Menu

Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Has Goldman fatally damaged their Franchise?

Viewing 15 posts - 661 through 675 (of 681 total)
1 2 3 … 44 45 46
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 28, 2010 at 11:44 AM #545480
    sd_matt
    Participant

    [quote=scaredycat]would it be all right to hook everyone to a polygraph, just for entertainment, no legal effect, so we can watch the needle bounce around ona big screen behind them? why dont they have that?[/quote]
    Love the idea.

    It would make a great reality show. I think the ratings would be out the roof. I’m having a hard time typing right now from laughing.

    April 28, 2010 at 7:10 PM #544674
    patb
    Participant

    [quote=briansd1]

    As a society, we depend of firms like Goldman. We can’t do without them.

    [/quote]

    actually, firms like Goldman are utterly replaceable.

    they don’t really control capital,

    they are a collection of lawyers and salesmen.

    they could be replaced in a month.

    April 28, 2010 at 7:10 PM #544788
    patb
    Participant

    [quote=briansd1]

    As a society, we depend of firms like Goldman. We can’t do without them.

    [/quote]

    actually, firms like Goldman are utterly replaceable.

    they don’t really control capital,

    they are a collection of lawyers and salesmen.

    they could be replaced in a month.

    April 28, 2010 at 7:10 PM #545266
    patb
    Participant

    [quote=briansd1]

    As a society, we depend of firms like Goldman. We can’t do without them.

    [/quote]

    actually, firms like Goldman are utterly replaceable.

    they don’t really control capital,

    they are a collection of lawyers and salesmen.

    they could be replaced in a month.

    April 28, 2010 at 7:10 PM #545363
    patb
    Participant

    [quote=briansd1]

    As a society, we depend of firms like Goldman. We can’t do without them.

    [/quote]

    actually, firms like Goldman are utterly replaceable.

    they don’t really control capital,

    they are a collection of lawyers and salesmen.

    they could be replaced in a month.

    April 28, 2010 at 7:10 PM #545635
    patb
    Participant

    [quote=briansd1]

    As a society, we depend of firms like Goldman. We can’t do without them.

    [/quote]

    actually, firms like Goldman are utterly replaceable.

    they don’t really control capital,

    they are a collection of lawyers and salesmen.

    they could be replaced in a month.

    April 29, 2010 at 1:19 AM #544739
    CA renter
    Participant

    [quote=patb][quote=briansd1]

    As a society, we depend of firms like Goldman. We can’t do without them.

    [/quote]

    actually, firms like Goldman are utterly replaceable.

    they don’t really control capital,

    they are a collection of lawyers and salesmen.

    they could be replaced in a month.[/quote]

    Agree with you, patb.

    April 29, 2010 at 1:19 AM #544853
    CA renter
    Participant

    [quote=patb][quote=briansd1]

    As a society, we depend of firms like Goldman. We can’t do without them.

    [/quote]

    actually, firms like Goldman are utterly replaceable.

    they don’t really control capital,

    they are a collection of lawyers and salesmen.

    they could be replaced in a month.[/quote]

    Agree with you, patb.

    April 29, 2010 at 1:19 AM #545331
    CA renter
    Participant

    [quote=patb][quote=briansd1]

    As a society, we depend of firms like Goldman. We can’t do without them.

    [/quote]

    actually, firms like Goldman are utterly replaceable.

    they don’t really control capital,

    they are a collection of lawyers and salesmen.

    they could be replaced in a month.[/quote]

    Agree with you, patb.

    April 29, 2010 at 1:19 AM #545428
    CA renter
    Participant

    [quote=patb][quote=briansd1]

    As a society, we depend of firms like Goldman. We can’t do without them.

    [/quote]

    actually, firms like Goldman are utterly replaceable.

    they don’t really control capital,

    they are a collection of lawyers and salesmen.

    they could be replaced in a month.[/quote]

    Agree with you, patb.

    April 29, 2010 at 1:19 AM #545700
    CA renter
    Participant

    [quote=patb][quote=briansd1]

    As a society, we depend of firms like Goldman. We can’t do without them.

    [/quote]

    actually, firms like Goldman are utterly replaceable.

    they don’t really control capital,

    they are a collection of lawyers and salesmen.

    they could be replaced in a month.[/quote]

    Agree with you, patb.

    April 29, 2010 at 8:59 PM #545034
    patb
    Participant

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703572504575214652998348876.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEADNewsCollection

    as I said originally.

    Has Goldman fatally damaged their franchise?

    can a company under criminal investigation,
    survive as a going concern?

    April 29, 2010 at 8:59 PM #545147
    patb
    Participant

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703572504575214652998348876.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEADNewsCollection

    as I said originally.

    Has Goldman fatally damaged their franchise?

    can a company under criminal investigation,
    survive as a going concern?

    April 29, 2010 at 8:59 PM #545626
    patb
    Participant

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703572504575214652998348876.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEADNewsCollection

    as I said originally.

    Has Goldman fatally damaged their franchise?

    can a company under criminal investigation,
    survive as a going concern?

    April 29, 2010 at 8:59 PM #545723
    patb
    Participant

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703572504575214652998348876.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEADNewsCollection

    as I said originally.

    Has Goldman fatally damaged their franchise?

    can a company under criminal investigation,
    survive as a going concern?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 661 through 675 (of 681 total)
1 2 3 … 44 45 46
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.