- This topic has 393 replies, 31 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 8 months ago by Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 28, 2008 at 4:19 PM #195888April 28, 2008 at 4:19 PM #195912UCGalParticipant
Since there seems to be so much discussion of fire maps – this is the map that was presented to the San Diego City Council on 4/17/08.
http://www.nbcsandiego.com/download/2008/0419/15928992.pdf
I think it’s safe to say that RB and 4S are in the fire zone. But good building practices can mitigate the risk.
I live fairly coastal, in UC, but because of San Clemente canyon – have a significant fire risk. According to the map, North County Coastal and OB have risk.
We had to get fire marshall review and approval for a project we’re doing. But the results are a structure that is much less flamable than our 45 year old existing home.
April 28, 2008 at 4:19 PM #195934UCGalParticipantSince there seems to be so much discussion of fire maps – this is the map that was presented to the San Diego City Council on 4/17/08.
http://www.nbcsandiego.com/download/2008/0419/15928992.pdf
I think it’s safe to say that RB and 4S are in the fire zone. But good building practices can mitigate the risk.
I live fairly coastal, in UC, but because of San Clemente canyon – have a significant fire risk. According to the map, North County Coastal and OB have risk.
We had to get fire marshall review and approval for a project we’re doing. But the results are a structure that is much less flamable than our 45 year old existing home.
April 28, 2008 at 4:19 PM #195975UCGalParticipantSince there seems to be so much discussion of fire maps – this is the map that was presented to the San Diego City Council on 4/17/08.
http://www.nbcsandiego.com/download/2008/0419/15928992.pdf
I think it’s safe to say that RB and 4S are in the fire zone. But good building practices can mitigate the risk.
I live fairly coastal, in UC, but because of San Clemente canyon – have a significant fire risk. According to the map, North County Coastal and OB have risk.
We had to get fire marshall review and approval for a project we’re doing. But the results are a structure that is much less flamable than our 45 year old existing home.
April 28, 2008 at 4:23 PM #195861AecetiaParticipantThanks for the update on the fire map. It is appreciated.
April 28, 2008 at 4:23 PM #195892AecetiaParticipantThanks for the update on the fire map. It is appreciated.
April 28, 2008 at 4:23 PM #195917AecetiaParticipantThanks for the update on the fire map. It is appreciated.
April 28, 2008 at 4:23 PM #195939AecetiaParticipantThanks for the update on the fire map. It is appreciated.
April 28, 2008 at 4:23 PM #195980AecetiaParticipantThanks for the update on the fire map. It is appreciated.
April 28, 2008 at 8:22 PM #195916Sandi EganParticipantHmm…. According to that map Del Mar is just as wildfire prone as 4S ranch. I don’t think even 4S owner believes that.
April 28, 2008 at 8:22 PM #195947Sandi EganParticipantHmm…. According to that map Del Mar is just as wildfire prone as 4S ranch. I don’t think even 4S owner believes that.
April 28, 2008 at 8:22 PM #195973Sandi EganParticipantHmm…. According to that map Del Mar is just as wildfire prone as 4S ranch. I don’t think even 4S owner believes that.
April 28, 2008 at 8:22 PM #195992Sandi EganParticipantHmm…. According to that map Del Mar is just as wildfire prone as 4S ranch. I don’t think even 4S owner believes that.
April 28, 2008 at 8:22 PM #196035Sandi EganParticipantHmm…. According to that map Del Mar is just as wildfire prone as 4S ranch. I don’t think even 4S owner believes that.
April 30, 2008 at 12:55 PM #196651AecetiaParticipantMeet “Pigzilla”, new information from Bubble Markets Inventory Tracking about tax distress:
http://bubbletracking.blogspot.com/2008/04/tax-distress-on-cassia-glen-drive.html
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.