Man-cession

[scaredyclassic]

i do feel like young guys get sold a bill of goods in society. we need to go back to arranged marraiges with family support. young people really cannot support themselves and afamily early on. arranged marriages. no reproducing without a care plan in place. if one party will stay at home, they have to sign binding agreements that they will do so. love stinks. we need some govt regulation

[scaredyclassic]

also, back to “at-fault” divorces. if someone signs an agreement to care for children, its binding, has to be court approved prior to birth, and if he or she wants to back out, he or she can either pay the damages if there’s a divorce or be held in contempt of court and jailed indefinitely.

our system is too loosey goosey. we need some rules.

[scaredyclassic]

also, back to “at-fault” divorces. if someone signs an agreement to care for children, its binding, has to be court approved prior to birth, and if he or she wants to back out, he or she can either pay the damages if there’s a divorce or be held in contempt of court and jailed indefinitely.

our system is too loosey goosey. we need some rules.

[scaredyclassic]

also, back to “at-fault” divorces. if someone signs an agreement to care for children, its binding, has to be court approved prior to birth, and if he or she wants to back out, he or she can either pay the damages if there’s a divorce or be held in contempt of court and jailed indefinitely.

our system is too loosey goosey. we need some rules.

[scaredyclassic]

also, back to “at-fault” divorces. if someone signs an agreement to care for children, its binding, has to be court approved prior to birth, and if he or she wants to back out, he or she can either pay the damages if there’s a divorce or be held in contempt of court and jailed indefinitely.

our system is too loosey goosey. we need some rules.

[scaredyclassic]

also, back to “at-fault” divorces. if someone signs an agreement to care for children, its binding, has to be court approved prior to birth, and if he or she wants to back out, he or she can either pay the damages if there’s a divorce or be held in contempt of court and jailed indefinitely.

our system is too loosey goosey. we need some rules.

[scaredyclassic]

oh yeah. i almost forgot.

in spite of it all, it was all worth it.

[scaredyclassic]

oh yeah. i almost forgot.

in spite of it all, it was all worth it.

[scaredyclassic]

oh yeah. i almost forgot.

in spite of it all, it was all worth it.

[scaredyclassic]

oh yeah. i almost forgot.

in spite of it all, it was all worth it.

[scaredyclassic]

oh yeah. i almost forgot.

in spite of it all, it was all worth it.

[temeculaguy]

And bringing this back to the uneven unemployment numbers and away from child care, how is this to affect low end/smaller rentals or certain neighborhoods. Will it treat sfr’s differently. It would seem that the unemployment numbers are not affecting everyone the same and there is a demographic element to the various housing markets. Could the racial inequities of the unemployment numbers be the reason certain communities are sticky in price, while others are not? There’s something there, it’s just not plain as day. It is causing me to rethink my plan to buy a small aprtmentish/condoish rental in a low end neighborhood (where I find the best values and ROI). Since married, non-minority women are the least affected by the unemployment rise, and demographicly as a group they value schools and crime rates probably more than other groups, I think if you look at the demographics of those communities that are sticky, you’ll find low crime and good schools. In bad times it seems important to know who is unemployed, just as much as how many. It may also back up some recent posts about bread and butter rental communities being in the mid level and not the lowest, even if I like the numbers better because others are afraid.

Forget trying to fix scardey, he is who he is and his name is fitting, at least he realizes he can’t make a decision without some level of regret.

[temeculaguy]

And bringing this back to the uneven unemployment numbers and away from child care, how is this to affect low end/smaller rentals or certain neighborhoods. Will it treat sfr’s differently. It would seem that the unemployment numbers are not affecting everyone the same and there is a demographic element to the various housing markets. Could the racial inequities of the unemployment numbers be the reason certain communities are sticky in price, while others are not? There’s something there, it’s just not plain as day. It is causing me to rethink my plan to buy a small aprtmentish/condoish rental in a low end neighborhood (where I find the best values and ROI). Since married, non-minority women are the least affected by the unemployment rise, and demographicly as a group they value schools and crime rates probably more than other groups, I think if you look at the demographics of those communities that are sticky, you’ll find low crime and good schools. In bad times it seems important to know who is unemployed, just as much as how many. It may also back up some recent posts about bread and butter rental communities being in the mid level and not the lowest, even if I like the numbers better because others are afraid.

Forget trying to fix scardey, he is who he is and his name is fitting, at least he realizes he can’t make a decision without some level of regret.

[temeculaguy]

And bringing this back to the uneven unemployment numbers and away from child care, how is this to affect low end/smaller rentals or certain neighborhoods. Will it treat sfr’s differently. It would seem that the unemployment numbers are not affecting everyone the same and there is a demographic element to the various housing markets. Could the racial inequities of the unemployment numbers be the reason certain communities are sticky in price, while others are not? There’s something there, it’s just not plain as day. It is causing me to rethink my plan to buy a small aprtmentish/condoish rental in a low end neighborhood (where I find the best values and ROI). Since married, non-minority women are the least affected by the unemployment rise, and demographicly as a group they value schools and crime rates probably more than other groups, I think if you look at the demographics of those communities that are sticky, you’ll find low crime and good schools. In bad times it seems important to know who is unemployed, just as much as how many. It may also back up some recent posts about bread and butter rental communities being in the mid level and not the lowest, even if I like the numbers better because others are afraid.

Forget trying to fix scardey, he is who he is and his name is fitting, at least he realizes he can’t make a decision without some level of regret.

[temeculaguy]

And bringing this back to the uneven unemployment numbers and away from child care, how is this to affect low end/smaller rentals or certain neighborhoods. Will it treat sfr’s differently. It would seem that the unemployment numbers are not affecting everyone the same and there is a demographic element to the various housing markets. Could the racial inequities of the unemployment numbers be the reason certain communities are sticky in price, while others are not? There’s something there, it’s just not plain as day. It is causing me to rethink my plan to buy a small aprtmentish/condoish rental in a low end neighborhood (where I find the best values and ROI). Since married, non-minority women are the least affected by the unemployment rise, and demographicly as a group they value schools and crime rates probably more than other groups, I think if you look at the demographics of those communities that are sticky, you’ll find low crime and good schools. In bad times it seems important to know who is unemployed, just as much as how many. It may also back up some recent posts about bread and butter rental communities being in the mid level and not the lowest, even if I like the numbers better because others are afraid.

Forget trying to fix scardey, he is who he is and his name is fitting, at least he realizes he can’t make a decision without some level of regret.

[Author]

Posts