Menu

Home › Forums › Other › Government spending is more beneficial than private spending

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 231 total)
1 2 3 … 6 7 8 … 14 15 16
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 28, 2010 at 11:02 AM #611156
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    I had a sneaking suspicion awhile back that BGIG might actually be a “wayward Pigg.”

    http://piggington.com/bonita_woman_forestalls_eviction_for_now

    September 28, 2010 at 11:09 AM #610109
    jstoesz
    Participant

    Food for thought…

    http://paper-money.blogspot.com/2010/09/fraud-and-fraudulent-fruadsters-that.html

    September 28, 2010 at 11:09 AM #610193
    jstoesz
    Participant

    Food for thought…

    http://paper-money.blogspot.com/2010/09/fraud-and-fraudulent-fruadsters-that.html

    September 28, 2010 at 11:09 AM #610744
    jstoesz
    Participant

    Food for thought…

    http://paper-money.blogspot.com/2010/09/fraud-and-fraudulent-fruadsters-that.html

    September 28, 2010 at 11:09 AM #610855
    jstoesz
    Participant

    Food for thought…

    http://paper-money.blogspot.com/2010/09/fraud-and-fraudulent-fruadsters-that.html

    September 28, 2010 at 11:09 AM #611166
    jstoesz
    Participant

    Food for thought…

    http://paper-money.blogspot.com/2010/09/fraud-and-fraudulent-fruadsters-that.html

    September 28, 2010 at 11:51 AM #610114
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    Sorry to come to this debate a bit late… but might I offer the suggestion that yeah big govt. vs boo big govt is about as meaningless at dem vs rep. or liberal vs conservative.

    Seems to me that whether govt control of things is better than corporate control of things hinges on which offers less corruption, fraud and misallocation of resources. In the end it doesn’t matter whether it’s govt sponsored corruption or corporate sponsored corruption, it’s how wisely the resources are applied to improve our lot.

    Given the recent history of govt and corporate collusion, I think this whole debate is a side show. The debate shouldn’t be yeah govt. or yeah corporations/free market, it should be how the heck do we control corruption, fraud, theft, and misallocation of resources?

    XBoxBoy

    September 28, 2010 at 11:51 AM #610198
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    Sorry to come to this debate a bit late… but might I offer the suggestion that yeah big govt. vs boo big govt is about as meaningless at dem vs rep. or liberal vs conservative.

    Seems to me that whether govt control of things is better than corporate control of things hinges on which offers less corruption, fraud and misallocation of resources. In the end it doesn’t matter whether it’s govt sponsored corruption or corporate sponsored corruption, it’s how wisely the resources are applied to improve our lot.

    Given the recent history of govt and corporate collusion, I think this whole debate is a side show. The debate shouldn’t be yeah govt. or yeah corporations/free market, it should be how the heck do we control corruption, fraud, theft, and misallocation of resources?

    XBoxBoy

    September 28, 2010 at 11:51 AM #610749
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    Sorry to come to this debate a bit late… but might I offer the suggestion that yeah big govt. vs boo big govt is about as meaningless at dem vs rep. or liberal vs conservative.

    Seems to me that whether govt control of things is better than corporate control of things hinges on which offers less corruption, fraud and misallocation of resources. In the end it doesn’t matter whether it’s govt sponsored corruption or corporate sponsored corruption, it’s how wisely the resources are applied to improve our lot.

    Given the recent history of govt and corporate collusion, I think this whole debate is a side show. The debate shouldn’t be yeah govt. or yeah corporations/free market, it should be how the heck do we control corruption, fraud, theft, and misallocation of resources?

    XBoxBoy

    September 28, 2010 at 11:51 AM #610860
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    Sorry to come to this debate a bit late… but might I offer the suggestion that yeah big govt. vs boo big govt is about as meaningless at dem vs rep. or liberal vs conservative.

    Seems to me that whether govt control of things is better than corporate control of things hinges on which offers less corruption, fraud and misallocation of resources. In the end it doesn’t matter whether it’s govt sponsored corruption or corporate sponsored corruption, it’s how wisely the resources are applied to improve our lot.

    Given the recent history of govt and corporate collusion, I think this whole debate is a side show. The debate shouldn’t be yeah govt. or yeah corporations/free market, it should be how the heck do we control corruption, fraud, theft, and misallocation of resources?

    XBoxBoy

    September 28, 2010 at 11:51 AM #611171
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    Sorry to come to this debate a bit late… but might I offer the suggestion that yeah big govt. vs boo big govt is about as meaningless at dem vs rep. or liberal vs conservative.

    Seems to me that whether govt control of things is better than corporate control of things hinges on which offers less corruption, fraud and misallocation of resources. In the end it doesn’t matter whether it’s govt sponsored corruption or corporate sponsored corruption, it’s how wisely the resources are applied to improve our lot.

    Given the recent history of govt and corporate collusion, I think this whole debate is a side show. The debate shouldn’t be yeah govt. or yeah corporations/free market, it should be how the heck do we control corruption, fraud, theft, and misallocation of resources?

    XBoxBoy

    September 28, 2010 at 11:54 AM #610119
    jpinpb
    Participant

    [quote=XBoxBoy]Given the recent history of govt and corporate collusion, I think this whole debate is a side show. The debate shouldn’t be yeah govt. or yeah corporations/free market, it should be how the heck do we control corruption, fraud, theft, and misallocation of resources?
    XBoxBoy[/quote]

    Definitely agree w/you on this.

    Edit: Particularly when private influences government. In the end, it is meaningless. At times, they are one and the same.

    September 28, 2010 at 11:54 AM #610203
    jpinpb
    Participant

    [quote=XBoxBoy]Given the recent history of govt and corporate collusion, I think this whole debate is a side show. The debate shouldn’t be yeah govt. or yeah corporations/free market, it should be how the heck do we control corruption, fraud, theft, and misallocation of resources?
    XBoxBoy[/quote]

    Definitely agree w/you on this.

    Edit: Particularly when private influences government. In the end, it is meaningless. At times, they are one and the same.

    September 28, 2010 at 11:54 AM #610754
    jpinpb
    Participant

    [quote=XBoxBoy]Given the recent history of govt and corporate collusion, I think this whole debate is a side show. The debate shouldn’t be yeah govt. or yeah corporations/free market, it should be how the heck do we control corruption, fraud, theft, and misallocation of resources?
    XBoxBoy[/quote]

    Definitely agree w/you on this.

    Edit: Particularly when private influences government. In the end, it is meaningless. At times, they are one and the same.

    September 28, 2010 at 11:54 AM #610864
    jpinpb
    Participant

    [quote=XBoxBoy]Given the recent history of govt and corporate collusion, I think this whole debate is a side show. The debate shouldn’t be yeah govt. or yeah corporations/free market, it should be how the heck do we control corruption, fraud, theft, and misallocation of resources?
    XBoxBoy[/quote]

    Definitely agree w/you on this.

    Edit: Particularly when private influences government. In the end, it is meaningless. At times, they are one and the same.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 231 total)
1 2 3 … 6 7 8 … 14 15 16
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.