Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › 13348 Shadetree Ct
- This topic has 370 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 30, 2010 at 6:49 PM #647406December 30, 2010 at 6:58 PM #646294
jpinpb
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]you are correct. i went back and found an earlier listing. he never lived there. it does look like it was tenant occupied for a good part of the time though.[/quote]
Are you familiar w/the owner and/or tenant, if it was tenant occupied? Do you have a rental contract on this property? Just curious as to why you say it was rented. Have you been by the place, shown it to people and made appointments w/the tenant to view it?
December 30, 2010 at 6:58 PM #646366Participant[quote=sdrealtor]you are correct. i went back and found an earlier listing. he never lived there. it does look like it was tenant occupied for a good part of the time though.[/quote]
Are you familiar w/the owner and/or tenant, if it was tenant occupied? Do you have a rental contract on this property? Just curious as to why you say it was rented. Have you been by the place, shown it to people and made appointments w/the tenant to view it?
December 30, 2010 at 6:58 PM #646953Participant[quote=sdrealtor]you are correct. i went back and found an earlier listing. he never lived there. it does look like it was tenant occupied for a good part of the time though.[/quote]
Are you familiar w/the owner and/or tenant, if it was tenant occupied? Do you have a rental contract on this property? Just curious as to why you say it was rented. Have you been by the place, shown it to people and made appointments w/the tenant to view it?
December 30, 2010 at 6:58 PM #647090Participant[quote=sdrealtor]you are correct. i went back and found an earlier listing. he never lived there. it does look like it was tenant occupied for a good part of the time though.[/quote]
Are you familiar w/the owner and/or tenant, if it was tenant occupied? Do you have a rental contract on this property? Just curious as to why you say it was rented. Have you been by the place, shown it to people and made appointments w/the tenant to view it?
December 30, 2010 at 6:58 PM #647416Participant[quote=sdrealtor]you are correct. i went back and found an earlier listing. he never lived there. it does look like it was tenant occupied for a good part of the time though.[/quote]
Are you familiar w/the owner and/or tenant, if it was tenant occupied? Do you have a rental contract on this property? Just curious as to why you say it was rented. Have you been by the place, shown it to people and made appointments w/the tenant to view it?
December 30, 2010 at 7:25 PM #646299ocrenter
Participantthe place was on the MLS continuously for the entire 3 years, except for occasional days to weeks in between the various listings to reset the DOM.
hard to imagine someone would agree to pay over $5000/month to rent a place that is also on the MLS perpetually.
December 30, 2010 at 7:25 PM #646371Participantthe place was on the MLS continuously for the entire 3 years, except for occasional days to weeks in between the various listings to reset the DOM.
hard to imagine someone would agree to pay over $5000/month to rent a place that is also on the MLS perpetually.
December 30, 2010 at 7:25 PM #646958Participantthe place was on the MLS continuously for the entire 3 years, except for occasional days to weeks in between the various listings to reset the DOM.
hard to imagine someone would agree to pay over $5000/month to rent a place that is also on the MLS perpetually.
December 30, 2010 at 7:25 PM #647095Participantthe place was on the MLS continuously for the entire 3 years, except for occasional days to weeks in between the various listings to reset the DOM.
hard to imagine someone would agree to pay over $5000/month to rent a place that is also on the MLS perpetually.
December 30, 2010 at 7:25 PM #647421Participantthe place was on the MLS continuously for the entire 3 years, except for occasional days to weeks in between the various listings to reset the DOM.
hard to imagine someone would agree to pay over $5000/month to rent a place that is also on the MLS perpetually.
December 30, 2010 at 7:26 PM #646304Participant[quote=ocrenter]hard to imagine someone would agree to pay over $5000/month to rent a place that is also on the MLS perpetually.[/quote]
I tend to agree w/you ocr.December 30, 2010 at 7:26 PM #646376Participant[quote=ocrenter]hard to imagine someone would agree to pay over $5000/month to rent a place that is also on the MLS perpetually.[/quote]
I tend to agree w/you ocr.December 30, 2010 at 7:26 PM #646963Participant[quote=ocrenter]hard to imagine someone would agree to pay over $5000/month to rent a place that is also on the MLS perpetually.[/quote]
I tend to agree w/you ocr.December 30, 2010 at 7:26 PM #647100Participant[quote=ocrenter]hard to imagine someone would agree to pay over $5000/month to rent a place that is also on the MLS perpetually.[/quote]
I tend to agree w/you ocr. -
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.