- This topic has 170 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by
barnaby33.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 20, 2007 at 8:04 AM #121545December 20, 2007 at 8:52 AM #121323
NotCranky
ParticipantI agree JWM with regards to asset inflation, epecially housing, but why can’t the question and answer be more nuanced? Most people I meet don’t look at it in “black and white”. Inflation could mitigate a bad but survivable purchase of an overpriced house.Ask anyone who had to ride out the last trough. I am not talking about extreme stupid and over-leveraged purchases. In fact it is to be expected that inflation will mitigate debt sooner or later,not guaranteed. I just don’t see why the possibility has to be completely off the table. It become a more important factor as prices come down. Especially for those who are taking heat from a spouse to buy yesterday.If I were going to somehow rationalize buying before some absolute bottom I think the inflation argument is valid. Same for moderately encumbering already held properties, at todays rates of interest, and investing as Surveyor is doing.
December 20, 2007 at 8:52 AM #121466NotCranky
ParticipantI agree JWM with regards to asset inflation, epecially housing, but why can’t the question and answer be more nuanced? Most people I meet don’t look at it in “black and white”. Inflation could mitigate a bad but survivable purchase of an overpriced house.Ask anyone who had to ride out the last trough. I am not talking about extreme stupid and over-leveraged purchases. In fact it is to be expected that inflation will mitigate debt sooner or later,not guaranteed. I just don’t see why the possibility has to be completely off the table. It become a more important factor as prices come down. Especially for those who are taking heat from a spouse to buy yesterday.If I were going to somehow rationalize buying before some absolute bottom I think the inflation argument is valid. Same for moderately encumbering already held properties, at todays rates of interest, and investing as Surveyor is doing.
December 20, 2007 at 8:52 AM #121492NotCranky
ParticipantI agree JWM with regards to asset inflation, epecially housing, but why can’t the question and answer be more nuanced? Most people I meet don’t look at it in “black and white”. Inflation could mitigate a bad but survivable purchase of an overpriced house.Ask anyone who had to ride out the last trough. I am not talking about extreme stupid and over-leveraged purchases. In fact it is to be expected that inflation will mitigate debt sooner or later,not guaranteed. I just don’t see why the possibility has to be completely off the table. It become a more important factor as prices come down. Especially for those who are taking heat from a spouse to buy yesterday.If I were going to somehow rationalize buying before some absolute bottom I think the inflation argument is valid. Same for moderately encumbering already held properties, at todays rates of interest, and investing as Surveyor is doing.
December 20, 2007 at 8:52 AM #121544NotCranky
ParticipantI agree JWM with regards to asset inflation, epecially housing, but why can’t the question and answer be more nuanced? Most people I meet don’t look at it in “black and white”. Inflation could mitigate a bad but survivable purchase of an overpriced house.Ask anyone who had to ride out the last trough. I am not talking about extreme stupid and over-leveraged purchases. In fact it is to be expected that inflation will mitigate debt sooner or later,not guaranteed. I just don’t see why the possibility has to be completely off the table. It become a more important factor as prices come down. Especially for those who are taking heat from a spouse to buy yesterday.If I were going to somehow rationalize buying before some absolute bottom I think the inflation argument is valid. Same for moderately encumbering already held properties, at todays rates of interest, and investing as Surveyor is doing.
December 20, 2007 at 8:52 AM #121566NotCranky
ParticipantI agree JWM with regards to asset inflation, epecially housing, but why can’t the question and answer be more nuanced? Most people I meet don’t look at it in “black and white”. Inflation could mitigate a bad but survivable purchase of an overpriced house.Ask anyone who had to ride out the last trough. I am not talking about extreme stupid and over-leveraged purchases. In fact it is to be expected that inflation will mitigate debt sooner or later,not guaranteed. I just don’t see why the possibility has to be completely off the table. It become a more important factor as prices come down. Especially for those who are taking heat from a spouse to buy yesterday.If I were going to somehow rationalize buying before some absolute bottom I think the inflation argument is valid. Same for moderately encumbering already held properties, at todays rates of interest, and investing as Surveyor is doing.
December 20, 2007 at 9:07 AM #121327JWM in SD
ParticipantJWM in SD
Simple Rustico, because the disparity between the house price growth and income growth is too severe in the bubble regions. Second, history has shown what happens in credit driven asset bubbles: Deflation. That is what happened in the Great Depression. We will not have a Weimer style hyperinflation here with the use of printing presses. Once asset values get beyond the ablility of the borrowers to service the related debt, then the assets value comes into question and becomes impaired. The assets pledged are no longer worth what they once were and the loans backing them become suspect. Credit tightens severely and lending institions don’t trust each other because they don’t know who is insolvent and who isn’t. The Fed can loosen rates all it wants, but liquidity will not help and insolvency problem at either the homedebtor level or the institutional level.
Hence, pushing on a string.
December 20, 2007 at 9:07 AM #121471JWM in SD
ParticipantJWM in SD
Simple Rustico, because the disparity between the house price growth and income growth is too severe in the bubble regions. Second, history has shown what happens in credit driven asset bubbles: Deflation. That is what happened in the Great Depression. We will not have a Weimer style hyperinflation here with the use of printing presses. Once asset values get beyond the ablility of the borrowers to service the related debt, then the assets value comes into question and becomes impaired. The assets pledged are no longer worth what they once were and the loans backing them become suspect. Credit tightens severely and lending institions don’t trust each other because they don’t know who is insolvent and who isn’t. The Fed can loosen rates all it wants, but liquidity will not help and insolvency problem at either the homedebtor level or the institutional level.
Hence, pushing on a string.
December 20, 2007 at 9:07 AM #121497JWM in SD
ParticipantJWM in SD
Simple Rustico, because the disparity between the house price growth and income growth is too severe in the bubble regions. Second, history has shown what happens in credit driven asset bubbles: Deflation. That is what happened in the Great Depression. We will not have a Weimer style hyperinflation here with the use of printing presses. Once asset values get beyond the ablility of the borrowers to service the related debt, then the assets value comes into question and becomes impaired. The assets pledged are no longer worth what they once were and the loans backing them become suspect. Credit tightens severely and lending institions don’t trust each other because they don’t know who is insolvent and who isn’t. The Fed can loosen rates all it wants, but liquidity will not help and insolvency problem at either the homedebtor level or the institutional level.
Hence, pushing on a string.
December 20, 2007 at 9:07 AM #121549JWM in SD
ParticipantJWM in SD
Simple Rustico, because the disparity between the house price growth and income growth is too severe in the bubble regions. Second, history has shown what happens in credit driven asset bubbles: Deflation. That is what happened in the Great Depression. We will not have a Weimer style hyperinflation here with the use of printing presses. Once asset values get beyond the ablility of the borrowers to service the related debt, then the assets value comes into question and becomes impaired. The assets pledged are no longer worth what they once were and the loans backing them become suspect. Credit tightens severely and lending institions don’t trust each other because they don’t know who is insolvent and who isn’t. The Fed can loosen rates all it wants, but liquidity will not help and insolvency problem at either the homedebtor level or the institutional level.
Hence, pushing on a string.
December 20, 2007 at 9:07 AM #121571JWM in SD
ParticipantJWM in SD
Simple Rustico, because the disparity between the house price growth and income growth is too severe in the bubble regions. Second, history has shown what happens in credit driven asset bubbles: Deflation. That is what happened in the Great Depression. We will not have a Weimer style hyperinflation here with the use of printing presses. Once asset values get beyond the ablility of the borrowers to service the related debt, then the assets value comes into question and becomes impaired. The assets pledged are no longer worth what they once were and the loans backing them become suspect. Credit tightens severely and lending institions don’t trust each other because they don’t know who is insolvent and who isn’t. The Fed can loosen rates all it wants, but liquidity will not help and insolvency problem at either the homedebtor level or the institutional level.
Hence, pushing on a string.
December 20, 2007 at 9:17 AM #121342Navydoc
Participant“It seems like 90% of the people who post here are renters waiting for prices to fall”
This may certainly be true, but don’t forget, there are many other reasons why people rent besides the pure economics of it. Sometimes I like to delude myself on what a genius I am for not buying in 2006 when we were transferred here. This was in fact an economic decision at the time as I knew I couldn’t stay more than 3 years. To be fair, I would have to admit that if I was sent to San Diego in 2006 I probably WOULD have bought, and would be crying, $100,000 in equity gone. Sometimes it’s just not the right time.
Interestingly, because of this blog and others like it, if I were transferred to San Diego now I absolutely would not buy. I just don’t think we’re going to see enough inflation in the next few years to justify anything close to these prices. I definitely wont see anything like the necessary pay increase to be able to justify them.
December 20, 2007 at 9:17 AM #121486Navydoc
Participant“It seems like 90% of the people who post here are renters waiting for prices to fall”
This may certainly be true, but don’t forget, there are many other reasons why people rent besides the pure economics of it. Sometimes I like to delude myself on what a genius I am for not buying in 2006 when we were transferred here. This was in fact an economic decision at the time as I knew I couldn’t stay more than 3 years. To be fair, I would have to admit that if I was sent to San Diego in 2006 I probably WOULD have bought, and would be crying, $100,000 in equity gone. Sometimes it’s just not the right time.
Interestingly, because of this blog and others like it, if I were transferred to San Diego now I absolutely would not buy. I just don’t think we’re going to see enough inflation in the next few years to justify anything close to these prices. I definitely wont see anything like the necessary pay increase to be able to justify them.
December 20, 2007 at 9:17 AM #121512Navydoc
Participant“It seems like 90% of the people who post here are renters waiting for prices to fall”
This may certainly be true, but don’t forget, there are many other reasons why people rent besides the pure economics of it. Sometimes I like to delude myself on what a genius I am for not buying in 2006 when we were transferred here. This was in fact an economic decision at the time as I knew I couldn’t stay more than 3 years. To be fair, I would have to admit that if I was sent to San Diego in 2006 I probably WOULD have bought, and would be crying, $100,000 in equity gone. Sometimes it’s just not the right time.
Interestingly, because of this blog and others like it, if I were transferred to San Diego now I absolutely would not buy. I just don’t think we’re going to see enough inflation in the next few years to justify anything close to these prices. I definitely wont see anything like the necessary pay increase to be able to justify them.
December 20, 2007 at 9:17 AM #121564Navydoc
Participant“It seems like 90% of the people who post here are renters waiting for prices to fall”
This may certainly be true, but don’t forget, there are many other reasons why people rent besides the pure economics of it. Sometimes I like to delude myself on what a genius I am for not buying in 2006 when we were transferred here. This was in fact an economic decision at the time as I knew I couldn’t stay more than 3 years. To be fair, I would have to admit that if I was sent to San Diego in 2006 I probably WOULD have bought, and would be crying, $100,000 in equity gone. Sometimes it’s just not the right time.
Interestingly, because of this blog and others like it, if I were transferred to San Diego now I absolutely would not buy. I just don’t think we’re going to see enough inflation in the next few years to justify anything close to these prices. I definitely wont see anything like the necessary pay increase to be able to justify them.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.