- This topic has 235 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by Allan from Fallbrook.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 31, 2008 at 5:07 PM #146609January 31, 2008 at 5:11 PM #146277nostradamusParticipant
CONCHO you’re right he’s doing well, but after my simplistic math (even if he’s paying 35% tax and maxing out the 401k at $15.5k) he should be taking home at least $6700 per month. I have lived quite comfortably for some time now on $2.5k per month (single and in a decent condo, with many toys and vacations) while I save the rest of my income.
I guess the rest goes to the wife-2b. Anyhow, my point is: pinch every penny!
January 31, 2008 at 5:11 PM #146521nostradamusParticipantCONCHO you’re right he’s doing well, but after my simplistic math (even if he’s paying 35% tax and maxing out the 401k at $15.5k) he should be taking home at least $6700 per month. I have lived quite comfortably for some time now on $2.5k per month (single and in a decent condo, with many toys and vacations) while I save the rest of my income.
I guess the rest goes to the wife-2b. Anyhow, my point is: pinch every penny!
January 31, 2008 at 5:11 PM #146548nostradamusParticipantCONCHO you’re right he’s doing well, but after my simplistic math (even if he’s paying 35% tax and maxing out the 401k at $15.5k) he should be taking home at least $6700 per month. I have lived quite comfortably for some time now on $2.5k per month (single and in a decent condo, with many toys and vacations) while I save the rest of my income.
I guess the rest goes to the wife-2b. Anyhow, my point is: pinch every penny!
January 31, 2008 at 5:11 PM #146560nostradamusParticipantCONCHO you’re right he’s doing well, but after my simplistic math (even if he’s paying 35% tax and maxing out the 401k at $15.5k) he should be taking home at least $6700 per month. I have lived quite comfortably for some time now on $2.5k per month (single and in a decent condo, with many toys and vacations) while I save the rest of my income.
I guess the rest goes to the wife-2b. Anyhow, my point is: pinch every penny!
January 31, 2008 at 5:11 PM #146618nostradamusParticipantCONCHO you’re right he’s doing well, but after my simplistic math (even if he’s paying 35% tax and maxing out the 401k at $15.5k) he should be taking home at least $6700 per month. I have lived quite comfortably for some time now on $2.5k per month (single and in a decent condo, with many toys and vacations) while I save the rest of my income.
I guess the rest goes to the wife-2b. Anyhow, my point is: pinch every penny!
January 31, 2008 at 5:20 PM #146282nostradamusParticipantMy gross pay of about $6,000 twice per month gives me a net pay of only about $3500 twice per month. Damned taxes! It's enough to make a die hard liberal like myself turn conservative! I live pretty frugally, actually.
Ha, my "simplistic" math was only off by $300!!! My guess was you take home $6700 per month but you're taking $7k. Yes, damn the taxes. I wonder if there's some kind of tax break you can take for the wife-2b's tuition. Or maybe you have to get married to take the tax break.
You should definitely negotiate with the company. What they're calling a promotion is a euphemism for a pay reduction with the accompanying enslavement of golden handcuffs.
January 31, 2008 at 5:20 PM #146526nostradamusParticipantMy gross pay of about $6,000 twice per month gives me a net pay of only about $3500 twice per month. Damned taxes! It's enough to make a die hard liberal like myself turn conservative! I live pretty frugally, actually.
Ha, my "simplistic" math was only off by $300!!! My guess was you take home $6700 per month but you're taking $7k. Yes, damn the taxes. I wonder if there's some kind of tax break you can take for the wife-2b's tuition. Or maybe you have to get married to take the tax break.
You should definitely negotiate with the company. What they're calling a promotion is a euphemism for a pay reduction with the accompanying enslavement of golden handcuffs.
January 31, 2008 at 5:20 PM #146553nostradamusParticipantMy gross pay of about $6,000 twice per month gives me a net pay of only about $3500 twice per month. Damned taxes! It's enough to make a die hard liberal like myself turn conservative! I live pretty frugally, actually.
Ha, my "simplistic" math was only off by $300!!! My guess was you take home $6700 per month but you're taking $7k. Yes, damn the taxes. I wonder if there's some kind of tax break you can take for the wife-2b's tuition. Or maybe you have to get married to take the tax break.
You should definitely negotiate with the company. What they're calling a promotion is a euphemism for a pay reduction with the accompanying enslavement of golden handcuffs.
January 31, 2008 at 5:20 PM #146564nostradamusParticipantMy gross pay of about $6,000 twice per month gives me a net pay of only about $3500 twice per month. Damned taxes! It's enough to make a die hard liberal like myself turn conservative! I live pretty frugally, actually.
Ha, my "simplistic" math was only off by $300!!! My guess was you take home $6700 per month but you're taking $7k. Yes, damn the taxes. I wonder if there's some kind of tax break you can take for the wife-2b's tuition. Or maybe you have to get married to take the tax break.
You should definitely negotiate with the company. What they're calling a promotion is a euphemism for a pay reduction with the accompanying enslavement of golden handcuffs.
January 31, 2008 at 5:20 PM #146623nostradamusParticipantMy gross pay of about $6,000 twice per month gives me a net pay of only about $3500 twice per month. Damned taxes! It's enough to make a die hard liberal like myself turn conservative! I live pretty frugally, actually.
Ha, my "simplistic" math was only off by $300!!! My guess was you take home $6700 per month but you're taking $7k. Yes, damn the taxes. I wonder if there's some kind of tax break you can take for the wife-2b's tuition. Or maybe you have to get married to take the tax break.
You should definitely negotiate with the company. What they're calling a promotion is a euphemism for a pay reduction with the accompanying enslavement of golden handcuffs.
January 31, 2008 at 5:27 PM #146292CogSciGuyParticipantYes stansd, it is a bit much.
But most people in my position here who have management options are making substantially less, maybe $75-$95K including OT, so the promotion isn’t such a sharp pay cut, and sometimes it’s even a raise. Current pay just isn’t much of a factor in determining the new mangager’s salary. They get $65-$75 to start, period.
January 31, 2008 at 5:27 PM #146536CogSciGuyParticipantYes stansd, it is a bit much.
But most people in my position here who have management options are making substantially less, maybe $75-$95K including OT, so the promotion isn’t such a sharp pay cut, and sometimes it’s even a raise. Current pay just isn’t much of a factor in determining the new mangager’s salary. They get $65-$75 to start, period.
January 31, 2008 at 5:27 PM #146563CogSciGuyParticipantYes stansd, it is a bit much.
But most people in my position here who have management options are making substantially less, maybe $75-$95K including OT, so the promotion isn’t such a sharp pay cut, and sometimes it’s even a raise. Current pay just isn’t much of a factor in determining the new mangager’s salary. They get $65-$75 to start, period.
January 31, 2008 at 5:27 PM #146575CogSciGuyParticipantYes stansd, it is a bit much.
But most people in my position here who have management options are making substantially less, maybe $75-$95K including OT, so the promotion isn’t such a sharp pay cut, and sometimes it’s even a raise. Current pay just isn’t much of a factor in determining the new mangager’s salary. They get $65-$75 to start, period.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.