- This topic has 390 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by
scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 19, 2011 at 3:04 PM #698154May 19, 2011 at 3:07 PM #696992
bearishgurl
Participant[quote=ucodegen]I know a Chinese lady who became an attorney after 50 (after her kids all grew up and left the nest) so it may not be too late.[/quote]
uco, I’m well past that age and am unable to get admitted into law school. I don’t have a bachelor’s degree :={
May 19, 2011 at 3:07 PM #697080Participant[quote=ucodegen]I know a Chinese lady who became an attorney after 50 (after her kids all grew up and left the nest) so it may not be too late.[/quote]
uco, I’m well past that age and am unable to get admitted into law school. I don’t have a bachelor’s degree :={
May 19, 2011 at 3:07 PM #697677Participant[quote=ucodegen]I know a Chinese lady who became an attorney after 50 (after her kids all grew up and left the nest) so it may not be too late.[/quote]
uco, I’m well past that age and am unable to get admitted into law school. I don’t have a bachelor’s degree :={
May 19, 2011 at 3:07 PM #697825Participant[quote=ucodegen]I know a Chinese lady who became an attorney after 50 (after her kids all grew up and left the nest) so it may not be too late.[/quote]
uco, I’m well past that age and am unable to get admitted into law school. I don’t have a bachelor’s degree :={
May 19, 2011 at 3:07 PM #698179Participant[quote=ucodegen]I know a Chinese lady who became an attorney after 50 (after her kids all grew up and left the nest) so it may not be too late.[/quote]
uco, I’m well past that age and am unable to get admitted into law school. I don’t have a bachelor’s degree :={
May 19, 2011 at 3:20 PM #697007Eugene
ParticipantI don’t think that “without offset” is a problem – it only means that no money has to change hands to offset the transfer of wife’s interest and liabilities to the husband.
A bigger concern is that California Family Code section 2640 only applies “…in the division of the community estate” in other words, during divorce proceedings. Since the divorce has been final for two months, it may be too late.
And there may have been some legal boilerplate in MSA that automatically waives all claims and rights to reimbursement that haven’t been addressed by MSA.
A real lawyer is needed here.
May 19, 2011 at 3:20 PM #697095ParticipantI don’t think that “without offset” is a problem – it only means that no money has to change hands to offset the transfer of wife’s interest and liabilities to the husband.
A bigger concern is that California Family Code section 2640 only applies “…in the division of the community estate” in other words, during divorce proceedings. Since the divorce has been final for two months, it may be too late.
And there may have been some legal boilerplate in MSA that automatically waives all claims and rights to reimbursement that haven’t been addressed by MSA.
A real lawyer is needed here.
May 19, 2011 at 3:20 PM #697692ParticipantI don’t think that “without offset” is a problem – it only means that no money has to change hands to offset the transfer of wife’s interest and liabilities to the husband.
A bigger concern is that California Family Code section 2640 only applies “…in the division of the community estate” in other words, during divorce proceedings. Since the divorce has been final for two months, it may be too late.
And there may have been some legal boilerplate in MSA that automatically waives all claims and rights to reimbursement that haven’t been addressed by MSA.
A real lawyer is needed here.
May 19, 2011 at 3:20 PM #697840ParticipantI don’t think that “without offset” is a problem – it only means that no money has to change hands to offset the transfer of wife’s interest and liabilities to the husband.
A bigger concern is that California Family Code section 2640 only applies “…in the division of the community estate” in other words, during divorce proceedings. Since the divorce has been final for two months, it may be too late.
And there may have been some legal boilerplate in MSA that automatically waives all claims and rights to reimbursement that haven’t been addressed by MSA.
A real lawyer is needed here.
May 19, 2011 at 3:20 PM #698194ParticipantI don’t think that “without offset” is a problem – it only means that no money has to change hands to offset the transfer of wife’s interest and liabilities to the husband.
A bigger concern is that California Family Code section 2640 only applies “…in the division of the community estate” in other words, during divorce proceedings. Since the divorce has been final for two months, it may be too late.
And there may have been some legal boilerplate in MSA that automatically waives all claims and rights to reimbursement that haven’t been addressed by MSA.
A real lawyer is needed here.
May 19, 2011 at 3:25 PM #697011sdrealtor
ParticipantMostly good information from BG on the legal issues. She really knows her stuff in that dept.
The one thing she isnt aware of is there may be a refi program for you. Under the Obama Making Home Affordable program, refinancing is available to those with little or no equity. All the big banks offer it and you should look into it. There is a good chance the fact that you have a 2nd with your ex-in-laws which may disqualify you but you should look into it. Here is a link to WF program. :Like I said, dont know if it will work but worth checking into:
May 19, 2011 at 3:25 PM #697100ParticipantMostly good information from BG on the legal issues. She really knows her stuff in that dept.
The one thing she isnt aware of is there may be a refi program for you. Under the Obama Making Home Affordable program, refinancing is available to those with little or no equity. All the big banks offer it and you should look into it. There is a good chance the fact that you have a 2nd with your ex-in-laws which may disqualify you but you should look into it. Here is a link to WF program. :Like I said, dont know if it will work but worth checking into:
May 19, 2011 at 3:25 PM #697697ParticipantMostly good information from BG on the legal issues. She really knows her stuff in that dept.
The one thing she isnt aware of is there may be a refi program for you. Under the Obama Making Home Affordable program, refinancing is available to those with little or no equity. All the big banks offer it and you should look into it. There is a good chance the fact that you have a 2nd with your ex-in-laws which may disqualify you but you should look into it. Here is a link to WF program. :Like I said, dont know if it will work but worth checking into:
May 19, 2011 at 3:25 PM #697844ParticipantMostly good information from BG on the legal issues. She really knows her stuff in that dept.
The one thing she isnt aware of is there may be a refi program for you. Under the Obama Making Home Affordable program, refinancing is available to those with little or no equity. All the big banks offer it and you should look into it. There is a good chance the fact that you have a 2nd with your ex-in-laws which may disqualify you but you should look into it. Here is a link to WF program. :Like I said, dont know if it will work but worth checking into:
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.