see it.
January 7, 2010 at 7:40 PM #499955scaredyclassic
Participantla cresta is nice. probably they were thinking, dang, we have these out of control kids, maybe it will be better in the great outdoors, more room, they won’t be so irritating. I think it’s a good example of “wherever you go, there you are”. maybe this is part of their ultimate path to enlightenment. there is one real cheap listing in la cresta right now, 5 acres, decent sized house, listed at 377,000, hasn’t sold for many many months. they coulda just bought the whole dang thing for cash and been done with it if they’d read this website and had a bit of patience.
January 7, 2010 at 7:40 PM #500106Participantla cresta is nice. probably they were thinking, dang, we have these out of control kids, maybe it will be better in the great outdoors, more room, they won’t be so irritating. I think it’s a good example of “wherever you go, there you are”. maybe this is part of their ultimate path to enlightenment. there is one real cheap listing in la cresta right now, 5 acres, decent sized house, listed at 377,000, hasn’t sold for many many months. they coulda just bought the whole dang thing for cash and been done with it if they’d read this website and had a bit of patience.
January 7, 2010 at 7:40 PM #500505Participantla cresta is nice. probably they were thinking, dang, we have these out of control kids, maybe it will be better in the great outdoors, more room, they won’t be so irritating. I think it’s a good example of “wherever you go, there you are”. maybe this is part of their ultimate path to enlightenment. there is one real cheap listing in la cresta right now, 5 acres, decent sized house, listed at 377,000, hasn’t sold for many many months. they coulda just bought the whole dang thing for cash and been done with it if they’d read this website and had a bit of patience.
January 7, 2010 at 7:40 PM #500598Participantla cresta is nice. probably they were thinking, dang, we have these out of control kids, maybe it will be better in the great outdoors, more room, they won’t be so irritating. I think it’s a good example of “wherever you go, there you are”. maybe this is part of their ultimate path to enlightenment. there is one real cheap listing in la cresta right now, 5 acres, decent sized house, listed at 377,000, hasn’t sold for many many months. they coulda just bought the whole dang thing for cash and been done with it if they’d read this website and had a bit of patience.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.