- This topic has 245 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 11 months ago by
NicMM.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 8, 2008 at 8:52 AM #201345May 8, 2008 at 9:30 AM #201244
capeman
ParticipantIf you are helping people with this endeavour then keep up the good work. Isn’t this still a losing battle for homeowners in the end when chopping 10% off of principle only to have the cushion erode away and be in the same position a year or less out?
May 8, 2008 at 9:30 AM #201289capeman
ParticipantIf you are helping people with this endeavour then keep up the good work. Isn’t this still a losing battle for homeowners in the end when chopping 10% off of principle only to have the cushion erode away and be in the same position a year or less out?
May 8, 2008 at 9:30 AM #201317capeman
ParticipantIf you are helping people with this endeavour then keep up the good work. Isn’t this still a losing battle for homeowners in the end when chopping 10% off of principle only to have the cushion erode away and be in the same position a year or less out?
May 8, 2008 at 9:30 AM #201341capeman
ParticipantIf you are helping people with this endeavour then keep up the good work. Isn’t this still a losing battle for homeowners in the end when chopping 10% off of principle only to have the cushion erode away and be in the same position a year or less out?
May 8, 2008 at 9:30 AM #201377capeman
ParticipantIf you are helping people with this endeavour then keep up the good work. Isn’t this still a losing battle for homeowners in the end when chopping 10% off of principle only to have the cushion erode away and be in the same position a year or less out?
May 8, 2008 at 9:45 AM #201261contraman
ParticipantCapeman,
That is indeed a risk that will be taken by some borrower’s, lenders, and the government. I am sure most people would feel a lot more comfortable with a home that is negative 10% in value in the short term vs. 60%.
Sincerely, Contraman
May 8, 2008 at 9:45 AM #201304contraman
ParticipantCapeman,
That is indeed a risk that will be taken by some borrower’s, lenders, and the government. I am sure most people would feel a lot more comfortable with a home that is negative 10% in value in the short term vs. 60%.
Sincerely, Contraman
May 8, 2008 at 9:45 AM #201332contraman
ParticipantCapeman,
That is indeed a risk that will be taken by some borrower’s, lenders, and the government. I am sure most people would feel a lot more comfortable with a home that is negative 10% in value in the short term vs. 60%.
Sincerely, Contraman
May 8, 2008 at 9:45 AM #201355contraman
ParticipantCapeman,
That is indeed a risk that will be taken by some borrower’s, lenders, and the government. I am sure most people would feel a lot more comfortable with a home that is negative 10% in value in the short term vs. 60%.
Sincerely, Contraman
May 8, 2008 at 9:45 AM #201392contraman
ParticipantCapeman,
That is indeed a risk that will be taken by some borrower’s, lenders, and the government. I am sure most people would feel a lot more comfortable with a home that is negative 10% in value in the short term vs. 60%.
Sincerely, Contraman
May 8, 2008 at 11:17 AM #201303IONEGARM
ParticipantSomeone mentioned that the DTI on conforming jumbos are capped at 45% and 417k are capped at 60%, it is my understanding that they only look at the back end ratio and dont look at front end. Is this true?
May 8, 2008 at 11:17 AM #201349IONEGARM
ParticipantSomeone mentioned that the DTI on conforming jumbos are capped at 45% and 417k are capped at 60%, it is my understanding that they only look at the back end ratio and dont look at front end. Is this true?
May 8, 2008 at 11:17 AM #201376IONEGARM
ParticipantSomeone mentioned that the DTI on conforming jumbos are capped at 45% and 417k are capped at 60%, it is my understanding that they only look at the back end ratio and dont look at front end. Is this true?
May 8, 2008 at 11:17 AM #201400IONEGARM
ParticipantSomeone mentioned that the DTI on conforming jumbos are capped at 45% and 417k are capped at 60%, it is my understanding that they only look at the back end ratio and dont look at front end. Is this true?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.