- This topic has 80 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by
NeetaT.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 4, 2009 at 11:17 AM #16601November 4, 2009 at 11:32 AM #477394
all
Participant[quote=CardiffBaseball]
I can’t help but wonder if the Govt. disagrees and at least holds jobs for these guys, or if we thumb our noses at them after they’ve served their sentences.[/quote]
You might want to read the article again.
They are not likely to serve:[quote]All the Americans were tried in absentia and are considered fugitives.[/quote]
The top guy has retired.
November 4, 2009 at 11:32 AM #477565Participant[quote=CardiffBaseball]
I can’t help but wonder if the Govt. disagrees and at least holds jobs for these guys, or if we thumb our noses at them after they’ve served their sentences.[/quote]
You might want to read the article again.
They are not likely to serve:[quote]All the Americans were tried in absentia and are considered fugitives.[/quote]
The top guy has retired.
November 4, 2009 at 11:32 AM #477931Participant[quote=CardiffBaseball]
I can’t help but wonder if the Govt. disagrees and at least holds jobs for these guys, or if we thumb our noses at them after they’ve served their sentences.[/quote]
You might want to read the article again.
They are not likely to serve:[quote]All the Americans were tried in absentia and are considered fugitives.[/quote]
The top guy has retired.
November 4, 2009 at 11:32 AM #478012Participant[quote=CardiffBaseball]
I can’t help but wonder if the Govt. disagrees and at least holds jobs for these guys, or if we thumb our noses at them after they’ve served their sentences.[/quote]
You might want to read the article again.
They are not likely to serve:[quote]All the Americans were tried in absentia and are considered fugitives.[/quote]
The top guy has retired.
November 4, 2009 at 11:32 AM #478232Participant[quote=CardiffBaseball]
I can’t help but wonder if the Govt. disagrees and at least holds jobs for these guys, or if we thumb our noses at them after they’ve served their sentences.[/quote]
You might want to read the article again.
They are not likely to serve:[quote]All the Americans were tried in absentia and are considered fugitives.[/quote]
The top guy has retired.
November 4, 2009 at 11:45 AM #477414CardiffBaseball
ParticipantI see what you mean I was looking at the sentences and missed that part. Our convictees will likely just avoid Italy and I doubt the Govt. would track them down and turn them it.
November 4, 2009 at 11:45 AM #477585ParticipantI see what you mean I was looking at the sentences and missed that part. Our convictees will likely just avoid Italy and I doubt the Govt. would track them down and turn them it.
November 4, 2009 at 11:45 AM #477951ParticipantI see what you mean I was looking at the sentences and missed that part. Our convictees will likely just avoid Italy and I doubt the Govt. would track them down and turn them it.
November 4, 2009 at 11:45 AM #478033ParticipantI see what you mean I was looking at the sentences and missed that part. Our convictees will likely just avoid Italy and I doubt the Govt. would track them down and turn them it.
November 4, 2009 at 11:45 AM #478252ParticipantI see what you mean I was looking at the sentences and missed that part. Our convictees will likely just avoid Italy and I doubt the Govt. would track them down and turn them it.
November 4, 2009 at 12:26 PM #477463ucodegen
ParticipantItalian justice is a joke.
Italian state did not want to press extradition, but the prosecutors went on ahead for ‘show'(make it look like they are doing something while not dealing with needed prosecutions within Italy)
The Italian ‘co-conspirators’ were not tried because “all evidence of coordination between the Italian secret services and the C.I.A. violated state secrecy rules and was therefore inadmissible in the trial”.
November 4, 2009 at 12:26 PM #477634ParticipantItalian justice is a joke.
Italian state did not want to press extradition, but the prosecutors went on ahead for ‘show'(make it look like they are doing something while not dealing with needed prosecutions within Italy)
The Italian ‘co-conspirators’ were not tried because “all evidence of coordination between the Italian secret services and the C.I.A. violated state secrecy rules and was therefore inadmissible in the trial”.
November 4, 2009 at 12:26 PM #478001ParticipantItalian justice is a joke.
Italian state did not want to press extradition, but the prosecutors went on ahead for ‘show'(make it look like they are doing something while not dealing with needed prosecutions within Italy)
The Italian ‘co-conspirators’ were not tried because “all evidence of coordination between the Italian secret services and the C.I.A. violated state secrecy rules and was therefore inadmissible in the trial”.
November 4, 2009 at 12:26 PM #478082ParticipantItalian justice is a joke.
Italian state did not want to press extradition, but the prosecutors went on ahead for ‘show'(make it look like they are doing something while not dealing with needed prosecutions within Italy)
The Italian ‘co-conspirators’ were not tried because “all evidence of coordination between the Italian secret services and the C.I.A. violated state secrecy rules and was therefore inadmissible in the trial”.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.