- This topic has 340 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by PadreBrian.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 15, 2009 at 12:58 AM #16034July 15, 2009 at 6:45 AM #430318PCinSDGuest
What you didn’t quote from the article:
Because he’s a reserve soldier who volunteered for an active duty tour he can “ask for a revocation of orders up until the day he is scheduled to report for active duty,” a public affairs officer explained. Cook volunteered for the tour in May of this year. It is not clear why he did so, considering his current objections.
Doesn’t seem like such a big deal. There won’t be tens of thousands of reservists volunteering for active duty only to ask for a revocation prior to deploying because they don’t believe Obama is not legit. I’m surprised you came to that conclusion. Scattered revolts? Where are you getting this? You’re a lawyer, right?
July 15, 2009 at 6:45 AM #430534PCinSDGuestWhat you didn’t quote from the article:
Because he’s a reserve soldier who volunteered for an active duty tour he can “ask for a revocation of orders up until the day he is scheduled to report for active duty,” a public affairs officer explained. Cook volunteered for the tour in May of this year. It is not clear why he did so, considering his current objections.
Doesn’t seem like such a big deal. There won’t be tens of thousands of reservists volunteering for active duty only to ask for a revocation prior to deploying because they don’t believe Obama is not legit. I’m surprised you came to that conclusion. Scattered revolts? Where are you getting this? You’re a lawyer, right?
July 15, 2009 at 6:45 AM #430829PCinSDGuestWhat you didn’t quote from the article:
Because he’s a reserve soldier who volunteered for an active duty tour he can “ask for a revocation of orders up until the day he is scheduled to report for active duty,” a public affairs officer explained. Cook volunteered for the tour in May of this year. It is not clear why he did so, considering his current objections.
Doesn’t seem like such a big deal. There won’t be tens of thousands of reservists volunteering for active duty only to ask for a revocation prior to deploying because they don’t believe Obama is not legit. I’m surprised you came to that conclusion. Scattered revolts? Where are you getting this? You’re a lawyer, right?
July 15, 2009 at 6:45 AM #430898PCinSDGuestWhat you didn’t quote from the article:
Because he’s a reserve soldier who volunteered for an active duty tour he can “ask for a revocation of orders up until the day he is scheduled to report for active duty,” a public affairs officer explained. Cook volunteered for the tour in May of this year. It is not clear why he did so, considering his current objections.
Doesn’t seem like such a big deal. There won’t be tens of thousands of reservists volunteering for active duty only to ask for a revocation prior to deploying because they don’t believe Obama is not legit. I’m surprised you came to that conclusion. Scattered revolts? Where are you getting this? You’re a lawyer, right?
July 15, 2009 at 6:45 AM #431058PCinSDGuestWhat you didn’t quote from the article:
Because he’s a reserve soldier who volunteered for an active duty tour he can “ask for a revocation of orders up until the day he is scheduled to report for active duty,” a public affairs officer explained. Cook volunteered for the tour in May of this year. It is not clear why he did so, considering his current objections.
Doesn’t seem like such a big deal. There won’t be tens of thousands of reservists volunteering for active duty only to ask for a revocation prior to deploying because they don’t believe Obama is not legit. I’m surprised you came to that conclusion. Scattered revolts? Where are you getting this? You’re a lawyer, right?
July 15, 2009 at 6:52 AM #430323sobmazParticipantYou gotta wonder, if there was REALLY any question about Obama’s birth, why the Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts violated his oath of office and swore in TWICE an illegitimate President?
This is much like “the Clinton’s Murdered several people”.
Even though Republicans were constantly going after the Clinton’s they never came up with any evidence.
Why don’t Republican Senators or Congressmen go after this issue? You gotta wonder why Roberts and the Republicans in Congress are involved in this crime. Could it be there is no crime?
July 15, 2009 at 6:52 AM #430538sobmazParticipantYou gotta wonder, if there was REALLY any question about Obama’s birth, why the Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts violated his oath of office and swore in TWICE an illegitimate President?
This is much like “the Clinton’s Murdered several people”.
Even though Republicans were constantly going after the Clinton’s they never came up with any evidence.
Why don’t Republican Senators or Congressmen go after this issue? You gotta wonder why Roberts and the Republicans in Congress are involved in this crime. Could it be there is no crime?
July 15, 2009 at 6:52 AM #430834sobmazParticipantYou gotta wonder, if there was REALLY any question about Obama’s birth, why the Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts violated his oath of office and swore in TWICE an illegitimate President?
This is much like “the Clinton’s Murdered several people”.
Even though Republicans were constantly going after the Clinton’s they never came up with any evidence.
Why don’t Republican Senators or Congressmen go after this issue? You gotta wonder why Roberts and the Republicans in Congress are involved in this crime. Could it be there is no crime?
July 15, 2009 at 6:52 AM #430903sobmazParticipantYou gotta wonder, if there was REALLY any question about Obama’s birth, why the Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts violated his oath of office and swore in TWICE an illegitimate President?
This is much like “the Clinton’s Murdered several people”.
Even though Republicans were constantly going after the Clinton’s they never came up with any evidence.
Why don’t Republican Senators or Congressmen go after this issue? You gotta wonder why Roberts and the Republicans in Congress are involved in this crime. Could it be there is no crime?
July 15, 2009 at 6:52 AM #431062sobmazParticipantYou gotta wonder, if there was REALLY any question about Obama’s birth, why the Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts violated his oath of office and swore in TWICE an illegitimate President?
This is much like “the Clinton’s Murdered several people”.
Even though Republicans were constantly going after the Clinton’s they never came up with any evidence.
Why don’t Republican Senators or Congressmen go after this issue? You gotta wonder why Roberts and the Republicans in Congress are involved in this crime. Could it be there is no crime?
July 15, 2009 at 8:17 AM #430378July 15, 2009 at 8:17 AM #430594July 15, 2009 at 8:17 AM #430891July 15, 2009 at 8:17 AM #430959 -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.