- This topic has 1,076 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 1 month ago by markmax33.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 16, 2011 at 12:53 PM #19038August 16, 2011 at 1:00 PM #720016AnonymousGuest
The media sells stories, stories have to be “fresh” to get the typical viewer’s attention, and the Ron Paul story just hasn’t changed in years.
Plus he just doesn’t have media appeal. Although some of his ideas may make sense, he just comes across as another also-ran oddball.
Since when did the media provide coverage based on merit?
August 16, 2011 at 1:00 PM #720108AnonymousGuestThe media sells stories, stories have to be “fresh” to get the typical viewer’s attention, and the Ron Paul story just hasn’t changed in years.
Plus he just doesn’t have media appeal. Although some of his ideas may make sense, he just comes across as another also-ran oddball.
Since when did the media provide coverage based on merit?
August 16, 2011 at 1:00 PM #720708AnonymousGuestThe media sells stories, stories have to be “fresh” to get the typical viewer’s attention, and the Ron Paul story just hasn’t changed in years.
Plus he just doesn’t have media appeal. Although some of his ideas may make sense, he just comes across as another also-ran oddball.
Since when did the media provide coverage based on merit?
August 16, 2011 at 1:00 PM #720863AnonymousGuestThe media sells stories, stories have to be “fresh” to get the typical viewer’s attention, and the Ron Paul story just hasn’t changed in years.
Plus he just doesn’t have media appeal. Although some of his ideas may make sense, he just comes across as another also-ran oddball.
Since when did the media provide coverage based on merit?
August 16, 2011 at 1:00 PM #721227AnonymousGuestThe media sells stories, stories have to be “fresh” to get the typical viewer’s attention, and the Ron Paul story just hasn’t changed in years.
Plus he just doesn’t have media appeal. Although some of his ideas may make sense, he just comes across as another also-ran oddball.
Since when did the media provide coverage based on merit?
August 16, 2011 at 1:12 PM #720021aldanteParticipantThat is some real world feedback for sure. However I thought the news was supposed to kinda report the news! Instead it seems like they are picking winners. Why don’t they just step up and say something like: Eventhough RP came in second by less then 200 votes and had twice as many as the next candidate, our analysis says RP has no chance of winning becasue he is an “also ran”. Instead they just ignore him.
Speaking of news: who has recieved more donations from Active Duty military then all other Republican candidates combined? RP. You know that crazy guy that saysIRAN, IRAQ, LIBYA, PAKISTAN have no possible way of chanllenging us militarily and we are wasting our time over there. Makes it kinda seem like the military folk think he is right instead of all the other warmongers. Don’t you think?August 16, 2011 at 1:12 PM #720113aldanteParticipantThat is some real world feedback for sure. However I thought the news was supposed to kinda report the news! Instead it seems like they are picking winners. Why don’t they just step up and say something like: Eventhough RP came in second by less then 200 votes and had twice as many as the next candidate, our analysis says RP has no chance of winning becasue he is an “also ran”. Instead they just ignore him.
Speaking of news: who has recieved more donations from Active Duty military then all other Republican candidates combined? RP. You know that crazy guy that saysIRAN, IRAQ, LIBYA, PAKISTAN have no possible way of chanllenging us militarily and we are wasting our time over there. Makes it kinda seem like the military folk think he is right instead of all the other warmongers. Don’t you think?August 16, 2011 at 1:12 PM #720713aldanteParticipantThat is some real world feedback for sure. However I thought the news was supposed to kinda report the news! Instead it seems like they are picking winners. Why don’t they just step up and say something like: Eventhough RP came in second by less then 200 votes and had twice as many as the next candidate, our analysis says RP has no chance of winning becasue he is an “also ran”. Instead they just ignore him.
Speaking of news: who has recieved more donations from Active Duty military then all other Republican candidates combined? RP. You know that crazy guy that saysIRAN, IRAQ, LIBYA, PAKISTAN have no possible way of chanllenging us militarily and we are wasting our time over there. Makes it kinda seem like the military folk think he is right instead of all the other warmongers. Don’t you think?August 16, 2011 at 1:12 PM #720868aldanteParticipantThat is some real world feedback for sure. However I thought the news was supposed to kinda report the news! Instead it seems like they are picking winners. Why don’t they just step up and say something like: Eventhough RP came in second by less then 200 votes and had twice as many as the next candidate, our analysis says RP has no chance of winning becasue he is an “also ran”. Instead they just ignore him.
Speaking of news: who has recieved more donations from Active Duty military then all other Republican candidates combined? RP. You know that crazy guy that saysIRAN, IRAQ, LIBYA, PAKISTAN have no possible way of chanllenging us militarily and we are wasting our time over there. Makes it kinda seem like the military folk think he is right instead of all the other warmongers. Don’t you think?August 16, 2011 at 1:12 PM #721232aldanteParticipantThat is some real world feedback for sure. However I thought the news was supposed to kinda report the news! Instead it seems like they are picking winners. Why don’t they just step up and say something like: Eventhough RP came in second by less then 200 votes and had twice as many as the next candidate, our analysis says RP has no chance of winning becasue he is an “also ran”. Instead they just ignore him.
Speaking of news: who has recieved more donations from Active Duty military then all other Republican candidates combined? RP. You know that crazy guy that saysIRAN, IRAQ, LIBYA, PAKISTAN have no possible way of chanllenging us militarily and we are wasting our time over there. Makes it kinda seem like the military folk think he is right instead of all the other warmongers. Don’t you think?August 16, 2011 at 1:24 PM #720026briansd1Guest[quote=aldante] RP. You know that crazy guy that saysIRAN, IRAQ, LIBYA, PAKISTAN have no possible way of chanllenging us militarily and we are wasting our time over there. Makes it kinda seem like the military folk think he is right instead of all the other warmongers. Don’t you think?[/quote]
Zbigniew Brzezinski, said from the beginning that the wars cannot be won because they are wrong wars at the wrong time in history.
After 10 years, the military is learning its lesson.
But you know what? If you’re a general and the president asks you if you can go to war and win, your answer would be “yes, of course, give me what I need.” The general probably wants to test his strategy and toys.
August 16, 2011 at 1:24 PM #720118briansd1Guest[quote=aldante] RP. You know that crazy guy that saysIRAN, IRAQ, LIBYA, PAKISTAN have no possible way of chanllenging us militarily and we are wasting our time over there. Makes it kinda seem like the military folk think he is right instead of all the other warmongers. Don’t you think?[/quote]
Zbigniew Brzezinski, said from the beginning that the wars cannot be won because they are wrong wars at the wrong time in history.
After 10 years, the military is learning its lesson.
But you know what? If you’re a general and the president asks you if you can go to war and win, your answer would be “yes, of course, give me what I need.” The general probably wants to test his strategy and toys.
August 16, 2011 at 1:24 PM #720718briansd1Guest[quote=aldante] RP. You know that crazy guy that saysIRAN, IRAQ, LIBYA, PAKISTAN have no possible way of chanllenging us militarily and we are wasting our time over there. Makes it kinda seem like the military folk think he is right instead of all the other warmongers. Don’t you think?[/quote]
Zbigniew Brzezinski, said from the beginning that the wars cannot be won because they are wrong wars at the wrong time in history.
After 10 years, the military is learning its lesson.
But you know what? If you’re a general and the president asks you if you can go to war and win, your answer would be “yes, of course, give me what I need.” The general probably wants to test his strategy and toys.
August 16, 2011 at 1:24 PM #720873briansd1Guest[quote=aldante] RP. You know that crazy guy that saysIRAN, IRAQ, LIBYA, PAKISTAN have no possible way of chanllenging us militarily and we are wasting our time over there. Makes it kinda seem like the military folk think he is right instead of all the other warmongers. Don’t you think?[/quote]
Zbigniew Brzezinski, said from the beginning that the wars cannot be won because they are wrong wars at the wrong time in history.
After 10 years, the military is learning its lesson.
But you know what? If you’re a general and the president asks you if you can go to war and win, your answer would be “yes, of course, give me what I need.” The general probably wants to test his strategy and toys.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.